RUNX3 functions as a critical transcription factor that forms a heterodimeric complex called core-binding factor (CBF) with CBFB. This complex modulates the transcription of target genes by recognizing the consensus binding sequence 5'-TGTGGT-3', or more rarely, 5'-TGCGGT-3', within regulatory regions via the RUNX3 runt domain . The CBFB component serves as a non-DNA-binding regulatory subunit that allosterically enhances RUNX3's sequence-specific DNA-binding capacity .
RUNX3 is involved in various cellular processes including proliferation and differentiation. Notably, in T cell development, CBF complexes containing RUNX3 repress the ZBTB7B transcription factor during cytotoxic (CD8+) T cell development by binding to RUNX-binding sequences within the ZBTB7B locus. This binding acts as a transcriptional silencer, allowing for cytotoxic T cell differentiation and recruiting nuclear protein complexes that establish epigenetic ZBTB7B silencing .
RUNX3 plays an essential role in cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) development and memory formation. Research has demonstrated that RUNX3 promotes accessibility to memory CTL-specific cis-regulatory regions prior to the first cell division and is essential for memory CTL differentiation . When RUNX3 is disrupted in experimental models, there is reduced accumulation of antigen-specific T cells following viral infection, blocked differentiation of both double-positive (DP) and memory-precursor (MP) phenotype cells, and increased frequencies of terminal-effector (TE) phenotype cells .
These findings indicate RUNX3's cell-intrinsic role in promoting certain T cell phenotypes while restraining others. The loss of RUNX3 in mouse models virtually eliminated RUNX3 protein expression in CD8+ T cells, strongly impaired accumulation of virus-specific cells, and decreased the frequencies of certain tetramer-positive cells that normally dominate the immune response .
RUNX3 is referenced in scientific literature under multiple aliases, which is important to know when conducting comprehensive literature searches. These include:
AML2 (Acute myeloid leukemia 2 protein)
CBFA3 (Core-binding factor subunit alpha-3)
PEBP2A3 (Polyomavirus enhancer-binding protein 2 alpha C subunit)
PEA2-alpha C
PEBP2-alpha C
SL3-3 enhancer factor 1 alpha C subunit
SL3/AKV core-binding factor alpha C subunit
Understanding these alternative nomenclatures ensures comprehensive literature searches and proper identification in research communications.
Monoclonal RUNX3 antibodies, such as clone EPR20687 or R3-5G4, are derived from a single B-cell clone and recognize a specific epitope on the RUNX3 protein . This provides high specificity for a single antigenic determinant, resulting in consistent batch-to-batch reproducibility and reduced background. For example, the recombinant rabbit monoclonal RUNX3 antibody EPR20687 demonstrates consistent performance across multiple applications including ChIP, Western blot, and immunostaining techniques .
In contrast, polyclonal RUNX3 antibodies are derived from multiple B-cell lineages and recognize multiple epitopes on the RUNX3 protein . The polyclonal antibody from Cusabio (CSB-PA020595LB01HU) is raised in rabbits against recombinant human RUNX3 protein (amino acids 1-415) and purified using Protein G . While polyclonal antibodies often provide greater sensitivity by binding multiple epitopes, they may show greater batch-to-batch variation.
The choice between monoclonal and polyclonal RUNX3 antibodies should be guided by the specific experimental requirements, with monoclonals preferred for applications requiring high specificity and reproducibility, while polyclonals may be advantageous when signal amplification is needed.
HRP (Horseradish Peroxidase) conjugation to RUNX3 antibodies provides direct enzymatic detection capability, eliminating the need for secondary antibody incubation steps in many applications . This conjugation affects performance in several ways:
Detection sensitivity: HRP conjugation enhances detection sensitivity through enzymatic signal amplification when used with appropriate substrates that produce colorimetric, chemiluminescent, or fluorescent signals.
Workflow efficiency: The direct conjugation reduces experiment time and potential background by eliminating secondary antibody steps.
Multiplexing capability: HRP-conjugated RUNX3 antibodies can be used alongside other primary antibodies in multiplexed assays, provided appropriate controls for cross-reactivity are implemented.
Storage considerations: HRP-conjugated antibodies typically require specific storage conditions (-20°C to -80°C) and may be more sensitive to repeated freeze-thaw cycles than unconjugated antibodies .
The main applications for HRP-conjugated RUNX3 antibodies include ELISA, Western blot, and immunohistochemistry. When used in Western blotting, RUNX3 typically appears at approximately 48-52 kDa, as demonstrated in experiments with Jurkat and Daudi cell lines .
Rigorous validation of RUNX3 antibodies is essential to ensure experimental reliability. Multiple complementary methods should be employed:
Genetic controls: Use RUNX3 knockout or knockdown models as negative controls. Research shows that Runx3-disruption in P14 cells reduces accumulation after LCMV infection and blocks differentiation of specific cell phenotypes .
Expression pattern analysis: Verify that the detected protein shows the expected subcellular localization (predominantly nuclear for RUNX3) and cell-type specific expression patterns. Flow cytometry data indicates that RUNX3 expression increases in PBMCs after PMA stimulation .
Multiple detection techniques: Validate the antibody using at least two independent methods (e.g., Western blot, IHC, flow cytometry). For example, R&D Systems antibody MAB3765 has been validated in Western blot, flow cytometry, and immunocytochemistry applications .
Peptide competition assays: Perform pre-adsorption with the immunizing antigen to confirm binding specificity.
Size verification: Confirm that the detected protein shows the expected molecular weight (approximately 48-52 kDa for RUNX3) .
The table below summarizes validation data for selected RUNX3 antibodies:
Optimizing RUNX3 antibody dilutions requires systematic titration experiments tailored to each application:
For Western Blotting:
Begin with the manufacturer's recommended dilution range (typically 1:500-1:5000 for HRP-conjugated antibodies).
Perform a dilution series (e.g., 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:5000) using positive control lysates from cells known to express RUNX3 (Jurkat or Daudi cell lines are recommended) .
Assess signal-to-noise ratio at each dilution, selecting the concentration that provides clear detection of the expected 48-52 kDa band with minimal background.
When using nuclear extracts, load approximately 10 μg per lane, as RUNX3 is predominantly nuclear. For whole cell lysates, 30 μg is typically appropriate .
For Flow Cytometry:
Start with approximately 10 μg/mL and test serial dilutions.
Use unstimulated and PMA-stimulated PBMCs (50 ng/mL) as comparative samples .
Include appropriate isotype controls to establish background levels.
After fixation and permeabilization (paraformaldehyde and saponin are recommended), the optimal antibody concentration should yield clear separation between positive and negative populations.
For Immunohistochemistry/Immunocytochemistry:
Begin with 5-10 μg/mL for initial testing.
Use appropriate positive control tissues or cells with known RUNX3 expression.
Include negative controls (primary antibody omission and isotype controls).
The optimal dilution should show clear nuclear staining with minimal cytoplasmic or extracellular background .
Document all optimization steps methodically, including blocking conditions, incubation times and temperatures, and detection reagents used.
Several well-characterized cell lines and tissue types serve as reliable positive controls for RUNX3 detection:
Cell Lines:
Jurkat (human acute T cell leukemia): Demonstrates clear nuclear RUNX3 expression at approximately 48-52 kDa in Western blots .
Daudi (human Burkitt's lymphoma): Shows consistent RUNX3 expression in both whole cell lysates and nuclear extracts .
DA3 (mouse myeloma): Useful for cross-species validation of antibodies with multi-species reactivity .
PBMCs (peripheral blood mononuclear cells): Particularly after stimulation with PMA (50 ng/mL), which increases RUNX3 expression .
Tissue Samples:
Lymphoid tissues: Spleen, lymph nodes, and tonsils show physiological expression of RUNX3.
Gastrointestinal tissues: Gastric epithelium expresses RUNX3, which is often downregulated in gastric cancer.
Hematopoietic tissues: Bone marrow samples contain RUNX3-expressing cells.
When using mouse models, Runx3 fl/fl mice with conditional deletion systems provide excellent negative control tissues for antibody validation. Research shows that in Runx3 fl/fl sYFP dLck-Cre mice, Runx3 protein expression is virtually eliminated in YFP+ CD8+ cells .
For experimental planning, include both positive and negative controls within each experiment. If studying RUNX3 in the context of its role in T cell development, compare unstimulated and stimulated conditions, as RUNX3 expression can be dynamically regulated during immune activation.
Several complementary methods can effectively detect and characterize protein-protein interactions involving RUNX3:
Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Use a validated anti-RUNX3 antibody (such as EPR20687) for immunoprecipitation from nuclear extracts .
Probe for interacting partners such as CBFB, the well-established heterodimeric partner of RUNX3 .
Reciprocal Co-IP (using antibodies against suspected interacting partners to pull down RUNX3) should be performed to confirm interactions.
Nuclear extraction protocols are critical since RUNX3 is predominantly nuclear, with approximately 10 μg of nuclear extract recommended for the IP step .
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP):
ChIP-grade RUNX3 antibodies such as EPR20687 can identify DNA regions bound by RUNX3 complexes .
Target analysis of consensus binding sequences (5'-TGTGGT-3' or 5'-TGCGGT-3') in promoter regions of genes such as ZBTB7B can confirm functional DNA binding .
Sequential ChIP (re-ChIP) can determine if RUNX3 and other factors (e.g., CBFB) co-occupy the same genomic regions.
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA):
Combines antibody-based detection with PCR amplification to visualize protein interactions in situ.
Requires two primary antibodies from different species (e.g., mouse anti-RUNX3 and rabbit anti-CBFB).
Provides spatial information about where in the cell RUNX3 interactions occur.
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC):
Express RUNX3 and potential partners as fusion proteins with complementary fragments of a fluorescent protein.
Interaction brings the fragments together, restoring fluorescence.
Useful for confirming interactions in living cells and determining subcellular localization.
When studying the RUNX3-CBFB interaction, it's important to note that CBFB is a non-DNA-binding regulatory subunit that allosterically enhances the DNA-binding capacity of RUNX3. This interaction is critical for proper RUNX3 function in regulating target gene expression .
RUNX3 antibodies are powerful tools for investigating T cell differentiation, particularly in the context of CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) development and memory formation:
Flow Cytometric Analysis:
Use HRP-conjugated or fluorophore-conjugated RUNX3 antibodies for intracellular staining combined with surface markers to identify specific T cell subsets.
Compare RUNX3 expression levels between naïve, effector, and memory CD8+ T cell populations.
For optimal results, stimulate cells with PMA (50 ng/mL) as a positive control, and use paraformaldehyde fixation with saponin permeabilization .
Analyze how RUNX3 expression correlates with functional markers and cytokine production.
ChIP-seq Analysis:
Employ ChIP-grade RUNX3 antibodies to map genome-wide binding sites during different stages of T cell differentiation .
Focus on the ZBTB7B locus and other key regulatory regions involved in CTL development.
Correlate RUNX3 binding with chromatin accessibility data from ATAC-seq to identify how RUNX3 establishes accessible chromatin regions prior to the first cell division .
Time-course Experiments:
Track RUNX3 expression and localization during T cell activation and differentiation using immunofluorescence or flow cytometry.
Compare wild-type cells with RUNX3-disrupted cells to assess phenotypic changes in differentiation markers.
Research indicates that RUNX3-disruption blocks differentiation of both double-positive (DP) and memory-precursor (MP) phenotype cells while increasing terminal-effector (TE) cells, demonstrating its crucial role in determining T cell fate .
When designing these experiments, consider that RUNX3 promotes accessibility to memory CTL-specific cis-regulatory regions prior to the first cell division, making early time points critical for understanding its role in establishing differentiation trajectories .
Identifying RUNX3 target genes requires integrative genomic approaches that combine multiple technologies:
ChIP-seq Combined with RNA-seq:
Use ChIP-grade RUNX3 antibodies to immunoprecipitate RUNX3-bound chromatin regions genome-wide .
Focus analysis on the consensus binding sequences recognized by RUNX3 (5'-TGTGGT-3' or 5'-TGCGGT-3') .
Perform parallel RNA-seq experiments in control versus RUNX3-depleted cells to correlate binding with expression changes.
This approach has revealed RUNX3 binding to enhancers and promoters of various genes, including T-cell receptor enhancers, LCK, IL3, and GM-CSF promoters .
CUT&RUN or CUT&Tag:
These techniques offer higher signal-to-noise ratios than traditional ChIP-seq and require fewer cells.
Use purified RUNX3 antibodies to target protein-DNA complexes in situ.
Particularly useful for precious primary cell samples or rare cell populations.
CRISPR Activation/Repression Screens:
Create libraries targeting promoters of candidate RUNX3 target genes.
Use RUNX3 antibodies in phenotypic assays to correlate target gene modulation with RUNX3 function.
Integrative Analysis Framework:
Analyze multiple cell types or conditions to identify context-specific RUNX3 targets.
For example, compare RUNX3 targets in:
Research has demonstrated that RUNX3 and associated CBF complexes bind to the RUNX-binding sequence within the ZBTB7B locus, functioning as a transcriptional silencer to allow cytotoxic T cell differentiation. This binding recruits nuclear protein complexes that catalyze epigenetic modifications to establish silencing .
RUNX3 antibodies are instrumental in deciphering the complex interplay between RUNX3 and epigenetic mechanisms:
ChIP-seq for Histone Modifications:
Perform sequential ChIP experiments using RUNX3 antibodies followed by antibodies against specific histone modifications (e.g., H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K27me3).
This approach reveals whether RUNX3-bound regions are associated with active enhancers, promoters, or repressive chromatin states.
Research indicates that CBF complexes containing RUNX3 are essential for recruiting nuclear protein complexes that catalyze epigenetic modifications to establish epigenetic silencing .
Protein Complex Analysis:
Use RUNX3 antibodies for immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry to identify epigenetic regulators that associate with RUNX3.
Focus on interactions with histone modifiers, chromatin remodelers, and DNA methylation machinery.
These interactions may differ depending on cellular context and target gene status.
Chromatin Accessibility Analysis:
Combine RUNX3 ChIP-seq with ATAC-seq or DNase-seq to correlate RUNX3 binding with changes in chromatin accessibility.
Research has shown that RUNX3 promotes accessibility to memory CTL-specific cis-regulatory regions prior to the first cell division, highlighting its role in establishing open chromatin domains .
DNA Methylation Studies:
Compare DNA methylation patterns (using techniques like bisulfite sequencing) at RUNX3 binding sites in wild-type versus RUNX3-deficient cells.
Examine how RUNX3 binding correlates with changes in methylation status at target gene promoters.
When studying RUNX3's role in epigenetic regulation during T cell development, it's important to note that RUNX3 binding to the transcriptional silencer is essential for recruitment of nuclear protein complexes that catalyze epigenetic modifications to establish epigenetic ZBTB7B silencing . This mechanism illustrates how transcription factors like RUNX3 can direct the establishment of epigenetic states that determine cell fate and function.
Researchers working with RUNX3 antibodies frequently encounter several technical challenges that can be methodically addressed:
High Background Signal:
Problem: Non-specific binding in Western blots or immunostaining.
Solutions:
Increase blocking time and concentration (5% BSA or milk in TBST is often effective).
Optimize antibody dilution (start with manufacturer recommendations and adjust as needed).
For HRP-conjugated antibodies, shorter substrate incubation times may reduce background.
For immunostaining, use appropriate permeabilization methods as RUNX3 is nuclear (paraformaldehyde fixation with saponin permeabilization is recommended) .
Weak or No Signal:
Problem: Insufficient antigen detection despite RUNX3 expression.
Solutions:
Ensure appropriate sample preparation (RUNX3 is predominantly nuclear; use nuclear extraction protocols).
For Western blots, load sufficient nuclear extract (approximately 10 μg recommended) .
Verify protein transfer efficiency with reversible staining.
Increase antibody concentration gradually.
Consider antigen retrieval methods for fixed tissues in IHC applications.
Multiple Bands in Western Blots:
Problem: Detection of multiple bands beyond the expected 48-52 kDa RUNX3 band.
Solutions:
Verify lysate preparation (avoid proteolytic degradation by using fresh protease inhibitors).
Compare with known positive controls (Jurkat or Daudi cell lines) .
Perform peptide competition assays to identify which bands represent specific binding.
Note that RUNX3 can appear at different molecular weights (48-52 kDa) due to post-translational modifications .
Cross-Reactivity Issues:
Problem: Antibody recognizes proteins other than RUNX3.
Solutions:
Cell Type-Specific Optimization:
Problem: Protocol optimization requirements differ between cell types.
Solutions:
Multiplexed detection of RUNX3 alongside other cellular markers requires careful optimization strategies:
Flow Cytometry Multiplexing:
Panel Design:
Select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap.
For detecting RUNX3 with CD8 and other T cell markers, consider the brightness hierarchy (reserve brightest fluorophores for lowest expression markers).
When using HRP-conjugated RUNX3 antibodies, employ tyramide signal amplification (TSA) systems for conversion to fluorescent signals.
Experimental Controls:
Include fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls for each marker.
Use isotype controls at the same concentration as the RUNX3 antibody.
Include single-stained controls for compensation.
Protocol Optimization:
For intracellular RUNX3 staining combined with surface markers, perform surface staining before fixation and permeabilization.
Paraformaldehyde fixation (4%) followed by saponin permeabilization works well for RUNX3 detection .
Titrate each antibody individually before combining in multiplexed panels.
Multiplex Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence:
Sequential Staining Approach:
For RUNX3 co-localization with other nuclear factors, use primary antibodies from different host species.
When using multiple rabbit antibodies, employ tyramide signal amplification with sequential antibody stripping.
Spectral Unmixing:
Consider multispectral imaging systems for tissues with high autofluorescence.
Optimize exposure times for each fluorophore to balance signal detection.
Spatial Analysis:
For analyzing RUNX3 co-expression patterns, use imaging software with co-localization quantification capabilities.
Measure nuclear versus cytoplasmic signal distributions to confirm proper RUNX3 detection.
The following table outlines a suggested multiplexed flow cytometry panel for studying RUNX3 in T cell subsets:
| Marker | Fluorophore | Purpose | Gating Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD3 | BV421 | T cell identification | First gate |
| CD8 | APC | Cytotoxic T cell identification | Second gate |
| CD44 | PE-Cy7 | Memory/activation marker | Effector/memory differentiation |
| RUNX3 | PE | Transcription factor | Nuclear expression |
| ZBTB7B | FITC | Antagonistic TF to RUNX3 | Reciprocal expression to RUNX3 |
With this panel, researchers can correlate RUNX3 expression with T cell differentiation status and other transcription factors known to interact with RUNX3-mediated pathways.
Implementing rigorous quality control metrics is essential for obtaining reproducible results with RUNX3 antibodies:
Antibody Validation Metrics:
Lot-to-Lot Consistency Testing:
Specificity Verification:
Experimental Quality Controls:
Quantitative Standards:
Include calibration standards for quantitative applications.
For Western blots, use housekeeping proteins (nuclear loading controls like Lamin B for RUNX3).
For flow cytometry, use fluorescent beads to standardize instrument settings between experiments.
Technical Replicates:
Perform at least three technical replicates for quantitative measurements.
Calculate coefficient of variation (CV) between replicates (aim for CV <15% for HRP-conjugated antibody applications).
Document mean, standard deviation, and CV for key measurements.
Environmental Controls:
Documentation and Reporting Standards:
Detailed Methodology Documentation:
Image Acquisition Standards:
Use consistent exposure settings for imaging between experiments.
Avoid image manipulation that alters data interpretation.
Include scale bars and resolution information.
Internal Reference Samples:
Implementing these quality control metrics will significantly enhance reproducibility of RUNX3 antibody-based experiments and facilitate meaningful comparisons across different studies and laboratories.
Single-cell technologies represent a frontier for RUNX3 research, offering unprecedented resolution of heterogeneous cell populations:
Single-Cell Protein Analysis:
Mass Cytometry (CyTOF):
Metal-conjugated RUNX3 antibodies can be integrated into CyTOF panels with dozens of other markers.
This approach could reveal how RUNX3 expression correlates with multiple cell surface and intracellular markers simultaneously in rare immune subpopulations.
Enables identification of novel cell states based on RUNX3 expression patterns across heterogeneous T cell populations.
Single-Cell Western Blotting:
Allows quantification of RUNX3 protein levels in individual cells using HRP-conjugated antibodies.
Can reveal cell-to-cell variation in RUNX3 expression within seemingly homogeneous populations.
May identify rare cell subsets with unique RUNX3 expression patterns.
Spatial Technologies:
Imaging Mass Cytometry:
Metal-labeled RUNX3 antibodies enable visualization of RUNX3 expression in tissue contexts with subcellular resolution.
Can map RUNX3 distribution relative to tissue microenvironments.
Particularly valuable for understanding RUNX3's role in T cell zones of lymphoid tissues.
Multiplexed Ion Beam Imaging (MIBI):
Allows simultaneous detection of RUNX3 with dozens of other proteins at subcellular resolution.
Can reveal spatial relationships between RUNX3-expressing cells and their tissue context.
Multi-omic Approaches:
CITE-seq with RUNX3 Antibodies:
Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing could incorporate RUNX3 antibodies.
This would allow correlation between RUNX3 protein levels and whole-transcriptome analysis at single-cell resolution.
May reveal previously unknown gene expression programs associated with different levels of RUNX3.
Integrated Single-Cell Chromatin and Protein Analysis:
These innovative approaches could help resolve outstanding questions about RUNX3's role in establishing chromatin accessibility prior to cell division in T cells , potentially revealing how varying levels of RUNX3 might direct distinct cell fate decisions in development and disease.
RUNX3 antibodies hold significant potential for advancing disease research across multiple fields:
Cancer Immunotherapy Research:
Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) Functional Assessment:
RUNX3 antibodies can help profile TILs to assess their differentiation and functional status.
Could identify whether RUNX3 expression correlates with T cell exhaustion or persistence in the tumor microenvironment.
May reveal whether modulating RUNX3 could enhance anti-tumor immunity.
Predictive Biomarker Development:
Immunohistochemistry with RUNX3 antibodies might identify patterns of expression that predict response to immunotherapy.
Could potentially stratify patients based on RUNX3 expression patterns in tumor or immune cells.
Autoimmune Disease Mechanisms:
Dysregulated T Cell Differentiation:
RUNX3 antibodies can help characterize T cell subsets in autoimmune conditions.
May reveal whether altered RUNX3 expression contributes to pathogenic CD8+ T cell responses.
Could identify therapeutic targets in the RUNX3 pathway.
Tissue-Specific Immune Regulation:
Multiplexed imaging with RUNX3 antibodies can map T cell phenotypes within autoimmune lesions.
May reveal tissue-specific regulation of RUNX3 expression in different autoimmune conditions.
Infectious Disease Response:
Memory T Cell Formation After Infection:
Chronic Infection Studies:
RUNX3 expression analysis during chronic infections may reveal mechanisms of T cell exhaustion.
Could identify whether modulating RUNX3 might reinvigorate exhausted T cells.
Developmental Immunology:
Thymic Selection Processes:
RUNX3 antibodies can help map the developmental trajectories of T cells during positive and negative selection.
May reveal how RUNX3 expression patterns relate to TCR signal strength and selection outcomes.
Age-Related Immune Changes:
Could identify whether alterations in RUNX3 expression contribute to immunosenescence.
May reveal targetable pathways to restore youthful immune function.
These emerging applications highlight how RUNX3 antibodies could bridge basic immunology research with clinical applications, potentially leading to new therapeutic approaches in various disease contexts.