RH52 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Introduction to Ro52 Antibody

Ro52 (TRIM21) is a 52 kDa protein belonging to the tripartite motif (TRIM) family, functioning as an E3 ubiquitin ligase. It plays roles in:

  • Regulating interferon pathways via ubiquitination of interferon regulatory factors

  • Mediating innate immune responses by clearing antibody-bound intracellular complexes

  • Exhibiting strong immunogenicity in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs)

Antibodies against Ro52 are commonly detected alongside anti-Ro60 in conditions like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sjögren’s syndrome (SjS), but isolated anti-Ro52 positivity is increasingly recognized .

Key Epitope Findings (Source: )

DomainAmino Acid RangeAntibody Prevalence in SARDs
Fragment 2125–26797%
Fragment 4200–26728%
Fragment 5237–47528%
200–239-aa peptide200–23974%

The primary immunogenic region resides in fragment 2 (125–267 aa), with overlapping reactivity in fragments 4 and 5. No single epitope is disease-specific .

Clinical Associations

Ro52 antibodies are linked to diverse autoimmune and non-autoimmune conditions:

Table 1: Disease Prevalence of Anti-Ro52 Antibodies (Sources: )

DiseasePrevalence (%)Key Clinical Correlations
Sjögren’s syndrome (SjS)59–90Xerostomia, interstitial lung disease (ILD)
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)40–70Congenital heart block, QT prolongation
Systemic sclerosis (SSc)10–30ILD, overlap syndromes
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM)19–40Anti-synthetase syndrome, myositis
Autoimmune hepatitis20–40Liver inflammation
Malignancy18*Pulmonary tumors, lymphoma

*Data from , where 18% of isolated anti-Ro52 patients had malignancies.

A. Co-Occurrence with Anti-Jo1 Antibodies (Source: )

  • 36% of anti-Jo1–positive patients had anti-Ro52.

  • Anti-Ro52 correlated with:

    • Dry eye/mouth (OR: 3.2)

    • Interstitial pneumonia (OR: 2.8)

    • Reduced survival in pulmonary events (HR: 4.1)

B. Prognostic Value in ILD (Sources: )

  • Anti-Ro52 is an independent predictor of:

    • Worse lung function decline (FVC%: –12.4 vs. –4.1 in seronegative patients)

    • Increased mortality (HR: 2.3)

Diagnostic Significance

  • Isolated anti-Ro52: Associated with milder undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) but predicts progression to SjS or SLE in 23% of cases .

  • Methodology: Detected via addressable laser-bead immunoassay (ALBIA) or ELISA; confirmatory immunoblotting reduces false positives .

Future Directions

  • Mechanistic studies on Ro52’s role in cancer immunity .

  • Standardization of epitope-specific assays to improve diagnostic specificity .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 week lead time (made-to-order)
Synonyms
RH52 antibody; At3g58570 antibody; F14P22.160 antibody; DEAD-box ATP-dependent RNA helicase 52 antibody; EC 3.6.4.13 antibody
Target Names
RH52
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is RH5 and why is it significant for malaria vaccine development?

RH5 (reticulocyte-binding protein homolog 5) is a blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum antigen that has demonstrated distinct advantages over prior blood-stage antigens. It is highly conserved across diverse parasite strains and is associated with more functionally potent antibody responses compared to previous targets . Notably, RH5 is the first blood-stage antigen to demonstrate a measurable reduction in parasite multiplication rate (PMR) in human volunteers, making it a promising vaccine candidate .

How does RH5.2 differ from the original RH5.1 antigen?

RH5.2 is a re-engineered and stabilized immunogen that includes only the alpha-helical core of the RH5 molecule, unlike RH5.1 which contains the full-length protein. This refinement was implemented after researchers identified that disordered regions of the full-length RH5 molecule induce non-growth inhibitory antibodies in human vaccinees . The streamlined RH5.2 design induces a qualitatively superior growth-inhibitory antibody response compared to the full-length protein when formulated with Matrix-M™ adjuvant .

What delivery platforms are being investigated for RH5 antibody induction?

Two primary delivery platforms are being investigated:

  • Soluble protein-in-adjuvant formulation (RH5.1/Matrix-M™)

  • Virus-like particles (VLPs) displaying RH5.2 using the "plug-and-display" SpyTag-SpyCatcher platform technology

The VLP approach has demonstrated superior quantitative antibody immunogenicity over soluble antigen/adjuvant formulations in vaccinated mice and rats .

What laboratory models are used to evaluate RH5 antibody efficacy?

Several key models have been validated for RH5 antibody research:

  • Blood-stage Controlled Human Malaria Infection (BS CHMI) - Used to demonstrate that RH5 vaccination significantly reduces PMR in adults

  • Growth Inhibition Assay (GIA) - Serves as a correlate of protection against cumulative and peak parasitemia in BS CHMI

  • Patient-derived Xenograft (PDX) Models - Similar models are used for other disease studies, such as leukemia research described in the literature

How are threshold antibody responses determined for RH5-based vaccines?

Researchers have established threshold growth inhibition assay (GIA) results in both Aotus monkeys and humans as correlates of protection against cumulative and peak parasitemia in blood-stage CHMI. These thresholds provide quantifiable targets for vaccine development . Recent data suggests that antibody responses in 5- to 17-month-old African infants have been significantly higher than in malaria-naïve adults and have exceeded the established GIA target threshold .

What methodologies are employed to isolate and characterize antibodies against Plasmodium antigens?

Researchers use a multi-step process that includes:

  • Target-agnostic memory B cell (MBC) sorting

  • B cell activation

  • Screening for reactivity against P. falciparum gamete or gametocyte lysate

  • Characterization of isolated monoclonal antibodies for binding properties and transmission-reducing activity

This approach has proven effective for identifying antibodies to sexual stage-specific antigens from donors exposed to malaria parasites .

What adjuvants are most effective for eliciting RH5-specific antibodies?

Matrix-M™ adjuvant has been extensively used in RH5 vaccine formulations. Clinical data shows that RH5.1/Matrix-M™ is highly immunogenic for antibodies in both African and European adults, and even more immunogenic in 5- to 17-month-old African children . Other adjuvant combinations are under investigation, but Matrix-M™ currently has the most substantial clinical data supporting its efficacy.

How can researchers measure the functional quality of RH5-induced antibodies?

The functional quality of RH5-induced antibodies can be measured through:

  • Growth Inhibition Assays (GIA) - Quantifies the ability of antibodies to inhibit parasite growth in vitro

  • Parasite Multiplication Rate (PMR) - Measures the impact on parasite replication following blood-stage CHMI

  • Binding Affinity Assays - Determines the strength of antibody-antigen interactions

Researchers should consider all these parameters rather than simply measuring antibody titer, as functional quality is critical for protective efficacy.

What controls should be included in RH5 antibody detection assays?

When designing experiments to detect or characterize RH5 antibodies, researchers should include:

  • Positive controls using validated anti-RH5 monoclonal antibodies

  • Negative controls using isotype-matched antibodies targeting irrelevant antigens

  • Pre-immunization serum samples (for in vivo studies)

  • Cross-reactivity controls testing against related Plasmodium proteins

How do structural features of RH5 impact antibody recognition and function?

Structural analysis of RH5 has revealed that:

  • The alpha-helical core region is the primary target for functional antibodies

  • Disordered regions induce non-inhibitory antibodies that may decrease vaccine efficacy

  • Stabilization of the core structure (as in RH5.2) enhances the induction of functional antibodies

This structural understanding has directly informed the development of RH5.2, which focuses immune responses on the functionally relevant alpha-helical core.

What novel delivery platforms show promise for enhancing RH5 antibody responses?

Emerging delivery platforms include:

  • Virus-Like Particles (VLPs) - The bioconjugation of RH5.2 to hepatitis B surface antigen VLPs using SpyTag-SpyCatcher technology has demonstrated superior quantitative antibody immunogenicity

  • mRNA Platforms - Similar to approaches used by BioNTech for PfCSP (BNT165b1), mRNA platforms may offer advantages for RH5 delivery

  • Combination Approaches - Co-delivery with other antigens, such as in the R21+RH5/Matrix-M combination vaccine currently in clinical testing

How do antibody responses to RH5 differ between malaria-naïve and malaria-exposed individuals?

Studies have shown significant differences:

  • Antibody responses in 5- to 17-month-old African children have been significantly higher than in malaria-naïve adults

  • Pre-existing immunity may influence the quality and quantity of antibody responses to vaccination

  • CHMI studies in semi-immune African adults allow for higher treatment thresholds for parasitemia (due to natural immunity), potentially providing additional insights into blood-stage protection conferred by RH5 vaccines

What factors might contribute to variability in RH5 antibody responses between study participants?

Several factors can influence antibody responses:

  • Prior malaria exposure history

  • Age-dependent immune response differences

  • Genetic factors affecting immune recognition

  • Co-infections that may modulate immune responses

  • Vaccine formulation stability and delivery consistency

Researchers should carefully document and control for these variables in clinical studies .

How can researchers address potential cross-reactivity with other Plasmodium antigens?

To address cross-reactivity:

  • Perform comprehensive binding studies against a panel of Plasmodium antigens

  • Consider epitope mapping to identify specific binding regions

  • Use competitive binding assays to distinguish between specific and cross-reactive antibodies

  • Be aware that some antibodies may target repetitive elements that appear across multiple parasite proteins, as demonstrated in studies of sexual stage antibodies

What approaches exist for analyzing homotypic antibody-antibody interactions in RH5 research?

Recent structural studies have revealed important insights about homotypic antibody interactions. Research techniques include:

  • Crystal structure analysis of antibody-antigen complexes to identify interaction interfaces

  • Characterization of salt-bridging networks and hydrogen bonds between adjacent antibody molecules

  • Analysis of antibody sequences using tools like IgBLAST to determine somatic hypermutation from germline sequences

Such homotypic interactions can significantly influence antibody function and should be considered when interpreting results.

How might RH5 antibodies complement responses to pre-erythrocytic vaccines like RTS,S or R21?

A combination approach targeting both pre-erythrocytic and blood stages could provide additive or synergistic protection:

  • RTS,S and R21 target the pre-erythrocytic stage, potentially preventing initial infection

  • RH5 targets the blood stage, reducing parasite multiplication if pre-erythrocytic protection is incomplete

  • An R21+RH5/Matrix-M combination vaccine candidate is currently undergoing initial clinical testing in young African children (NCT05357560)

What clinical development pathways are being considered for RH5-based vaccines?

Expert consultations have outlined several development pathways:

  • Standalone RH5 vaccine evaluation

  • Combination with established vaccines like RTS,S or R21

  • Incorporation into next-generation platforms like mRNA vaccines

  • Use of controlled human malaria infection studies to accelerate development timelines

The concept of clinical development velocity has been introduced to overcome limitations of time and resources by employing CHMI studies to advance clinical development .

What are the limitations of current preclinical models for evaluating RH5 antibodies?

Despite advancements in model systems, researchers should be aware of several limitations:

  • Differences between human and animal immune responses to RH5

  • Challenges in replicating natural malaria exposure patterns in controlled settings

  • Potential discrepancies between controlled infection models and field efficacy

  • Difficulties in establishing definitive correlates of protection that translate between models and human populations

How does RH5 research relate to CD52 antibodies like Alemtuzumab?

It's important to note that RH5 (reticulocyte-binding protein homolog 5) and CD52 are entirely different targets studied in separate research domains:

  • RH5 is a Plasmodium falciparum blood-stage antigen being developed for malaria vaccines

  • CD52 is a human cell surface antigen targeted by therapeutic antibodies like Alemtuzumab for conditions including leukemia and autoimmune diseases

Although both fields involve antibody research, they target different diseases through different mechanisms. Researchers should be careful not to confuse these distinct research areas despite similar alphanumeric designations that might appear in product codes or literature databases.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.