rrp6 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Target Overview

RRP6 antibody is a specialized immunological tool designed to detect and study the RNA exosome component Rrp6 (Ribosomal RNA-processing protein 6), a conserved 3’-to-5’ exoribonuclease critical for RNA processing, quality control, and degradation. Rrp6 (human homolog: EXOSC10) functions in both exosome-dependent and independent pathways, regulating gene expression, heterochromatin dynamics, and stress responses .

Research Applications and Key Findings

RRP6 antibodies have been instrumental in uncovering the protein’s roles across model systems:

Nuclear RNA Metabolism and Transcription Termination

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): RRP6 interacts with chromatin modifiers (e.g., RPD3, HP1a) and transcription elongation factors (e.g., Spt5), linking RNA processing to epigenetic regulation .

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP): RRP6 associates with transcribed genes independently of the core exosome, influencing RNA polymerase II termination and mRNA stability .

Heterochromatin Regulation

  • ChIRP-seq: In Plasmodium falciparum, RRP6 regulates heterochromatic gene silencing by degrading RUF6 ncRNA, which alters H3K9me3/HP1 levels and activates virulence genes .

Stress Response and Cell Survival

  • Genetic Interaction Studies: RRP6 supports cell survival during heat stress via the CWI pathway, independent of its catalytic activity .

Validation and Performance Metrics

ApplicationValidation DataSource
Western BlotDetects endogenous RRP6 at ~100 kDa in HeLa nuclear extracts
ImmunofluorescenceLocalizes RRP6 to nuclear bodies and polytene chromosomes in C. tentans
ImmunoprecipitationCo-precipitates RPD3 and HP1a in Drosophila S2 cells

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
rrp6 antibody; SPAC1F3.01 antibody; SPAC3H8.11 antibody; Exosome complex exonuclease rrp6 antibody; EC 3.1.13.- antibody; Ribosomal RNA-processing protein 6 antibody
Target Names
rrp6
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
RRP6 is the nuclear-specific catalytic component of the RNA exosome complex. This protein exhibits 3'->5' exoribonuclease activity and plays a critical role in various cellular RNA processing and degradation events. Within the nucleus, the RNA exosome complex participates in the precise maturation of stable RNA species such as rRNA, snRNA, and snoRNA. It also eliminates RNA processing by-products and non-coding 'pervasive' transcripts, including antisense RNA species and cryptic unstable transcripts (CUTs). Moreover, it degrades mRNAs with processing defects, thereby limiting or excluding their export to the cytoplasm. The catalytically inactive RNA exosome core complex, composed of 9 subunits (Exo-9), is believed to be crucial for the binding and presentation of RNA for ribonucleolysis. It serves as a scaffold for the association with catalytic subunits and accessory proteins or complexes. RRP6 possesses 3'-5' exonuclease activity, which remains unchanged upon association with Exo-9. This suggests that the complex inner RNA-binding pathway is not utilized to access its active site.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. RRP6 may act as a structural adapter to target specific RNAs to the exosome by interacting with sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins. PMID: 27402898
Database Links
Protein Families
Exosome component 10/RRP6 family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus, nucleolus.

Q&A

What is Rrp6 and why is it significant in research?

Rrp6 is an exoribonuclease critically involved in the quality control of mRNA biogenesis. It plays an important role in nuclear RNA surveillance mechanisms and has been implicated in various aspects of RNA processing. Studies have shown that Rrp6 is associated with newly synthesized transcripts during all nuclear steps of gene expression, making it a significant target for research into fundamental RNA biology processes . Unlike what might be expected for a quality control factor, Rrp6 appears to associate with transcripts independently of their splicing status, suggesting more complex roles beyond simple surveillance of unprocessed RNAs .

How does Rrp6 function differ between species?

Rrp6 shows high sequence conservation across eukaryotic species. For example, Chironomus tentans Rrp6 (Ct-Rrp6) shares approximately 84% sequence similarity with Drosophila melanogaster Rrp6 and 85% similarity with the human Rrp6 homolog . Despite this conservation, there are species-specific differences in its subcellular distribution and functional associations. In C. tentans salivary gland cells, Rrp6 is found predominantly in the nucleus with a small fraction in discrete nuclear bodies, while in yeast, flies, and humans, it shows similar nuclear localization patterns but with some variations in its association with other nuclear components .

What is the relationship between Rrp6 and the exosome complex?

Rrp6 is often described as an exosome component, but research indicates that Rrp6 can act both in association with and independently of the core exosome. Immunofluorescence studies have shown that while Rrp6 colocalizes with many exosome components in some nuclear regions, there are also Rrp6-positive nuclear bodies that do not contain the core exosome component Rrp4 . This suggests that Rrp6 has exosome-independent functions. Additionally, ChIP experiments have demonstrated that the distribution of Rrp6 along genes does not strictly follow that of Rrp4, further supporting the idea that Rrp6 and the exosome core can bind to transcribed genes independently of each other .

What criteria should be considered when selecting an Rrp6 antibody for research?

When selecting an Rrp6 antibody, researchers should consider several crucial factors: (1) Specificity - the antibody should recognize Rrp6 without cross-reactivity to other proteins; (2) Species reactivity - ensure the antibody recognizes Rrp6 in your experimental species; (3) Applications - confirm the antibody is validated for your intended applications (Western blotting, immunofluorescence, ChIP, etc.); (4) Epitope - consider whether the antibody recognizes a specific domain that might be masked in certain experimental conditions; and (5) Validation data - look for published validation including Western blots showing a single band of appropriate molecular weight. In published research, antibodies such as the anti-Ct-Rrp6 antibody have been validated by Western blotting to confirm monospecificity before use in multiple applications .

How can I validate a commercial or custom-made Rrp6 antibody?

Thorough validation of an Rrp6 antibody should include:

  • Western blot analysis to confirm specificity (single band of expected molecular weight)

  • RNA interference or knockout controls to verify signal reduction when Rrp6 is depleted

  • Immunofluorescence pattern comparison with published data

  • Cross-validation with multiple antibodies against different epitopes

  • Testing in multiple experimental contexts

In published studies, researchers have validated anti-Rrp6 antibodies by expressing recombinant Rrp6 protein fragments in E. coli, using the purified protein to raise antibodies, and then testing these antibodies by Western blotting against cellular extracts . Additional validation often includes immunofluorescence staining of tissues known to express Rrp6, with parallel negative controls to assess background staining.

What are the differences between polyclonal and monoclonal Rrp6 antibodies?

CharacteristicPolyclonal Rrp6 AntibodiesMonoclonal Rrp6 Antibodies
ProductionGenerated in animals (rabbits, goats) against Rrp6 protein or peptidesProduced by single B-cell clones in vitro
Epitope recognitionRecognize multiple epitopes on Rrp6Recognize a single epitope
Batch consistencyMay vary between batchesHighly consistent between batches
SensitivityGenerally higher sensitivity due to multiple epitope bindingMay have lower sensitivity but higher specificity
ApplicationsOften preferred for immunoprecipitation and ChIPPreferred for applications requiring high reproducibility
Cross-reactivityHigher potential for cross-reactivityLower cross-reactivity risk
Research examplesUsed in studies of Rrp6 association with nascent transcriptsOften used in precise localization studies

The choice between polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies depends on the specific research application. For initial characterization of Rrp6 in a new system, polyclonal antibodies might offer better sensitivity, while monoclonal antibodies may provide more reproducible results for quantitative experiments.

How can Rrp6 antibodies be used in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments?

Rrp6 antibodies have been successfully employed in ChIP experiments to study the association of Rrp6 with transcribed genes. Based on published protocols, the following methodology has proven effective:

  • Cross-link protein-DNA complexes using 1% formaldehyde (typically 10 minutes at room temperature)

  • Lyse cells and sonicate chromatin to generate fragments of approximately 200-500 bp

  • Immunoprecipitate using anti-Rrp6 antibody (4-10 μg per sample) bound to protein A/G beads

  • Include appropriate controls (IgG control, input samples)

  • Reverse cross-linking and purify DNA

  • Analyze by qPCR using primers designed to target regions of interest

This approach has revealed that Rrp6 associates with both proximal and distal parts of genes, and its distribution does not correlate with the exon-intron structure . ChIP experiments in Drosophila S2 cells have shown that Rrp6 levels are significantly higher near gene promoters and decrease in the 5'-3' direction, providing insights into its potential regulatory roles .

What are the optimal conditions for immunofluorescence using Rrp6 antibodies?

For successful immunofluorescence (IF) with Rrp6 antibodies, researchers should consider these optimized conditions:

  • Fixation: 4% paraformaldehyde for 15-20 minutes at room temperature works well for most cell types

  • Permeabilization: 0.2-0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5-10 minutes

  • Blocking: 3-5% BSA or normal serum in PBS for 30-60 minutes

  • Primary antibody: Anti-Rrp6 diluted 1:100 to 1:500 in blocking buffer, incubated overnight at 4°C

  • Secondary antibody: Species-appropriate fluorophore-conjugated antibody (1:500-1:1000)

  • Counterstaining: DAPI for nuclear visualization

  • Mounting: Anti-fade mounting medium

Published studies have successfully used IF to demonstrate that Rrp6 stains the cytoplasm faintly while giving intense staining in the nucleus, with strong nucleoplasmic labeling and a banded pattern on polytene chromosomes . IF has also revealed Rrp6 concentration in discrete nuclear bodies with diameters ranging from 1 to 5 μm .

How can Rrp6 antibodies be used in RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) experiments?

RNA immunoprecipitation with Rrp6 antibodies allows researchers to identify RNA populations associated with Rrp6 in vivo. The following protocol outline is based on successful implementations:

  • Prepare nuclear extracts containing nucleoplasmic RNPs using gentle lysis conditions that preserve RNA-protein interactions

  • Pre-clear extracts with protein A/G beads

  • Immunoprecipitate using anti-Rrp6 antibody (typically 5-10 μg)

  • Include controls (non-specific IgG, input samples)

  • Wash stringently to remove non-specific interactions

  • Extract and purify RNA from the immunoprecipitates

  • Analyze by RT-qPCR using specific primers for target transcripts or by RNA-seq

This approach has been used to compare the association of Rrp6 with spliced versus unspliced transcripts. Interestingly, studies have not detected enrichment of unspliced transcripts in Rrp6 immunoprecipitates; rather, there may be a preference for spliced mRNAs . This contradicts the assumption that Rrp6 primarily associates with unprocessed transcripts as part of quality control.

How can I use Rrp6 antibodies to investigate the spatial and temporal dynamics of Rrp6 during transcription?

Investigating Rrp6 dynamics during transcription requires sophisticated approaches combining multiple techniques:

  • ChIP-seq with spike-in normalization: This allows genome-wide quantitative measurement of Rrp6 association with chromatin at different transcriptional stages.

  • Immunoelectron microscopy: As demonstrated in C. tentans studies, immuno-EM using Rrp6 antibodies can reveal the precise localization of Rrp6 on nascent transcripts. Research has shown that Rrp6 associates with all regions of transcribed genes, often located near the chromatin axis, suggesting interaction with either chromatin, the transcription machinery, or the stalk of nascent pre-mRNPs .

  • Live-cell imaging: For dynamic studies, creating fluorescently tagged Rrp6 constructs allows real-time visualization of Rrp6 recruitment and movement during transcription.

  • Sequential ChIP: This technique can determine whether Rrp6 co-occupies the same DNA regions as other factors like RNA polymerase II or splicing factors.

  • Nascent RNA sequencing with Rrp6 depletion: This approach helps determine how Rrp6 affects co-transcriptional processing.

Research has revealed that Rrp6 is recruited to transcribed genes, and its distribution along genes does not correlate with exon-intron structure, suggesting broad surveillance roles rather than intron-specific functions .

What methods can be used to distinguish between the roles of Rrp6 when it acts independently versus as part of the exosome complex?

Distinguishing between exosome-dependent and exosome-independent functions of Rrp6 requires sophisticated experimental approaches:

  • Differential co-immunoprecipitation: Compare proteins co-precipitated with Rrp6 versus core exosome components like Rrp4. Research has identified Rrp6-positive nuclear bodies that lack Rrp4, indicating exosome-independent localization of Rrp6 .

  • Domain-specific antibodies: Antibodies targeting domains involved in exosome interaction versus catalytic domains can help differentiate populations.

  • Selective depletion: Compare phenotypes resulting from Rrp6 depletion versus depletion of core exosome components.

  • Functional assays with catalytic mutants: Use Rrp6 mutants that maintain structural integrity but lack catalytic activity to separate structural from enzymatic roles.

  • In situ proximity ligation assay (PLA): This technique can visualize where Rrp6 and exosome components interact in cells versus where Rrp6 functions alone.

Evidence from RNase treatment experiments suggests differential binding mechanisms, with Rrp6 association with chromosomes being less RNA-dependent than Rrp4 association, suggesting independent recruitment pathways .

How can Rrp6 antibodies be used to investigate the role of Rrp6 in RNA quality control and surveillance?

Investigating Rrp6's role in RNA quality control using antibodies requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • RNA immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput sequencing (RIP-seq): This identifies the full spectrum of RNAs associated with Rrp6, potentially revealing quality control targets.

  • CLIP-seq (Cross-linking immunoprecipitation): This identifies direct Rrp6-RNA interactions at nucleotide resolution.

  • Immunodepletion followed by in vitro RNA degradation assays: Removing Rrp6 from nuclear extracts can reveal its specific contribution to degradation of various RNA substrates.

  • Microscopy-based colocalization studies: Double-labeling for Rrp6 and aberrant RNAs can identify surveillance locations.

  • Pulse-chase experiments with Rrp6 immunoprecipitation: These track the kinetics of Rrp6 association with newly synthesized RNAs.

Research has revealed that Rrp6 binds to both unspliced and spliced transcripts and is released from mRNPs near the nuclear pore before nuclear export . Contrary to expectations for a surveillance factor, RIP experiments have not shown enrichment of unspliced transcripts in Rrp6-associated populations, suggesting complex roles beyond simple quality control of splicing .

What are common issues in Western blot detection of Rrp6 and how can they be resolved?

IssuePossible CausesSolutions
No signal- Insufficient protein loading
- Antibody concentration too low
- Protein degradation
- Inefficient transfer
- Increase protein amount (25-50 μg total protein)
- Optimize antibody dilution (try 1:500-1:2000)
- Add protease inhibitors during extraction
- Verify transfer efficiency with Ponceau S staining
Multiple bands- Non-specific binding
- Protein degradation
- Cross-reactivity with related proteins
- Post-translational modifications
- Increase blocking time/concentration
- Add 0.1-0.2% SDS to antibody dilution
- Try monoclonal antibody
- Include phosphatase inhibitors if modifications suspected
High background- Insufficient blocking
- Antibody concentration too high
- Inadequate washing
- Extend blocking time (2-3 hours)
- Optimize antibody dilution
- Increase wash duration and number of washes
- Add 0.05-0.1% Tween-20 to wash buffer
Inconsistent results- Sample preparation variability
- Antibody batch variation
- Inconsistent transfer
- Standardize extraction protocol
- Use the same antibody lot for comparative studies
- Include loading controls
- Use wet transfer for consistent results

In published research, antibodies against Rrp6 have been validated by Western blotting and found to be monospecific, detecting a single band of the expected molecular weight .

How should experimental conditions be adjusted when studying Rrp6 in different cell types or species?

Adapting Rrp6 antibody experiments to different biological systems requires careful optimization:

  • Species cross-reactivity: Verify antibody cross-reactivity with your species of interest. While there is high conservation between species (e.g., 84-85% similarity between Ct-Rrp6, Drosophila, and human homologs), epitope differences may affect antibody recognition .

  • Extraction protocols: Cell-type specific optimization of lysis conditions is crucial. Nuclear proteins like Rrp6 may require specialized extraction:

    • For cultured cells: Use NP-40 lysis followed by nuclear extraction

    • For tissues: Dounce homogenization in hypotonic buffer may be necessary

    • For insect systems like Chironomus: Specialized protocols for salivary gland extraction have been established

  • Fixation conditions: For microscopy:

    • Adherent cells: 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 minutes

    • Suspension cells: Methanol fixation may give better results

    • Tissues: May require longer fixation times or perfusion fixation

  • Antibody dilutions: Optimal concentrations vary by application and system:

    • IF in mammalian cells: Typically 1:100-1:500

    • IF in insect tissues: May require higher concentrations (1:50-1:100)

    • Western blotting: Usually 1:1000-1:5000 depending on expression level

  • Controls: System-specific controls are essential:

    • Knockdown/knockout validation in the specific system being studied

    • Comparison with known distribution patterns in the cell type of interest

Research in C. tentans successfully used antibodies generated against recombinant Rrp6 for various applications including Western blotting, immunofluorescence, immunoelectron microscopy, and immunoprecipitation .

How can I troubleshoot ChIP experiments with Rrp6 antibodies that show low enrichment?

ChIP experiments with Rrp6 antibodies may present unique challenges due to the dynamic nature of Rrp6 interactions with chromatin. When facing low enrichment issues, consider these troubleshooting approaches:

  • Optimize cross-linking conditions: Since Rrp6 associates with RNA and the transcription machinery, standard formaldehyde cross-linking may not optimally capture these interactions. Try:

    • Dual cross-linking with both formaldehyde (1%) and a protein-protein cross-linker like DSG

    • Vary cross-linking times (5-20 minutes) to find optimal conditions

    • Test different formaldehyde concentrations (0.5-2%)

  • Adjust sonication parameters: Over-sonication can disrupt Rrp6-chromatin complexes while under-sonication reduces antibody accessibility

    • Aim for chromatin fragments of 200-500 bp

    • Test different sonication protocols and verify fragment size by gel electrophoresis

  • Modify immunoprecipitation conditions:

    • Increase antibody amount (try 5-10 μg per reaction)

    • Extend incubation time (overnight at 4°C)

    • Try different antibody-bead combinations (protein A, protein G, or mixed beads)

    • Reduce stringency of wash buffers to preserve weaker interactions

  • Target analysis regions strategically: Research has shown that Rrp6 levels are often higher near gene promoters and decrease in the 5'-3' direction . Design primers to analyze different regions along genes.

  • Consider RNA dependence: Since some Rrp6 interactions may be RNA-mediated, RNase treatment experiments can help distinguish direct chromatin binding from RNA-dependent association .

Research has successfully used ChIP to detect Rrp6 association with both proximal and distal parts of genes, revealing important insights about its distribution along transcription units .

How can Rrp6 antibody studies be integrated with RNA sequencing approaches?

Integrating Rrp6 antibody-based techniques with RNA sequencing creates powerful approaches for understanding RNA processing and quality control:

  • RIP-seq (RNA Immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing):

    • Immunoprecipitate Rrp6-bound RNAs using validated antibodies

    • Prepare libraries from extracted RNAs for high-throughput sequencing

    • This reveals the complete repertoire of RNAs associated with Rrp6

    • Compare spliced versus unspliced transcript enrichment to understand surveillance roles

  • CLIP-seq (Cross-linking Immunoprecipitation with sequencing):

    • UV cross-linking stabilizes direct RNA-protein interactions

    • Immunoprecipitate with Rrp6 antibodies and sequence associated RNAs

    • Provides nucleotide-resolution maps of Rrp6 binding sites

  • RNA-seq after Rrp6 depletion:

    • Compare transcriptomes before and after Rrp6 knockdown/knockout

    • Analyze changes in splicing patterns, retained introns, and transcript levels

    • Identify potential Rrp6 surveillance targets

  • ChIP-seq with RNA-seq correlation:

    • Compare Rrp6 chromatin occupancy with nascent RNA production

    • Correlate Rrp6 binding with splicing efficiency at specific genomic loci

Research using RIP with Rrp6 antibodies has revealed unexpected findings, including no enrichment of unspliced transcripts in Rrp6-bound populations and a possible preference for spliced mRNAs , challenging simple models of Rrp6 function.

What are the considerations for studying Rrp6 interactions with other nuclear proteins using co-immunoprecipitation?

Studying Rrp6 protein interactions requires careful experimental design:

  • Extraction conditions: Nuclear proteins like Rrp6 require specialized extraction methods:

    • Low-salt extraction may preserve weak interactions

    • Consider detergent types and concentrations to maintain native complexes

    • Include protease and phosphatase inhibitors to preserve interaction states

  • Cross-linking considerations:

    • For transient interactions, consider reversible cross-linking with DSP

    • For stable complexes, native co-IP without cross-linking may be sufficient

    • RNase treatment can distinguish RNA-dependent from direct protein interactions

  • Antibody selection and validation:

    • Confirm that the epitope recognized isn't involved in protein interactions

    • Verify that the antibody doesn't disrupt known complexes

    • For reciprocal co-IPs, ensure both antibodies are validated for IP

  • Controls are critical:

    • IgG negative controls

    • Input samples (typically 5-10%)

    • Positive controls targeting known Rrp6 interactors (e.g., core exosome components)

  • Detection methods:

    • Western blotting for targeted analysis of specific interactions

    • Mass spectrometry for unbiased identification of interaction partners

Research using immunofluorescence has shown that Rrp6 and the core exosome component Rrp4 show differential localization in some nuclear structures, suggesting complex-independent functions , which could be further characterized by co-IP studies.

How can we integrate Rrp6 antibody studies with structural biology approaches?

Combining antibody-based techniques with structural approaches provides comprehensive insights into Rrp6 function:

  • Epitope mapping for structural insights:

    • Generate domain-specific antibodies against different Rrp6 regions

    • Use these antibodies to probe accessibility of domains in different cellular contexts

    • This can reveal conformational changes or binding-induced structural alterations

  • Immunoprecipitation for structural studies:

    • Use Rrp6 antibodies to purify native complexes for cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography

    • Verify complex integrity by Western blotting before structural analysis

    • Compare structures of Rrp6 alone versus in complex with the exosome

  • Proximity labeling combined with antibody validation:

    • Express BioID or APEX2 fusions of Rrp6 to identify proximal proteins

    • Validate interactions using co-IP with Rrp6 antibodies

    • Map interaction surfaces based on labeled residues

  • In situ structural probing:

    • Use conformation-specific antibodies to detect structural states in cells

    • Combine with FRET-based sensors to monitor structural dynamics

  • Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) with immunopurification:

    • Immunoprecipitate Rrp6 complexes after cross-linking

    • Identify cross-linked peptides by mass spectrometry

    • Generate distance constraints for structural modeling

Electron microscopy studies using Rrp6 antibodies have revealed key insights into its localization within nuclear complexes, showing that it associates with all regions of transcribed genes and is often located near the chromatin axis , information that complements crystallographic and cryo-EM studies of isolated Rrp6.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.