RPL9 antibodies are immunological reagents designed to detect and quantify the ribosomal protein L9, which has a calculated molecular weight of 22 kDa . These antibodies are critical for studying RPL9’s dual roles:
Ribosomal function: Stabilizing rRNA and aiding protein biosynthesis .
Extra-ribosomal roles: Including cancer progression via miRNA transport in exosomes (e.g., hepatocellular carcinoma) and maintaining stemness in colorectal cancer .
Stemness regulation:
Diagnostic potential: Elevated RPL9 in serum exosomes serves as a biomarker for HCC progression .
Therapeutic targeting: Silencing RPL9 suppressed HCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion , and impaired CRC stemness .
Based on validation data across multiple sources, RPL9 antibodies demonstrate high specificity in Western blot (1:500-1:50000 dilution), immunohistochemistry (1:50-1:500), and immunofluorescence (1:200-1:800) . For optimal results in Western blot applications, using 20-30 μg of total protein from whole cell lysates is recommended, with HeLa, HepG2, and HCT116 cells showing consistent detection at the predicted molecular weight of 22 kDa . For immunofluorescence, methanol fixation at 1/200 dilution has been successfully employed with HeLa cells . When conducting flow cytometry analysis of RPL9, proper permeabilization is critical since RPL9 is primarily an intracellular protein .
Verification of RPL9 antibody specificity should include:
siRNA knockdown validation: Transfect cells with RPL9-specific siRNA (e.g., sequence 5'-GCAATCAGACTGTCGACATTC-3') and perform Western blot to confirm reduction in RPL9 protein levels .
Multiple cell line testing: Compare detection across diverse cell types that express RPL9 at different levels (e.g., HeLa, HepG2, HCT116, NALM-6) .
Proper molecular weight confirmation: Verify detection at the expected 22 kDa band .
Tissue specificity: Test in tissues known to express RPL9, such as brain and cerebellum .
Recombinant protein control: Use RPL9 fusion protein as a positive control .
To investigate RPL9's role in cancer stemness:
Sphere formation assays: Perform RPL9 knockdown in cancer cell lines like HT29, then evaluate both size and number of spheres formed over 9 days using phase-contrast microscopy .
CD133+ cell isolation: Isolate CD133+ cancer stem cells using magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) or fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) .
Co-staining analysis: Perform dual immunofluorescence for RPL9 and stem cell markers (CD133) to assess correlation in expression patterns .
Migration and invasion assays: Conduct transwell migration and Matrigel invasion assays after RPL9 knockdown to assess stemness-associated phenotypes .
RT-qPCR analysis: Measure expression of stemness-related genes (CD133, ID-1) after RPL9 modulation using appropriate primers (CD133 forward: 5'-AGTCGGAAACTGGCAGATAGC-3', CD133 reverse: 5'-GGTAGTGTTGTACTGGGCCAAT-3') .
To study RPL9's role in p53 pathway activation:
For comprehensive analysis, perform RPL9 knockdown using validated siRNA sequences and compare effects on p53 pathway components across multiple cell lines. Include appropriate controls such as p53-null cells to confirm pathway specificity .
To investigate RPL9's function in ribosome biogenesis:
Polysome profiling: After RPL9 knockdown, analyze polysome profiles by sucrose gradient centrifugation to assess 80S monosome formation and polysome assembly .
Pre-rRNA processing analysis: Use Northern blotting with probes specific for different pre-rRNA intermediates to detect processing defects induced by RPL9 depletion .
Nucleolar stress assessment: Examine nucleolar morphology using immunofluorescence with nucleolar markers (fibrillarin, nucleolin) following RPL9 knockdown .
Metabolic labeling: Perform pulse-chase experiments with 32P-orthophosphate to track ribosomal RNA synthesis and processing kinetics .
Mass spectrometry: Analyze changes in ribosome composition following RPL9 depletion to identify alterations in associated proteins .
The search results indicate that RPL9 variants can differentially impact pre-rRNA processing during ribosome biogenesis, affecting downstream cellular processes including TP53 pathway activation and erythrocyte development .
For robust RPL9 knockdown experimental design:
Target sequence selection: Use validated siRNA sequences like "GCAATCAGACTGTCGACATTC" that have demonstrated efficient knockdown (70-80% reduction) .
Multiple time points: Assess effects at various time points (24h, 48h, 72h, 96h) to capture both immediate and delayed responses .
Proper controls: Include non-targeting shRNA/siRNA controls (shCtrl) and untreated cells .
Knockdown validation: Confirm RPL9 reduction at both mRNA level (RT-qPCR) and protein level (Western blot, flow cytometry) .
Cell viability monitoring: Track cell viability during knockdown using MTT assays to distinguish specific effects from general cytotoxicity .
Multiple cell lines: Test effects across different cell types (e.g., HT29, HCT116, NALM-6) to identify cell-type specific responses .
Rescue experiments: Perform rescue experiments with RPL9 overexpression to confirm specificity of observed phenotypes .
For optimal immunohistochemistry (IHC) with RPL9 antibodies:
Tissue fixation: Use 4% paraformaldehyde fixation for optimal epitope preservation .
Antigen retrieval methods: For optimal results, use TE buffer at pH 9.0, though citrate buffer at pH 6.0 can serve as an alternative .
Antibody dilution range: Use dilutions between 1:50-1:500, with optimization recommended for each tissue type .
Positive control tissues: Include mouse cerebellum tissue as a reliable positive control .
Counterstaining: Standard Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining works well for morphological assessment .
Specificity controls: Include isotype controls and RPL9-depleted samples to confirm staining specificity .
Detection systems: Both chromogenic and fluorescent secondary detection systems are compatible with RPL9 antibodies .
When analyzing differential RPL9 expression across cancer types:
Baseline comparison: Compare tumor samples with matched normal tissues rather than cell lines alone. Research shows RPL9 is significantly upregulated in B-ALL cells and colorectal cancer compared to normal counterparts .
Expression correlation analysis: Examine correlations between RPL9 and other markers:
Function interpretation: Different roles may exist depending on cancer type:
Expression heterogeneity assessment: Use imaging flow cytometry for single-cell resolution of RPL9 expression to detect population heterogeneity .
Troubleshooting inconsistent RPL9 antibody results:
RPL9 shows significant potential as a therapeutic target in cancer:
B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL): RPL9 knockdown significantly suppresses B-ALL cell proliferation both in vitro and in vivo, while enhancing apoptosis. Additionally, RPL9 knockdown extends survival time in mouse xenograft models and increases MICA/B expression, potentially enhancing NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity .
Colorectal cancer (CRC): RPL9 maintains CRC stemness properties through the ID-1 signaling axis. Targeting RPL9 reduces invasion, migration, and sphere-forming capacity of CD133+ colorectal cancer stem cells, suggesting its role in preventing metastasis and recurrence .
Therapeutic strategies:
Potential advantages: RPL9 knockdown activates the p53 signaling pathway specifically in cancer cells and upregulates MICA/B expression, potentially making tumors more susceptible to immune surveillance .
RPL9 variants have important implications in both hematological disorders and cancer:
RPL9's role in inflammation presents novel research directions:
Novel DAMP function: RPL9 has been identified as a damage-associated molecular pattern molecule (DAMP) that can be found in the centrifugal supernatant of ruptured cells and in the serum of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated sepsis model mice .
Regulatory role: Unlike typical pro-inflammatory DAMPs like HMGB1, RPL9 exhibits a regulatory function by suppressing the potentiated mRNA expression and protein production of TNF-α in macrophages stimulated with HMGB1 plus LPS .
Interaction mechanism: Differential scanning fluorimetric analysis suggests direct interaction between RPL9 and HMGB1 may contribute to RPL9's suppressive effects on inflammatory responses .
Research implications:
Therapeutic potential in inflammatory diseases by leveraging RPL9's regulatory properties
New insights into the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory signals in sepsis
Understanding how ribosomal proteins may have extra-ribosomal functions in immunity
Experimental approaches: Researchers should consider both intracellular and extracellular RPL9 functions when studying inflammatory conditions and include analysis of RPL9 levels in plasma/serum samples from patients with sepsis or inflammatory disorders .