RPS16 is a 16 kDa protein essential for ribosome assembly and translation regulation. Antibody pairs consist of:
Capture antibody: A primary antibody that binds to RPS16 and immobilizes it on a solid phase (e.g., ELISA plate).
Detection antibody: A secondary antibody conjugated to a reporter (e.g., HRP, fluorescent dye) that targets the primary antibody-RPS16 complex.
This dual recognition system minimizes cross-reactivity and improves assay accuracy .
Western Blot (WB): Detects RPS16 in cell lysates (e.g., HeLa, MCF-7) at dilutions of 1:500–1:1000 .
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Visualizes RPS16 in tissues (e.g., breast cancer) with antigen retrieval using TE buffer (pH 9.0) .
Immunofluorescence (IF): Localizes RPS16 in cytoplasmic regions of cells like Jurkat and MCF-7 .
ELISA: Measures RPS16 levels in serum or lysates using paired antibodies .
Cancer Research: RPS16 overexpression correlates with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is regulated by the USP1 deubiquitinase .
Pathogen Studies: Paralogous RPS16 genes in Leishmania exhibit compensatory expression, suggesting functional redundancy .
USP1 deubiquitinates RPS16 at the C90 site, stabilizing it and promoting hepatocellular carcinoma growth .
RPS16 depletion mimics USP1 knockout effects, including reduced tumor metastasis .
RPS16 interacts with proteins like RPS18 and RPL5 during ribosome assembly .
Its acetylation status influences ribosomal subunit maturation .
Leishmania RPS16 paralogs exhibit isoform-specific expression during lifecycle stages, ensuring ribosome functionality under stress .
WB: Use 1:500–1:1000 dilutions with PVDF membranes and ECL detection .
ELISA: Pair rabbit anti-RPS16 (capture) with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (detection) .
Proteintech (2025). RPS16 Antibody (15603-1-AP).
Biorxiv (2023). Leishmania Ribosomal Protein Paralogs.
PMC (2021). USP1-RPS16 Axis in HCC.
Thermo Fisher (2025). RPS16 Polyclonal Antibody (PA5-64162).
Abcam (2023). Anti-RPS16 antibody [EPR11755] (ab177951).
MyBioSource (2025). RPS16 Recombinant Protein.
Antibodypedia (2025). RPS16 Antibodies.
Boster Bio (2017). Anti-40S RPS16 Antibody (A05230).
RPS16 is a ribosomal protein that functions as a basic component of the 40S ribosome. It has been identified as an important factor in several disease processes, particularly in cancer research. RPS16 has been recognized as an oncoprotein in breast cancer and gliomas, mediating resistance to doxorubicin and activating signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT/Snail . More recently, research has revealed its critical role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) proliferation and metastasis through its interaction with ubiquitin-specific peptidase 1 (USP1), making it a potentially valuable target for cancer research and therapy development .
RPS16 antibodies can be used in multiple experimental applications including:
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
Western Blotting (WB) with recommended dilutions ranging from 1:500 to 1:5000
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with recommended dilutions of 1:20 to 1:200
Immunofluorescence/Immunocytochemistry (IF/ICC) with recommended dilutions of 1:20 to 1:200
The optimal dilutions should be determined by individual researchers based on their specific experimental conditions and sample types.
Commercial RPS16 antibodies typically show reactivity with human, mouse, and rat samples . This cross-reactivity makes these antibodies valuable for comparative studies across different model organisms. Researchers should verify the specific reactivity of their chosen antibody by consulting the manufacturer's documentation or conducting preliminary validation experiments, especially when working with less common species or specialized cell lines.
For optimal longevity and performance, RPS16 antibodies should be aliquoted and stored at -20°C. It is critical to avoid repeated freeze/thaw cycles as these can degrade antibody quality and reduce binding efficacy . Most commercial RPS16 antibodies are typically supplied in a buffer of PBS (pH 7.3) containing 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol to maintain stability, with a standard concentration of 2 mg/ml .
Recent research has identified a critical molecular mechanism where USP1 (ubiquitin-specific peptidase 1) directly interacts with RPS16, specifically through USP1's C-terminal domain (401-785 amino acids) . This interaction allows USP1 to deubiquitinate and stabilize RPS16 via its deubiquitinating (DUB) activity at the C90 site. When USP1 is depleted, either pharmacologically using ML323 or genetically through RNA interference, this leads to increased K48-linked ubiquitination of RPS16 and subsequent proteasome-dependent degradation .
The USP1-RPS16 axis has been demonstrated to promote growth and metastasis of HCC cells by elevating RPS16-dependent expression of Twist1 and Snail transcription factors. Importantly, clinical observations have shown that high expression of both USP1 and RPS16 in liver tissue correlates with poor survival outcomes in HCC patients, suggesting this pathway as a potential therapeutic target .
Several sophisticated methodological approaches have been employed to elucidate RPS16 protein interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Using antibody coupling kits, researchers have successfully identified protein interactions by incubating dynabeads with specified antibodies for 16-24 hours, followed by incubation with cell lysates for 1-2 hours . The protein-dynabeads-antibody complexes are then processed for analysis.
Cellular Immunofluorescence: This technique provides morphological evidence of protein interactions, as demonstrated in studies of USP1-RPS16 interaction where co-localization appears as yellow/orange areas in merged images .
Molecular Dynamics Simulation: This computational approach has been used to model the USP1-RPS16 complex, providing three-dimensional binding conformations that strengthen hypotheses about protein-protein interactions .
Mass Spectrometry: Unbiased screening via biological mass spectrometry has been instrumental in identifying RPS16 as a substrate of USP1 .
For researchers seeking to modulate RPS16 expression in experimental systems, several approaches have been documented:
Plasmid Transfection: Full-length human RPS16 (Gene ID: 6217) can be cloned into expression vectors (such as CMV-MCS-HA-SV40-neomycin). Transfection mixtures including plasmids, RPMI opti-MEM, and lipofectamine can be prepared and incubated for 15 minutes before addition to cells .
siRNA Knockdown: Targeted knockdown can be achieved using siRNAs specifically designed against human RPS16. Commercial options are available (e.g., #sc-97,200, Santa Cruz), and transfection can be performed using lipofectamine RNAiMax in conjunction with RPMI opti-MEM .
Indirect Modulation: RPS16 protein levels can be indirectly manipulated by targeting USP1 either pharmacologically (using inhibitors like ML323) or genetically (using RNAi), which subsequently affects RPS16 stability through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway .
While RPS16 has been used as a reference gene in some quantitative PCR studies, researchers should consider several factors:
Dilution Effects: Evidence suggests that at high dilutions (e.g., 500-fold), amplification of RPS16 may deviate from linearity, potentially affecting the accuracy of qPCR results .
Experimental Design Efficiency: Traditional approaches requiring identical replicates for all reactions may be inefficient and prone to technical variations. Alternative experimental designs, such as dilution-replicate sample standard curves, may provide more robust data while requiring fewer sample reactions .
Expression Stability: When using RPS16 as a reference gene, its expression stability across different experimental conditions should be verified, particularly in studies involving cancer cells where RPS16 expression might be altered due to its role in oncogenic processes .
The optimal dilutions for RPS16 antibodies vary depending on the specific application:
Immunofluorescence/Immunocytochemistry (IF/ICC): 1:20 to 1:200
ELISA: Specific dilutions should be determined by the researcher, though conjugated antibodies (HRP or Biotin) are typically recommended for this application
It's important to note that these are general recommendations, and optimal dilutions may need to be determined empirically for each specific experimental setup, antibody lot, and sample type.
Validation of RPS16 antibody specificity is crucial for accurate experimental results. Recommended validation approaches include:
Western Blot Analysis: Verify that the antibody detects a band at the expected molecular weight of 16 kDa . Multiple bands or bands at unexpected molecular weights may indicate non-specific binding.
Positive and Negative Controls: Include samples with known RPS16 expression levels. Cell lines or tissues with knockdown or overexpression of RPS16 serve as valuable controls.
Blocking Peptide Competition: Pre-incubating the antibody with the immunogen peptide should eliminate specific binding in subsequent applications.
Multiple Antibody Comparison: Using different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of RPS16 can help confirm specificity.
Cross-Reactivity Testing: If working across species, verify the antibody's reactivity with the target species' RPS16 protein.
For detecting RPS16 in complex biological samples, the following optimized protocols are recommended:
Western Blot Protocol:
Prepare protein lysates in buffer containing proteasome inhibitors
Separate proteins on 12-15% SDS-PAGE gels (optimal for low molecular weight proteins)
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes
Block with 5% non-fat milk or BSA
Incubate with RPS16 antibody at recommended dilutions (1:1000 to 1:5000)
Use appropriate secondary antibodies (typically anti-rabbit IgG)
Immunohistochemistry Protocol:
Fix tissues appropriately (formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded)
Perform antigen retrieval (heat-induced or enzymatic)
Block endogenous peroxidase and non-specific binding
Incubate with RPS16 antibody (1:20 to 1:200)
Use detection systems like MaxVision Kit
Counterstain, dehydrate, and mount
Non-specific binding is a common challenge when working with antibodies. For RPS16 antibodies, consider these troubleshooting approaches:
Optimize Blocking Conditions: Increase the concentration of blocking agent (BSA or non-fat milk) or try alternative blocking agents.
Adjust Antibody Dilution: Test a range of dilutions, as over-concentrated antibody solutions can increase non-specific binding.
Increase Washing Stringency: Add additional washing steps or increase detergent (Tween-20) concentration in wash buffers.
Pre-absorb the Antibody: Incubate the antibody with tissues/cells known not to express RPS16 to remove antibodies that bind non-specifically.
Validate Antibody Purity: Ensure the antibody meets high purity standards (≥95% by SDS-PAGE as specified for some commercial antibodies) .
Understanding factors affecting RPS16 stability is crucial for experimental design and interpretation:
Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway: RPS16 is regulated through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, and inhibition of proteasome activity (e.g., with Bortezomib) can increase RPS16 protein levels .
USP1 Activity: USP1 deubiquitinates and stabilizes RPS16. Changes in USP1 expression or activity (through inhibitors like ML323) directly impact RPS16 protein levels .
Sample Preparation Conditions: Extraction buffers lacking protease inhibitors may lead to degradation of RPS16 during sample preparation.
Freeze-Thaw Cycles: Repeated freeze-thaw cycles of samples can lead to protein degradation, affecting RPS16 detection.
Cell Culture Conditions: Cellular stress, including serum starvation or high confluence, may alter RPS16 expression and stability.
Discrepancies between RPS16 mRNA and protein levels are not uncommon and may result from several factors:
Post-transcriptional Regulation: RPS16 protein levels are significantly influenced by post-transcriptional mechanisms, particularly ubiquitination and deubiquitination processes mediated by enzymes like USP1 .
Protein Stability: The half-life of RPS16 protein may vary depending on cellular conditions and the activity of regulatory proteins like USP1 .
Translational Efficiency: Changes in translational efficiency can affect how efficiently RPS16 mRNA is translated into protein.
Technical Limitations: Different sensitivities and dynamic ranges of techniques used to measure mRNA (e.g., qPCR) versus protein (e.g., Western blot) can contribute to apparent discrepancies.
When encountering such discrepancies, researchers should consider employing multiple complementary techniques and investigating potential post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms specific to their experimental system.