RGS19 antibody is primarily a polyclonal rabbit antibody targeting the N-terminal region of the RGS19 protein. Key structural and functional properties include:
The antibody’s specificity is validated through western blotting, where it detects a ~25 kDa band corresponding to RGS19 in transfected cell lysates .
RGS19 antibody is widely used in:
Western Blotting: To assess RGS19 expression levels in cell lysates or tissue samples.
Immunohistochemistry: For spatial localization studies in tumor tissues.
Interactome Studies: To identify RGS19-binding partners, such as GNAI3, RIP3, and GIPC1 .
Sample Preparation: Lyse cells in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors.
Gel Electrophoresis: Resolve proteins on 12% SDS-PAGE.
Transfer and Blocking: Transfer to PVDF membrane, block with 5% BSA.
Primary Antibody: Incubate with RGS19 antibody (1:1,000 dilution) overnight at 4°C .
Detection: Use HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and ECL reagents.
RGS19 antibody research has uncovered critical roles for the RGS19 protein in:
Upregulated Expression: RGS19 is overexpressed in HCC tissues and correlates with poor prognosis, advanced tumor size, and elevated AFP levels .
Mechanistic Insights:
| Clinical Parameter | RGS19 Expression Correlation | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Tumor Size | Positive association (p = 0.014) | |
| AFP Levels | Positive association (p = 0.003) | |
| TNM Stage | Advanced stage correlation |
Contradictory roles have been observed:
Nm23-H1/2 Upregulation: RGS19 enhances metastasis suppressor proteins Nm23-H1/2 via CREB/AP-1 signaling, potentially inhibiting cancer progression in non-HCC contexts .
RGS19 interacts with multiple signaling components, as shown in co-immunoprecipitation studies:
RGS19, also known as GAIP (G-alpha-interacting protein) or GNAI3IP, functions primarily as a regulator of G-protein signaling. It inhibits signal transduction by increasing GTPase activity of G protein alpha subunits, thereby driving them into their inactive GDP-bound form. RGS19 binds preferentially to G-alpha subfamily 1 members with varying affinities in the order: G(i)a3 > G(i)a1 > G(o)a >> G(z)a/G(i)a2. The activity of RGS19 on G(z)-alpha is inhibited by phosphorylation and palmitoylation of the G-protein . RGS19 forms part of larger protein complexes where its interactions modulate the intensity and duration of cellular signals to maintain physiological balance .
RGS19 is commonly detected using antibody-based techniques, with Western blotting being the most prevalent method. Typical protocols use 12% SDS-PAGE gels with RGS19-specific antibodies diluted at 1:8,000 to 1:10,000 . The predicted molecular weight of human RGS19 protein is approximately 25 kDa . For verification experiments, RT-PCR is often employed using specific primers designed from the RGS19 coding region, which yields a PCR product of approximately 663 base pairs .
Research on RGS19 commonly employs various cell lines including SH-SY5Y (neuroblastoma), HepG2, HCCLM3, Huh7, and Hep3B (hepatocellular carcinoma), and bladder cancer cell lines . For in vivo studies, subcutaneous xenograft models, orthotopic liver tumor models, and C57BL/6 HCC mouse models have been established . RGS19 function can be manipulated through overexpression of wild-type or mutant RGS19, or through knockdown using shRNA delivered via lentiviral systems .
When selecting an RGS19 antibody, researchers should consider:
Specificity: The antibody should recognize RGS19 without cross-reactivity to other RGS family proteins
Applications compatibility: Verify the antibody is validated for your application (e.g., Western blot, immunohistochemistry)
Species reactivity: Ensure compatibility with your experimental model (e.g., human, mouse, rat)
Epitope information: Consider whether the antibody targets the RGS domain or other regions
Validation data: Review available data showing specificity, such as RGS19 knockdown/overexpression controls
Clonality: Polyclonal antibodies (like ab229253) offer good sensitivity while monoclonal antibodies provide better specificity
Validation of RGS19 antibody specificity should include:
Positive and negative controls: Use cell lines with known RGS19 expression levels (e.g., HEK-293T with and without RGS19 transfection)
Knockdown validation: Compare antibody reactivity in wild-type cells versus cells with RGS19 knockdown using shRNA
Overexpression studies: Test antibody using RGS19-overexpressing systems to confirm signal increases accordingly
Band size verification: Confirm detection at the expected molecular weight of 25 kDa
Multiple antibodies: When possible, use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes to confirm specificity
When performing Western blot analysis for RGS19, appropriate loading controls include:
β-actin: Commonly used as a reference protein (antibody dilution typically 1:2000)
GAPDH: Used as an alternative loading control, particularly in cancer studies
Total protein normalization: Consider using total protein staining methods for more accurate normalization
Tissue-specific controls: For specialized tissues, use loading controls with stable expression in the specific tissue type
The optimal Western blotting protocol for RGS19 detection includes:
Sample preparation:
Lyse cells in RIPA buffer
Load 20-30 μg of total protein per lane
Gel electrophoresis:
Use 12% SDS-PAGE gels
Include prestained protein standards (e.g., Bio-Rad Precision Plus Protein Standards)
Transfer and blocking:
Transfer to PVDF membrane
Block with 1% bovine serum albumin in TBST for 1 hour
Primary antibody incubation:
Use RGS19-specific antibody at 1:8,000 to 1:10,000 dilution
Incubate overnight at 4°C
Secondary antibody and detection:
To establish RGS19 knockdown models:
Design multiple shRNA targeting sites based on the human RGS19 gene sequence. Effective targeting sites include:
Construct lentiviral vectors:
Clone annealed shRNA oligos into lentivectors (e.g., pLVTHM)
Include reporter genes like GFP for tracking transduction efficiency
Viral production and cell transduction:
Verification of knockdown efficiency:
To assess RGS19's impact on cell cycle:
Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry:
Proliferation assays:
Apoptosis assessment:
In vivo growth assessment:
RGS19 expression is significantly altered in multiple cancer types:
RGS19 regulates several key signaling pathways in cancer:
MYH9/β-catenin/c-Myc feedback loop:
G-protein signaling:
Cell cycle regulation:
RGS19 shows promise as a clinical biomarker:
RGS19 appears to have functions beyond its canonical GAP (GTPase-activating protein) activity:
RGS domain-mediated protein interactions:
Scaffolding functions:
RGS19 may serve as a scaffold protein that facilitates assembly of signaling complexes
These complexes could activate alternative signaling pathways independent of G-protein modulation
Research approach:
Several contradictions exist in RGS19 research:
Dual role in signaling:
RGS19 canonically inhibits G-protein signaling as a negative regulator
In cancer contexts, RGS19 appears to promote proliferative signaling
These opposite functions may be explained by context-dependent protein interactions or cell type-specific effects
Tissue-specific functions:
RGS19 may have opposite effects in different tissues
Comprehensive tissue-specific knockout models would help clarify these differences
Methodological approach to resolve contradictions:
Single-cell analysis to identify cell-specific functions
Tissue-specific conditional knockout models
Domain-specific mutational analysis to separate different functional aspects
Comprehensive interactome mapping in different cellular contexts
Emerging therapeutic strategies targeting RGS19 include:
Small molecule inhibitors:
Gene therapy approaches:
Combination therapies:
Biomarker-guided therapy:
Using RGS19 expression levels to stratify patients for specific treatment approaches
Monitoring RGS19 expression as a treatment response indicator