Target: Ribosomal Protein L30 (RPL30), a 13 kDa protein encoded by the RPL30 gene (NCBI Gene ID: 6156) .
Immunogen: Varies by manufacturer:
| Application | Dilution Range | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blotting (WB) | 1:500–1:2000 | |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:50–1:500 | |
| Immunofluorescence (IF) | 1:50–1:100 | |
| ELISA | 1:500–1:1000 |
WB Optimization: Recommended starting dilution for WB is 1/1000 (Bio-Rad) or 1:500–1:1000 (Proteintech) .
Cross-Reactivity: Validated for human, mouse, and rat samples, with broader species reactivity noted in .
| Species | Reactivity | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Human | Primary target | |
| Mouse | Confirmed | |
| Rat | Confirmed | |
| Monkey/Cow/Rabbit | Limited data (reported in ) |
Ribosomal Stress Response: RPL30 regulates ribosome assembly and has been implicated in cellular stress responses, including nutrient deprivation .
Cancer Research: Used in proteogenomic studies to identify tumor-specific markers, as highlighted in a 2023 publication .
Human Protein Atlas: Integrated into the Human Protein Atlas project for comprehensive tissue profiling (Sigma-Aldrich) .
KEGG: spo:SPAC17A5.03
STRING: 4896.SPAC17A5.03.1
rpl301 is a gene encoding a ribosomal protein found in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) with the UniProt Number P40372 and Entrez Gene ID 2542265 . This protein constitutes part of the large 60S ribosomal subunit and plays an essential role in protein synthesis. Studying rpl301 provides valuable insights into eukaryotic ribosome structure and function, translation regulation, and cellular stress responses. The protein serves as an important model for understanding ribosomal biology across species, as ribosomal proteins are highly conserved evolutionary markers.
Commercial rpl301 antibodies typically present with the following specifications:
These specifications ensure appropriate experimental design and interpretation of results when working with rpl301 in research settings.
While they share functional similarity as ribosomal proteins, rpl301 from S. pombe and human RPL30 have important distinctions:
Human RPL30 is part of the 60S ribosomal subunit with a calculated molecular weight of approximately 13 kDa (115 amino acids) , while the yeast rpl301 functions in a similar capacity but with sequence divergence reflecting evolutionary distance. Human RPL30 antibodies typically show reactivity across multiple mammalian species including human, mouse, and rat , whereas rpl301 antibodies are specifically designed for yeast research applications . Understanding these differences is crucial when designing cross-species studies or interpreting conservation of ribosomal protein function across evolutionary boundaries.
For optimal Western blot performance with rpl301 antibody:
Sample preparation:
Use glass bead lysis or enzymatic methods optimized for yeast cells
Include protease inhibitor cocktail to prevent degradation
Load 15-20 μg total protein per lane
Electrophoresis and transfer:
Use 12-15% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal resolution
Transfer to PVDF membrane at 100V for 1 hour
Antibody incubation:
Detection and controls:
When encountering detection issues with rpl301 antibody:
For weak signals:
Increase antibody concentration (1:250 dilution)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Optimize protein extraction buffer to improve antigen availability
Increase protein loading (up to 30μg)
Employ a more sensitive detection system
For non-specific binding:
Increase blocking concentration (5-10% blocking agent)
Add 0.1-0.3% Tween-20 to washing buffer
Extend washing steps (5-6 washes, 10 minutes each)
Pre-adsorb antibody with yeast lysate lacking the target
Try alternative blocking agents (casein, fish gelatin)
Systematic optimization can be achieved by testing multiple parameters:
| Parameter | Test Range |
|---|---|
| Antibody dilution | 1:250 - 1:2000 |
| Blocking agent | BSA, milk, casein |
| Blocking time | 1-3 hours |
| Wash buffer composition | 0.05-0.3% Tween-20 |
| Incubation temperature | 4°C, RT |
For effective immunofluorescence microscopy with rpl301 antibody:
Cell fixation and permeabilization:
Fix cells with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes
Create spheroplasts using zymolyase treatment (optimize concentration and time)
Permeabilize with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes
Antibody incubation:
Imaging considerations:
Use appropriate filters based on secondary antibody fluorophore
Capture Z-stack images to account for 3D cell structure
Include counterstaining for nuclei (DAPI) and cell wall (calcofluor white)
Controls:
Studying ribosome biogenesis with rpl301 antibody requires sophisticated experimental approaches:
Nuclear-cytoplasmic fractionation:
Separate nuclear and cytoplasmic components through differential centrifugation
Use Western blotting with rpl301 antibody to track protein localization
Compare distribution under normal conditions versus stress or inhibitor treatment
Pulse-chase analysis:
Label newly synthesized proteins with radioisotopes or click chemistry
Immunoprecipitate rpl301-containing complexes at different time points
Analyze incorporation kinetics into mature ribosomes
Co-immunoprecipitation studies:
Use rpl301 antibody to pull down associated factors
Analyze interacting proteins by mass spectrometry
Compare interactome changes during different biogenesis stages
Combined with genetic approaches:
Study rpl301 incorporation in strains with mutations in assembly factors
Use temperature-sensitive mutants to create synchronized biogenesis defects
Compare results with other ribosomal protein antibodies for comprehensive analysis
This multifaceted approach provides insights into the temporal sequence of ribosome assembly and the functional importance of rpl301 in the process.
When incorporating rpl301 antibody into ribosome profiling workflows:
Pre-profiling validation:
Verify ribosome integrity by Western blotting across fractions
Ensure antibody specificity in the context of ribosome complexes
Optimize immunoprecipitation conditions for intact ribosome recovery
Experimental design:
Consider selective ribosome profiling by immunoprecipitating rpl301-containing ribosomes
Compare total ribosome profiling with rpl301-specific profiles
Include appropriate controls (input RNA, non-specific antibody pull-down)
Technical considerations:
Buffer optimization to maintain ribosome integrity during immunoprecipitation
RNase treatment calibration for optimal footprint generation
RNA recovery methods compatible with immunoprecipitation protocols
Data analysis:
Normalize for potential biases introduced by immunoprecipitation
Compare ribosome occupancy patterns between total and rpl301-enriched samples
Apply appropriate statistical methods for differential translation analysis
This approach can reveal specific populations of ribosomes and their association with distinct mRNA subsets.
Investigating post-translational modifications (PTMs) of rpl301 requires specialized approaches:
PTM detection strategies:
Immunoprecipitate with rpl301 antibody and probe with modification-specific antibodies
Use 2D gel electrophoresis to separate modified forms before Western blotting
Perform phosphatase or deubiquitinase treatments to confirm modification types
Mass spectrometry workflow:
Immunoprecipitate rpl301 using the specific antibody
Perform on-bead or in-solution digestion with appropriate proteases
Use enrichment strategies for specific modifications (e.g., TiO₂ for phosphopeptides)
Analyze with high-resolution MS and appropriate fragmentation methods
Comparative analysis:
Study modification changes across growth conditions and stress responses
Compare modifications between wild-type and mutant strains
Analyze temporal dynamics following environmental perturbations
Functional correlation:
Correlate modification patterns with ribosome activity
Assess impact on protein-protein interactions
Determine effects on translation efficiency or selectivity
This comprehensive approach provides insight into how PTMs regulate ribosomal function through rpl301 modifications.
Using rpl301 antibody for cross-species studies requires careful consideration:
Sequence homology assessment:
Perform alignment of rpl301 sequences across target yeast species
Identify regions of conservation that may contain the epitope
Predict potential cross-reactivity based on sequence similarity
Cross-reactivity validation:
Test antibody against lysates from multiple yeast species (S. cerevisiae, C. albicans, etc.)
Perform titration experiments to determine relative affinity
Consider Western blotting with decreasing protein amounts to assess sensitivity limits
Optimization strategies:
Adjust antibody concentrations based on species-specific affinity
Modify incubation conditions for optimal detection across species
Consider using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes for confirmation
Data interpretation:
Account for evolutionary relationships when interpreting results
Consider functional conservation despite sequence divergence
Use bioinformatic tools to correlate antibody reactivity with sequence conservation
This approach enables evolutionary studies of ribosomal biology across the fungal kingdom.
When comparing studies using yeast rpl301 antibody and human RPL30 antibody:
Evolutionary context:
Recognize that while functionally similar, these proteins have diverged significantly
Consider that human RPL30 and yeast rpl301 may have evolved specialized functions
Understand that extrapolation between systems requires validation
Technical considerations:
Different antibodies have unique specificity and sensitivity profiles
Experimental conditions optimized for one system may not transfer directly
Standard protocols may require significant modification between systems
Methodological approach:
Use purified recombinant proteins from both species as controls
Perform parallel experiments with both antibodies when possible
Consider complementary methods (mass spectrometry, genetic approaches)
Data interpretation framework:
Focus on conserved functions rather than species-specific details
Validate key findings across both systems when making translational claims
Use bioinformatic approaches to identify truly conserved aspects
Understanding these considerations enables proper interpretation of comparative ribosome biology across evolutionary distances.
For rigorous quantitative assessment of rpl301 antibody performance:
Titration analysis:
Perform serial dilutions of yeast lysate (2-fold dilutions)
Plot signal intensity versus protein amount to determine linear range
Calculate limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ)
Specificity assessment:
Conduct peptide competition assays with immunizing antigen
Test against lysates from rpl301 deletion or depletion strains if available
Assess cross-reactivity with closely related ribosomal proteins
Quantitative metrics:
Signal-to-noise ratio across different sample types
Coefficient of variation in replicate experiments
Recovery efficiency in immunoprecipitation experiments
Validation with orthogonal methods:
Compare antibody-based quantification with mass spectrometry
Correlate with RNA expression data when appropriate
Verify with genetically tagged versions of the protein
This thorough characterization ensures reliable interpretation of experimental results and appropriate method selection.
Essential controls for experimental rigor when using rpl301 antibody include:
Implementing these controls ensures experimental validity and facilitates troubleshooting when unexpected results occur.