PHF7 Antibody, HRP conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Our typical lead time for dispatching orders is 1-3 working days after receipt. Delivery times may vary based on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributor for specific delivery information.
Synonyms
DKFZp434L1850 antibody; HSPC045 antibody; HSPC226 antibody; MGC26088 antibody; NYD SP6 antibody; OTTHUMP00000212988 antibody; OTTHUMP00000212989 antibody; OTTHUMP00000212990 antibody; OTTHUMP00000212993 antibody; PHD finger protein 7 antibody; Phf7 antibody; PHF7_HUMAN antibody; Testis development protein NYD SP6 antibody; Testis development protein NYD-SP6 antibody
Target Names
PHF7
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
PHF7 antibody, HRP conjugated, may play a role in spermatogenesis.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. The PHF7 promoter binds H4K12ac in mature spermatozoa. PMID: 22894908
Database Links

HGNC: 18458

KEGG: hsa:51533

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000333024

UniGene: Hs.372719

Subcellular Location
Nucleus.
Tissue Specificity
Highly expressed in Sertoli cells, but not in germ cells in adult testis. Expression in embryonic testis is 30-times lower. Highly expressed in colon, spleen, white blood cells, pancreas, lung, liver, placenta and brain. Detected at lower levels in thymus

Q&A

What is PHF7 and why is it important in epigenetic research?

PHF7 functions as a critical histone reader protein that specifically recognizes and binds to H3K4me2 and H3K4me3 histone modifications, which are key epigenetic marks associated with transcriptionally active chromatin regions. Research has demonstrated that PHF7 plays a significant role in direct cellular reprogramming, particularly in the conversion of fibroblasts to cardiac-like myocytes by cooperating with cardiac transcription factors such as Gata4, Hand2, and Mef2c . The importance of PHF7 in epigenetic research stems from its ability to modify chromatin structure through recruitment of chromatin remodeling complexes like SWI/SNF, specifically interacting with SMARCD3 (BAF60c), a subunit known to orchestrate cardiac development . By studying PHF7, researchers can gain insights into the mechanisms governing cell fate determination, gene expression regulation, and tissue-specific development programs.

PHF7's ability to localize to super enhancers and strengthen transcription factor binding to target regulatory regions makes it a fascinating subject for investigation in developmental biology, regenerative medicine, and epigenetic regulation studies. Particularly noteworthy is PHF7's capacity to identify cardiac regulatory regions in fibroblasts through its recognition of H3K4me2 marks, suggesting its potential role as a molecular bridge between the epigenome and cell-type-specific transcriptional programs .

What are the principal applications of HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies in molecular biology?

HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies serve as valuable tools for detecting and visualizing PHF7 protein in various experimental contexts. Similar to other HRP-conjugated antibodies, these conjugates are primarily used in immunoassays and immunoblotting applications where sensitive detection is required . The principal applications include:

  • Western blotting/immunoblotting: HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies enable direct detection of PHF7 protein in cell or tissue lysates without requiring a secondary antibody step, streamlining the experimental workflow and potentially reducing background signal.

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by detection (ChIP-western): After chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify PHF7-bound genomic regions, HRP-conjugated antibodies can be used to confirm the presence of PHF7 in the immunoprecipitated complexes.

  • Immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry: For tissue sections or fixed cells, HRP-conjugated antibodies allow for visualization of PHF7 localization through enzymatic conversion of chromogenic substrates like DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine).

  • ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay): HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies can be employed in quantitative detection of PHF7 in biological samples, providing a sensitive readout through colorimetric, chemiluminescent, or fluorescent substrate conversion .

These applications are particularly valuable for researchers studying epigenetic regulation mechanisms, chromatin dynamics, or cellular reprogramming processes involving PHF7.

How should PHF7 antibody, HRP conjugated be stored to maintain optimal activity?

Proper storage of HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies is critical for maintaining their functional integrity and extending their shelf life. Based on established protocols for similar antibodies, these conjugates should be stored at -20°C in a non-frost-free freezer to prevent damaging freeze-thaw cycles . The antibody solution typically contains stabilizers such as 50% glycerol (v/v) to prevent freezing at this temperature, maintaining the antibody in a semi-liquid state that helps preserve its activity .

For working solutions, aliquoting the stock antibody into single-use volumes prior to freezing is strongly recommended to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, which can significantly diminish antibody activity and specificity. When handling the antibody, it should be kept on ice or at 4°C and returned to -20°C storage promptly after use. Short-term storage (1-2 weeks) at 4°C is generally acceptable for working aliquots, but prolonged storage at this temperature may lead to decreased activity due to gradual denaturation of the antibody protein or degradation of the HRP enzyme.

It's important to note that exposure to strong light, particularly UV light, should be minimized as it can affect both the antibody and the HRP conjugate. Additionally, avoid contamination of the antibody solution with microorganisms or chemicals that might compromise its functionality. Regular monitoring of antibody performance through positive controls can help determine whether storage conditions are adequate or if antibody activity has diminished over time.

What considerations are important when designing ChIP-seq experiments with PHF7 antibodies?

When designing Chromatin Immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments with PHF7 antibodies, several critical factors must be considered to ensure experimental success and data reliability. First, antibody specificity is paramount – researchers should validate the PHF7 antibody's specificity through approaches such as western blotting with known positive and negative controls, or by using genetically modified cell lines (knockout or knockdown of PHF7) . The antibody should recognize PHF7 without cross-reactivity to other PHD-finger containing proteins.

For experimental design, multiple biological replicates (minimum of 3) are essential to account for biological variability and establish reproducible binding sites. Based on previous PHF7 ChIP-seq studies, researchers should consider using epitope-tagged PHF7 constructs (such as 3xTy1 tags) for immunoprecipitation if direct ChIP with PHF7 antibodies proves challenging . Cross-linking conditions should be optimized; typical formaldehyde fixation (1%) for 10 minutes at room temperature works for many histone readers, but pilot experiments might be necessary to determine optimal conditions for PHF7.

Sonication or enzymatic digestion parameters should be carefully optimized to generate chromatin fragments of approximately 200-500 bp, which are ideal for high-resolution mapping of binding sites. Special attention should be paid to chromatin input amounts, antibody concentrations, and incubation conditions – usually 2-5 μg of antibody per ChIP reaction with overnight incubation at 4°C provides good results. Appropriate controls are crucial, including input chromatin (pre-immunoprecipitation), IgG control (non-specific binding), and ideally a PHF7 knockout/knockdown sample as a negative control .

For data analysis, researchers should be aware that PHF7 binds predominantly to intergenic and intronic genomic regions consistent with regulatory elements . Analysis should include evaluating co-localization with H3K4me2/3 marks to validate the expected binding pattern of PHF7 as a histone reader protein that recognizes these modifications.

How can I optimize western blot protocols when using HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies?

Optimizing western blot protocols for HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies requires careful consideration of several technical aspects to achieve clear and specific detection. First, sample preparation is critical – complete lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors are essential to preserve PHF7 integrity, and nuclear extraction protocols may be necessary as PHF7 functions primarily as a nuclear protein involved in chromatin interactions .

For gel electrophoresis, 8-10% polyacrylamide gels are typically appropriate for resolving PHF7 (expected molecular weight should be verified based on the specific protein variant being studied). Transfer efficiency to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes should be optimized based on protein size – wet transfer methods often provide better results for nuclear proteins compared to semi-dry transfers.

The blocking step is particularly important when using HRP-conjugated antibodies to minimize background signal. A 5% non-fat dry milk or 3-5% BSA solution in TBST (Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20) is commonly effective, with blocking times of 1-2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Unlike traditional western blots that use separate primary and secondary antibodies, HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies combine these steps, requiring careful optimization of antibody dilution. Starting with a 1:1000 to 1:5000 dilution range is recommended, with systematic testing to determine the optimal concentration that provides specific signal with minimal background .

Incubation time and temperature are also critical – while standard protocols suggest 1-2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C, HRP-conjugated antibodies might require shorter incubation times to prevent non-specific binding. Thorough washing steps (typically 3-5 washes of 5-10 minutes each with TBST) are essential to remove unbound antibody and reduce background signal. For detection, enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrates are commonly used, with exposure times adjusted based on signal strength.

A methodological table for optimization might include:

ParameterSuggested Starting PointsOptimization Range
Antibody Dilution1:20001:1000 - 1:10,000
Blocking Agent5% milk in TBST3-5% BSA or milk
Incubation Time2 hours at RT1-4 hours at RT or overnight at 4°C
Wash BufferTBST (0.1% Tween-20)0.05% - 0.3% Tween-20
Number of Washes4 × 5 minutes3-6 × 5-10 minutes

What controls should be included when using PHF7 antibody, HRP conjugated in immunoassays?

Including appropriate controls in immunoassays with HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies is essential for validating results and troubleshooting potential issues. A comprehensive control strategy should include both positive and negative controls to verify antibody specificity and experimental validity.

Positive controls should include samples known to express PHF7, such as cell lines with confirmed PHF7 expression (e.g., certain embryonic or cardiac cell lines based on PHF7's role in cardiac reprogramming) . Recombinant PHF7 protein can serve as an excellent positive control for western blotting and ELISA applications. For cell-based assays, cells overexpressing tagged PHF7 (such as PHF7-3xTy1) provide readily detectable signals that confirm antibody functionality .

Negative controls are equally important and should include samples devoid of the target protein. PHF7 knockout or knockdown cell lines represent ideal negative controls when available. Alternatively, cell types with naturally low or absent PHF7 expression can be used. For western blotting, pre-absorption controls (where the antibody is pre-incubated with excess recombinant PHF7 protein before use) can demonstrate binding specificity – a diminished signal indicates that the antibody is binding specifically to PHF7.

Technical controls specific to HRP-conjugated antibodies should also be incorporated. These include substrate-only controls (omitting the antibody) to assess non-enzymatic substrate conversion, and enzyme inhibition controls using peroxidase inhibitors like sodium azide to confirm that the signal depends on HRP activity. Non-specific binding controls using isotype-matched HRP-conjugated antibodies irrelevant to the target can help distinguish specific binding from Fc receptor or other non-specific interactions .

For quantitative assays, standard curves using purified recombinant PHF7 at known concentrations are essential for accurate quantification. Calibration controls employing standardized HRP activity measurements can help normalize results across different experimental batches or when comparing results from different antibody lots.

How can PHF7 antibodies be utilized to study chromatin remodeling mechanisms in cardiac reprogramming?

PHF7 antibodies, particularly HRP-conjugated variants, provide powerful tools for investigating the complex mechanisms of chromatin remodeling during cardiac reprogramming. Research has demonstrated that PHF7 plays a critical role in direct cardiac reprogramming by enhancing the efficiency of converting fibroblasts to induced cardiac-like myocytes (iCLMs) . To study these mechanisms, researchers can employ several advanced methodological approaches using PHF7 antibodies.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) with PHF7 antibodies reveals genome-wide binding patterns, identifying regulatory elements involved in cardiac reprogramming. Previous studies have shown that PHF7 binds predominantly to intergenic and intronic regions, consistent with enhancer locations, and particularly to cardiac super enhancers (SEs) during reprogramming . Sequential ChIP (ChIP-reChIP) using PHF7 antibodies followed by antibodies against cardiac transcription factors (Gata4, Hand2, Mef2c) can determine co-occupancy at specific genomic loci, providing insights into cooperative binding events critical for reprogramming.

HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies are particularly valuable for immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry studies to visualize the spatiotemporal dynamics of PHF7 localization during the reprogramming process. Co-localization studies with markers of active chromatin (H3K4me2/3, H3K27ac) and cardiac transcription factors can reveal how PHF7 orchestrates the establishment of cardiac-specific gene expression programs . Additionally, proximity ligation assays (PLA) using PHF7 antibodies in combination with antibodies against SWI/SNF complex components (particularly SMARCD3/BAF60c) can confirm physical interactions between these proteins in situ, providing spatial context to biochemical interaction data .

For mechanistic studies, researchers can combine PHF7 antibodies with transient inhibition of PHF7 expression using inducible systems to track consequent changes in chromatin accessibility (through ATAC-seq), histone modifications (through ChIP-seq for H3K4me2/3 and H3K27ac), and gene expression (through RNA-seq). This approach has revealed that PHF7 enhances cardiac TF binding to target loci and activates cardiac enhancers, particularly at the MHC super enhancer governing cardiac myosin isoform expression .

What are the methodological considerations when using PHF7 antibodies to investigate the interplay between histone modifications and transcription factors?

When investigating the complex interplay between histone modifications and transcription factors using PHF7 antibodies, researchers must carefully consider several methodological aspects to obtain reliable and biologically meaningful data. PHF7's role as a histone reader that binds H3K4me2/3 modifications while also interacting with transcription factors and chromatin remodeling complexes makes it an excellent model for studying these interactions .

Sequential chromatin immunoprecipitation (Re-ChIP) represents a powerful approach, where chromatin is first immunoprecipitated with antibodies against specific histone modifications (H3K4me2/3) followed by a second immunoprecipitation with PHF7 antibodies, or vice versa. This technique identifies genomic regions where both the histone mark and PHF7 co-localize, providing direct evidence of PHF7's reading function in a native chromatin context. When implementing this technique, buffer compatibility between immunoprecipitation steps is crucial, often requiring gentle elution methods that preserve epitopes for the second immunoprecipitation.

For examining PHF7's interactions with transcription factors, co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) using HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies followed by western blotting for cardiac transcription factors (such as Gata4, Hand2, and Mef2c) can confirm physical interactions . Nuclear extract preparation is critical for these experiments, requiring conditions that preserve protein-protein interactions while efficiently extracting nuclear proteins. Crosslinking conditions must be carefully optimized – too little crosslinking may fail to capture transient interactions, while excessive crosslinking can mask epitopes and reduce antibody binding efficiency.

Genome-wide association studies combining CHiP-seq data for PHF7, histone modifications, and transcription factors require sophisticated bioinformatic approaches to identify statistically significant co-occurrence patterns. Diffbind or similar algorithms can be employed to identify differential binding sites, while motif analysis can reveal enrichment of specific transcription factor binding sites at PHF7-occupied regions . Quantitative analysis of ChIP-seq signal intensities at these sites can provide insights into how PHF7 influences the strength of transcription factor binding and histone mark deposition.

In mechanistic studies, researchers should consider the temporal dynamics of these interactions during processes like cellular reprogramming. Time-course experiments with synchronized cell populations can reveal the sequence of events – whether PHF7 binding precedes, coincides with, or follows transcription factor recruitment and changes in histone modifications. This temporal information is essential for establishing causality in the molecular mechanisms governing chromatin-based regulation.

How can multiplexed immunoassays be developed using PHF7 antibody, HRP conjugated alongside other epigenetic markers?

Developing multiplexed immunoassays that incorporate HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies alongside other epigenetic markers requires sophisticated methodological approaches to overcome the inherent limitations of using multiple HRP-conjugated antibodies simultaneously. Multiplexed detection is particularly valuable for studying the complex interplay between PHF7 and other epigenetic regulators in processes like cellular reprogramming .

One effective approach involves sequential multiplexing through iterative rounds of antibody staining, imaging, and signal quenching/stripping. This technique begins with applying the HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibody, developing the signal with a substrate (typically using different chromogenic substrates like DAB, AEC, or fluorescent tyramides), imaging the result, and then chemically inactivating the HRP enzyme and/or stripping the antibody before proceeding with the next marker. Complete inactivation can be achieved using sodium azide, hydrogen peroxide, or acidic glycine buffers, with validation steps to ensure no residual activity remains before proceeding to the next marker.

For simultaneous detection of multiple markers, researchers can employ spectrally distinct fluorophores through tyramide signal amplification (TSA). In this approach, HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibody is used with a specific fluorophore-conjugated tyramide, which becomes covalently bound to tyrosine residues in the vicinity of the HRP enzyme. After signal development, the HRP activity is completely quenched before applying the next HRP-conjugated antibody targeting a different epigenetic marker with a spectrally distinct fluorophore-tyramide pair. This method allows for the detection of multiple markers in the same sample with subcellular resolution.

A methodological table for a typical five-marker multiplexed immunofluorescence protocol might include:

RoundTargetAntibody TypeDetection SystemImaging ChannelQuenching Method
1PHF7HRP-conjugatedTyramide-Cy3550/570 nm3% H₂O₂, 100 mM NaN₃
2H3K4me3HRP-conjugatedTyramide-FITC490/525 nm3% H₂O₂, 100 mM NaN₃
3SMARCD3HRP-conjugatedTyramide-Cy5650/670 nm3% H₂O₂, 100 mM NaN₃
4GATA4HRP-conjugatedTyramide-Pacific Blue410/455 nm3% H₂O₂, 100 mM NaN₃
5H3K27acHRP-conjugatedTyramide-Cy7750/775 nmFinal round

For quantitative multiplexed analyses, such as multiplex ELISA or protein array formats, spatial separation of capture antibodies in microwell plates or microarray spots allows simultaneous detection of multiple targets. In these formats, the HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibody would be used alongside other HRP-conjugated antibodies targeting different epigenetic regulators, with signals developed using a common substrate and quantified based on spatial position rather than spectral properties.

What are common issues encountered when using PHF7 antibody, HRP conjugated, and how can they be resolved?

Researchers working with HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies may encounter several technical challenges that can impact experimental results. By understanding these common issues and implementing appropriate solutions, these problems can be effectively mitigated.

High background signal is a frequent problem that manifests as non-specific staining or bands in immunoblotting, or elevated baseline signals in ELISAs. This issue may stem from insufficient blocking, inadequate washing, or antibody concentration being too high. To resolve this, researchers should optimize blocking conditions (increasing blocking agent concentration to 5% or switching between milk and BSA), extend washing steps (4-6 washes of 10 minutes each with gentle agitation), and perform careful antibody titration to determine the minimum effective concentration . Additionally, increasing the Tween-20 concentration in wash buffers (up to 0.3%) can help reduce non-specific hydrophobic interactions.

Loss of signal or low sensitivity can occur due to antibody degradation, insufficient antigen, or suboptimal detection conditions. To address this, researchers should first verify antibody activity using positive controls and check storage conditions – HRP-conjugated antibodies typically require storage at -20°C with minimal freeze-thaw cycles . Antigen retrieval methods (for fixed tissues or cells) should be optimized to ensure epitope accessibility. Enhanced chemiluminescent (ECL) substrates with higher sensitivity can be employed, and longer exposure times during imaging may help detect weak signals. For quantitative assays, signal amplification systems like tyramide signal amplification (TSA) can significantly enhance detection sensitivity.

Non-specific bands in western blotting may represent cross-reactivity with structurally similar proteins (other PHD finger proteins), protein degradation products, or post-translational modifications. Researchers should validate antibody specificity using knockout/knockdown controls when available. Adjusting lysis conditions to include appropriate protease inhibitors can minimize degradation products. Pre-absorption of the antibody with recombinant PHF7 protein can help verify which bands are specific. Additionally, more stringent washing conditions or higher dilutions of antibody may reduce cross-reactivity.

Batch-to-batch variability can significantly impact experimental reproducibility. Researchers should maintain detailed records of antibody lot numbers and performance characteristics. When receiving a new lot, side-by-side comparison with the previous lot using standardized positive controls helps ensure consistent performance. Establishing internal standards and normalization procedures for quantitative assays can help accommodate minor variations between antibody lots.

How should researchers interpret ChIP-seq data generated using PHF7 antibodies in the context of cellular reprogramming studies?

Interpreting ChIP-seq data generated using PHF7 antibodies in cellular reprogramming studies requires careful analysis and consideration of biological context. PHF7 has been shown to play a crucial role in direct cardiac reprogramming by binding to specific genomic loci and influencing chromatin structure . When analyzing such data, researchers should focus on several key aspects to extract meaningful biological insights.

First, binding pattern analysis should examine the genomic distribution of PHF7 binding sites. Previous studies have shown that PHF7 predominantly binds to intergenic and intronic regions consistent with enhancer locations, particularly cardiac super enhancers during reprogramming . Researchers should quantify the percentage of binding sites in different genomic features (promoters, introns, intergenic regions) and compare this distribution to random genomic segments to identify significant enrichment patterns. Analysis of the distance between PHF7 binding sites and transcription start sites (TSS) can provide insights into whether PHF7 primarily functions at promoters or distal regulatory elements.

Co-localization analysis with histone modifications is critical given PHF7's role as a histone reader protein that recognizes H3K4me2/3 marks . Researchers should examine the overlap between PHF7 binding sites and ChIP-seq data for various histone modifications, particularly H3K4me2/3 (which PHF7 directly binds) and H3K27ac (which marks active enhancers). Heatmaps and aggregate plots centered on PHF7 peaks can visualize the spatial relationship between PHF7 binding and these histone modifications. During reprogramming, researchers should track changes in these patterns over time to understand how PHF7 influences the epigenetic landscape during cell fate conversion.

Motif enrichment analysis can identify transcription factor binding motifs enriched at PHF7-bound regions, providing insights into potential cooperative interactions. In cardiac reprogramming contexts, enrichment of cardiac transcription factor motifs (GATA, MEF2, TBX, etc.) at PHF7 binding sites would support its role in cardiac gene regulation . De novo motif discovery may also identify previously unrecognized sequence features at PHF7 binding sites.

Integrative analysis with other genomic data is essential for biological interpretation. Researchers should correlate PHF7 binding patterns with RNA-seq data to identify genes whose expression changes correlate with nearby PHF7 binding. Integration with ATAC-seq data can reveal how PHF7 binding relates to changes in chromatin accessibility during reprogramming. Comparison with ChIP-seq data for cardiac transcription factors and SWI/SNF complex components can identify sites of co-occupancy and potential cooperative action .

Temporal dynamics analysis in time-course experiments can reveal the sequence of events during reprogramming. Does PHF7 binding precede or follow changes in histone modifications, chromatin accessibility, or transcription factor binding? Such temporal information is critical for establishing causal relationships in the reprogramming process.

How can researchers validate the specificity of PHF7 antibodies for distinguishing between different PHD finger proteins?

Validating the specificity of PHF7 antibodies for distinguishing between different PHD finger proteins is crucial given the structural similarities within this protein family. The PHD (Plant Homeodomain) finger domain is a common zinc finger motif found in numerous nuclear proteins involved in chromatin-mediated gene regulation, and cross-reactivity between these structurally similar proteins can lead to misinterpretation of experimental results .

A comprehensive validation strategy begins with sequence analysis and epitope mapping. Researchers should determine which region of PHF7 the antibody recognizes and perform sequence alignment with other PHD finger proteins to identify potential cross-reactive domains. If the antibody targets a highly conserved PHD finger domain, the risk of cross-reactivity is greater than if it targets a unique region specific to PHF7. Commercial antibodies should provide information about the immunogen used for antibody generation, which helps in predicting potential cross-reactivity.

Genetic validation approaches provide the most definitive evidence of antibody specificity. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of PHF7 should eliminate the signal in western blotting, immunoprecipitation, or immunostaining if the antibody is specific. Similarly, siRNA or shRNA-mediated knockdown should proportionally reduce signal intensity. Overexpression systems using tagged PHF7 (e.g., FLAG, Myc, or GFP-tagged) can be used to confirm that the antibody recognizes the correct protein by detecting both the endogenous and overexpressed protein with the expected size difference .

Biochemical validation using recombinant proteins offers another approach. A panel of recombinant PHD finger proteins, including PHF7 and structurally similar family members (such as PHF1, PHF2, PHD finger protein 8, etc.), can be used in western blotting or ELISA to assess cross-reactivity . Ideally, the antibody should show strong signal with PHF7 and negligible signal with other family members. Competition assays where the antibody is pre-incubated with excess recombinant PHF7 before application to samples should abolish specific binding if the antibody is truly specific for PHF7.

Mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitated material provides an unbiased approach to identify all proteins recognized by the antibody. Immunoprecipitation using the PHF7 antibody followed by mass spectrometry analysis should predominantly identify PHF7 peptides, with minimal or absent peptides from other PHD finger proteins if the antibody is highly specific.

A methodological table for antibody validation might include:

Validation MethodExpected Result for Specific AntibodyCommon Pitfalls
Western blot - PHF7 KO/KDAbsence/reduction of target bandIncomplete KO/KD; non-specific bands remain
Western blot - PHF7 overexpressionAdditional band at expected MW for tagged proteinMultiple bands due to degradation
IP-Mass Spectrometry>80% of peptides map to PHF7Co-precipitating proteins may be misinterpreted
Recombinant protein panelSignal with PHF7, minimal with other PHD proteinsBuffer conditions may affect specificity
Competition assayPre-absorption with PHF7 eliminates signalIncomplete blocking if antibody concentration too high

What role might PHF7 antibodies play in studying the epigenetic mechanisms of cellular reprogramming beyond cardiac lineages?

PHF7 antibodies, particularly HRP-conjugated variants, have significant potential for investigating epigenetic mechanisms in cellular reprogramming beyond cardiac lineages. While initial research established PHF7's role in enhancing direct cardiac reprogramming, its fundamental function as a histone reader protein that recognizes H3K4me2/3 marks and interacts with chromatin remodeling complexes suggests broader applications across multiple cell fate conversion contexts .

Neuronal reprogramming represents a promising area where PHF7 antibodies could provide valuable insights. Similar to cardiac reprogramming, direct conversion of fibroblasts to neurons involves overcoming epigenetic barriers and establishing new transcriptional networks. Researchers could employ PHF7 antibodies in ChIP-seq experiments to determine if PHF7 similarly binds to neuronal super enhancers during neuronal reprogramming, potentially interacting with neurogenic transcription factors like Ascl1, Brn2, and Myt1l. Comparative analysis of PHF7 binding patterns between cardiac and neuronal reprogramming contexts could reveal common principles of epigenetic regulation during cell fate conversion as well as lineage-specific differences.

Hepatic reprogramming studies could benefit from investigating whether PHF7 interacts with liver-specific transcription factors (HNF4α, FoxA factors) to facilitate chromatin remodeling at hepatic regulatory elements. Similarly, pancreatic reprogramming research could examine PHF7's potential role in enabling pioneer factor activity of PDX1 and other pancreatic transcription factors. The ability of PHF7 to locate cell-type-specific enhancers through H3K4me2 recognition makes it potentially relevant to diverse reprogramming contexts .

Beyond direct reprogramming, PHF7 antibodies could be valuable for studying induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) generation. The process of somatic cell reprogramming to pluripotency involves extensive chromatin remodeling and establishment of pluripotency-associated enhancer networks. Research could investigate whether PHF7 facilitates the action of Yamanaka factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, c-Myc) by modifying chromatin accessibility at pluripotency-associated regulatory elements.

Time-course experiments using PHF7 antibodies during various reprogramming processes could reveal whether PHF7 functions as an early facilitator of pioneer factor binding or plays a later role in stabilizing newly established enhancer networks. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments with lineage-specific transcription factors across different reprogramming contexts would establish whether PHF7's ability to interact with and strengthen transcription factor binding extends beyond cardiac factors to other lineage-determining transcription factors .

How might PHF7 antibodies be used to investigate potential therapeutic applications in regenerative medicine?

PHF7 antibodies represent valuable research tools for investigating potential therapeutic applications in regenerative medicine, particularly given PHF7's demonstrated ability to enhance direct cardiac reprogramming efficiency. Research has shown that PHF7 can increase the reprogramming efficiency of adult cardiac human fibroblasts by approximately three to four-fold when added to a human reprogramming cocktail, suggesting significant therapeutic potential .

For cardiac regeneration studies, HRP-conjugated PHF7 antibodies can be employed to track PHF7 expression and localization in cardiac injury models treated with reprogramming factors. Immunohistochemistry on tissue sections from infarcted hearts undergoing in vivo reprogramming can reveal whether endogenous PHF7 is upregulated in response to injury and whether its expression correlates with successful conversion of fibroblasts to cardiomyocyte-like cells. Single-cell analysis combining antibody-based detection methods with transcriptomic profiling can identify cellular subpopulations most responsive to PHF7-enhanced reprogramming, potentially revealing optimal target cell types for therapeutic interventions.

For developing cell-based therapies, PHF7 antibodies can help optimize ex vivo reprogramming protocols by monitoring PHF7 expression levels and chromatin binding patterns during the conversion process. Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by qPCR for key cardiac genes can establish correlations between PHF7 binding to cardiac enhancers and successful acquisition of cardiomyocyte identity, potentially identifying predictive biomarkers of reprogramming success. Flow cytometry using fluorophore-conjugated PHF7 antibodies could enable selection of cells with optimal PHF7 expression levels for transplantation.

In drug discovery contexts, high-throughput screening assays utilizing PHF7 antibodies can identify small molecules that mimic or enhance PHF7's effects on chromatin remodeling during reprogramming. Compounds that increase PHF7 expression, enhance its binding to H3K4me2/3 marks, or strengthen its interactions with the SWI/SNF complex represent potential therapeutic candidates . For such screening applications, PHF7 antibodies can be adapted to automated immunofluorescence or ELISA formats to quantify changes in PHF7 expression or activity in response to compound libraries.

Safety assessment of PHF7-based therapeutic approaches requires careful monitoring of off-target effects. PHF7 antibodies can be used in ChIP-seq experiments to map genome-wide binding patterns following manipulation of PHF7 expression, identifying any potentially concerning binding to oncogenes or other safety-relevant loci. Multiplex immunohistochemistry combining PHF7 antibodies with markers of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cellular identity can assess whether PHF7 manipulation affects tissue homeostasis beyond the intended reprogramming effects.

What advanced microscopy techniques can be combined with PHF7 antibodies to study chromatin dynamics in live cells?

Advanced microscopy techniques combined with PHF7 antibodies or fluorescently tagged PHF7 constructs offer powerful approaches for studying chromatin dynamics in live cells, providing temporal and spatial resolution that complement the static snapshots obtained from conventional ChIP-seq or fixed-cell immunofluorescence studies. While HRP-conjugated antibodies are primarily used in fixed-cell applications, related approaches using fluorescent tags can enable live-cell visualization of PHF7 dynamics during processes like cellular reprogramming.

Super-resolution microscopy techniques such as Structured Illumination Microscopy (SIM), Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) microscopy, or Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy (STORM) can be applied to fixed cells labeled with immunofluorescent PHF7 antibodies to visualize the spatial distribution of PHF7 at sub-diffraction resolution (approximately 20-100 nm). These techniques can reveal whether PHF7 forms distinct nuclear foci at specific genomic loci during reprogramming, potentially corresponding to the cardiac super enhancers identified in ChIP-seq studies . For such applications, secondary antibodies conjugated with appropriate fluorophores (rather than HRP) would be used after primary PHF7 antibody labeling.

For live-cell imaging, CRISPR-mediated knock-in of fluorescent protein tags (GFP, mCherry) to the endogenous PHF7 locus allows visualization of PHF7 dynamics with minimal disruption to its natural expression patterns and functions. Alternatively, doxycycline-inducible expression of fluorescently tagged PHF7 at near-physiological levels can be employed, similar to the doxycycline-inducible system previously used to study PHF7's role in reprogramming . These approaches enable time-lapse imaging to track PHF7 nuclear localization patterns during the reprogramming process, potentially revealing dynamic recruitment to specific nuclear domains during key phases of cell fate conversion.

Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) can assess the dynamics of PHF7-chromatin interactions in live cells expressing fluorescently tagged PHF7. By photobleaching PHF7 fluorescence in specific nuclear regions and measuring the rate of fluorescence recovery, researchers can quantify whether PHF7 exhibits stable or transient binding to chromatin, and whether these binding dynamics change during the reprogramming process or in response to specific signaling events.

Single-molecule tracking of PHF7 can be achieved using techniques like Single-Particle Tracking (SPT) where PHF7 is tagged with photoactivatable fluorescent proteins or quantum dots. This approach enables tracking of individual PHF7 molecules as they navigate the nuclear environment, binding to and dissociating from chromatin. Analysis of diffusion coefficients and residence times can reveal mechanistic insights into how PHF7 searches for and identifies its target binding sites at H3K4me2/3-marked regions .

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) microscopy can visualize direct interactions between PHF7 and other proteins in live cells. By expressing PHF7 fused to a donor fluorophore (e.g., CFP) and potential interaction partners (such as SMARCD3/BAF60c or cardiac transcription factors) fused to acceptor fluorophores (e.g., YFP), researchers can visualize where and when these protein-protein interactions occur during cellular reprogramming .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.