Ribonuclease MC Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Clarification of Terminology

  • Ribonuclease (RNase): A broad class of enzymes that degrade RNA, subdivided into families such as RNase A, RNase T2, and others .

  • Antibodies targeting RNases: Multiple studies describe antibodies against specific RNase isoforms (e.g., RNase1, RNase3, RNase7) , but no "MC" variant is documented.

Hypothesis 1: Typographical or Nomenclature Error

  • Mislabeling: "MC" may refer to a commercial antibody (e.g., Santa Cruz Biotechnology’s catalog codes like "sc-365783" for anti-RNH1) , but no "MC" designation exists in the literature reviewed.

  • Cell-Specific RNases: Some RNases are secreted by mast cells (MCs) , but antibodies targeting these are typically named after their isoforms (e.g., RNase2/3/6) , not "MC."

Hypothesis 2: Context-Specific Usage

  • Tumor Microenvironment (TME): RNases like RNase1 and RNase7 modulate immune activity in the TME , but no antibody termed "MC" is linked to these processes.

  • Mycobacterium-Related RNases: RNase3 and RNase6 target Mycobacterium species , but again, no "MC" terminology is applied.

Relevant Antibody Data from Search Results

While "Ribonuclease MC Antibody" is unverified, the following antibodies targeting RNases are documented:

Antibody TargetApplicationSourceReference
Anti-RNH1 (A-9)Detects ribonuclease inhibitor in humansSanta Cruz Biotech
Anti-ANGTargets angiogenin (RNase5)Santa Cruz Biotech
EGFR-CD3 bsAbCombines RNase1 with bispecific antibodyPreclinical study
MN-IgG-RNaseTargets tumor antigen CA9Fusion construct

Research Gaps and Recommendations

  1. Verify Specificity: Confirm if "MC" refers to a proprietary antibody from a commercial vendor (e.g., MilliporeSigma catalog codes) or a non-standard abbreviation.

  2. Explore Analogues: Investigate antibodies against well-characterized RNases:

    • RNase1: Implicated in antitumor immunity .

    • RNase3/RNase7: Antimicrobial and immunomodulatory roles .

  3. Review Patent Literature: Novel antibody constructs, such as RNase-linked immunoconjugates (e.g., RN-PEG-Cet) , may use unique naming conventions not yet indexed in public databases.

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (12-14 weeks)
Synonyms
Ribonuclease MC (RNase MC) (EC 3.1.27.1)
Target Names
Ribonuclease MC
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What are ribonuclease antibodies and how are they classified?

Ribonuclease (RNase) antibodies are immunoglobulins developed to specifically bind to various members of the ribonuclease family of enzymes. These antibodies can be classified based on:

  • Target specificity: Antibodies targeting specific RNase types (e.g., RNase A, RNase 1-8, RNase H)

  • Source: Monoclonal (from single cell clone) or polyclonal (from multiple B cells)

  • Species reactivity: Human-specific, mouse-specific, or cross-reactive

  • Application suitability: Optimized for Western blot, immunohistochemistry, or immunoprecipitation

Research indicates that monoclonal antibodies against various ribonucleases have been developed with different specificities and applications. For example, monoclonal antibodies against human ribonuclease inhibitor have been isolated as immunoglobulin G1 subtype antibodies with monospecificity demonstrated through Western blot analysis . Similarly, mouse monoclonal antibodies against RNASE3 (Clone C3) have been developed for various applications including Western blotting and immunohistochemistry .

How should researchers validate ribonuclease antibodies before experimental use?

Proper validation of ribonuclease antibodies is critical for experimental success and reliability. A systematic validation approach should include:

Validation Strategy Workflow:

  • Specificity testing: Determine cross-reactivity with similar proteins

  • Affinity assessment: Measure binding strength to target

  • Application-specific validation: Test performance in the intended application

  • Positive and negative controls: Include appropriate controls in all experiments

For antibodies targeting modified ribonucleotides, additional validation steps are essential. Researchers have developed panels of assays for rigorous antibody validation, particularly important given the low abundance of some RNA modifications and the potential for non-specific binding . For example, when validating antibodies against m6A and other modifications, researchers should test:

  • Enrichment of modified vs. unmodified oligonucleotides

  • Cross-reactivity with other RNA modifications

  • Binding within natural sequence contexts

  • Performance in the presence of total RNA

For accurate validation, UV cross-linking assays can determine whether antibodies bind efficiently to endogenous RNA targets, while northern blotting can confirm specific immunoprecipitation of known modified RNA species like rRNA .

What are the optimal methods for using ribonuclease antibodies in immunoprecipitation studies?

Immunoprecipitation (IP) studies with ribonuclease antibodies require specific methodological considerations to maintain both antibody functionality and ribonuclease activity/inactivity as desired:

Standard IP Protocol for Ribonuclease Studies:

  • Cell lysis optimization: Use appropriate buffers that preserve both antibody-antigen interactions and RNA integrity

    • Example buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM PMSF with protease inhibitor mixture

  • Antibody incubation: Typically 1-2 μg purified antibody per mg of protein lysate, incubated at 4°C for 2 hours

  • Capture and washing: Add protein A-agarose beads for 1 hour, followed by 5 washes with lysis buffer

  • Elution and analysis: Elute bound proteins with SDS-PAGE sample buffer for analysis

For RNA-protein complex immunoprecipitation, additional considerations include:

  • RNA preservation with RNase inhibitors during extraction

  • Cross-linking options (formaldehyde or UV) to stabilize RNA-protein interactions

  • Modified washing conditions to maintain RNA integrity

How can researchers assess the specificity and affinity of anti-ribonuclease antibodies?

Accurate assessment of antibody specificity and affinity is crucial for experimental reliability. Multiple complementary approaches should be employed:

Specificity Assessment Methods:

  • Western blot analysis: To verify monospecificity of antibodies

  • Competition assays: Immunoradiometric competition assays can determine epitope specificity

  • Cross-reactivity testing: Using related proteins to assess potential off-target binding

Affinity Determination Techniques:

  • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR): For precise binding affinity measurement

    • Example: Binding affinity constants (KD) of Fv-antibodies to RNase A were estimated using SPR, with values ranging from 17.5±4.1 to 33.9±8.9 nM

  • Enzyme inhibition assays: For functional antibodies that inhibit enzyme activity

    • Example: Inhibition constants (IC50) of expressed Fv-antibodies were determined to be 90.2, 65.3, and 98.8 nM against RNase A

  • Modified RNA enrichment assay: For antibodies targeting modified ribonucleotides

    • Researchers have demonstrated that the α-m6A clone 9B7 enriched m6A-modified RNA approximately fivefold with high specificity

What role do ribonuclease antibodies play in studying RNA modification pathways?

Ribonuclease antibodies serve as critical tools for investigating RNA modification pathways, offering insights into both physiological processes and disease mechanisms:

Applications in RNA Modification Research:

  • Epitranscriptome mapping: Antibodies against modified ribonucleotides enable genome-wide profiling of RNA modifications

    • Example: m6A-specific antibodies have been used to identify m6A on mRNA and study its role in gene regulation

  • Protein-modification interactions: Antibodies help identify proteins that recognize or modify RNA

    • Research has employed antibodies to study how RNase A family members shape cellular RNA populations during viral infection

  • Modification function analysis: By blocking specific modifications with antibodies or detecting modification-related proteins

    • Studies have shown that RNase 2 is involved in cellular tRF (tRNA-derived fragment) production during RSV infection

Recent research demonstrates that these antibodies must be rigorously validated for specificity, as cross-reactivity with other modifications can lead to inconsistent results. For instance, the commercial m6A-specific polyclonal antibody from Synaptic Systems showed moderate cross-reactivity with m5C and m26A in experimental validation .

How do ribonucleases and their inhibitors interact, and how can antibodies be used to study these interactions?

The interaction between ribonucleases and their inhibitors represents a critical regulatory mechanism in RNA metabolism. Antibodies provide valuable tools for dissecting these interactions:

Study Methods for RNase-Inhibitor Interactions:

  • Epitope mapping: Antibodies help identify binding sites between RNases and inhibitors

    • Example: Studies have generated antibodies directed against different epitopes of ribonuclease inhibitor, revealing that some antibodies do not interfere with the ribonuclease binding site

  • Conformational analysis: Antibodies can detect conformational changes upon binding

    • Research has demonstrated that the binding of antibodies to barstar (a ribonuclease inhibitor) is highly sensitive to mutations of residues known to contact the enzyme barnase

  • Inhibitor screening: Antibodies themselves can function as RNase inhibitors

    • Example: Fv-antibodies screened from an autodisplayed library showed nanomolar binding affinity to RNase A and functioned as inhibitors with IC50 values ranging from 65.3 to 98.8 nM

These studies reveal that understanding RNase-inhibitor interactions can inform the design of therapeutic approaches. For instance, antibodies directed against specific epitopes can be engineered to modulate RNase activity in disease contexts.

How can RNase H-dependent PCR improve antibody discovery platforms?

RNase H-dependent PCR (rh-PCR) offers significant advantages for antibody discovery platforms, particularly when working with single B-cells:

Benefits of rh-PCR in Antibody Discovery:

  • Primer dimer elimination: rh-PCR completely eliminates primer dimer synthesis, preventing false positive antibody titers in downstream screening

  • Increased recovery efficiency: The technology increases the recovery of cognate antibody variable regions from single B-cells and improves downstream recombinant antibody titers

  • Enhanced sequence quality: rh-PCR provides a more homogeneous sample pool and greater sequence quality in Next Generation Sequencing approaches

  • Better germline matching: The higher specificity allows for improved matching between native antibody germline sequences and the VL/VH fragments amplified from single B-cells

The methodology significantly enhances multiplexed PCR approaches, which are necessary to recover antibodies from a diverse range of germline sequences. This is particularly valuable when working with low template concentrations from single B-cells while requiring all primers to function under identical PCR conditions .

What are the current methodological approaches for using anti-ribonuclease antibodies in cellular localization studies?

Determining the cellular localization of ribonucleases requires specific methodological considerations:

Cellular Localization Protocol Guidelines:

  • Fixation optimization: Different ribonucleases may require specific fixation methods

    • Example: Cells can be fixed with paraformaldehyde (4% v/v) for 20 minutes at 4°C to prevent endocytosis while preserving cell surface-associated ribonucleases

  • Antibody concentration titration:

    • Typical ranges: Primary antibodies at 1-5 μg/mL; secondary antibodies at 1:1000 dilution

  • Controls and validation:

    • Include ribonuclease-deficient cells as negative controls

    • Use multiple antibodies recognizing different epitopes to confirm findings

  • Detection methods:

    • Confocal microscopy for high-resolution imaging of subcellular localization

    • Flow cytometry for quantitative analysis of cell surface association

Research has demonstrated that these approaches can successfully visualize cell surface-associated ribonucleases, providing insights into their extracellular functions beyond traditional intracellular roles .

How do ribonuclease antibodies contribute to understanding the immunomodulatory functions of RNases?

Ribonuclease antibodies have been instrumental in uncovering the unexpected immunomodulatory roles of various RNases:

Key Findings on RNase Immunomodulatory Functions:

  • RNase1 in antitumor immunity:

    • RNase1 enhances antitumor immunity by increasing CD4+ Th1 and Th17 cells and natural killer cells while reducing granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells

    • Antibodies allowed researchers to demonstrate that RNase1 increased T cell activation marker CD69 in CD4+ T cell subsets

  • Eosinophil-associated RNases in defense:

    • Antibodies against RNase2 and RNase3 have revealed their increased expression in respiratory infections

    • RNase2 has demonstrated higher antiviral activity than RNase3, attributable to a specific region in its C-terminal loop L7 that facilitates interaction with viral capsids

  • RNases in bacterial defense:

    • Studies using antibodies showed that RNase3 exhibits antibacterial activity through cytoplasmic membrane depolarization, particularly against Gram-negative bacteria

    • Antibody-based studies demonstrated that RNase7's bactericidal action requires binding to bacterial cell surface structures such as OprI

These findings, enabled by specific antibodies, have expanded our understanding of ribonucleases as multifunctional proteins with roles beyond RNA degradation.

What are the emerging applications of ribonuclease antibodies in therapeutic development?

Ribonuclease antibodies are increasingly being utilized in therapeutic development contexts:

Therapeutic Applications:

  • Cancer immunotherapy enhancement:

    • Research has shown that RNase1 collaborates with EGFR-CD3 bispecific antibodies to enhance T cell-mediated antitumor immunity against breast cancer cells

    • This combination approach provides potential treatment strategies for immunocompetent patients

  • Antibody-based ribonuclease inhibitors:

    • Designed antibody repertoires can specifically target given protein epitopes with high affinity

    • Example: Fv-antibodies screened against RNase A have demonstrated potent inhibition with IC50 values in the nanomolar range

    • These inhibitors can be further developed as therapeutic agents for conditions involving dysregulated RNase activity

  • Engineering antibodies with ribonuclease activity:

    • Emerging approaches combine antibody targeting with ribonuclease activity for enhanced therapeutic potential

    • The directed evolution of antibodies with catalytic activity against RNA targets offers novel therapeutic modalities

These applications represent the frontier of ribonuclease antibody research, with potential implications for treating diseases ranging from cancer to inflammatory conditions associated with aberrant RNA metabolism.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.