RND1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
We typically dispatch products within 1-3 business days of receiving your order. Delivery timelines may vary depending on the purchase method and location. For specific delivery estimates, please consult your local distributor.
Synonyms
ARHS antibody; FLJ42294 antibody; GTP binding protein RHO6 antibody; Ras homolog gene family member S antibody; RHO 6 antibody; Rho family GTPase 1 antibody; Rho related GTP binding protein Rho6 antibody; RHO S antibody; Rho-related GTP-binding protein Rho6 antibody; RHO6 antibody; RHOS antibody; RND 1 antibody; Rnd1 antibody; RND1_HUMAN antibody
Target Names
RND1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
RND1 lacks intrinsic GTPase activity. It exhibits a low affinity for GDP and constitutively binds GTP. This protein plays a crucial role in regulating rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton. RND1 induces Rac-dependent neuritic process formation, in part, by disrupting cortical actin filaments. Notably, it triggers the formation of numerous neuritic processes emanating from the cell body, accompanied by disruption of the cortical actin filaments.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Reduced RND1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been linked to cancer progression, likely through its influence on the Ras signaling pathway. PMID: 27770342
  2. Research suggests that Rho GTPase signaling is a complex mechanism in RhoA-driven cancer cell invasive migration. PMID: 27913679
  3. RND1 plays a significant role in the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PMID: 26250459
  4. Findings reveal a previously unrecognized mechanism by which Rnd1 restrains the activation of Ras-MAPK signaling and breast tumor initiation and progression. PMID: 25531777
  5. Data indicate that Rnd1 effectively displaces Rac1 from its complex with Plexin-B1, but not vice versa. PMID: 23603360
  6. The N-terminal region of Rnd1 and Rnd3 possesses a KERRA (Lys-Glu-Arg-Arg-Ala) amino acid sequence that serves as the lipid raft-targeting determinant. This sequence facilitates lipid raft targeting of p190 RhoGAP, correlating with its activation. PMID: 22357615
  7. Rnd1 does not play a role in the activation of plexin-C1 and -D1. PMID: 21610070
  8. Socius is a novel Rnd GTPase-interacting protein involved in the disassembly of actin stress fibers. PMID: 11940653
  9. RND1 mRNA expression levels exhibit a significant increase after gestation in myometria. PMID: 16311049
  10. The binding of Rac1, Rnd1, and RhoD to a novel Rho GTPase interaction motif destabilizes the dimerization of the plexin-B1 effector domain. PMID: 17916560

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 18314

OMIM: 609038

KEGG: hsa:27289

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000308461

UniGene: Hs.124940

Protein Families
Small GTPase superfamily, Rho family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Lipid-anchor; Cytoplasmic side. Cytoplasm, cytoskeleton.
Tissue Specificity
Mostly expressed in brain and liver.

Q&A

What is RND1 and why is it significant in cellular research?

RND1 (Rho family GTPase 1) is a 232 amino acid protein with a molecular mass of 26.1 kDa that belongs to the Rho protein family. Unlike typical Rho GTPases, RND1 exists constitutively in the GTP-bound form, suggesting it functions as a permanently active signaling molecule. It primarily localizes to the cell membrane and cytoplasm, with notable expression in brain and liver tissues . RND1 plays a crucial role as a negative regulator of actin cytoskeleton assembly and cell adhesion. When overexpressed in fibroblasts, it inhibits the formation of actin stress fibers, membrane ruffles, and integrin-based focal adhesions, ultimately causing significant reduction in cell-matrix adhesion . This distinctive regulatory function makes RND1 an important target for investigating cytoskeletal dynamics, cell migration, and morphogenesis in both normal and pathological conditions.

What are the key structural and functional properties of RND1 protein?

RND1 possesses several distinctive structural and functional properties that differentiate it from other Rho family members:

PropertyDescription
Molecular Weight26.1 kDa
Amino Acid Length232 residues
Subcellular LocalizationCell membrane and cytoplasm
Primary ExpressionBrain and liver tissues
Nucleotide BindingConstitutively GTP-bound
Functional StatePermanently active (unlike classical Rho proteins)
Biological FunctionNegative regulator of actin assembly and cell adhesion
Associated StructuresAdherens junctions in fibroblasts and epithelial cells
Phylogenetic ConservationOrthologs in mouse, rat, bovine, frog, chimpanzee, and chicken

RND1 associates with adherens junctions in both confluent fibroblasts and epithelial cells, suggesting a role in regulating cell-cell contacts . Its constitutively active state represents a significant departure from the typical GTP/GDP cycling exhibited by most Rho family members, indicating a specialized regulatory mechanism in cytoskeletal dynamics .

What advantages do biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies offer over unconjugated variants?

Biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies provide several methodological advantages for researchers:

  • Enhanced signal amplification: The biotin-streptavidin system offers one of the strongest non-covalent biological interactions (Kd ≈ 10^-15 M), enabling significant signal enhancement without background increase.

  • Flexible detection options: Biotin conjugation allows researchers to use various streptavidin-conjugated detection systems (fluorophores, enzymes, quantum dots) without needing multiple directly labeled primary antibodies.

  • Multi-layer detection strategies: Researchers can implement detection schemes utilizing streptavidin bridges between biotinylated molecules, enabling multiple amplification steps.

  • Preserved antibody functionality: The small size of biotin (244 Da) minimizes interference with antibody binding, maintaining epitope recognition capabilities while adding detection versatility .

  • Compatibility with challenging samples: The biotin-streptavidin system provides robust detection in samples with high background or low target abundance, making it particularly valuable for detecting low-expression proteins like RND1.

What are the primary research applications for biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies?

Biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies serve multiple research applications with specific methodological advantages in each case:

  • ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay): These antibodies excel in quantitative detection of RND1 in biological samples. The biotin-streptavidin amplification system enables sensitive detection even with low RND1 expression . This application is particularly valuable for comparing expression levels across tissue samples or experimental conditions.

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies allow for precise localization of RND1 within tissue sections. The signal amplification properties are especially beneficial when studying tissues where RND1 is expressed at lower levels, such as non-neural tissues .

  • Co-localization Studies: When combined with differentially labeled antibodies against proteins like adherens junction components, biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies can help establish spatial relationships between RND1 and other cellular structures.

  • Protein Interaction Assays: These antibodies can be employed in pull-down assays to identify RND1-interacting proteins, particularly those involved in actin cytoskeleton regulation and focal adhesion dynamics .

  • Flow Cytometry: For studying RND1 expression in heterogeneous cell populations, biotin-conjugated antibodies provide flexibility in detection strategies with various streptavidin-fluorophore conjugates .

How should researchers optimize ELISA protocols when using biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies?

For optimal ELISA performance with biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies, researchers should consider this methodological workflow:

  • Plate Preparation: Use high-binding ELISA plates coated with capture antibody (anti-RND1) at 1-5 μg/ml in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4°C.

  • Blocking Optimization: Critical step - use biotin-free blocking buffer (5% BSA or specialized commercial blockers) to prevent interference with detection system. Block for 1-2 hours at room temperature.

  • Sample Dilution Series: Prepare standards using recombinant RND1 protein (10 ng/ml to 0.01 ng/ml) and dilute unknown samples in antibody diluent containing 0.05% Tween-20.

  • Detection Strategy: Apply biotin-conjugated RND1 antibody at 0.5-2 μg/ml for 1-2 hours, followed by streptavidin-HRP (1:5000-1:20000) for 30-60 minutes.

  • Signal Development: Use TMB substrate with stop solution after precise development time (typically 5-15 minutes). Monitor development visually to prevent oversaturation.

  • Data Analysis: Generate standard curve using four-parameter logistic regression to quantify RND1 concentrations in unknown samples.

  • Critical Controls:

    • Include biotin-blocking steps if endogenous biotin is suspected

    • Run specificity controls using RND1-depleted samples

    • Include isotype control antibodies to assess non-specific binding

The key optimization parameters are antibody concentration, incubation times, and washing stringency, which should be systematically tested for each experimental system.

What experimental design considerations are important when studying RND1's effects on cytoskeletal dynamics?

When investigating RND1's role in cytoskeletal organization, researchers should implement the following experimental design elements:

  • Expression System Selection: Choose between transient transfection and stable expression systems based on research questions. For acute effects, transient systems are preferred, while stable expression better reveals long-term adaptations.

  • Expression Level Control: Implement titratable expression systems (tetracycline-inducible) to study dose-dependent effects of RND1, as different expression levels may produce varying phenotypes.

  • Visualization Strategies: Combine biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies with phalloidin staining of F-actin and phosphotyrosine antibodies for focal adhesions to comprehensively assess cytoskeletal changes .

  • Temporal Analysis: Establish time-course experiments (1h, 4h, 24h, 48h post-induction) to differentiate between immediate signaling events and secondary adaptations.

  • Rescue Experiments: Include RND1 knockdown/knockout with subsequent rescue using wild-type or mutant constructs to confirm specificity of observed phenotypes.

  • Quantification Methods:

    • Measure stress fiber density using fluorescence intensity across cell axis

    • Quantify focal adhesion number, size, and turnover rates

    • Assess cell spreading area and morphological parameters

    • Analyze cell-matrix adhesion strength using detachment assays

  • Interaction Studies: Include co-immunoprecipitation assays with biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies to identify binding partners mediating cytoskeletal effects .

The experimental design should account for cell type-specific responses, as RND1's effects may vary between fibroblasts, epithelial cells, and other specialized cell types.

How does RND1 signaling differ from classical Rho GTPases, and what implications does this have for experimental design?

RND1 represents a functionally distinct subset of Rho GTPases with several unique signaling properties:

PropertyClassical Rho GTPases (RhoA, Rac1, Cdc42)RND1
GTP/GDP CyclingRegulated by GEFs and GAPsConstitutively GTP-bound
Activity StateSwitches between active and inactivePermanently active
RegulationPrimarily through nucleotide exchangeThrough expression level and localization
Effector BindingConditional upon GTP bindingConstitutive interaction potential
Cellular EffectGenerally promote actin assemblyInhibits actin assembly and focal adhesions

These fundamental differences require specific experimental considerations:

  • Activity Assays: Standard GTP-loading assays used for classical Rho proteins are not applicable to RND1. Instead, researchers should focus on measuring RND1 protein levels and localization patterns using biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies in fractionation studies.

  • Inhibitor Studies: While classical Rho GTPases can be inhibited with nucleotide binding competitors, RND1 research requires genetic approaches (siRNA, CRISPR) or dominant-negative constructs targeting downstream effectors.

  • Interaction Analysis: RND1 likely competes with active classical Rho GTPases for effector binding. Researchers should implement proximity ligation assays using biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies alongside antibodies for potential effectors to map interaction networks .

  • Compensatory Mechanisms: When manipulating RND1 levels, researchers must account for potential compensatory changes in classical Rho GTPase activities. Multiplex analysis of RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 activities should accompany RND1 studies.

Understanding these signaling differences is crucial for correctly interpreting experimental results and developing targeted interventions in RND1-mediated pathways.

What are the critical validation steps for confirming RND1 antibody specificity in immunological applications?

Ensuring antibody specificity is paramount for generating reliable data with biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies. Researchers should implement this comprehensive validation pipeline:

  • Genetic Validation:

    • Test antibody reactivity in RND1 knockout/knockdown models

    • Compare staining patterns in cells with endogenous versus overexpressed RND1

    • Verify absence of signal in tissues from RND1-null models

  • Peptide Competition Assays:

    • Pre-incubate antibody with increasing concentrations of RND1 immunizing peptide

    • Demonstrate dose-dependent signal reduction

    • Include non-related peptides as negative controls

  • Cross-Reactivity Assessment:

    • Test reactivity against recombinant RND1, RND2, and RND3/RhoE proteins

    • Quantify relative binding affinities to ensure RND subfamily specificity

    • Verify expected molecular weight (26.1 kDa) in Western blot applications

  • Multi-technique Confirmation:

    • Compare localization patterns across immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, and subcellular fractionation

    • Verify consistency of expression patterns with published transcriptomic data

    • Confirm expression in known high-expression tissues (brain and liver)

  • Epitope Mapping:

    • Determine the specific region recognized by the antibody

    • Ensure epitope accessibility in native protein conformation

    • Verify epitope conservation across species if cross-reactivity is claimed

Each validation step should be thoroughly documented, with appropriate positive and negative controls included in all experimental applications.

What methodological approaches can address sample-specific challenges when using biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies?

Researchers face various sample-specific challenges that require tailored methodological solutions:

  • High Endogenous Biotin Samples (e.g., liver, kidney, brain tissues):

    • Implement avidin/streptavidin blocking steps (10-30 min with unconjugated avidin)

    • Use specialized biotin-blocking kits before applying biotin-conjugated antibodies

    • Consider alternative detection systems for tissues with extremely high biotin content

  • Low RND1 Expression Samples:

    • Employ tyramide signal amplification (TSA) with biotin-conjugated antibodies

    • Increase antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C) with gentle agitation

    • Utilize high-sensitivity detection substrates (e.g., SuperSignal West Femto)

    • Consider sample enrichment techniques prior to analysis

  • High Background Tissues:

    • Optimize blocking conditions (duration, temperature, blocking agent composition)

    • Increase washing stringency (more washes, higher detergent concentration)

    • Implement antigen retrieval optimization matrix (pH, temperature, duration)

    • Pre-adsorb antibodies against tissues from RND1-null models

  • Fixation-Sensitive Applications:

    • Compare multiple fixation protocols (PFA, methanol, acetone) for epitope preservation

    • Conduct titration series for optimal antibody concentration with each fixation method

    • Determine optimal permeabilization conditions for accessing intracellular RND1

  • Multi-Color Imaging Challenges:

    • Carefully select fluorophore combinations to avoid spectral overlap

    • Implement sequential staining protocols for complex co-localization studies

    • Use streptavidin conjugates with far-red fluorophores to minimize tissue autofluorescence interference

Each sample type may require specific protocol modifications, which should be systematically optimized and documented to ensure reproducible results.

How can researchers troubleshoot inconsistent results when using biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies?

When facing reproducibility challenges with biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies, implement this systematic troubleshooting approach:

  • Signal Variability Issues:

    • Check antibody storage conditions (avoid freeze-thaw cycles, store aliquots at -20°C)

    • Verify consistent lot numbers between experiments (lot-to-lot variation is common)

    • Standardize protein loading for Western blots using total protein normalization

    • Implement automated image acquisition parameters for consistent exposure settings

  • High Background Problems:

    • Test multiple blocking agents (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers)

    • Increase washing buffer stringency (higher detergent concentration, longer wash times)

    • Purify antibody using antigen-affinity methods if non-specific binding persists

    • For histological samples, use Sudan Black B to reduce autofluorescence

  • Inconsistent Detection Methods:

    • Standardize streptavidin-conjugate dilutions using calibration curves

    • Ensure complete biotin blocking before antibody application

    • Verify detection reagent quality with positive control samples

    • Implement automated development timing for consistent results

  • Cell/Tissue-Specific Variations:

    • Document RND1 expression levels across different cell types via RT-qPCR

    • Adjust antibody concentration based on expected target abundance

    • Optimize fixation protocols for each tissue type

    • Account for protein post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition

  • Methodological Troubleshooting Matrix:

IssuePossible CausesSolutions
No signalDegraded antibody, low RND1 expressionFresh antibody aliquot, longer exposure, signal amplification
Multiple bandsCross-reactivity, protein degradationPeptide competition, fresh sample preparation, protease inhibitors
Inconsistent signalVariable RND1 expression, technical variationStandardize cell density, automate protocol steps, internal controls
High backgroundInsufficient blocking, non-specific bindingOptimize blocking, titrate antibody, increase wash stringency
Unexpected localizationFixation artifacts, epitope maskingCompare multiple fixation methods, validate with second antibody

Systematic documentation of troubleshooting experiments will help establish optimal conditions for each experimental system.

What advanced research applications can benefit from biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies beyond standard techniques?

Biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies enable several sophisticated research applications:

  • Super-Resolution Microscopy:

    • The biotin-streptavidin system provides excellent signal-to-noise ratio for STORM/PALM imaging

    • Use streptavidin-conjugated photoswitchable fluorophores to achieve nanoscale resolution

    • Map precise RND1 localization relative to cytoskeletal structures and adhesion complexes

    • Implementation requires careful fixation optimization to preserve nanoscale structures

  • Live-Cell Imaging Strategies:

    • Employ cell-permeable streptavidin conjugates with internalized biotinylated Fab fragments

    • Monitor RND1 dynamics during cell migration, division, or response to stimuli

    • Combine with fluorescently-tagged actin to correlate RND1 localization with cytoskeletal remodeling

    • Requires careful validation to ensure antibody binding doesn't alter protein function

  • Proximity-Dependent Labeling:

    • Use biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies with streptavidin-coupled enzymes (HRP, APEX2)

    • Generate reactive biotin derivatives to label proteins in close proximity to RND1

    • Identify the RND1 proximal proteome through mass spectrometry

    • Implementation requires optimization of labeling radius and reaction conditions

  • Multiplexed Tissue Imaging:

    • Employ cyclic immunofluorescence with biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies

    • Strip and reprobe tissues with antibodies against multiple markers

    • Create comprehensive spatial maps of RND1 in relation to tissue architecture

    • Analysis requires sophisticated image registration and computational techniques

  • In vivo Imaging Applications:

    • Utilize biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies with streptavidin-coupled contrast agents

    • Track RND1 expression in disease models using appropriate imaging modalities

    • Correlate RND1 expression with physiological or pathological processes

    • Requires careful validation of antibody specificity in complex in vivo environments

These advanced applications extend beyond conventional techniques to provide deeper insights into RND1 biology and function in complex systems.

How can quantitative analysis of RND1 expression inform understanding of cytoskeletal regulation?

Quantitative analysis of RND1 provides crucial insights into cytoskeletal regulatory mechanisms:

  • Expression Level Thresholds:

    • Determine the critical concentration of RND1 required to induce cytoskeletal phenotypes

    • Construct dose-response curves relating RND1 levels to stress fiber disassembly rates

    • Use biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies with quantitative imaging to establish precise expression level measurements

    • Correlate expression thresholds with functional outcomes in different cell types

  • Spatial Distribution Analysis:

    • Implement distance mapping between RND1 localization and focal adhesions

    • Quantify RND1 enrichment at adherens junctions relative to cytoplasmic levels

    • Analyze colocalization coefficients between RND1 and actin regulatory proteins

    • Spatial statistics provide insights into localized versus global regulatory mechanisms

  • Temporal Dynamics Quantification:

    • Measure RND1 expression changes during cell cycle progression

    • Track RND1 levels during cellular responses to mechanical stimuli

    • Quantify the kinetics of cytoskeletal reorganization following RND1 induction

    • Time-series analysis reveals sequence of regulatory events and feedback mechanisms

  • Multivariate Pattern Analysis:

    • Correlate RND1 expression with multiple cytoskeletal parameters simultaneously

    • Implement machine learning approaches to identify pattern relationships

    • Create predictive models of cytoskeletal states based on RND1 expression profiles

    • Integration with other Rho family GTPase measurements provides systems-level insights

  • Quantitative Data Integration Framework:

MeasurementTechniqueAnalysis ApproachInsight Provided
Expression LevelWestern blot with biotin-conjugated antibodiesDensitometry with standard curvesAbsolute protein quantity
Subcellular DistributionImmunofluorescence with intensity profilingSpatial correlation analysisCompartment-specific functions
Binding Partner RatiosCo-immunoprecipitation with quantitative MSStoichiometric calculationsRegulatory complex composition
Activity-State RelationsCombined IF with FRET sensorsCorrelation analysisRelationship to classical Rho activities
Temporal PatternsTime-lapse imagingFourier analysis, wavelet transformsOscillatory or pulsatile behaviors

These quantitative approaches transform descriptive observations into mechanistic insights regarding RND1's role in cytoskeletal regulation.

How might biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies contribute to understanding disease mechanisms?

Biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies offer significant potential for investigating RND1's role in various pathological processes:

  • Cancer Progression Studies:

    • Quantify RND1 expression across tumor stages and grades using tissue microarrays

    • Correlate expression patterns with invasion capacity and metastatic potential

    • Investigate RND1's contribution to cancer cell migration through cytoskeletal regulation

    • The biotin-conjugated format enables multiplexed analysis with cancer biomarkers

  • Neurodegenerative Disease Research:

    • Examine RND1 expression in relation to neuronal cytoskeletal abnormalities

    • Investigate potential roles in axonal transport and synaptic maintenance

    • Study RND1 contributions to neuroinflammatory processes

    • High-sensitivity detection is crucial given the complex cellular composition of neural tissues

  • Cardiovascular Pathology:

    • Analyze RND1's function in vascular smooth muscle cell contractility

    • Investigate roles in endothelial barrier function and angiogenesis

    • Study contributions to cardiac remodeling following injury

    • Multiplexed imaging with biotin-conjugated antibodies can map RND1 in complex vascular structures

  • Fibrotic Disorders:

    • Examine RND1's potential protective role against excessive ECM deposition

    • Investigate expression changes during fibrotic progression

    • Study interactions with TGF-β signaling pathways

    • Quantitative analysis may reveal therapeutic potential for fibrosis management

  • Developmental Disorders:

    • Map RND1 expression during critical developmental windows

    • Investigate potential roles in neuronal migration and tissue morphogenesis

    • Study contributions to congenital abnormalities involving cytoskeletal defects

    • The biotin-streptavidin system provides necessary sensitivity for developmental tissue analysis

These disease-focused applications may reveal novel therapeutic targets and diagnostic biomarkers related to RND1 dysfunction.

What methodological innovations might enhance future research applications of RND1 antibodies?

Several emerging methodological approaches promise to expand RND1 research capabilities:

  • Single-Cell Analysis Technologies:

    • Implement mass cytometry (CyTOF) with biotin-conjugated RND1 antibodies

    • Develop single-cell Western blot protocols for heterogeneous populations

    • Apply spatial transcriptomics alongside RND1 protein detection

    • These approaches will reveal cell-specific expression patterns masked in bulk analysis

  • Organoid and 3D Culture Systems:

    • Optimize penetration of biotin-conjugated antibodies in complex 3D structures

    • Develop clearing techniques compatible with streptavidin-based detection

    • Implement light-sheet microscopy for whole-organoid RND1 mapping

    • These applications will better recapitulate physiological RND1 functions

  • CRISPR-Based Functional Genomics:

    • Combine genome editing of RND1 with antibody-based detection

    • Develop knock-in tags for endogenous protein tracking

    • Create conditional expression systems for temporal control

    • Integration with antibody detection provides validation of genetic manipulations

  • Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Analysis:

    • Implement machine learning for automated RND1 localization patterns

    • Develop computer vision algorithms for cytoskeletal phenotype classification

    • Create predictive models connecting RND1 expression to functional outcomes

    • These computational approaches will extract deeper insights from imaging data

  • Protein Engineering Applications:

    • Develop split-biotin systems for detecting RND1 protein interactions

    • Create conformation-specific RND1 antibodies to distinguish binding states

    • Engineer antibodies with improved penetration for in vivo applications

    • These molecular tools will provide more nuanced understanding of RND1 biology

These methodological innovations will expand both the scope and depth of RND1 research using biotin-conjugated antibodies.

What key principles should guide researcher selection and use of RND1 antibodies?

Researchers should adhere to these fundamental principles when working with RND1 antibodies:

  • Validation-First Approach: Always begin with comprehensive validation of antibody specificity using genetic controls, peptide competition, and cross-reactivity testing before proceeding to experimental applications.

  • Application-Specific Optimization: Recognize that optimal conditions vary significantly between applications (Western blot, immunofluorescence, ELISA). Systematic optimization should precede experimental use.

  • Conjugation Considerations: Select between biotin-conjugated and unconjugated antibodies based on experimental requirements. Biotin conjugation offers signal amplification advantages but introduces potential complications in biotin-rich samples.

  • Biological Context Awareness: Interpret RND1 expression patterns with awareness of its unique properties as a constitutively active Rho family member with negative regulatory functions on the cytoskeleton .

  • Quantitative Mindset: Move beyond qualitative assessments to implement rigorous quantification of RND1 expression, localization, and associated phenotypes for mechanistic insights.

  • Technical Documentation: Maintain detailed records of antibody sources, lot numbers, validation results, and optimized protocols to ensure reproducibility and facilitate troubleshooting.

  • Control Implementation: Incorporate appropriate positive and negative controls in every experiment, including isotype controls, competing peptides, and genetic manipulation controls.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.