NRPB9A Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
NRPB9A antibody; NRPE9A antibody; At3g16980 antibody; K14A17 antibody; DNA-directed RNA polymerases II antibody; IV and V subunit 9A antibody
Target Names
NRPB9A
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
DNA-dependent RNA polymerase catalyzes the transcription of DNA into RNA using the four ribonucleoside triphosphates as substrates. It is a component of RNA polymerase II, which synthesizes mRNA precursors and many functional non-coding RNAs. Pol II serves as the central component of the basal RNA polymerase II transcription machinery, composed of mobile elements that move relative to each other. It is also a component of RNA polymerases IV and V, which mediate short-interfering RNAs (siRNA) accumulation and subsequent RNA-directed DNA methylation-dependent (RdDM) transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) of endogenous repeated sequences, including transposable elements. RNA polymerase II is essential for RNA silencing.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Research indicates that the ninth subunit, NRP(B/D/E) 9a and NRP(B/D/E) 9b, plays a role in RNA silencing and demonstrates that subunit diversity generates functionally distinct subtypes of RNA polymerases II and V. [NRPE9A] PMID: 22550619
  2. These findings highlight the role of the ninth subunit in RNA silencing and demonstrate that subunit diversity generates functionally distinct subtypes of RNA polymerases II and V. PMID: 22550619
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G16980

STRING: 3702.AT3G16980.1

UniGene: At.73939

Protein Families
Archaeal rpoM/eukaryotic RPA12/RPB9/RPC11 RNA polymerase family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus, nucleolus.

Q&A

What is NRPB9A and what is its role in transcriptional machinery?

NRPB9A is a subunit of RNA polymerase II (Pol II), which is essential for transcription in eukaryotes. In plants like Arabidopsis, the RPB9 family includes paralogs that function in plant-specific RNA polymerases IV and V (Pol IV and Pol V), which play specialized roles in siRNA-directed DNA methylation and gene silencing. These plant-specific polymerases evolved from Pol II and contain subunits that are either identical to or paralogs of the 12 subunits found in Pol II .

The RPB9 subunit is positioned strategically near the RNA exit path of the polymerase complex, suggesting its involvement in transcription fidelity and potentially in RNA processing. While NRPB9A functions in Pol II, its paralogs NRPE9a and NRPE9b (which are 92% identical to each other) function in Pol V . These slight structural variations between paralogs likely contribute to the specialized functions of these different polymerase complexes.

How do NRPB9A and its paralogs differ in structure and function?

NRPB9A operates within Pol II, while its close paralogs NRPE9a and NRPE9b function within Pol V. According to research on Arabidopsis, these paralogs share approximately 92% sequence identity, making them challenging to distinguish experimentally . The key functional differences appear to relate to their positions within different polymerase complexes:

Table 1: Comparison of RPB9 Family Proteins in Arabidopsis

ProteinPolymerase ComplexFunctionKey Distinguishing Features
NRPB9APol IIEssential transcriptionFunctions in protein-coding gene expression
NRPE9aPol VNon-coding RNA productionInvolved in siRNA-directed DNA methylation
NRPE9bPol VNon-coding RNA productionHighly similar to NRPE9a (92% identity)

These subtle structural differences between family members highlight the importance of antibody specificity when targeting NRPB9A for research purposes .

What evolutionary insights can be gained from studying NRPB9A across species?

Studying NRPB9A and its orthologs across species provides valuable insights into the evolution of transcriptional machinery. In plants, the duplication and specialization of polymerase subunits led to the development of Pol IV and Pol V, which have unique roles in RNA-directed DNA methylation and gene silencing not found in animals or fungi .

The conservation of RPB9-like proteins across eukaryotes suggests their fundamental importance in transcription, while the diversification seen in plants indicates evolutionary adaptation for specialized regulatory mechanisms. Research suggests that the subunit differences between these polymerases "occur in key positions relative to the template entry and RNA exit paths," supporting the hypothesis that "Pol IV and Pol V are Pol II-like enzymes that evolved specialized roles in the production of noncoding transcripts for RNA silencing and genome defense" .

What is the recommended procedure for validating NRPB9A antibodies?

A robust antibody validation procedure for NRPB9A should follow these steps:

  • Cell line selection: Use proteomics databases like PaxDB to identify cell lines with high NRPB9A expression that are amenable to genetic modification .

  • Knockout generation: Generate NRPB9A knockout (KO) cell lines using CRISPR/Cas9 technology to serve as negative controls .

  • Initial screening: Test commercial antibodies by immunoblot analysis comparing parental and KO cell lines .

  • Secondary validation: Use validated antibodies for quantitative immunoblots on multiple cell lines to identify those with highest expression for further testing .

  • Advanced validation: Subject promising antibodies to immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence tests using the validated cell models .

This systematic approach, as demonstrated for C9ORF72 antibody validation, provides a reliable framework applicable to NRPB9A antibody validation .

How can I ensure my NRPB9A antibody distinguishes between close paralogs?

Due to the high sequence similarity between NRPB9A and its paralogs (NRPE9a and NRPE9b, which share 92% identity), specificity testing is crucial:

  • Epitope mapping: Determine the exact epitope recognized by your antibody and compare it with sequence alignments of the paralogs.

  • Recombinant protein testing: Test antibody reactivity against purified recombinant proteins of all three paralogs.

  • Competitive binding assays: Perform peptide competition assays using synthetic peptides corresponding to the equivalent regions of each paralog.

  • Genetic models: Test antibodies in genetic models where individual paralogs have been knocked out or knocked down.

  • Mass spectrometry validation: Confirm the identity of immunoprecipitated proteins using mass spectrometry to verify antibody specificity .

What are the optimal conditions for using NRPB9A antibodies in ChIP experiments?

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments with NRPB9A antibodies require optimization for studying polymerase occupancy on chromatin:

  • Crosslinking optimization: Since NRPB9A is part of a large polymerase complex, dual crosslinking with DSG (disuccinimidyl glutarate) followed by formaldehyde can better preserve protein-protein interactions.

  • Sonication parameters: Aim for chromatin fragments of 200-500bp through careful optimization of sonication conditions.

  • Antibody concentration: Typically, 2-5μg of validated antibody per ChIP reaction is recommended, but titration may be necessary.

  • Controls: Include:

    • Input chromatin (pre-immunoprecipitation)

    • IgG control (same species as NRPB9A antibody)

    • Positive control (antibody against another Pol II subunit)

    • Negative control (non-transcribed region)

  • Washing stringency: Optimize washing conditions to balance between signal retention and background reduction.

For plant systems, where NRPB9A has paralogs in Pol IV and Pol V, additional controls may be necessary to ensure specificity when studying transcriptional complexes involved in gene silencing pathways .

How can I effectively use NRPB9A antibodies to study polymerase complex assembly?

To investigate polymerase complex assembly using NRPB9A antibodies:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Use validated NRPB9A antibodies to precipitate intact polymerase complexes. Based on successful approaches with other polymerase subunits, gentle lysis conditions using buffers containing 150-300mM salt and 0.1-0.5% NP-40 or Triton X-100 are recommended .

  • Sequential IP (Re-IP): Perform sequential immunoprecipitation with antibodies against different polymerase subunits to identify subcomplexes.

  • Size exclusion chromatography: Combine with immunoblotting to identify different NRPB9A-containing complexes based on size.

  • Mass spectrometry analysis: Identify co-precipitating proteins to map the interaction network of NRPB9A within the polymerase complex .

The approach used in studying RNA polymerase composition in Arabidopsis, where "NRPD1-FLAG and NRPE1-FLAG, and their respective associated subunits, were affinity purified on anti-FLAG resin, and tryptic peptides were identified by using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)" provides a good methodological model .

What are common issues with NRPB9A antibodies and how can they be resolved?

Researchers working with NRPB9A antibodies frequently encounter these challenges:

Table 2: Common Issues and Resolutions

IssuePossible CausesRecommended Solutions
Cross-reactivity with paralogsHigh sequence homology between NRPB9A and NRPE9a/b (92% identity)Use knockout controls, competitive binding assays with specific peptides, or antibodies raised against unique epitopes
Weak or no signalLow abundance in some cell types, epitope maskingIncrease sample concentration, try different lysis methods, test alternative epitope antibodies
High backgroundNon-specific bindingIncrease blocking agent concentration, optimize washing steps, pre-clear lysates
Inconsistent resultsAntibody batch variationValidate each new lot, use monoclonal antibodies if possible, maintain consistent protocols
Poor immunoprecipitationEpitope inaccessibility in complexesTry different antibodies recognizing different epitopes, gentler lysis conditions

These troubleshooting approaches are consistent with general antibody validation principles and specifically address the challenges of distinguishing between close paralogs like those in the RPB9 family .

How should antibody dilutions be optimized for different applications?

Proper antibody dilution optimization is critical for each application:

  • Western blotting: Begin with 1:1000 dilution and perform a dilution series (1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:5000) to identify optimal signal-to-noise ratio.

  • Immunofluorescence: Start with manufacturer recommendations, typically 1:50 to 1:500, and optimize based on signal intensity and background.

  • Immunoprecipitation: Usually 2-5μg of antibody per 500μg of protein lysate, with optimization based on capture efficiency.

  • ChIP: Typically 2-5μg per reaction, with titration recommended for optimal chromatin recovery.

  • Flow cytometry: Start at 1:100 and perform titration to determine optimal concentration.

For each application, include appropriate controls and document the optimization process for reproducibility. When comparing different antibodies, normalize results based on their optimal working concentrations rather than using identical dilutions.

How can NRPB9A antibodies be used to study RNA-directed DNA methylation pathways?

NRPB9A antibodies can provide valuable insights into RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathways, particularly in plants where Pol IV and Pol V play specialized roles:

  • Comparative ChIP analysis: Use antibodies against NRPB9A (Pol II) alongside antibodies against its paralogs NRPE9a/b (Pol V) to map the differential occupancy of these polymerases on chromatin, revealing distinct roles in transcription versus silencing .

  • Co-localization studies: Combine NRPB9A antibodies with antibodies against siRNA processing factors to investigate the spatial organization of transcription and silencing machinery.

  • Genetic background analysis: Compare NRPB9A antibody staining patterns in wild-type versus mutants defective in siRNA biogenesis or DNA methylation to understand functional relationships.

  • Temporal dynamics: Use NRPB9A antibodies in time-course experiments to track changes in polymerase recruitment during establishment of silencing.

Research has shown that "Pol IV and Pol V are composed of subunits that are paralogous or identical to the 12 subunits of Pol II" and "play nonredundant roles in siRNA-directed DNA methylation and gene silencing" . By specifically targeting NRPB9A and its paralogs, researchers can dissect the distinct contributions of each polymerase complex to these pathways.

What bioinformatic resources are available to support NRPB9A antibody research?

Several bioinformatic resources can enhance NRPB9A antibody research:

  • Antibody databases: The Patent and Literature Antibody Database (PLAbDab) contains over 150,000 paired antibody sequences from more than 10,000 small-scale studies, providing a valuable resource for antibody sequence information .

  • Search tools: PLAbDab offers methods to search by sequence identity using KA-search, structural similarity, or keywords, facilitating identification of related antibodies .

  • Protein expression databases: PaxDB can help identify cell lines with high expression of target proteins for antibody validation experiments .

  • Epitope prediction tools: Online tools can predict potential antigenic regions of NRPB9A that might be distinguishable from its paralogs.

  • Structural modeling: Protein structure prediction tools can help visualize NRPB9A within the polymerase complex, aiding in understanding epitope accessibility.

These resources support both antibody selection and experimental design, improving research outcomes when working with complex targets like NRPB9A.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.