RUB3 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks (made-to-order)
Synonyms
RUB3 antibody; UBQ16 antibody; At1g11980 antibody; F12F1.15NEDD8-like protein RUB3 antibody; Ubiquitin-related protein 3 antibody; AtRUB3 antibody
Target Names
RUB3
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a protein that may function as a stable post-translational modifier.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G11980

STRING: 3702.AT1G11980.1

UniGene: At.51581

Tissue Specificity
Detected in stems and flower buds, but not in leaves, mature flowers and seedlings.

Q&A

Here’s a structured collection of FAQs tailored for researchers studying RUNX3 Antibody (note: corrected from "RUB3" based on scientific literature), incorporating experimental design, methodological insights, and data analysis challenges:

What is the biological role of RUNX3, and how do antibodies targeting it aid in mechanistic studies?

RUNX3 is a transcription factor critical for immune cell differentiation (e.g., CD8+ T cells, NK cells) and tumor suppression . Antibodies like R3-5G4 enable:

  • Flow cytometry: Tracking RUNX3 expression in immune subsets (e.g., intraepithelial lymphocytes) .

  • Immunohistochemistry: Localizing RUNX3 in gastric or neural tissues to study tumorigenesis .

  • Knockdown validation: Confirming CRISPR/Cas9-mediated RUNX3 deletion via Western blot .

What validation criteria ensure RUNX3 antibody specificity in experimental models?

Key validation steps include:

Validation MethodPurposeExample from Literature
ImmunoblotConfirm target band size (~45 kDa) and isoform detection SIRT6 antibody validation showed doublet bands due to splice variants .
Knockout/KnockdownVerify loss of signal in RUNX3-deficient cell lines BD Biosciences’ R3-5G4 validated in CHO cells .
Tissue specificityCompare expression in RUNX3-high (e.g., gut) vs. low tissues (e.g., lung) Used in studies of CD8αα intraepithelial lymphocytes .

How do researchers optimize RUNX3 antibody dilution for diverse applications?

A tiered approach is recommended:

  • Pilot titration: Test dilutions (1:100–1:1,000) in control tissues.

  • Blocking validation: Use peptide competition to confirm specificity .

  • Cross-species reactivity: Validate in murine/human models (e.g., thymic sections) .

How can epitope mapping resolve contradictory RUNX3 localization data across studies?

Discrepancies often arise from non-overlapping epitopes. Strategies include:

  • Structural alignment: Compare antibody-binding regions to RUNX3 domains (e.g., Runt homology domain) .

  • Mutagenesis: Introduce point mutations (e.g., D127A) to disrupt epitope binding .

  • Multiplex assays: Combine IF, ChIP-seq, and Co-IP to reconcile nuclear vs. cytoplasmic signals .

What computational approaches improve RUNX3 antibody design for cross-reactive epitopes?

Lessons from SARS-CoV-2 antibody engineering :

MethodApplication to RUNX3
Rosetta-based CDR designOptimize paratope flexibility for conserved RUNX family regions .
Molecular dynamicsSimulate RUNX3-antibody binding under pH shifts (e.g., tumor microenvironments) .
Affinity maturationUse phage display libraries to enhance binding for low-expressing isoforms .

How do researchers address RUNX3 antibody cross-reactivity in autoimmune disease models?

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) studies reveal:

  • Interference mitigation: Pre-adsorb serum with RUNX1/RUNX2 to isolate RUNX3-specific signals .

  • Assay thresholds: Establish cutoff values (e.g., >40 Units = moderate positivity) .

  • Longitudinal monitoring: Track antibody titers in SSc patients with renal crisis .

Why do RUNX3 expression levels vary between flow cytometry and Western blot data?

Common pitfalls and solutions:

FactorImpactResolution
Post-translational modificationPhosphorylation alters epitope accessibility Use phosphatase inhibitors during lysis.
Subcellular fractionationCytoplasmic vs. nuclear RUNX3 pools Validate with compartment-specific markers (e.g., Lamin B1).
Antibody clonalityPolyclonal vs. monoclonal (e.g., R3-5G4) cross-reactivity Compare multiple clones side-by-side.

Methodological Workflow Table

StepProtocolKey ParametersSource
Epitope validationCompetitive ELISA with RUNX3 peptidesIC50 ≤ 10 nM for high-affinity antibodies
In vivo modelingAdoptive transfer of RUNX3-deficient T cellsMonitor tumor growth suppression (e.g., gastric adenocarcinoma)
Data normalizationSpike-in controls (e.g., β-actin)CV < 15% across replicates

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.