rpl-39 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Antibody Design and Reactivity

ParameterDetails
ImmunogenSynthetic peptide derived from human RPL-39 (e.g., AA 1–50)
Host SpeciesRabbit (polyclonal)
Cross-ReactivityHuman, mouse, rat, zebrafish (varies by vendor)
ApplicationsWestern blot (WB), immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunofluorescence (IF), ELISA

Validation Data

  • Western Blot: Detects a ~6–7 kDa band in human, mouse, and rat lysates (e.g., HepG2, COLO cells) .

  • Immunohistochemistry: Demonstrates cytoplasmic staining in human brain tissue .

  • Immunofluorescence: Labels ribosomal structures in cultured cells (e.g., BT549, HS578T) .

Role in Cancer Biology

  1. Metaplastic Breast Cancer:

    • RPL-39 expression correlates with reduced survival and chemoresistance. Inhibition of iNOS (inducible nitric oxide synthase) via L-NMMA suppresses tumor growth and metastasis in patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) .

    • Mechanistically, RPL-39 upregulates ADAR1 (RNA editing enzyme) and STAT3 signaling, promoting cancer stem cell (CSC) self-renewal and migration .

  2. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC):

    • RPL-39 knockdown reduces CD44+/CD24low subpopulations and mammosphere formation, highlighting its role in CSC maintenance .

Mechanistic Insights

StudyModel SystemKey Findings
RPL-39 and iNOSBCM-4664/3807 PDXsL-NMMA reduces tumor volume (P < 0.05)
RPL-39 KnockdownSUM159/MDAMB231 xenograftsDecreased lung metastasis (P < 0.05)
RPL-39 OverexpressionBT549/MDAMB231 cellsIncreased cell migration and proliferation

Challenges and Limitations

  • Detection Sensitivity: RPL-39’s small size (6 kDa) and high arginine content make it prone to degradation during sample preparation, limiting detection in low-expression tissues .

  • Cross-Reactivity: No antibodies currently distinguish RPL-39 from its paralog RPL-39L due to 92% sequence homology .

  • Tissue-Specific Expression: Primarily validated in cancer cell lines and PDX models; limited data on normal tissues .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Composition: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
rpl-39 antibody; C26F1.9 antibody; 60S ribosomal protein L39 antibody
Target Names
rpl-39
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is RPL39 and why is it significant in research?

RPL39 is a small ribosomal protein (51 amino acids, 6.4 kDa) that functions as an RNA-binding component of the large ribosomal subunit . It plays a critical role in stabilizing ribosomal structure and enabling proper decoding of genetic information . Beyond its canonical function in protein synthesis, RPL39 has gained significant research interest due to its potential role in cancer biology, particularly in breast cancer where it demonstrates oncogenic activity . The protein is primarily localized in the cytoplasm and has several alternative names including 60S ribosomal protein L39, eL39, and large ribosomal subunit protein eL39 .

What are the molecular characteristics of RPL39 that researchers should consider when selecting antibodies?

When selecting RPL39 antibodies, researchers should consider several key molecular characteristics:

CharacteristicDetailsImplications for Antibody Selection
Molecular Weight6.4 kDa (observed at ~6-7 kDa on gels)Requires high percentage gels for detection
Amino Acid Length51 residuesSmall protein may have limited epitopes
Subcellular LocalizationPrimarily cytoplasmicSample preparation should preserve cytoplasmic fraction
Species ConservationHighly conserved across vertebratesConsider cross-reactivity for comparative studies
Post-translational ModificationsLimited documentationEpitope may be affected by modifications

The small size of RPL39 presents unique challenges for detection and requires careful consideration of experimental parameters including gel percentage, transfer conditions, and antibody specificity .

How do researchers distinguish between RPL39 and other ribosomal proteins when using antibodies?

Distinguishing RPL39 from other ribosomal proteins requires rigorous validation approaches:

  • Epitope specificity: Select antibodies raised against unique regions of RPL39 that don't share homology with other ribosomal proteins.

  • Molecular weight verification: Confirm detection at the expected 6-7 kDa band size, which differs from most other ribosomal proteins .

  • Knockout validation: Use RPL39 knockout or knockdown samples as negative controls to confirm specificity .

  • Peptide competition assays: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide to demonstrate that signal disappearance is specific to RPL39 .

  • Multiple antibody comparison: Use antibodies from different sources that recognize distinct epitopes to build confidence in specificity.

What are the optimal conditions for Western blot detection of RPL39?

Given RPL39's small size (6.4 kDa), specific protocols must be followed for successful Western blot detection:

ParameterRecommended ConditionsRationale
Sample PreparationLysis in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitorsPreserves small proteins
Gel Selection15-20% SDS-PAGERequired to resolve small proteins
Protein Loading20-30 μg total proteinEnsures adequate detection
Transfer SystemSemi-dry transfer or wet transfer with specialized buffersPrevents small protein loss
Membrane Type0.2 μm PVDF membraneRetains small proteins better than 0.45 μm
Blocking5% non-fat milk in TBST, 1 hour at RTReduces background
Primary Antibody1:500-1:2000 dilution, overnight at 4°COptimal range based on validated protocols
Detection SystemEnhanced chemiluminescenceProvides sensitivity for small proteins
Positive ControlHepG2 cells or human liver tissueVerified expression of RPL39

Researchers should note that the small size of RPL39 may cause it to transfer off standard membranes, necessitating specialized transfer conditions .

What are the recommended protocols for immunohistochemical detection of RPL39?

For optimal immunohistochemical detection of RPL39:

  • Tissue preparation: 4-6 μm FFPE tissue sections, deparaffinized and rehydrated.

  • Antigen retrieval: Use TE buffer pH 9.0 for heat-induced epitope retrieval; alternatively, citrate buffer pH 6.0 may be used .

  • Endogenous peroxidase blocking: 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes.

  • Antibody dilution: 1:20-1:200 depending on the specific antibody and tissue .

  • Incubation conditions: Overnight at 4°C in a humidified chamber.

  • Detection system: Polymer-based detection systems provide superior sensitivity for low-abundance proteins like RPL39.

  • Validated positive control tissues: Human liver cancer tissue has been validated for RPL39 expression .

Human liver cancer tissue sections have shown reliable and reproducible RPL39 staining when following these protocols .

How can researchers optimize immunofluorescence protocols for RPL39 detection?

For successful immunofluorescence detection of RPL39:

  • Cell fixation: 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes at room temperature preserves cytoplasmic structures.

  • Permeabilization: 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes enables antibody access to intracellular RPL39.

  • Blocking: 5% BSA in PBS for 1 hour reduces non-specific binding.

  • Primary antibody: Dilute 1:200-1:800 and incubate overnight at 4°C .

  • Washing: Thorough washing with PBS (3 × 5 minutes) is critical for reducing background.

  • Secondary antibody: Fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody (1:500) for 1 hour at room temperature.

  • Counterstaining: DAPI for nuclear visualization helps distinguish RPL39's cytoplasmic localization.

  • Validated cell lines: HepG2 cells serve as reliable positive controls for RPL39 immunofluorescence .

Confocal microscopy is recommended for precise subcellular localization studies, as it can distinguish cytoplasmic RPL39 from other cellular compartments .

How can RPL39 antibodies be utilized to investigate its role in cancer biology?

RPL39 has emerged as a potential oncogenic factor, particularly in breast cancer. Researchers can use RPL39 antibodies to:

  • Expression profiling: Compare RPL39 levels across cancer types and stages using immunohistochemistry or Western blot analysis .

  • Prognostic marker evaluation: Correlate RPL39 expression with patient outcomes in tissue microarrays to assess prognostic value.

  • Mutation analysis: Detect the gain-of-function A14V mutation that has been implicated in triple-negative and metaplastic breast cancer .

  • Mechanism studies: Investigate RPL39's interaction with the nitric oxide pathway, which has been identified as a potential mechanism of its oncogenic activity .

  • Therapeutic response monitoring: Assess changes in RPL39 expression following treatment to identify potential resistance mechanisms.

  • Functional studies: Validate RPL39 knockdown or overexpression effects using antibodies as readouts for expression verification.

Research has specifically implicated RPL39 in metaplastic breast cancer, one of the most therapeutically challenging breast cancer subtypes due to its heterogeneity and chemoresistance .

What methods can be employed to study interactions between RPL39 and other molecules?

To investigate RPL39's interactome:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Utilize RPL39 antibodies to pull down protein complexes

    • Western blot analysis with antibodies against suspected interaction partners

    • Sensitivity can be enhanced with crosslinking prior to lysis

  • Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):

    • Detects protein-protein interactions in situ with single-molecule sensitivity

    • Requires antibodies from different host species against RPL39 and potential interactors

    • Provides spatial information about interactions

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP):

    • Investigate potential interactions between RPL39 and chromatin if extra-ribosomal functions are suspected

    • Requires highly specific RPL39 antibodies validated for ChIP applications

  • RNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP):

    • Identify RNAs directly bound by RPL39 beyond its canonical ribosomal targets

    • Can reveal novel regulatory roles in RNA metabolism

  • Mass Spectrometry Analysis:

    • Following immunoprecipitation with RPL39 antibodies

    • Unbiased approach to identify novel interaction partners

These methodologies can help distinguish between RPL39's canonical ribosomal functions and potential moonlighting activities in cancer cells .

How can researchers distinguish between canonical and non-canonical functions of RPL39?

Differentiating RPL39's ribosomal functions from potential extra-ribosomal roles requires sophisticated approaches:

  • Subcellular fractionation combined with immunoblotting:

    • Separate ribosomal from non-ribosomal fractions

    • Use RPL39 antibodies to detect protein distribution

    • Compare patterns in normal versus disease states

  • Ribosome profiling with RPL39 immunoprecipitation:

    • Identify mRNAs specifically associated with RPL39-containing ribosomes

    • Compare to total ribosome-associated mRNAs to identify specialized translation functions

  • Structure-function analysis:

    • Create RPL39 mutants that specifically disrupt ribosome incorporation

    • Use antibodies to monitor localization and interaction changes

    • Determine which cellular phenotypes require ribosomal incorporation versus free RPL39

  • Comparative analysis across tissues:

    • Examine whether RPL39 levels correlate with global translation rates

    • Identify tissues where RPL39 expression deviates from other ribosomal proteins

  • Response to translation inhibitors:

    • Monitor RPL39 behavior following treatment with translation inhibitors

    • Non-canonical functions may persist despite translation inhibition

These approaches can reveal whether RPL39's role in cancer stems from altered translation or novel extra-ribosomal functions .

What are common challenges in RPL39 antibody experiments and how can they be addressed?

When working with RPL39 antibodies, researchers frequently encounter these challenges:

ChallengePotential CausesSolution Strategies
No detection in Western blotProtein running off gel due to small size (6.4 kDa)Use 15-20% gels; optimize transfer for small proteins; verify with positive controls (HepG2 cells)
Multiple bandsNon-specific binding; protein modificationsIncrease antibody dilution; validate with knockout controls; perform peptide competition
High background in IHC/IFInsufficient blocking; antibody concentration too highOptimize blocking conditions; increase antibody dilution; extend washing steps
Inconsistent results between applicationsDifferent epitope accessibility in various applicationsValidate each application independently; consider different antibodies for different applications
Poor reproducibilityLot-to-lot antibody variation; protocol inconsistenciesStandardize protocols; aliquot antibodies to avoid freeze-thaw cycles; include consistent positive controls

When encountering difficulties, researchers should systematically optimize each step while maintaining appropriate controls to verify specificity .

What controls are essential for validating RPL39 antibody specificity?

Rigorous validation requires multiple control strategies:

  • Positive controls: Use tissues/cells with verified RPL39 expression:

    • HepG2 cells and human liver tissue for Western blot

    • Human liver cancer tissue for IHC

    • HepG2 cells for immunofluorescence

  • Negative controls:

    • Primary antibody omission

    • Isotype control antibodies

    • RPL39 knockdown/knockout samples

  • Peptide competition assay:

    • Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide

    • Should abolish specific signal while non-specific binding remains

    • Example shown in Western blot detection of COLO cell extracts with immunizing peptide

  • Method validation:

    • Confirm results with orthogonal methods (qPCR, mass spectrometry)

    • Use multiple antibodies recognizing different epitopes

  • Cross-reactivity assessment:

    • Test antibody against recombinant closely-related ribosomal proteins

    • Verify species specificity if performing cross-species comparisons

Publication-quality research requires demonstration of antibody specificity through multiple validation approaches .

How should researchers evaluate contradictory results obtained with different RPL39 antibodies?

When faced with discrepant results using different RPL39 antibodies:

  • Epitope analysis:

    • Determine epitope locations for each antibody

    • Different epitopes may be differentially accessible in various experimental conditions

    • Some epitopes may be masked by protein-protein interactions in specific contexts

  • Validation hierarchy:

    • Prioritize results from antibodies validated with knockout controls

    • Consider antibodies with published validation in similar applications

    • Evaluate the rigor of validation provided by manufacturers

  • Technical considerations:

    • Different fixation methods may affect epitope accessibility in IHC/IF

    • Buffer conditions can impact epitope recognition in Western blot

    • Post-translational modifications may alter epitope recognition

  • Resolution strategies:

    • Use orthogonal methods to verify results (e.g., RNA expression)

    • Perform functional validation through knockdown/overexpression

    • Consider the possibility that both results may be correct but reflect different pools or states of RPL39

Antibody-specific optimization is often necessary to achieve consistent and reliable results across different experimental platforms .

How can RPL39 antibodies contribute to understanding translational control in cancer?

RPL39 antibodies can provide unique insights into cancer-associated translational dysregulation:

  • Specialized ribosome hypothesis testing:

    • Immunoprecipitate RPL39-containing ribosomes to identify associated mRNAs

    • Compare translational profiles between normal and cancer cells

    • Determine if RPL39-containing ribosomes preferentially translate specific oncogenic mRNAs

  • Integration with other ribosomal protein studies:

    • Correlate RPL39 expression with other cancer-associated ribosomal proteins

    • Create comprehensive maps of ribosome heterogeneity in cancer

  • Therapy response monitoring:

    • Track changes in RPL39 expression and localization following treatment

    • Correlate with alterations in global and specific mRNA translation

  • Translational stress responses:

    • Monitor RPL39 behavior during various cellular stresses common in cancer

    • Investigate potential stress-specific roles in modulating translation

  • Patient stratification:

    • Develop IHC protocols for patient samples to correlate RPL39 expression with outcomes

    • Identify patient subgroups that might benefit from translation-targeting therapies

These approaches can help determine whether targeting RPL39 or its associated pathways could represent a viable therapeutic strategy .

What is known about the RPL39 A14V mutation and how can antibodies help study its effects?

The RPL39 A14V mutation has been implicated in metaplastic breast cancer biology:

  • Mutation-specific antibodies:

    • Development of antibodies that specifically recognize the A14V mutant form

    • Enable screening of patient samples for this specific mutation

    • Facilitate studies of mutation prevalence across cancer types

  • Functional consequences:

    • Compare wild-type and mutant RPL39 localization and interactions

    • Investigate whether the mutation alters ribosome incorporation or function

    • Determine effects on nitric oxide signaling, which has been linked to RPL39 function

  • Clinical correlations:

    • Assess whether A14V mutation correlates with treatment resistance

    • Determine prognostic significance in metaplastic breast cancer

    • Evaluate potential as a biomarker for patient stratification

  • Therapeutic implications:

    • Use antibodies to monitor the effects of targeted therapies on mutant RPL39

    • Develop screening assays for compounds that specifically target mutant RPL39

This mutation represents a potential driver in aggressive breast cancer subtypes, and antibody-based approaches can help elucidate its mechanisms and clinical relevance .

How might RPL39 antibodies be used in developing potential cancer therapeutics?

RPL39 antibodies can support therapeutic development through several approaches:

  • Target validation:

    • Confirm RPL39 expression in target tissues

    • Validate knockdown efficiency in preclinical models

    • Correlate expression with disease progression and therapy response

  • Biomarker development:

    • Standardize IHC protocols for patient stratification

    • Develop companion diagnostics for potential RPL39-targeting therapies

    • Monitor RPL39 expression changes during treatment as response indicators

  • Mechanism-based therapeutic approaches:

    • Investigate RPL39's relationship with nitric oxide pathways in cancer

    • Use antibodies to monitor effects of nitric oxide modulators on RPL39 function

    • Develop screening assays for compounds disrupting RPL39's oncogenic functions

  • In vivo models:

    • Monitor RPL39 expression in patient-derived xenografts

    • Correlate expression with treatment response in animal models

    • Validate RPL39 as a therapeutic target through antibody-based detection

  • Clinical trial support:

    • Provide validated IHC protocols for patient selection

    • Enable pharmacodynamic monitoring of RPL39-targeted therapies

    • Support analysis of resistance mechanisms through expression monitoring

These applications highlight RPL39 antibodies' potential role in translating basic research findings into clinical applications for challenging cancer types like metaplastic breast cancer .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.