RNF26 Antibody is critical for studying protein interactions and post-translational modifications:
Antiviral Response: RNF26 regulates type I interferon (IFN) signaling by ubiquitinating MITA (STING) and IRF3. Antibodies enable tracking of RNF26’s dual role in promoting early IFN induction and limiting late-phase responses .
Cancer Research:
RNF26 modulates innate immunity by:
Protecting MITA from Degradation: RNF26-mediated K11-linked polyubiquitination of MITA at lysine 150 prevents RNF5-induced K48-linked degradation, ensuring rapid IFN-β induction during viral infection .
Autophagy-Dependent IRF3 Degradation: RNF26 limits excessive IFN signaling by promoting IRF3 degradation via autophagy, independent of proteasomal pathways .
RNF26 binds perinuclear vimentin filaments, stabilizing ER-endolysosomal membrane contact sites (MCS). Loss of RNF26 disrupts perinuclear ER integrity, exacerbating ER stress and impairing recovery from proteotoxicity .
RNF26 is an ER-embedded RING finger protein that functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase. It plays a critical role in spatiotemporal compartmentalization of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by binding to perinuclear vimentin intermediate filaments. This interaction helps integrate ER function with cytoskeletal organization . RNF26 has been demonstrated to regulate membrane dynamics, with its depletion resulting in enhanced motility of the perinuclear ER segment . Beyond structural roles, RNF26 has been implicated in cancer progression through cell cycle regulation, particularly in bladder cancer via the FOXM1/RNF26/p57 axis .
RNF26 contains a C-terminal RING domain (amino acids 304-433) that is crucial for its E3 ligase activity and protein interactions. This domain can directly bind to vimentin intermediate filaments . The protein also contains transmembrane segments that anchor it to the ER membrane, with its RING domain extending into the cytoplasm where it can interact with cytoskeletal elements and ubiquitylation substrates . Commercial antibodies are available against various regions, including the central region (amino acids 247-273) and other epitopes recognized by monoclonal antibodies .
RNF26 directly binds to vimentin intermediate filaments through its C-terminal RING domain. This interaction is enhanced when RNF26 is catalytically inactive, such as with the I382R mutation . In cells, RNF26 shows partial colocalization with vimentin structures, and this colocalization increases significantly with catalytically inactive RNF26-I382R mutants . This direct binding was confirmed through experiments showing that purified fluorescently-labeled RING domain (Rhodamine-RING-I382R) can be precipitated by recombinant His-tagged vimentin .
Multiple types of RNF26 antibodies are commercially available, including:
| Antibody Type | Host Species | Target Region | Applications | Storage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyclonal | Rabbit | Central (247-273 aa) | Western Blotting | -20°C |
| Monoclonal | Mouse | Human RNF26 | Western Blot (1-5 μg/mL), indirect ELISA | -20°C |
Researchers should select antibodies based on their specific experimental requirements, considering factors such as clonality, target epitope, and validated applications .
To ensure specificity of RNF26 antibodies, researchers should:
Compare staining patterns in wild-type cells versus RNF26 knockout or knockdown cells
Perform peptide competition assays using the immunizing peptide
Verify molecular weight specificity through Western blot analysis (expected RNF26 band should be detected)
For immunofluorescence applications, compare staining patterns with published localization data showing characteristic perinuclear ER distribution
Use positive control samples with known RNF26 expression, such as Y79 cell line lysates which have been validated for some commercial antibodies
For optimal Western blot detection of RNF26:
Use 35-50 μg of total protein lysate per lane to ensure sufficient detection of endogenous RNF26
For commercial monoclonal antibodies, a concentration of 1-5 μg/mL is typically recommended
Include appropriate positive control lysates, such as Y79 cell line lysates, which have been validated with commercial antibodies
Consider membrane transfer conditions carefully, as RNF26 contains transmembrane domains that may affect transfer efficiency
When studying RNF26 mutants or fragments, ensure your antibody's epitope is preserved in the construct of interest
To investigate RNF26-vimentin interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation using RNF26 antibodies can help identify interaction partners, though direct protein-protein interaction studies require careful buffer optimization due to RNF26's membrane localization
Proximity ligation assays can detect in situ interactions between RNF26 and vimentin
Immunofluorescence co-localization analysis can reveal spatial relationships between RNF26 and vimentin filaments, particularly when examining catalytically inactive RNF26-I382R which shows enhanced filamentous distribution aligned with vimentin fibers
In vitro binding assays using purified components can establish direct binding, as demonstrated with Rhodamine-labeled RING domain fragments and His-tagged vimentin
Biotinylation proximity assays using RNF26 fused to TurboID can identify in vivo proximity partners
To study RNF26's function in ER organization:
Immunofluorescence microscopy comparing wild-type, RNF26-depleted, and vimentin knockout cells can reveal alterations in ER morphology and distribution
Live-cell imaging using ER markers in RNF26-depleted cells can demonstrate enhanced motility of perinuclear ER segments
ER stress experiments using Tunicamycin treatment can reveal RNF26's role in ERQC (ER quality control) compartment formation, which depends on both RNF26 and vimentin
Co-staining for RNF26 and ER markers like VAP-A can quantify the degree of perinuclear ER retention mediated by RNF26
Rescue experiments reintroducing wild-type or mutant RNF26 into knockout cells can establish structure-function relationships
RNF26's catalytic activity significantly influences its localization and interaction partners:
Catalytically inactive RNF26 (I382R mutant) shows enhanced binding to vimentin compared to wild-type RNF26
While RNF26 interactions with endosomal adaptors (TOLLIP, EPS15, TAX1BP1) depend on its E3 ligase activity, vimentin binding is enhanced by catalytic inactivation
Wild-type RNF26 shows partial colocalization with vimentin, while the I382R mutant displays pronounced filamentous distribution aligned with vimentin fibers
In vimentin knockout cells, catalytically inactive RNF26 loses its perinuclear filamentous distribution and forms aggregate-like clusters, suggesting vimentin dependency for proper localization
The presence of specific E2 enzymes (UBE2J1 vs. UBE2J2) influences RNF26 activity states and may dictate preferential binding to cytoskeleton versus endolysosomal components
RNF26 has been implicated in cancer progression, particularly in bladder cancer:
Bioinformatics analyses have identified RNF26 as a risk factor for bladder cancer
RNF26 is abnormally upregulated in bladder cancer cells and tissues, with higher expression correlating with unfavorable prognosis
Mechanistically, RNF26 expression is promoted by FOXM1 at the transcriptional level through the MuvB complex
Upregulated RNF26 degrades p57 (CDKN1C), a cell cycle regulator, thereby promoting cell cycle progression and cancer development
The FOXM1/RNF26/p57 signaling axis represents a potential therapeutic target for bladder cancer treatment
RNF26 plays important roles in ER stress responses and can be studied using antibodies:
Western blot analysis can detect RNF26 upregulation in parallel with HERP1 following Tunicamycin-induced ER stress
Immunofluorescence microscopy can visualize the formation of ERQC (ER Quality Control) compartments during stress, which depends on both RNF26 and vimentin
Co-staining for RNF26 and endolysosomal markers (CD63) can reveal perinuclear clustering of endolysosomes during ER stress, which requires RNF26
Antibodies against RNF26 and its binding partners (UBE2J1, HERP1/2) can help identify how these protein complexes assemble during stress responses
Time-course experiments with synchronized stress induction can reveal the temporal dynamics of RNF26 involvement in stress pathway activation
Researchers may encounter several challenges when working with RNF26 antibodies:
As a membrane protein, RNF26 may require specialized extraction buffers containing appropriate detergents for efficient solubilization
Cross-reactivity with other RING domain-containing proteins may occur, necessitating careful validation
When studying overexpressed RNF26, high expression levels may alter normal localization patterns or induce aggregation, particularly with catalytically inactive mutants
For immunofluorescence, maintaining intact ER and cytoskeletal structures during fixation is crucial for accurate localization studies
When detecting RNF26-mediated ubiquitylation events, deubiquitinase inhibitors may be necessary to preserve modification status
Critical controls for RNF26 antibody experiments include:
RNF26 knockout or knockdown cells as negative controls
Rescue experiments with wild-type RNF26 to confirm specificity of observed phenotypes
Catalytically inactive RNF26 (I382R) as a control for ubiquitin ligase activity-dependent functions
Secondary antibody-only controls to assess background staining
For co-localization studies, appropriate markers for ER (VAP-A), vimentin, and endolysosomal compartments (CD63)
When studying protein interactions, catalytically inactive RNF26 may yield stronger signals due to enhanced binding to partners like vimentin