RILPL2 (Rab Interacting Lysosomal Protein-Like 2) is a protein related to lysosomal protein RILP which interacts with RAB7, a small GTPase that controls transport to endocytic degradative compartments. RILPL2 has emerged as an important research target due to its multiple biological functions:
It functions in the regulation of ciliary membrane protein concentration by promoting protein removal from the primary cilium
It serves as a downstream effector of LRRK2 signaling in Parkinson's disease pathways
It plays a role in cell morphology regulation by interacting with myosin-Va
It demonstrates tumor suppressor properties in breast cancer
The diverse roles of RILPL2 make antibodies against this protein valuable tools for studying cellular trafficking, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer biology.
RILPL2 antibodies are utilized across multiple experimental techniques, with the following applications being most common:
Research has demonstrated successful use of RILPL2 antibodies in detecting endogenous RILPL2 expression at the apical surface of cells in MTEC cultures and in studying RILPL2's interaction with Rab proteins in the context of LRRK2 signaling .
Effective sample preparation is crucial for optimal RILPL2 antibody performance:
For Western Blotting:
Complete cell lysis using buffers containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% TritonX-100, and protease inhibitors
Determine protein concentration using BCA Protein Assay Kit
Use 2-3 mg of total cell extract for immunoprecipitation studies
For direct Western blot, load 20-50 μg of total protein
For Immunofluorescence:
Fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde is generally effective
For studying ciliary localization, special attention to cilia markers (such as acetylated tubulin) is recommended
When examining RILPL2's colocalization with centrosomal markers, include pericentrin or γ-tubulin antibodies
For Immunohistochemistry:
Standard fixation and antigen retrieval protocols are applicable
Use appropriate blocking to minimize background signal
Proper storage of antibodies (at 4°C for three months or -20°C for up to one year) is essential for maintaining reactivity. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this can degrade antibody quality .
Validation of RILPL2 antibody specificity is critical for ensuring reliable research results:
Positive and negative controls:
Western blot validation:
Peptide competition assay:
Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide
Specific signal should be blocked or significantly reduced
Cross-reactivity testing:
Knockout/knockdown validation:
RILPL2-Rab protein interactions are central to understanding LRRK2 signaling pathways, especially in Parkinson's disease research. Optimized protocols include:
Co-immunoprecipitation approach:
Lyse cells in buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% TritonX-100, and protease inhibitors
Incubate cell extracts (2-3 mg) with rabbit anti-human RILPL2 antibody for 2h at 4°C
Add protein G Plus-agarose and incubate for 2h
Wash immunoprecipitates five times with lysis buffer
Analyze by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot for Rab proteins of interest
Pull-down assays with biotinylated peptides:
Prepare cell lysates from cells of interest
Add biotin-labeled peptides at a final concentration of 2.5 μM
Rotate at 4°C for 4 hours before adding streptavidin agarose resin
For studying LRRK2-mediated Rab interactions:
Express pathogenic LRRK2 (e.g., R1441C mutant)
Use constrained peptides mimicking the switch II region of Rab8a
Analyze binding to RILPL2 using anti-RILPL2 antibodies
Research indicates that phosphorylation of Thr 72 in Rab8a is critical for promoting interactions with RILPL2, so experimental designs should account for this modification .
RILPL2 has been identified as having altered expression in breast cancer, making it a significant research target. Methodologies for using RILPL2 antibodies in cancer research include:
For expression analysis in clinical samples:
Perform IHC on tissue microarrays of breast cancer samples and adjacent normal tissues
Use rabbit polyclonal anti-human RILPL2 antibody alongside markers for ER, PR, and HER2
Evaluate RILPL2 expression according to established scoring criteria
For mechanistic studies:
Compare RILPL2 expression in breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, T-47D) versus normal breast epithelial cells (MCF-10A)
Establish RILPL2 knockdown or overexpression models in appropriate cell lines
Use RILPL2 antibodies to confirm knockdown/overexpression efficiency
Analyze effects on proliferation, migration, and chemoresistance
For in vivo studies:
Generate RILPL2-overexpressing cancer cells
Implant cells in mouse models
Use RILPL2 antibodies to confirm sustained expression in extracted tumors
Research has shown that RILPL2 mRNA expression is significantly reduced in breast cancer samples compared to normal tissues (1.690-fold and 1.306-fold reduction in datasets from TCGA and Curtis database). The role of RILPL2 in chemoresistance can be studied through models combining RILPL2 expression modulation with taxotere treatment .
RILPL2's role in LRRK2-mediated pathways makes it relevant for Parkinson's disease research. Methodological approaches include:
For studying LRRK2-Rab-RILPL2 pathway:
Use cellular models expressing pathogenic LRRK2 mutants (e.g., R1441C)
Apply RILPL2 antibodies to detect localization changes under pathogenic conditions
Combine with analyses of ciliogenesis and centrosomal cohesion defects
For therapeutic target validation:
Design constrained peptides mimicking the switch II region of Rab8a
Use RILPL2 antibodies to evaluate binding of these peptides to RILPL2
Assess the ability of peptides to reverse ciliogenesis and centrosomal cohesion defects
For protein-protein interaction (PPI) research:
Target the PPI between Rab8a-RILPL2 using constrained peptides
Employ all-hydrocarbon-constrained peptides mimicking switch II derived from Rab8a
Confirm binding using RILPL2 antibodies in pull-down assays
Recent research has developed constrained peptides (RIP series) that bind RILPL2 and can reverse pathogenic effects of LRRK2 mutations, demonstrating the utility of targeting RILPL2 interactions as an alternative strategy to LRRK2 kinase inhibition .
Distinguishing between the closely related RILPL1 and RILPL2 proteins presents a methodological challenge. Recommended approaches include:
Antibody selection and validation:
Choose antibodies specifically validated for distinguishing between RILPL1 and RILPL2
Some antibodies recognize both proteins by Western blot but only RILPL2 by immunofluorescence
Validate antibody specificity using recombinant proteins and knockout/knockdown controls
Experimental design strategies:
Use specific RILPL1 and RILPL2 antibodies in parallel experiments
Employ siRNA/shRNA knockdown of each protein as controls
For co-immunoprecipitation studies, use antibodies targeting unique regions of each protein
Expression pattern analysis:
RILPL2 expression is observed specifically at the apical surface of a subset of cells in MTEC cultures
Compare localization patterns using immunofluorescence with specific antibodies
Use double-labeling approaches with markers for cellular compartments
Research has demonstrated that polyclonal antibodies directed against full-length murine Rilpl2 protein can recognize both Rilpl1 and Rilpl2 by Western blot but Rilpl2 alone by immunofluorescence, highlighting the importance of validation in specific applications .
RILPL2's function in regulating ciliary membrane proteins makes it important for cilia biology research. Optimal methods include:
For localization studies:
Use RILPL2 antibodies alongside cilia markers (acetylated tubulin) and pericentrin or γ-tubulin for centrosomes
Examine RILPL2 localization during different stages of ciliogenesis
Analyze expression in multiciliated cells at different stages of differentiation
For functional studies:
Establish RILPL2 knockdown or overexpression cell models
Examine effects on cilia formation and morphology
Analyze ciliary membrane protein composition using specific markers
In mouse tracheal epithelial cell (MTEC) cultures:
Culture MTECs containing cells at different stages of differentiation
Use RILPL2 antibodies to detect endogenous expression at the apical surface
Examine correlation between RILPL2 expression and ciliogenesis stages
Combine with markers for basal body amplification and mature ciliation
Research has shown that endogenous Rilpl2 expression is observed specifically at the apical surface of a subset of cells in MTEC cultures, suggesting a specific role in ciliary regulation .
Researchers frequently encounter challenges when using RILPL2 antibodies. Here are common issues and solutions:
Low or no signal in Western blot:
Problem: Insufficient protein loaded or low RILPL2 expression
Solution: Load more protein (50-100 μg) or use cell lines with known RILPL2 expression (e.g., MDA-MB-231, T-47D)
Problem: Inadequate transfer or blocking
Solution: Optimize transfer conditions for proteins in the 24-28 kDa range; use 5% milk/TBS-Tween for blocking
Problem: Incorrect antibody dilution
Solution: Titrate antibody concentrations; recommended starting dilutions are 1:1000-1:4000
High background in immunofluorescence:
Problem: Non-specific binding
Solution: Increase blocking time/concentration; use appropriate blocking agents (BSA, normal serum)
Problem: Autofluorescence
Solution: Include an autofluorescence quenching step; optimize fixation methods
Cross-reactivity with RILPL1:
Problem: Antibody recognizes both RILPL1 and RILPL2
Solution: Use antibodies validated for RILPL2 specificity; include RILPL1 and RILPL2 knockdown controls
Problem: Uncertainty about detected protein
Solution: Perform parallel experiments with specific RILPL1 antibodies; check molecular weight (RILPL1 is larger than RILPL2)
Optimizing co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) protocols is essential for studying RILPL2's protein interactions:
Buffer optimization:
Use lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% TritonX-100, and protease inhibitors
For phosphorylation-dependent interactions, include phosphatase inhibitors
Adjust salt concentration to reduce non-specific binding
Antibody selection:
Use antibodies with high affinity for RILPL2 in native conditions
Pre-clear lysates with protein G beads to reduce non-specific binding
Incubate cell extracts (2-3 mg) with antibody for 2h at 4°C before adding protein G Plus-agarose
Detection optimization:
For RILPL2-Rab interactions, use multiple wash steps (5× recommended)
Use gentle elution conditions to maintain interaction integrity
Include appropriate controls (IgG, input, washout)
For Rab-RILPL2 interactions specifically:
Consider the phosphorylation status of Rab proteins (especially Thr72 in Rab8a)
Use phosphomimetic mutations (Asp or Glu substitutions) to study phosphorylation-dependent interactions
Include LRRK2 inhibitors as controls when studying LRRK2-mediated interactions
Accurate quantification of RILPL2 in clinical samples requires careful methodological considerations:
For immunohistochemistry:
Use standardized scoring systems
Include positive and negative tissue controls
Evaluate both intensity and proportion of staining
For Western blot quantification:
Use Image Studio or similar software for densitometry
Normalize RILPL2 expression to appropriate housekeeping proteins
Ensure consistent exposure times across samples
Include standard curves with recombinant RILPL2 for absolute quantification
For clinical correlations:
Recent studies have analyzed RILPL2 expression in breast cancer patients, correlating RILPL2 levels with clinical outcomes using Kaplan-Meier plotter and statistical analysis with SPSS 23.0 software. This demonstrates the value of standardized quantification approaches .
RILPL2 antibodies are poised to contribute to several emerging research areas:
Neurodegenerative disease mechanisms:
Use RILPL2 antibodies to study its role in models of Parkinson's disease beyond LRRK2 mutations
Explore connections to other neurodegenerative conditions through Rab protein interactions
Cancer biology beyond breast cancer:
Extend RILPL2 expression studies to other cancer types
Investigate RILPL2's potential as a biomarker for disease progression or treatment response
Explore the relationship between RILPL2 and cancer cell metabolism
Therapeutic target validation:
Use RILPL2 antibodies to validate novel therapeutic approaches targeting Rab-RILPL2 interactions
Evaluate effects of constrained peptides in cellular and animal models
Develop screening assays for compounds that modulate RILPL2 interactions
Ciliopathy research:
Investigate RILPL2's potential involvement in ciliopathies
Study relationships between RILPL2 and established ciliopathy genes
The development of constrained peptides that bind RILPL2 and reverse pathogenic effects of LRRK2 mutations demonstrates one promising future direction, potentially offering an alternative strategy to direct LRRK2 kinase inhibition for Parkinson's disease treatment .
Emerging technologies present opportunities to advance RILPL2 research:
Proximity labeling techniques:
Combine RILPL2 antibodies with BioID or APEX2 approaches
Map the proximal interactome of RILPL2 in different cellular contexts
Identify novel interaction partners in specific subcellular compartments
Super-resolution microscopy:
Use highly specific RILPL2 antibodies compatible with super-resolution techniques
Study nanoscale localization at cilia and centrosomes
Analyze co-localization with interaction partners at molecular resolution
Live-cell imaging approaches:
Develop cell-permeable labeled antibody fragments
Track RILPL2 dynamics during cellular processes like ciliogenesis
Combine with optogenetic approaches to manipulate RILPL2 function
Single-cell analyses:
Apply RILPL2 antibodies in single-cell proteomics workflows
Analyze cell-to-cell variability in RILPL2 expression and localization
Correlate with single-cell transcriptomics data
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Use antibodies to identify RILPL2 in complex protein assemblies
Facilitate structural studies of RILPL2-Rab complexes
Enhance understanding of molecular mechanisms in LRRK2 signaling