RSC58 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Functional Roles in Chromatin Remodeling

RSC58 contributes to diverse chromatin-related processes:

Key Functions:

  • Nucleosome Positioning: Facilitates ATP-dependent nucleosome sliding to expose DNA for transcriptional machinery .

  • Cell Cycle Regulation: Essential for progression through mitosis; depletion leads to cell cycle arrest .

  • Stress Response: Modulates gene expression during oxidative stress and nutrient limitation .

Mechanistic Insights:

  • Biochemical studies show RSC58 interacts directly with Rsc7 and Rsc14 to stabilize the RSC complex .

  • Genetic ablation of RSC58 results in mislocalization of RSC components and defective chromatin structure .

Applications in Scientific Research

RSC58 antibodies are pivotal for:

  • Chromatin Dynamics Studies: Mapping nucleosome repositioning during transcription .

  • Genetic Interaction Networks: Identifying synthetic lethal partners of RSC58 via high-throughput screens .

  • Disease Models: Investigating conserved roles of RSC homologs in fungal pathogens (e.g., Candida albicans) .

Future Directions

  • Comparative Genomics: Explore RSC58 homologs in pathogenic fungi to identify antifungal drug targets .

  • Structural Biology: Cryo-EM studies to resolve RSC58’s role in ATPase activation within the RSC complex .

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
RSC58 antibody; YLR033W antibody; Chromatin structure-remodeling complex protein RSC58 antibody; Remodel the structure of chromatin complex subunit 58 antibody
Target Names
RSC58
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
RSC58 Antibody is a component of the chromatin structure-remodeling complex (RSC), which plays a crucial role in transcription regulation and nucleosome positioning. RSC facilitates the transfer of a histone octamer from a nucleosome core particle to naked DNA. This process requires ATP and involves an activated RSC-nucleosome intermediate. The remodeling reaction also encompasses DNA translocation, DNA twist, and conformational change. As a reconfigurer of centromeric and flanking nucleosomes, the RSC complex is essential for proper kinetochore function in chromosome segregation and, through a PKC1-dependent signaling pathway, for organizing the cellular cytoskeleton.
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YLR033W

STRING: 4932.YLR033W

Subcellular Location
Nucleus. Note=Localizes to centromeric and flanking chromatin. Association with these loci is dependent on STH1.

Q&A

What is RSC58 and why is it significant in yeast research?

RSC58 is a component of the RSC (Remodel the Structure of Chromatin) complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Baker's yeast). This complex plays critical roles in chromatin remodeling, transcription regulation, DNA repair, and chromosome segregation. The antibody targeting this protein enables researchers to investigate fundamental chromatin biology processes that are conserved across eukaryotes, making it valuable for understanding chromatin dynamics and gene expression regulation .

What experimental applications is the RSC58 Antibody validated for?

The RSC58 Antibody has been validated for several research applications including Western blotting, immunoprecipitation (IP), chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), and immunohistochemistry. These techniques allow researchers to detect protein expression, study protein-protein interactions, and analyze chromatin binding patterns. As with all antibodies, researchers should perform their own validation tests for their specific experimental conditions .

How should I validate the specificity of RSC58 Antibody for my experiments?

Validation of antibody specificity is critical for ensuring experimental reproducibility. For RSC58 Antibody, comprehensive validation should include:

  • Western blot analysis showing a band at the expected molecular weight (approximately 58 kDa)

  • Testing in wild-type yeast strains alongside RSC58 knockout/knockdown controls

  • Peptide competition assays to confirm epitope specificity

  • Comparison with another validated antibody targeting different regions of RSC58

  • Testing across multiple experimental conditions to ensure consistent performance

As emphasized in current literature, knockout or knockdown samples serve as crucial negative controls for antibody specificity validation .

What is the optimal protocol for using RSC58 Antibody in immunoprecipitation experiments?

For immunoprecipitation using RSC58 Antibody, the following protocol is recommended based on established antibody methodologies:

  • Prepare yeast cell lysates under conditions that preserve protein integrity and native interactions

  • Pre-clear lysates with Protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding

  • Incubate lysates with RSC58 Antibody (typically at 1:50-1:200 dilution)

  • Add Protein A/G beads to capture antibody-antigen complexes

  • Wash extensively with appropriate buffers to remove non-specific interactions

  • Elute proteins for downstream analysis (e.g., Western blotting, mass spectrometry)

Include appropriate controls such as an IgG control and input samples. The successful immunoprecipitation of recombinant RBD with an antibody coupled to Protein-A/G, as demonstrated in similar experiments, provides a methodological template for RSC58 antibody applications .

How should I design ChIP experiments using RSC58 Antibody?

When designing ChIP experiments with RSC58 Antibody, consider the following steps:

  • Optimize crosslinking conditions specific for yeast cells (typically 1% formaldehyde for 10-15 minutes)

  • Ensure complete cell lysis and appropriate chromatin fragmentation (200-500 bp fragments)

  • Test different antibody concentrations to determine optimal enrichment

  • Include essential controls: IgG control, input sample, and positive/negative genomic regions

  • Design primers for known RSC binding sites for validation

  • Consider coupling with sequencing (ChIP-seq) for genome-wide analysis

The experimental approach should be similar to that used for other nuclear proteins in yeast, with specific optimization for chromatin preparation .

What are the key considerations for tissue immunohistochemistry with RSC58 Antibody?

For immunohistochemistry applications with RSC58 Antibody, researchers should consider:

  • Optimize fixation methods (10% buffered formalin followed by alcohol preservation works well for many antibodies)

  • Perform appropriate antigen retrieval (test both citrate buffer pH 6 and Tris-EDTA pH 9)

  • Block with 5% serum (e.g., horse serum) for at least 15-20 minutes

  • Dilute antibody appropriately (starting at 1:3 dilution in PBS with 1.5% serum)

  • Incubate overnight at 4°C for optimal binding

  • Include proper controls: sections without primary antibody and isotype controls

  • Use appropriate secondary antibody (e.g., anti-mouse IgG conjugated to a fluorophore)

  • Counterstain with DAPI for nuclear visualization

Similar approaches have been successful for other antibodies in tissue sections .

Why might I observe multiple bands when using RSC58 Antibody in Western blotting?

Multiple bands in Western blot analysis with RSC58 Antibody may result from:

  • Post-translational modifications of RSC58 (phosphorylation, ubiquitination, etc.)

  • Proteolytic degradation during sample preparation

  • Alternative splice variants or isoforms

  • Cross-reactivity with structurally similar proteins

  • Non-specific binding due to suboptimal blocking or washing conditions

To address these issues, optimize sample preparation with fresh protease inhibitors, adjust blocking conditions, and validate using genetic controls. Similar patterns have been observed with other antibodies, where they recognize both the target protein and slight degradation products .

How can I minimize background noise in immunofluorescence experiments?

To reduce background in immunofluorescence experiments:

  • Optimize fixation and permeabilization protocols

  • Extend blocking time with 5% serum or BSA

  • Increase the number and duration of wash steps

  • Dilute the antibody appropriately (test a range from 1:100 to 1:500)

  • Pre-absorb the antibody with non-specific proteins if necessary

  • Use highly specific secondary antibodies with minimal cross-reactivity

  • Include proper controls, including secondary-only controls

Technical approaches similar to those described for fluorescent detection in tissue immunohistochemistry can be adapted for cell-based immunofluorescence .

What strategies can address inconsistent results across experiments?

Inconsistencies in experimental results may stem from:

  • Antibody lot-to-lot variation

  • Differences in experimental protocols

  • Sample handling and preparation variations

  • Changes in protein expression under different conditions

  • Degradation of antibody or target protein

To ensure reproducibility:

  • Maintain detailed records of antibody lot numbers and protocols

  • Standardize all experimental conditions

  • Include consistent positive and negative controls

  • Consider bulk purchasing of antibody lots for long-term studies

  • Validate each new lot against previously successful experiments

The reproducibility crisis in antibody research emphasizes the importance of these practices for generating reliable data .

How can I use RSC58 Antibody to study protein-protein interactions within the RSC complex?

To investigate protein-protein interactions involving RSC58:

  • Perform co-immunoprecipitation with RSC58 Antibody followed by Western blotting or mass spectrometry to identify interacting partners

  • Consider cross-linking approaches to capture transient interactions

  • Use sequential immunoprecipitation to isolate specific subcomplexes

  • Couple with proximity labeling methods for in vivo interaction mapping

  • Validate interactions with reciprocal immunoprecipitation experiments

The affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry approach described for protein interaction studies provides a methodological framework that can be applied to RSC58 .

How can I optimize ChIP-seq experiments to map genome-wide RSC58 binding sites?

For optimal ChIP-seq with RSC58 Antibody:

  • Ensure high-quality chromatin preparation with consistent fragmentation

  • Optimize antibody amount and incubation conditions for maximum specificity and sensitivity

  • Include input controls and IgG controls for normalization and background assessment

  • Use appropriate bioinformatic pipelines for peak calling and analysis

  • Validate selected binding sites with ChIP-qPCR

  • Consider spike-in controls for quantitative comparisons across conditions

These approaches align with best practices for chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments described in the literature .

What methods can I use to quantitatively analyze RSC58 protein levels?

For quantitative analysis of RSC58 protein levels:

  • Western blotting with appropriate loading controls

  • Ensure signal detection within the linear range

  • Use digital imaging systems with quantification software

  • Normalize to total protein rather than single housekeeping genes

  • Include calibration standards when possible

  • Perform multiple biological and technical replicates for statistical analysis

Proper antibody characterization, as emphasized in current literature, is essential for quantitative applications to ensure specificity and reproducibility .

How should I interpret changes in RSC58 binding patterns under different experimental conditions?

When analyzing changes in RSC58 binding:

  • Normalize data appropriately to account for technical variations

  • Distinguish between global changes and locus-specific effects

  • Correlate binding changes with functional outcomes (e.g., transcription, chromatin accessibility)

  • Consider potential cofactor dependencies

  • Analyze enrichment at functional genomic elements (promoters, enhancers, etc.)

  • Use appropriate statistical methods for differential binding analysis

Comprehensive analysis should integrate multiple data types to understand the biological significance of binding pattern changes.

How do I distinguish between direct and indirect effects in RSC58-related experiments?

To differentiate direct from indirect effects:

  • Compare acute vs. chronic depletion phenotypes

  • Use rapidly inducible systems for time-course experiments

  • Perform in vitro reconstitution with purified components

  • Analyze motif enrichment at binding sites

  • Conduct sequential ChIP to identify co-binding with other factors

  • Integrate with genetic interaction data

These approaches help establish causality and direct functionality in complex biological systems.

What controls are essential when using RSC58 Antibody in different experimental contexts?

Essential controls include:

Experimental TechniqueRequired Controls
Western BlottingRSC58 knockout/knockdown samples, loading controls, molecular weight markers
ImmunoprecipitationIgG control, input samples, negative control lysates (knockout)
ChIPIgG control, input samples, positive and negative genomic regions
ImmunofluorescenceSecondary antibody only, peptide competition, unrelated primary antibody

The inclusion of proper controls is critical for interpreting results and ensuring reproducibility, as emphasized in current antibody research guidelines .

How can RSC58 Antibody be used to study chromatin remodeling mechanisms?

To investigate chromatin remodeling mechanisms:

  • Combine ChIP-seq with other genomic approaches (ATAC-seq, MNase-seq)

  • Analyze RSC58 binding relative to nucleosome positioning

  • Perform chromatin remodeling assays with immunodepleted extracts

  • Study the kinetics of RSC58 recruitment during gene activation

  • Investigate the relationship between RSC58 and histone modifications

These approaches can provide insights into how the RSC complex functions to remodel chromatin structure.

What strategies can help optimize co-immunoprecipitation of RSC58 with other chromatin factors?

For successful co-immunoprecipitation:

  • Test different lysis buffers to preserve specific interactions

  • Optimize salt and detergent concentrations

  • Consider mild crosslinking to stabilize transient interactions

  • Use nuclease treatment to release chromatin-bound complexes

  • Adjust antibody-to-lysate ratios for optimal capture

The immunoprecipitation methodology described for other proteins provides a useful framework for RSC58-specific applications .

How can I validate RSC58 Antibody for use in evolutionary studies across different yeast species?

For cross-species applications:

  • Perform sequence alignment to identify conservation of the epitope region

  • Test antibody reactivity in lysates from different yeast species

  • Include appropriate positive and negative controls for each species

  • Optimize experimental conditions for each organism

  • Validate with genetic approaches (e.g., tagged proteins) when possible

Cross-reactivity testing is essential before using antibodies across species due to potential sequence divergence.

RSC58 Protein Specifications

ParameterInformation
Protein NameRSC58
UniProt AccessionQ07979
OrganismSaccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c)
Antibody Product CodeCSB-PA214988XA01SVG
Available Sizes2ml/0.1ml
Molecular Weight~58 kDa
FunctionComponent of the RSC chromatin remodeling complex
Cellular LocalizationNuclear

Recommended Experimental Conditions for RSC58 Antibody Applications

ApplicationDilution RangeBuffer RecommendationsIncubation ConditionsCritical Controls
Western Blot1:500-1:2000TBST with 5% non-fat milk or BSAOvernight at 4°CRSC58 knockout/knockdown, molecular weight marker
Immunoprecipitation1:50-1:200Low-stringency IP buffer4 hours to overnight at 4°CIgG control, input sample
ChIP1:50-1:100ChIP dilution bufferOvernight at 4°CIgG control, input sample
Immunofluorescence1:100-1:500PBS with 1-5% BSA or serum1-2 hours at RT or overnight at 4°CSecondary only, peptide competition

Troubleshooting Common Issues with RSC58 Antibody

IssuePossible CausesRecommended Solutions
No signal in Western blotInsufficient protein, antibody dilution too high, protein degradationIncrease protein loading, optimize antibody dilution, add protease inhibitors
Multiple bandsDegradation, cross-reactivity, post-translational modificationsOptimize sample preparation, validate with knockout controls, test different blocking agents
High backgroundInsufficient blocking, antibody concentration too high, inadequate washingIncrease blocking time, dilute antibody further, increase wash steps
Variable resultsLot-to-lot variation, inconsistent protocols, sample degradationMaintain consistent protocols, use the same lot when possible, prepare fresh samples
Poor IP efficiencyInadequate lysis, epitope masking, suboptimal binding conditionsOptimize lysis conditions, test different IP buffers, adjust antibody-to-sample ratio

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.