RIMKLB antibodies are immunoreagents designed to bind specifically to the RIMKLB protein, which:
Catalyzes ATP-dependent synthesis of β-citrylglutamate (β-CG) and N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) .
Is expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and testis .
These antibodies are critical for investigating RIMKLB's roles in neurological signaling, cancer progression, and male fertility .
Key commercial RIMKLB antibodies include:
Key Features:
Epitopes: Target regions include AA 1–307 (full-length), AA 41–90, and internal domains .
Cross-Reactivity: Some antibodies react across species (e.g., mouse, rat, primate) .
Validation: Confirmed via Western blot (WB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and immunofluorescence (IF) .
RIMKLB synthesizes NAAG, a neurotransmitter implicated in glutamatergic signaling .
Deficiency in NAAG synthesis correlates with neurological disorders, though direct links remain under investigation .
Rimklb mutant mice exhibit reduced testicular size and complete male infertility, highlighting its role in spermatogenesis .
Colorectal Cancer (CRC): High RIMKLB expression correlates with poor prognosis (HR = 2.5 for OS, p = 0.00042) .
Immune Modulation: RIMKLB levels associate with tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs), including CD8+ T cells and macrophages .
Western Blot: Detects RIMKLB at 42–48 kDa in mouse eye and testis tissues .
IHC: Strong staining in human and mouse testis, with optimal antigen retrieval (TE buffer pH 9.0) .
NeuroMab and commercial vendors (e.g., Proteintech, Thermo Fisher) validate antibodies using transfected lysates, KO models, and orthogonal assays .
Mechanistic Studies: Elucidating RIMKLB’s enzymatic activity in β-CG/NAAG synthesis .
Disease Models: Assessing RIMKLB’s role in cancer immune evasion and infertility .
Diagnostic Tools: Developing prognostic assays for CRC and neurological disorders .
Species Reactivity: Most antibodies are validated for human and mouse; cross-reactivity in other species is limited .
Antibody Batch Variability: Requires rigorous lot-specific validation .
RIMKLB is a protein that catalyzes the synthesis of beta-citryl-L-glutamate and N-acetyl-L-aspartyl-L-glutamate (NAAG). Beta-citryl-L-glutamate is synthesized more efficiently than N-acetyl-L-aspartyl-L-glutamate . RIMKLB belongs to the ATP-grasp family of ligases and produces stoichiometric amounts of NAAG and ADP during its enzymatic reaction .
Alternative names include:
Beta-citrylglutamate synthase B
FAM80B
KIAA1238
N-acetyl-aspartylglutamate synthetase B (NAAG synthetase B)
Understanding RIMKLB is significant for research into neurological systems, as it's predominantly expressed in the CNS and testis , and has emerging relevance in cancer research as indicated by its correlation with immune checkpoint molecules in colorectal cancer .
Based on the search results, several types of RIMKLB antibodies are available:
Most commercially available RIMKLB antibodies are polyclonal and derived from either rabbit or mouse hosts, designed primarily for Western blotting applications, with some also validated for immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence.
RIMKLB antibodies are utilized in several key experimental techniques:
Western Blotting (WB): The most common application, used for detecting RIMKLB protein expression in tissue or cell lysates. Recommended dilutions typically range from 1:200-1:2000 .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Used to visualize RIMKLB distribution in tissue sections, particularly in testis and CNS tissues. Recommended dilutions are typically 1:50-1:500 .
Immunofluorescence (IF): Both for paraffin-embedded tissues (IF-P) and cultured cells (ICC), enabling cellular localization studies of RIMKLB. Recommended dilutions are typically 1:50-1:500 .
ELISA: For quantitative measurement of RIMKLB levels in biological samples .
These applications collectively enable researchers to study RIMKLB expression patterns, subcellular localization, and potential interactions with other proteins across different experimental systems.
Validating RIMKLB antibody specificity requires multiple complementary approaches:
Genetic Validation: Using CRISPR/Cas9 knockout or RNAi knockdown systems to demonstrate reduced or absent antibody signal in samples where RIMKLB expression has been diminished . This is considered the gold standard for antibody validation.
Orthogonal Validation: Correlating antibody-based detection with antibody-independent methods such as RNA-seq . For example, comparing RIMKLB protein detection in tissues with high vs. low RIMKLB mRNA expression (ideally with at least a 5-fold difference) to confirm correlation.
Western Blot Analysis: Confirming single-band detection at the expected molecular weight (~42 kDa) for RIMKLB . Multiple bands or unexpected molecular weights may indicate cross-reactivity.
Testing Across Multiple Cell/Tissue Types: Verifying consistent detection patterns across samples with known RIMKLB expression profiles, especially in CNS and testis tissues where RIMKLB is predominantly expressed .
Immunogen Sequence Analysis: Evaluating whether the antibody was raised against a unique region of RIMKLB to reduce cross-reactivity with homologous proteins .
As noted by Dr. David Rimm, comprehensive validation should address specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility to prevent scientific irreproducibility in antibody-based research .
When designing experiments using RIMKLB antibodies, researchers should consider:
Appropriate Positive and Negative Controls:
Sample Preparation:
Antibody Dilution Optimization:
Detection Methods:
For Western blot: Consider whether chemiluminescence, fluorescence, or colorimetric detection is most appropriate
For IHC/IF: Select appropriate secondary antibodies and visualization systems based on experimental needs
Quantitative Analysis: Establish appropriate normalization controls when quantifying RIMKLB expression levels
Experimental Replication: Include biological and technical replicates to ensure reproducibility
Differentiating between RIMKLA and RIMKLB, which share 65% sequence identity , requires careful experimental planning:
Antibody Selection: Use antibodies raised against non-homologous regions. The peptide sequences used for RIMKLB-specific antibody production include "CDPESTTEREMLTKLP" and "AGRLTRRMSLLS," which differ from RIMKLA sequences .
Expression Pattern Analysis: RIMKLA is almost exclusively expressed in the CNS, while RIMKLB is expressed in both CNS and testis . This differential expression pattern can be leveraged to distinguish the proteins.
Enzymatic Activity Assessment: While both proteins catalyze the synthesis of N-acetylaspartylglutamate, RIMKLB more efficiently catalyzes the synthesis of beta-citryl-L-glutamate . This functional difference can be used to distinguish the two proteins in biochemical assays.
Molecular Weight Verification: Confirm by Western blot that the detected protein matches the expected molecular weight for RIMKLB (42-48 kDa) .
Peptide Competition Assays: Use peptides specific to either RIMKLA or RIMKLB in competition assays to demonstrate antibody specificity.
Gene-Specific Knockdown: Perform selective knockdown of RIMKLA or RIMKLB to confirm antibody specificity.
Recommended Western Blot Protocol for RIMKLB Detection:
Sample Preparation:
Lyse cells or tissues in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors
Determine protein concentration (BCA or Bradford assay)
Prepare samples with loading buffer containing DTT or β-mercaptoethanol
Heat samples at 95°C for 5 minutes
Gel Electrophoresis:
Transfer:
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membrane
Use wet transfer at 100V for 1 hour or 30V overnight at 4°C
Blocking:
Block with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Primary Antibody Incubation:
Washing:
Wash 3-5 times with TBST, 5-10 minutes each
Secondary Antibody Incubation:
Use appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (anti-rabbit or anti-mouse, depending on primary antibody host)
Dilute 1:2000-1:5000 in blocking buffer
Incubate for 1 hour at room temperature
Detection:
Controls:
Optimal IHC Protocol for RIMKLB Detection:
Tissue Preparation:
Fix tissues in 10% neutral buffered formalin
Process and embed in paraffin
Section at 4-6 μm thickness
Deparaffinization and Rehydration:
Xylene: 3 changes, 5 minutes each
100% ethanol: 2 changes, 3 minutes each
95% ethanol: 2 changes, 3 minutes each
70% ethanol: 1 change, 3 minutes
Rinse in distilled water
Antigen Retrieval:
Blocking:
Endogenous peroxidase: 3% H₂O₂ for 10 minutes
Protein block: 5-10% normal serum in PBS for 30 minutes
Primary Antibody:
Washing:
PBS or TBS: 3 changes, 5 minutes each
Detection System:
Apply appropriate HRP-polymer detection system
Follow manufacturer's recommendations for incubation times
Chromogen Development:
DAB substrate: Apply for 5-10 minutes or until desired color intensity
Monitor microscopically to avoid overdevelopment
Counterstaining and Mounting:
Counterstain with hematoxylin
Dehydrate through graded alcohols and xylene
Mount with permanent mounting medium
Controls:
Accurate quantification of RIMKLB expression requires appropriate methodology selection and rigorous controls:
Western Blot Quantification:
Use appropriate loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH)
Ensure signal is within linear range of detection
Perform densitometric analysis using software like ImageJ
Include a standard curve of recombinant RIMKLB protein for absolute quantification
Run at least three biological replicates
ELISA-Based Quantification:
Use validated RIMKLB ELISA kits or develop sandwich ELISA using paired RIMKLB antibodies
Include standard curves with recombinant RIMKLB protein
Perform technical duplicates or triplicates
Ensure samples fall within the linear range of the standard curve
Immunofluorescence Quantification:
Use consistent exposure settings across all samples
Employ automated image analysis software with threshold settings
Normalize fluorescence intensity to cell number or area
Include reference samples of known RIMKLB expression
RNA-Protein Correlation:
Mass Spectrometry Validation:
For absolute quantification, consider targeted MS approaches with isotope-labeled standards
Can be used to validate antibody-based quantification methods
When publishing quantitative RIMKLB expression data, include complete methodological details including antibody catalog numbers, dilutions, exposure times, and analysis parameters to ensure reproducibility .
Non-specific binding is a common challenge with RIMKLB antibodies. Here are potential causes and solutions:
Causes of Non-Specific Binding:
Cross-Reactivity with Related Proteins: RIMKLB shares 65% sequence identity with RIMKLA , potentially causing cross-reactivity.
Suboptimal Blocking: Insufficient blocking allows antibodies to bind non-specifically to the membrane or tissue.
Excessive Antibody Concentration: Too high primary antibody concentration increases background binding.
Sample Overloading: Excessive protein can lead to non-specific interactions.
Degraded Antibody: Antibody quality diminishes over time or with improper storage.
Solutions:
Antibody Validation and Selection:
Optimization Strategies:
Titrate antibody concentrations (try 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000 dilutions)
Test different blocking agents (5% milk, 3-5% BSA)
Increase washing duration and frequency
Reduce protein loading (20-30 μg may be sufficient)
Peptide Competition:
Pre-incubate the antibody with excess immunogen peptide
If the signal disappears, it confirms specificity
Alternative Detection Methods:
Try fluorescent secondary antibodies which may provide cleaner signals
Consider more sensitive ECL substrates at lower antibody concentrations
Sample Preparation:
Include phosphatase and protease inhibitors in lysis buffers
Consider gentler lysis methods to preserve epitope integrity
Inconsistent results with RIMKLB antibodies may arise from various factors. Here's a systematic approach to address and minimize variability:
Sources of Inconsistency:
Antibody Lot Variation: Different manufacturing lots may have varying specificities and affinities.
Sample Preparation Differences: Variations in lysis buffers, fixation times, or antigen retrieval methods.
Detection System Variability: Inconsistent ECL reagents or developing times.
Technical Execution: Differences in washing stringency, incubation times, or temperatures.
Biological Variability: Natural expression differences between biological replicates.
Resolution Strategies:
Standardize Protocols:
Document detailed protocols with exact reagent compositions, incubation times, and temperatures
Use consistent sample preparation methods
Maintain identical antibody dilutions between experiments
Antibody Management:
Quality Control Measures:
Validation Across Methods:
Statistical Approaches:
Increase biological and technical replicates
Use appropriate statistical tests to account for experimental variability
Consider normalized ratios rather than absolute values when comparing across experiments
Alternative Antibodies:
Test multiple RIMKLB antibodies targeting different epitopes
Compare polyclonal vs. monoclonal antibodies for consistency
Detecting low-abundance RIMKLB expression presents technical challenges. Here are specialized approaches to enhance sensitivity:
Sample Enrichment Techniques:
Enhanced Detection Systems:
Utilize high-sensitivity ECL substrates for Western blotting
Consider tyramide signal amplification (TSA) for IHC/IF to amplify weak signals
Use biotin-streptavidin amplification systems
Optimized Antibody Selection:
Protocol Modifications:
Increase primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Reduce washing stringency slightly (shorter wash times or fewer washes)
Use more sensitive detection methods (fluorescence over colorimetric)
Alternative Methodologies:
Consider more sensitive techniques like droplet digital PCR for gene expression
Employ proximity ligation assay (PLA) for protein detection with single-molecule sensitivity
Use mass spectrometry with targeted approaches for RIMKLB peptides
Control Experiments:
Include serial dilutions of positive control samples to establish detection limits
Use recombinant RIMKLB as a standard for quantification
Include samples with RIMKLB overexpression as positive controls
Technical Considerations:
Ensure fresh antibody dilutions for each experiment
Use PVDF membranes instead of nitrocellulose for higher protein binding capacity
Minimize protein loss during sample preparation