RUNX1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
We typically dispatch products within 1-3 business days after receiving your order. Delivery times may vary depending on the shipping method and location. Please contact your local distributor for specific delivery time estimates.
Synonyms
Acute myeloid leukemia 1 antibody; Acute myeloid leukemia 1 protein antibody; alpha subunit core binding factor antibody; AML 1 antibody; AML1 antibody; AML1 EVI 1 antibody; AML1 EVI 1 fusion protein antibody; Aml1 oncogene antibody; AMLCR 1 antibody; AMLCR1 antibody; CBF alpha 2 antibody; CBF-alpha-2 antibody; CBFA 2 antibody; CBFA2 antibody; Core binding factor alpha 2 subunit antibody; Core binding factor runt domain alpha subunit 2 antibody; Core-binding factor subunit alpha-2 antibody; EVI 1 antibody; EVI1 antibody; HGNC antibody; Oncogene AML 1 antibody; Oncogene AML-1 antibody; OTTHUMP00000108696 antibody; OTTHUMP00000108697 antibody; OTTHUMP00000108699 antibody; OTTHUMP00000108700 antibody; OTTHUMP00000108702 antibody; PEA2 alpha B antibody; PEA2-alpha B antibody; PEBP2 alpha B antibody; PEBP2-alpha B antibody; PEBP2A2 antibody; PEBP2aB antibody; Polyomavirus enhancer binding protein 2 alpha B subunit antibody; Polyomavirus enhancer-binding protein 2 alpha B subunit antibody; Run1 antibody; Runt related transcription factor 1 antibody; Runt-related transcription factor 1 antibody; RUNX 1 antibody; Runx1 antibody; RUNX1_HUMAN antibody; SL3 3 enhancer factor 1 alpha B subunit antibody; SL3-3 enhancer factor 1 alpha B subunit antibody; SL3/AKV core binding factor alpha B subunit antibody; SL3/AKV core-binding factor alpha B subunit antibody
Target Names
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
RUNX1, in conjunction with CBFB, forms the heterodimeric complex core-binding factor (CBF). RUNX family members regulate the transcription of target genes by recognizing the core consensus binding sequence 5'-TGTGGT-3' (or rarely, 5'-TGCGGT-3') within their regulatory regions through their runt domain. CBFB, a non-DNA-binding regulatory subunit, enhances the sequence-specific DNA-binding capacity of RUNX allosterically. These heterodimers bind to the core site of numerous enhancers and promoters, including those of murine leukemia virus, polyomavirus enhancer, T-cell receptor enhancers, LCK, IL3, and GM-CSF promoters. RUNX1 plays a critical role in normal hematopoiesis. It acts synergistically with ELF4 to transactivate the IL-3 promoter and with ELF2 to transactivate the BLK promoter. RUNX1 inhibits KAT6B-dependent transcriptional activation and is involved in lineage commitment of immature T cell precursors. CBF complexes repress ZBTB7B transcription factor during cytotoxic (CD8+) T cell development. They bind to a RUNX-binding sequence within the ZBTB7B locus, acting as a transcriptional silencer and facilitating cytotoxic T cell differentiation. Binding of CBF complexes to this transcriptional silencer is essential for the recruitment of nuclear protein complexes that catalyze epigenetic modifications, establishing epigenetic ZBTB7B silencing. RUNX1 controls the anergy and suppressive function of regulatory T-cells (Treg) by associating with FOXP3. It activates the expression of IL2 and IFNG and down-regulates the expression of TNFRSF18, IL2RA, and CTLA4 in conventional T-cells. RUNX1 positively regulates the expression of RORC in T-helper 17 cells. Isoform AML-1G exhibits higher binding activities for target genes and binds TCR-beta-E2 and RAG-1 target site with threefold higher affinity than other isoforms. However, it is less effective in the context of neutrophil terminal differentiation. Isoform AML-1L interferes with the transactivation activity of RUNX1.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. This study demonstrated the presence of clonal heterogeneity and impaired FCM-MRD clearance among ETV6/RUNX1-positive patients, ultimately influencing prognosis. PMID: 29778230
  2. Results indicate that Runx1 associates with c-Abl kinase through its C-terminal inhibitory domain, which directly binds to c-Abl. Runx1 is also phosphorylated by c-Abl kinase, modulating its transcriptional activity and megakaryocyte maturation. PMID: 29730354
  3. The DEGs and pathways identified in this study enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying RUNX1 mutations in AML and facilitate the development of effective therapeutic strategies for RUNX1-mutation AML. PMID: 30289875
  4. RUNX1 regulates ITGA6 through a consensus RUNX1 binding motif in its promoter. PMID: 28926098
  5. Loss of RUNX1 resulted in enhanced proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung adenocarcinomas. PMID: 28926105
  6. Ezh2 and Runx1 mutations collaborate to initiate lympho-myeloid leukemia in early thymic progenitors. PMID: 29438697
  7. miR-144 mimics can inhibit the proliferation and migration of ovarian cancer cells by regulating the expression of RUNX1. PMID: 29445078
  8. The effect of FENDRR on cell proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion and migration ability in prostate cancer cells was suppressed by silencing of RUNX1. PMID: 29465000
  9. KSRP, miR-129, and RUNX1 participate in a regulatory axis to control the outcome of myeloid differentiation. PMID: 29127290
  10. PKM2, a novel target of RUNX1-ETO, is specifically downregulated in RUNX1-ETO positive AML patients. This suggests that PKM2 level might have diagnostic potential in RUNX1-ETO associated AML. PMID: 28092997
  11. Specific type of RUNX1 mutation did not affect its association pattern with trisomy 21. PMID: 29249799
  12. High RUNX1 expression is associated with prostatic cancer. PMID: 29328406
  13. RUNX1 Mutation is associated with acute myeloid leukemia. PMID: 29479958
  14. The specific association of ZBTB7A mutations with t(8;21) rearranged acute myeloid leukemia suggests leukemogenic cooperativity between mutant ZBTB7A and the RUNX1/RUNX1T1 fusion protein. PMID: 27252013
  15. miR-216a-3p can promote gastric cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by targeting RUNX1 and activating the NF-kappaB signaling pathway. PMID: 28835317
  16. The t(5;21)(p15;q22) translocation could be identified only when what appeared to be a del(21)(qq) in G-banded preparations was examined using FISH and RNA-sequencing. This investigation aimed to determine the underlying cause of the 21q-. PMID: 29672642
  17. Our findings underscore the profound impact of RUNX1 allele dosage on gene expression profile and glucocorticoid sensitivity in AML. This opens opportunities for preclinical testing that may lead to drug repurposing and improved disease characterization. PMID: 28855357
  18. This study established inducible RUNX1b/c-overexpressing human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines. RUNX1b/c overexpression in these lines prevented the emergence of CD34+ cells from early stage, drastically reducing the production of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Concurrently, the expression of hematopoiesis-related factors was downregulated. PMID: 28992293
  19. Genome-engineered hPSCs expressing ETV6-RUNX1 from the endogenous ETV6 locus exhibit expansion of the CD19(-)IL-7R(+) compartment. PMID: 29290585
  20. Our study demonstrated that specific bone marrow abnormalities and acquired genetic alterations may be precursors to hematological malignancies in patients with familial platelet disorder with germline RUNX1 mutation. PMID: 28659335
  21. These studies provide the first evidence in patients with a RUNX1 mutation for a defect in AH (lysosomal) secretion and for a global defect in secretion involving all three types of platelet granules, independent of a granule content deficiency. They highlight the pleiotropic effects and multiple platelet defects associated with RUNX1 mutations. PMID: 28662545
  22. Younger mRUNX1 AML patients treated with intensive chemotherapy experienced inferior treatment outcomes. In older patients with AML treated with hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy, response and survival were independent of RUNX1 status. Older mRUNX1 patients with prior myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) had particularly dismal outcome. PMID: 28933735
  23. Data indicate miR-29b-1 as a regulator of the AML1-ETO protein (RUNX1-RUNX1T1), and that miR-29b-1 expression in t(8;21)-carrying leukemic cell lines partially rescues the leukemic phenotype. PMID: 28611288
  24. EBPA and RUNX1 are expressed at higher levels in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in comparison to healthy subjects. PMID: 28895127
  25. This is the first characterization of CASC15 in RUNX1-translocated leukemia. PMID: 28724437
  26. These findings reveal an unexpected and significant epigenetic mini-circuit of AML1-ETO/THAP10/miR-383 in t(8;21) acute myeloid leukaemia. Epigenetic suppression of THAP10 predicts a poor clinical outcome and represents a novel therapeutic target. PMID: 28539478
  27. Several studies have examined the mechanism by which ETV6/RUNX1 (E/R) contributes to leukemogenesis, including the necessary secondary genetic lesions, the cellular framework in which E/R initially arises, and the maintenance of a pre-leukemic condition. [review] PMID: 28418909
  28. MLD- and MLD+ RUNX1-mutated AML differ in some associations with genetic markers, such as +13 or IDH2 mutation status, without prognostic impact in multivariate analysis. However, in RUNX1-mutated AML, the overall pattern reveals a specific landscape with high incidences of trisomies (such as +8 and +13), and mutations in the spliceosome and chromatin modifiers. PMID: 27211269
  29. RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels were measured in bone marrow samples collected from 208 patients at scheduled time points after transplantation. Over 90% of the 175 patients who were in continuous complete remission had a >/=3-log reduction in RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels from the time of diagnosis at each time point after transplantation and a >/=4-log reduction at >/=12 months. PMID: 28166825
  30. RUNX1 defects causing haploinsufficiency are thought to be associated with a lower incidence of myeloid malignancies compared to those patients with dominant-negative RUNX1 defects. PMID: 28277065
  31. This result suggests that TET2(P1962T) mutation in conjunction with germline RUNX1(R174Q) mutation leads to amplification of a hematopoietic clone susceptible to acquiring other transforming alterations. PMID: 27997762
  32. The presence of fusion genes BCR/ABL1, ETV6/RUNX1, and MLL/AF4 does not have any impact on the clinical and laboratory features of ALL at presentation. PMID: 26856288
  33. ETV6/RUNX1 (+) ALL may be heterogeneous in terms of prognosis. Variables such as MRD at end of remission induction or additional structural abnormalities of 12p could define a subset of patients who are likely to have poor outcome. PMID: 27506214
  34. High RUNX1 expression is associated with lymphoma. PMID: 27056890
  35. PLDN is a direct target of RUNX1, and its dysregulation is a mechanism for platelet dense granule deficiency associated with RUNX1 haplodeficiency. PMID: 28075530
  36. The transcriptomic subgroup-based approach presented here unified the gene expression profiles of RUNX1-CBFA2T3 and RUNX1-RUNX1T1 acute myeloid leukemia. PMID: 26968532
  37. Platelet CD34 expression and alpha/delta-granule abnormalities in GFI1B- and RUNX1-related familial bleeding disorders. PMID: 28096094
  38. A strong correlation was observed between EVI1 and alpha1, 6-fucosyltransferase (FUT8) in the chronic phase of the disease. Both were found to be up-regulated with the progression of the disease. PMID: 27967290
  39. This study elucidates a novel function of RUNX1 and offers an explanation for the link between RUNX1 mutations and chemotherapy and radiation resistance. These data suggest that pharmacologic modulation of RUNX1 might be an attractive new approach to treat hematologic malignancies. PMID: 29055018
  40. High EVI1 expression might predict a high risk of relapse in AML patients undergoing myeloablative allo-HSCT in CR1. PMID: 27042849
  41. Hypermethylation of the CTNNA1 promoter was associated with unfavorable karyotype and had a higher frequency of coexisting with ASXL1 and RUNX1 mutations. PMID: 27129146
  42. Three siblings with a germline causative RUNX1 variant developed acute myelomonocytic leukemia and acquired variants within the JAK-STAT pathway, specifically targeting JAK2 and SH2B3. PMID: 28513614
  43. These findings suggest that RUNX1high is a prognostic biomarker of unfavorable outcome in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. PMID: 26910834
  44. Three distinct heterozygous mutations segregated with thrombocytopenia in three families: one missense (c.578T > A/p.Ile193Asn) variant affecting a highly conserved residue of the runt-homologous domain, two nucleotide substitutions of the canonical "gt" dinucleotide in the donor splice sites of intron 4, (c.351 1 1G > A) and intron 8 (c.967 1 2_5del), and two alternative spliced products affecting the transactivation domain. PMID: 28240786
  45. This study reports the first identification of H3(K27M) and H3(K27I) mutations in patients with AML. It was found that these lesions are major determinants of reduced H3K27me2/3 in these patients and that they are associated with common aberrations in the RUNX1 gene. PMID: 28855157
  46. NPM1 mutation but not RUNX1 mutation or multilineage dysplasia defines a prognostic subgroup within de novo acute myeloid leukemia lacking recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities. PMID: 28370403
  47. This study describes the phenotype and bleeding risks of an inherited platelet disorder in a family with a RUNX1 frameshift mutation. PMID: 28181366
  48. ERG, FLI1, TAL1, and RUNX1 bind at all AML1-ETO-occupied regulatory regions, including those of the AML1-ETO gene itself, suggesting their involvement in regulating AML1-ETO expression levels. PMID: 27851970
  49. This research sheds light on the role of RUNX1 and the importance of dosage balance in the development of neural phenotypes in DS. PMID: 27618722
  50. Studies have shown transient expression of RUNX1 during early mesendodermal differentiation of hESCs, suggesting its contribution to differentiation in addition to hematopoietic lineage identity. RUNX1 has a defined role in epithelial to mesenchymal transition and the associated competency for cell mobility and motility required for development of the mesendodermal germ layer. [review] PMID: 27591551

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 10471

OMIM: 151385

KEGG: hsa:861

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000300305

UniGene: Hs.149261

Involvement In Disease
Familial platelet disorder with associated myeloid malignancy (FPDMM)
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed in all tissues examined except brain and heart. Highest levels in thymus, bone marrow and peripheral blood.

Q&A

What is the RUNX1 transcription factor and why is it significant in research?

RUNX1, also known as AML1 (Acute Myeloid Leukemia 1), functions as a key transcription factor forming heterodimeric complexes with CBFB (Core-Binding Factor Beta). This complex recognizes and binds to the core consensus sequence 5'-TGTGGT-3', or rarely 5'-TGCGGT-3', within regulatory regions of target genes . RUNX1 plays an essential role in normal hematopoiesis development and functions through its DNA-binding capabilities via the Runt domain . The significance of RUNX1 in research stems from its critical role in blood cell lineage determination, with expression predominantly in thymus, bone marrow, and peripheral blood tissues, while notably absent in brain and heart tissues . Its involvement in regulatory T-cell function through FOXP3 association and its ability to activate IL2 and IFNG expression while down-regulating TNFRSF18, IL2RA, and CTLA4 in conventional T-cells further underscores its research importance .

What are the primary applications for RUNX1 antibody, biotin conjugated?

The biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody serves as a versatile tool across multiple experimental applications. Primary applications include Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Western Blotting (WB), with recommended dilutions of 1:10,000 for optimal results in both techniques . The antibody can also be utilized in immunohistochemistry (IHC) at a 1:500 dilution . While some RUNX1 antibody variants support additional applications like ChIC/CUT&RUN-seq, immunoprecipitation (IP), flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry on frozen tissues (IHC-Fr), these applications may be dependent on specific antibody formulations and should be validated before use . The biotin conjugation specifically enhances detection capabilities by allowing for amplification of signal through streptavidin-based detection systems, making it particularly valuable for low-abundance target detection in complex biological samples .

How should researchers properly store and handle RUNX1 antibody, biotin conjugated?

Proper storage and handling of biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody is critical for maintaining its functionality and ensuring reproducible experimental results. The antibody should be stored at -20°C for long-term stability . Some formulations may alternatively be stored at -80°C, but researchers should avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this can degrade antibody quality and compromise binding efficiency . The antibody is typically supplied in a stabilization buffer containing 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative, 50% glycerol, and 0.01M PBS at pH 7.4 . This formulation helps maintain antibody integrity during storage. When handling the antibody for experimental procedures, it should be thawed completely but gently, kept on ice during use, and returned to storage promptly after aliquoting to minimize exposure to room temperature. Working aliquots may be prepared to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles of the stock solution when frequent use is anticipated .

How can researchers validate the specificity of RUNX1 antibody in their experimental system?

Validating antibody specificity is a critical step before conducting experiments with biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody. Researchers should implement a multi-step validation process beginning with positive and negative control samples. For positive controls, tissues or cell lines with known RUNX1 expression (such as thymus, bone marrow, or hematopoietic cell lines) should be used, while tissues known to lack RUNX1 expression (brain or heart) serve as negative controls . Western blot analysis should confirm a single band at the expected molecular weight for RUNX1 (approximately 49 kDa, though isoforms may vary). Additional validation can include siRNA knockdown or CRISPR knockout of RUNX1, where signal reduction should be observed with the antibody. For cross-reactivity concerns, particularly when working with antibodies that recognize multiple RUNX family members (RUNX1, RUNX2, RUNX3), researchers should conduct peptide competition assays using the immunogen peptide to confirm binding specificity . When validating for specific applications like ChIP or immunoprecipitation, sequential analysis with multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of RUNX1 provides robust confirmation of target specificity .

What are the optimal protocols for using biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody in Western blotting?

For optimal Western blotting results with biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody, researchers should follow a systematic protocol beginning with proper sample preparation. Cell or tissue lysates should be prepared using RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors, followed by protein quantification to ensure equal loading across samples. Approximately 20-30 μg of total protein should be loaded per lane on a 10-12% SDS-PAGE gel. After electrophoresis, proteins should be transferred to a PVDF membrane (preferred over nitrocellulose for enhanced protein retention). The membrane should be blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature. The RUNX1 biotin-conjugated antibody should be diluted to 1:10,000 in blocking buffer and incubated with the membrane overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation . Following thorough washing with TBST (3-5 times, 5 minutes each), the membrane should be incubated with streptavidin-HRP at 1:5000-1:10000 dilution for 1 hour at room temperature. After additional washing steps, signal development can proceed using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents. When troubleshooting, consider that high background may require more stringent washing or higher antibody dilutions, while weak signals might necessitate longer exposure times or signal amplification techniques .

How can researchers optimize ELISA protocols using biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody?

For ELISA optimization with biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody, researchers should establish a comprehensive protocol considering multiple parameters. Begin by coating high-binding ELISA plates with capture antibody (typically an unconjugated anti-RUNX1 antibody) at 1-2 μg/ml in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBS-T (PBS with 0.05% Tween-20), block non-specific binding sites with 2-5% BSA or non-fat dry milk in PBS for 1-2 hours at room temperature. Prepare a standard curve using recombinant RUNX1 protein alongside samples of interest. For detection, the biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody should be diluted to 1:10,000 in blocking buffer and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature . Following washing steps, add streptavidin-HRP (1:5000-1:10000) and incubate for 30-60 minutes. After final washing, develop with TMB substrate and stop the reaction with 2N H₂SO₄ before reading absorbance at 450 nm. For sandwich ELISA specifically, ensure the capture and detection antibodies recognize different epitopes to prevent competitive binding. Validation experiments should include determining the linear range of detection and the limit of detection through serial dilutions of positive control samples. Cross-reactivity testing with other RUNX family members may be necessary, especially when using antibodies that might recognize multiple RUNX proteins .

How does RUNX1 function in chromatin remodeling during hematopoietic development?

RUNX1 plays a pivotal role in chromatin remodeling during hematopoietic development, orchestrating blood-cell lineage-specific chromatin priming at surprisingly early developmental stages. Research has demonstrated that RUNX1 initiates the process of chromatin unfolding at critical hematopoietic regulator genes like Pu.1 and Csf1r, marking them for subsequent activation . This mechanism involves RUNX1 binding to its consensus sequences (5'-TGTGGT-3') within regulatory regions of target genes, where it recruits chromatin-modifying enzymes that facilitate the transition from condensed to accessible chromatin states . The molecular process includes histone modifications, particularly H3K4me3 enrichment (associated with active promoters) and H3K27ac accumulation (marking active enhancers). Once RUNX1 has established these initial chromatin alterations, it enables the assembly of stable transcription factor complexes that maintain the active chromatin state in a heritable manner, allowing for continued expression of hematopoietic genes even if RUNX1 expression later diminishes . This establishes a developmental window during which RUNX1 activity is critical; after stable transcription factor circuits form, the direct presence of RUNX1 becomes less essential for maintaining the hematopoietic cell fate, demonstrating the epigenetic memory established through its initial chromatin remodeling activities .

What are the implications of RUNX1 in T-cell development and how can researchers investigate this using biotin-conjugated antibodies?

RUNX1 exhibits multifaceted roles in T-cell development, with significant implications for immune regulation and T-cell lineage commitment. It forms CBF complexes that repress the ZBTB7B transcription factor during cytotoxic (CD8+) T-cell development by binding to RUNX-binding sequences within the ZBTB7B locus, acting as a transcriptional silencer . This binding is essential for recruiting nuclear protein complexes that catalyze epigenetic modifications, establishing epigenetic silencing of ZBTB7B and allowing for cytotoxic T-cell differentiation . Additionally, RUNX1 controls regulatory T-cell (Treg) anergy and suppressive function through association with FOXP3, activating IL2 and IFNG expression while down-regulating TNFRSF18, IL2RA, and CTLA4 in conventional T-cells . RUNX1 also positively regulates RORC expression in T-helper 17 cells .

To investigate these mechanisms using biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibodies, researchers can employ multiple approaches:

  • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP): Using biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibodies with streptavidin-coated magnetic beads to pull down RUNX1-bound chromatin, followed by qPCR or sequencing to identify binding sites within T-cell specific genes.

  • Co-immunoprecipitation: Investigating RUNX1 interactions with partners like FOXP3 by precipitating protein complexes with biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody followed by western blotting for associated proteins.

  • Flow cytometry: Analyzing RUNX1 expression levels across T-cell developmental stages using biotin-conjugated antibodies with fluorochrome-labeled streptavidin.

  • Immunofluorescence microscopy: Visualizing nuclear localization and co-localization with other transcription factors during T-cell activation and differentiation .

How can researchers effectively use biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody in multiplex detection systems?

Multiplex detection systems offer significant advantages for comprehensive analysis of complex signaling networks involving RUNX1. Biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibodies can be effectively incorporated into these systems through several optimized approaches. For multiplex immunofluorescence microscopy, researchers should pair the biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody with spectrally distinct fluorophore-conjugated streptavidin (e.g., streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 488, 568, or 647) while using primary antibodies from different host species for additional targets to prevent cross-reactivity . Optimal dilutions should be empirically determined, typically starting with 1:500 for tissue sections . For multiplex flow cytometry, intracellular staining protocols must include proper fixation and permeabilization steps, with 0.1% saponin or commercial permeabilization reagents suitable for nuclear transcription factor detection. Sequential staining may be necessary when combining surface and intracellular markers . In multiplex protein detection arrays or bead-based multiplex systems, researchers should validate the absence of cross-reactivity with other analytes in the panel through single-analyte control experiments. Signal amplification can be achieved by incorporating tyramide signal amplification (TSA) after streptavidin-HRP binding. For ChIP-seq or CUT&RUN applications in multiplex genomic studies, biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody should be validated for specificity using spike-in controls, and optimized antibody concentrations should be determined to minimize background while maintaining sensitivity . Batch effects can be controlled by including reference samples across experimental runs and incorporating appropriate normalization methods during data analysis .

How can researchers troubleshoot non-specific binding or weak signals when using biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody?

When encountering non-specific binding or weak signals with biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibody, researchers should implement a systematic troubleshooting approach addressing multiple experimental aspects. For non-specific binding issues, first examine blocking conditions by increasing the concentration of blocking agent (5-10% BSA or non-fat dry milk) or trying alternative blockers like normal serum from the secondary reagent species . Incorporating additional washing steps with increased stringency (higher salt concentration or 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 in wash buffers) can help reduce background signal. Pre-absorbing the antibody with tissue powder from a negative control sample may eliminate cross-reactive antibodies .

For weak signal issues, several strategies can be employed: First, optimize antibody concentration by testing a range of dilutions (e.g., 1:500 to 1:20,000) to identify the optimal signal-to-noise ratio . Antigen retrieval methods should be evaluated for tissue samples, with citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) under various heating conditions. Extended primary antibody incubation (overnight at 4°C rather than 1-2 hours at room temperature) often improves signal strength . Signal amplification systems such as tyramide signal amplification (TSA) or poly-HRP streptavidin can enhance detection of low-abundance targets.

To address biotin-specific issues, consider endogenous biotin blocking kits for tissues with high endogenous biotin (liver, kidney, brain) before applying biotin-conjugated antibodies. Finally, sample preparation is crucial - fresh samples generally yield better results than those subjected to prolonged storage, and optimal fixation protocols (4% paraformaldehyde for 10-15 minutes for cells) should be established for consistent results .

How should researchers analyze and interpret RUNX1 binding patterns in chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments?

Analysis and interpretation of RUNX1 binding patterns in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments require careful consideration of biological context and technical variables. Researchers should begin by establishing robust peak calling parameters, with recommended false discovery rate (FDR) thresholds of ≤0.05 and fold enrichment ≥2-fold over input or IgG control . Motif analysis of RUNX1-bound regions should confirm enrichment of the canonical binding motif (5'-TGTGGT-3' or 5'-TGCGGT-3'), which serves as a quality control measure for antibody specificity .

When analyzing genomic distribution of binding sites, researchers should categorize peaks based on their location relative to transcriptional start sites (promoter regions: ±2kb from TSS; distal regulatory elements: >2kb from TSS), as RUNX1 functions in both proximal promoters and distal enhancers . Integration with expression data is crucial - researchers should correlate ChIP-seq peaks with RNA-seq data from the same cell type to distinguish between functional binding events (associated with gene expression changes) and non-functional interactions. For developmental studies, comparison of RUNX1 binding patterns across different hematopoietic differentiation stages can reveal stage-specific regulatory mechanisms .

Co-localization analysis with other transcription factors and epigenetic marks provides deeper insights into RUNX1 function. Specifically, overlay with H3K4me3 (active promoters), H3K27ac (active enhancers), and binding data for known RUNX1 partners like CBFB can illuminate functional genomic regions . Validation of key binding sites should be performed using ChIP-qPCR with additional biological replicates. For data interpretation, researchers should consider that early chromatin priming by RUNX1 may not immediately correlate with gene expression changes, as demonstrated in studies showing RUNX1-mediated chromatin unfolding precedes transcriptional activation of hematopoietic genes .

How is RUNX1 antibody being utilized in research on hematological malignancies?

RUNX1 antibody applications in hematological malignancy research span diagnostic, prognostic, and mechanistic investigations due to RUNX1's critical role in leukemogenesis. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), where RUNX1 mutations occur in approximately 10-15% of cases, biotin-conjugated RUNX1 antibodies enable precise immunohistochemical assessment of RUNX1 protein expression patterns in patient samples . These analyses reveal how altered RUNX1 expression correlates with specific cytogenetic abnormalities, particularly the t(8;21) translocation that produces the RUNX1-ETO fusion protein . In mechanistic studies, ChIP-seq applications using RUNX1 antibodies have mapped genome-wide binding alterations of mutant RUNX1 proteins compared to wild-type, identifying dysregulated target genes contributing to leukemogenesis .

For minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring, multiplexed flow cytometry incorporating RUNX1 antibodies with other hematopoietic markers helps distinguish leukemic cells from normal progenitors . In translational research, RUNX1 antibodies facilitate screening of potential therapeutic compounds targeting the transcriptional complexes formed by RUNX1 and its partners . Co-immunoprecipitation studies using biotinylated RUNX1 antibodies have identified novel protein interactions specific to leukemic contexts, providing new therapeutic targets . Importantly, comparative analysis of RUNX1 binding patterns between healthy and malignant hematopoietic cells has revealed cancer-specific regulatory networks, with RUNX1 showing altered genomic distribution and differential co-factor recruitment in leukemic cells compared to normal counterparts . This research direction offers promising avenues for developing targeted therapies that specifically disrupt aberrant RUNX1-mediated transcriptional programs in hematological malignancies .

What are the latest techniques for studying RUNX1-mediated transcriptional regulation using biotinylated antibodies?

Cutting-edge techniques for studying RUNX1-mediated transcriptional regulation increasingly leverage the high affinity of biotinylated antibodies in combination with advanced genomic and proteomic methodologies. CUT&RUN (Cleavage Under Targets and Release Using Nuclease) represents one of the most significant advances, requiring substantially fewer cells than traditional ChIP-seq while providing higher signal-to-noise ratios . In this technique, biotinylated RUNX1 antibodies bound to protein A-micrococcal nuclease fusion proteins enable targeted DNA cleavage around RUNX1 binding sites, followed by next-generation sequencing of the released fragments. For single-cell applications, technologies like CITE-seq (Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing) combine biotinylated RUNX1 antibodies with oligonucleotide barcodes, allowing simultaneous analysis of RUNX1 protein levels and transcriptomes in thousands of individual cells .

Proximity ligation assays (PLA) using biotinylated RUNX1 antibodies in combination with antibodies against potential interaction partners enable in situ visualization of protein complexes at specific genomic loci . This approach has revealed cell type-specific RUNX1 co-factor interactions that would be missed in bulk biochemical assays. For studying chromatin looping and three-dimensional genome organization, HiChIP protocols incorporating biotinylated RUNX1 antibodies allow identification of long-range chromatin interactions mediated by RUNX1, providing insights into how distant enhancers regulate RUNX1 target genes .

Nascent RNA capture techniques combined with RUNX1 ChIP-seq have refined our understanding of direct transcriptional targets versus secondary effects, with biotin-streptavidin purification systems enhancing the sensitivity of these approaches . Finally, CRISPR-based epigenome editing systems that recruit RUNX1 to specific genomic loci are being used to dissect the sufficiency of RUNX1 binding for initiating chromatin remodeling and gene activation during hematopoietic specification, complementing the loss-of-function studies that have dominated the field .

How can researchers integrate RUNX1 antibody-based studies with advanced genomic technologies for comprehensive hematopoietic development analysis?

Integrating RUNX1 antibody-based studies with advanced genomic technologies enables comprehensive multi-omics analysis of hematopoietic development. Researchers can implement several strategic approaches to achieve this integration. Sequential ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq on the same cell populations provides correlated maps of RUNX1 binding and chromatin accessibility changes during developmental transitions . This approach reveals how RUNX1 binding precedes and potentially drives accessibility changes at key hematopoietic regulatory elements. Multi-omics single-cell approaches combining protein detection (using biotinylated RUNX1 antibodies with metal-conjugated streptavidin for mass cytometry) and single-cell RNA-seq or ATAC-seq data allow researchers to define precise developmental trajectories where RUNX1 activity is critical .

Spatial transcriptomics technologies can be enhanced with immunofluorescence using biotinylated RUNX1 antibodies to correlate RUNX1 protein localization with gene expression patterns in intact tissues, providing insights into microenvironmental influences on RUNX1 function during development . Time-course experiments using DOX-inducible RUNX1 systems, as described in the literature, combined with temporal ChIP-seq, RNA-seq, and ChIC/CUT&RUN-seq create comprehensive datasets for modeling the dynamic gene regulatory networks controlled by RUNX1 . Computational integration of these multi-omics datasets requires sophisticated bioinformatic approaches, including trajectory inference algorithms, gene regulatory network reconstruction, and machine learning methods to predict RUNX1-dependent developmental decision points .

For mechanistic validation of predictions from integrated analyses, CRISPR perturbation of RUNX1 binding sites identified through ChIP-seq, followed by phenotypic and molecular characterization using antibody-based detection methods, closes the loop between correlation and causation . This multi-layered approach has revealed that RUNX1 orchestrates hematopoietic specification through sequential chromatin priming events that establish self-sustaining transcriptional circuits, a finding with significant implications for understanding both normal development and leukemogenesis .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.