RSC58 contributes to diverse chromatin-related processes:
Nucleosome Positioning: Facilitates ATP-dependent nucleosome sliding to expose DNA for transcriptional machinery .
Cell Cycle Regulation: Essential for progression through mitosis; depletion leads to cell cycle arrest .
Stress Response: Modulates gene expression during oxidative stress and nutrient limitation .
Biochemical studies show RSC58 interacts directly with Rsc7 and Rsc14 to stabilize the RSC complex .
Genetic ablation of RSC58 results in mislocalization of RSC components and defective chromatin structure .
RSC58 antibodies are pivotal for:
Chromatin Dynamics Studies: Mapping nucleosome repositioning during transcription .
Genetic Interaction Networks: Identifying synthetic lethal partners of RSC58 via high-throughput screens .
Disease Models: Investigating conserved roles of RSC homologs in fungal pathogens (e.g., Candida albicans) .
KEGG: sce:YLR033W
STRING: 4932.YLR033W
RSC58 is a component of the RSC (Remodel the Structure of Chromatin) complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Baker's yeast). This complex plays critical roles in chromatin remodeling, transcription regulation, DNA repair, and chromosome segregation. The antibody targeting this protein enables researchers to investigate fundamental chromatin biology processes that are conserved across eukaryotes, making it valuable for understanding chromatin dynamics and gene expression regulation .
The RSC58 Antibody has been validated for several research applications including Western blotting, immunoprecipitation (IP), chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), and immunohistochemistry. These techniques allow researchers to detect protein expression, study protein-protein interactions, and analyze chromatin binding patterns. As with all antibodies, researchers should perform their own validation tests for their specific experimental conditions .
Validation of antibody specificity is critical for ensuring experimental reproducibility. For RSC58 Antibody, comprehensive validation should include:
Western blot analysis showing a band at the expected molecular weight (approximately 58 kDa)
Testing in wild-type yeast strains alongside RSC58 knockout/knockdown controls
Peptide competition assays to confirm epitope specificity
Comparison with another validated antibody targeting different regions of RSC58
Testing across multiple experimental conditions to ensure consistent performance
As emphasized in current literature, knockout or knockdown samples serve as crucial negative controls for antibody specificity validation .
For immunoprecipitation using RSC58 Antibody, the following protocol is recommended based on established antibody methodologies:
Prepare yeast cell lysates under conditions that preserve protein integrity and native interactions
Pre-clear lysates with Protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding
Incubate lysates with RSC58 Antibody (typically at 1:50-1:200 dilution)
Add Protein A/G beads to capture antibody-antigen complexes
Wash extensively with appropriate buffers to remove non-specific interactions
Elute proteins for downstream analysis (e.g., Western blotting, mass spectrometry)
Include appropriate controls such as an IgG control and input samples. The successful immunoprecipitation of recombinant RBD with an antibody coupled to Protein-A/G, as demonstrated in similar experiments, provides a methodological template for RSC58 antibody applications .
When designing ChIP experiments with RSC58 Antibody, consider the following steps:
Optimize crosslinking conditions specific for yeast cells (typically 1% formaldehyde for 10-15 minutes)
Ensure complete cell lysis and appropriate chromatin fragmentation (200-500 bp fragments)
Test different antibody concentrations to determine optimal enrichment
Include essential controls: IgG control, input sample, and positive/negative genomic regions
Design primers for known RSC binding sites for validation
Consider coupling with sequencing (ChIP-seq) for genome-wide analysis
The experimental approach should be similar to that used for other nuclear proteins in yeast, with specific optimization for chromatin preparation .
For immunohistochemistry applications with RSC58 Antibody, researchers should consider:
Optimize fixation methods (10% buffered formalin followed by alcohol preservation works well for many antibodies)
Perform appropriate antigen retrieval (test both citrate buffer pH 6 and Tris-EDTA pH 9)
Block with 5% serum (e.g., horse serum) for at least 15-20 minutes
Dilute antibody appropriately (starting at 1:3 dilution in PBS with 1.5% serum)
Incubate overnight at 4°C for optimal binding
Include proper controls: sections without primary antibody and isotype controls
Use appropriate secondary antibody (e.g., anti-mouse IgG conjugated to a fluorophore)
Counterstain with DAPI for nuclear visualization
Similar approaches have been successful for other antibodies in tissue sections .
Multiple bands in Western blot analysis with RSC58 Antibody may result from:
Post-translational modifications of RSC58 (phosphorylation, ubiquitination, etc.)
Proteolytic degradation during sample preparation
Alternative splice variants or isoforms
Cross-reactivity with structurally similar proteins
Non-specific binding due to suboptimal blocking or washing conditions
To address these issues, optimize sample preparation with fresh protease inhibitors, adjust blocking conditions, and validate using genetic controls. Similar patterns have been observed with other antibodies, where they recognize both the target protein and slight degradation products .
To reduce background in immunofluorescence experiments:
Optimize fixation and permeabilization protocols
Extend blocking time with 5% serum or BSA
Increase the number and duration of wash steps
Dilute the antibody appropriately (test a range from 1:100 to 1:500)
Pre-absorb the antibody with non-specific proteins if necessary
Use highly specific secondary antibodies with minimal cross-reactivity
Include proper controls, including secondary-only controls
Technical approaches similar to those described for fluorescent detection in tissue immunohistochemistry can be adapted for cell-based immunofluorescence .
Inconsistencies in experimental results may stem from:
Antibody lot-to-lot variation
Differences in experimental protocols
Sample handling and preparation variations
Changes in protein expression under different conditions
Degradation of antibody or target protein
To ensure reproducibility:
Maintain detailed records of antibody lot numbers and protocols
Standardize all experimental conditions
Include consistent positive and negative controls
Consider bulk purchasing of antibody lots for long-term studies
Validate each new lot against previously successful experiments
The reproducibility crisis in antibody research emphasizes the importance of these practices for generating reliable data .
To investigate protein-protein interactions involving RSC58:
Perform co-immunoprecipitation with RSC58 Antibody followed by Western blotting or mass spectrometry to identify interacting partners
Consider cross-linking approaches to capture transient interactions
Use sequential immunoprecipitation to isolate specific subcomplexes
Couple with proximity labeling methods for in vivo interaction mapping
Validate interactions with reciprocal immunoprecipitation experiments
The affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry approach described for protein interaction studies provides a methodological framework that can be applied to RSC58 .
For optimal ChIP-seq with RSC58 Antibody:
Ensure high-quality chromatin preparation with consistent fragmentation
Optimize antibody amount and incubation conditions for maximum specificity and sensitivity
Include input controls and IgG controls for normalization and background assessment
Use appropriate bioinformatic pipelines for peak calling and analysis
Validate selected binding sites with ChIP-qPCR
Consider spike-in controls for quantitative comparisons across conditions
These approaches align with best practices for chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments described in the literature .
For quantitative analysis of RSC58 protein levels:
Western blotting with appropriate loading controls
Ensure signal detection within the linear range
Use digital imaging systems with quantification software
Normalize to total protein rather than single housekeeping genes
Include calibration standards when possible
Perform multiple biological and technical replicates for statistical analysis
Proper antibody characterization, as emphasized in current literature, is essential for quantitative applications to ensure specificity and reproducibility .
When analyzing changes in RSC58 binding:
Normalize data appropriately to account for technical variations
Distinguish between global changes and locus-specific effects
Correlate binding changes with functional outcomes (e.g., transcription, chromatin accessibility)
Consider potential cofactor dependencies
Analyze enrichment at functional genomic elements (promoters, enhancers, etc.)
Use appropriate statistical methods for differential binding analysis
Comprehensive analysis should integrate multiple data types to understand the biological significance of binding pattern changes.
To differentiate direct from indirect effects:
Compare acute vs. chronic depletion phenotypes
Use rapidly inducible systems for time-course experiments
Perform in vitro reconstitution with purified components
Analyze motif enrichment at binding sites
Conduct sequential ChIP to identify co-binding with other factors
Integrate with genetic interaction data
These approaches help establish causality and direct functionality in complex biological systems.
Essential controls include:
| Experimental Technique | Required Controls |
|---|---|
| Western Blotting | RSC58 knockout/knockdown samples, loading controls, molecular weight markers |
| Immunoprecipitation | IgG control, input samples, negative control lysates (knockout) |
| ChIP | IgG control, input samples, positive and negative genomic regions |
| Immunofluorescence | Secondary antibody only, peptide competition, unrelated primary antibody |
The inclusion of proper controls is critical for interpreting results and ensuring reproducibility, as emphasized in current antibody research guidelines .
To investigate chromatin remodeling mechanisms:
Combine ChIP-seq with other genomic approaches (ATAC-seq, MNase-seq)
Analyze RSC58 binding relative to nucleosome positioning
Perform chromatin remodeling assays with immunodepleted extracts
Study the kinetics of RSC58 recruitment during gene activation
Investigate the relationship between RSC58 and histone modifications
These approaches can provide insights into how the RSC complex functions to remodel chromatin structure.
For successful co-immunoprecipitation:
Test different lysis buffers to preserve specific interactions
Optimize salt and detergent concentrations
Consider mild crosslinking to stabilize transient interactions
Use nuclease treatment to release chromatin-bound complexes
Adjust antibody-to-lysate ratios for optimal capture
The immunoprecipitation methodology described for other proteins provides a useful framework for RSC58-specific applications .
For cross-species applications:
Perform sequence alignment to identify conservation of the epitope region
Test antibody reactivity in lysates from different yeast species
Include appropriate positive and negative controls for each species
Optimize experimental conditions for each organism
Validate with genetic approaches (e.g., tagged proteins) when possible
Cross-reactivity testing is essential before using antibodies across species due to potential sequence divergence.
| Parameter | Information |
|---|---|
| Protein Name | RSC58 |
| UniProt Accession | Q07979 |
| Organism | Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c) |
| Antibody Product Code | CSB-PA214988XA01SVG |
| Available Sizes | 2ml/0.1ml |
| Molecular Weight | ~58 kDa |
| Function | Component of the RSC chromatin remodeling complex |
| Cellular Localization | Nuclear |
| Application | Dilution Range | Buffer Recommendations | Incubation Conditions | Critical Controls |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | 1:500-1:2000 | TBST with 5% non-fat milk or BSA | Overnight at 4°C | RSC58 knockout/knockdown, molecular weight marker |
| Immunoprecipitation | 1:50-1:200 | Low-stringency IP buffer | 4 hours to overnight at 4°C | IgG control, input sample |
| ChIP | 1:50-1:100 | ChIP dilution buffer | Overnight at 4°C | IgG control, input sample |
| Immunofluorescence | 1:100-1:500 | PBS with 1-5% BSA or serum | 1-2 hours at RT or overnight at 4°C | Secondary only, peptide competition |
| Issue | Possible Causes | Recommended Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| No signal in Western blot | Insufficient protein, antibody dilution too high, protein degradation | Increase protein loading, optimize antibody dilution, add protease inhibitors |
| Multiple bands | Degradation, cross-reactivity, post-translational modifications | Optimize sample preparation, validate with knockout controls, test different blocking agents |
| High background | Insufficient blocking, antibody concentration too high, inadequate washing | Increase blocking time, dilute antibody further, increase wash steps |
| Variable results | Lot-to-lot variation, inconsistent protocols, sample degradation | Maintain consistent protocols, use the same lot when possible, prepare fresh samples |
| Poor IP efficiency | Inadequate lysis, epitope masking, suboptimal binding conditions | Optimize lysis conditions, test different IP buffers, adjust antibody-to-sample ratio |