RXFP3 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
The antibody is provided as a liquid solution in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 50% glycerol, 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 0.02% sodium azide.
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we can ship the products within 1-3 business days after receiving your order. Delivery times may vary depending on the shipping method and destination. For specific delivery time estimates, please consult your local distributors.
Synonyms
RXFP3; GPCR135; RLN3R1; SALPR; Relaxin-3 receptor 1; RLN3 receptor 1; G protein-coupled receptor SALPR; G-protein coupled receptor GPCR135; Relaxin family peptide receptor 3; Somatostatin- and angiotensin-like peptide receptor
Target Names
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
RXFP3 is a receptor for RNL3/relaxin-3. Binding of the ligand inhibits cAMP accumulation.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Research has shown that RXFP3 is primarily localized in the post-acrosomal region of the sperm head and neck. PMID: 29159832
  2. This study identified four key determinants within INSL5 that differentiate RXFP4 from RXFP3. PMID: 27404393
  3. The findings indicate that stapling of the relaxin-3 B chain does not impede its ability to activate RXFP3. This method holds promise for developing stable peptide agonists and antagonists of RXFP3, furthering research in relaxin-3/RXFP3 interactions. PMID: 27498038
  4. The negatively charged transmembrane aspartate residue plays a crucial role in regulating the activation of the relaxin-3 receptor, RXFP3. PMID: 27353281
  5. This study demonstrated distinct signaling patterns for H3 and H2 relaxin and R3(BDelta23-27)R/I5 at the RXFP3 receptor. PMID: 24641548
  6. Glu141 and Asp145 of the RXFP3 interact with highly conserved arginine residues of relaxin-3. PMID: 24615237
  7. This study demonstrated the existence of an allosteric site for modulation of RXFP3. PMID: 22347403
  8. H3 relaxin potently activates all signaling pathways coupled to RXFP3, while H2 relaxin acts as an AP-1-biased ligand compared to H3 relaxin. PMID: 20159943
  9. GPCR135 (SALPR) is identified as the receptor for relaxin-3. PMID: 14522968
  10. Substituting the relaxin-3 A-chain with the A-chain from insulin-like peptide 5 results in a chimeric peptide that selectively activates GPCR135 and GPCR142. PMID: 15465925
  11. Functional responses to H3 relaxin and other relaxin/insulin peptides of GPCR135 expressed in CHO-K1 cells were measured using a cytosensor microphysiometer and analyzed with inhibitors of signal transduction proteins. PMID: 15956730
  12. This study analyzed truncated human relaxin-2 and -3 (H2 and H3) relaxin peptides, investigating their binding and cAMP activities on RXFP1, RXFP2, and RXFP3. PMID: 18434306
  13. The N-terminus and EL2 domains of RXFP3 and RXFP4 are involved in ligand binding, while TM2, 3, and 5 are critical for receptor activation. PMID: 18582868
  14. This research provides insights into the structural and functional aspects of the interaction between relaxin-3 and its receptor, RXFP3. PMID: 19152634

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 24883

OMIM: 609445

KEGG: hsa:51289

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000328708

UniGene: Hs.170146

Protein Families
G-protein coupled receptor 1 family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed predominantly in brain regions. Highest expression in substantia nigra and pituitary, followed by hippocampus, spinal cord, amygdala, caudate nucleus and corpus callosum, quite low level in cerebellum. In peripheral tissues, relatively high leve

Q&A

What is RXFP3 and what is its biological function?

RXFP3 (relaxin/insulin-like family peptide receptor 3) is a G-protein-coupled receptor primarily expressed in the brain that serves as the receptor for relaxin-3 (RNL3) . This receptor plays a critical role in several neurobiological processes, including stress responses, memory formation, and emotional processing . At the molecular level, binding of the relaxin-3 ligand to RXFP3 inhibits cyclic AMP (cAMP) accumulation, distinguishing it from other relaxin family receptors . RXFP3 is also known by several synonyms including GPCR135, RLN3R1, and SALPR .

RXFP3 has emerged as a particularly important target in neuropsychiatric research due to its involvement in feeding behaviors, making it a promising therapeutic target for treating obesity and other eating disorders . Studies have shown that pharmacological manipulation of RXFP3 alters feeding behaviors in rodents, with intracerebroventricular administration of relaxin-3 increasing food consumption in experimental models .

How is RXFP3 expression detected in tissue samples?

Given the challenges with fully validated RXFP3 antibodies, researchers employ multiple complementary techniques to detect RXFP3 expression:

  • Immunohistochemistry/Immunoblotting: When using antibodies, it's crucial to validate specificity through appropriate controls. Some studies use immunohistochemical analysis with carefully titrated antibody concentrations (typically 15 μg/ml) to detect RXFP3 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues .

  • Genetic reporter systems: Due to antibody validation challenges, many researchers utilize transgenic approaches such as RXFP3-Cre/tdTomato mice where Cre-recombinase expression under the RXFP3 promoter drives tdTomato fluorophore expression specifically in RXFP3-expressing cells .

  • Co-localization studies: To understand RXFP3 distribution in specific neuronal populations, researchers often combine RXFP3 detection with markers like tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) to identify dopaminergic neurons expressing RXFP3 .

For optimal detection, tissue preparation protocols must be optimized for RXFP3, including proper fixation methods and antigen retrieval techniques when working with paraffin-embedded samples.

What criteria should be considered when selecting an RXFP3 antibody?

When selecting an RXFP3 antibody for research applications, consider these critical factors:

  • Target epitope: For RXFP3, antibodies targeting the C-terminal region have shown reliability in some applications. For example, ab140917 is a rabbit polyclonal antibody targeting the C-terminal region of human RXFP3 .

  • Cross-reactivity profile: Verify whether the antibody cross-reacts with other relaxin family receptors (particularly RXFP1) or with RXFP3 from different species. Some antibodies may recognize human RXFP3 but not rodent orthologs, which is crucial for translational research .

  • Validation method: The gold standard for RXFP3 antibody validation includes testing with lysates from RXFP3-transfected HEK cells and preadsorption with RXFP3 peptides to confirm specificity .

  • Application-specific validation: An antibody that works for western blotting may not work for immunohistochemistry. Confirm that the antibody has been validated specifically for your intended application .

  • Lot-to-lot consistency: Request data on lot-to-lot variation, especially for polyclonal antibodies where greater variation may occur.

Given the challenges with RXFP3 antibody validation noted in the literature, alternative approaches such as genetic reporter systems may be necessary for certain applications .

How can I validate an RXFP3 antibody for my specific application?

Comprehensive validation of RXFP3 antibodies requires multiple approaches:

  • Positive controls: Use tissues or cells with confirmed RXFP3 expression. Human brain tissue, particularly from the neocortex, has been used successfully .

  • Negative controls: Include RXFP3-negative tissues or RXFP3 knockout models when available.

  • Peptide competition assays: Pre-adsorb the antibody with synthetic RXFP3 peptides corresponding to the immunogen. If specific, the antibody signal should be significantly reduced or eliminated .

  • Heterologous expression systems: Test the antibody on cells transfected with RXFP3 versus non-transfected cells. HEK293 cells are commonly used for this purpose .

  • Correlation with mRNA expression: Compare antibody staining patterns with RXFP3 mRNA expression data from in situ hybridization or PCR studies.

  • Multiple antibody validation: Use two or more antibodies targeting different epitopes of RXFP3 to confirm staining patterns.

For example, in studies examining RXFP3 in Alzheimer's disease, researchers characterized antibodies by immunoblotting with lysates from transfected HEK cells and performed preadsorption tests with RXFP3 peptides to confirm specificity before proceeding with tissue analysis .

What are the optimal protocols for immunohistochemical detection of RXFP3?

Based on published methodologies, the following protocol has demonstrated successful RXFP3 detection:

  • Tissue preparation: For brain tissue, perfusion fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde followed by post-fixation (4-24 hours) yields optimal results. Both frozen sections and paraffin-embedded tissues have been used successfully .

  • Antigen retrieval: For paraffin sections, heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) is recommended.

  • Blocking: Use 5-10% normal serum (corresponding to the species of the secondary antibody) with 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 for 1-2 hours at room temperature.

  • Primary antibody incubation: Apply RXFP3 antibody at 15 μg/ml concentration and incubate overnight at 4°C . For double-labeling studies, combine with other primary antibodies such as anti-tyrosine hydroxylase to identify dopaminergic neurons .

  • Detection system: For fluorescent detection, use species-appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to fluorophores. For chromogenic detection, HRP-DAB systems have been successfully employed .

  • Controls: Always include appropriate negative controls (primary antibody omission, isotype controls) and positive controls (tissues known to express RXFP3).

Recent studies have successfully detected RXFP3 in human brain neurons and glia using the ab140917 antibody at 15 μg/ml concentration in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples .

How can RXFP3 expression be quantified in tissue samples?

Accurate quantification of RXFP3 expression requires rigorous methodological approaches:

  • Western blot quantification:

    • Use validated antibodies with appropriate positive and negative controls

    • Include loading controls (β-actin, GAPDH)

    • Implement densitometric analysis with normalization to loading controls

    • Compare results across multiple independent experiments

  • Immunohistochemical quantification:

    • Manual cell counting: Using software like ImageJ to count individual neurons in separate channels before merging to determine co-localization

    • Automated analysis: Threshold-based quantification of immunoreactive area

    • Optical density measurements: For DAB-stained sections

  • Flow cytometry:

    • For cell suspensions prepared from fresh tissue

    • Allows quantification of RXFP3-positive cell populations

For example, in studies examining RXFP3 in brain tissues, manual cell quantification using ImageJ software was employed, whereby individual neurons in separate channels were counted/tagged before images were merged to determine co-localization counts .

When reporting quantitative data, provide clear descriptions of the quantification method, including software used, thresholds applied, and statistical approaches for comparisons between groups.

How does RXFP3 expression change in neurodegenerative conditions?

Research has revealed significant alterations in RXFP3 expression in neurodegenerative conditions, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD):

  • Alzheimer's disease: Studies examining postmortem neocortical tissues from AD patients showed differential changes in RXFP3 levels that correlate with neuropsychiatric symptoms rather than cognitive decline:

    • RXFP3 immunoreactivity is increased specifically in depressed AD patients compared to non-depressed AD patients and controls

    • RXFP3 levels did not correlate with dementia severity or β-amyloid burden

    • These findings suggest RXFP3 alterations may be neurochemical markers of depression in AD rather than direct indicators of the neurodegenerative process

  • Region-specific changes: RXFP3 alterations appear to be region-specific, with changes observed in the parietal cortex correlating with severity of depression symptoms in AD patients .

These findings highlight the potential of RXFP3 as a target for addressing neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia and underscore the importance of investigating RXFP3 in the context of both cognitive and affective symptoms in neurodegenerative disorders.

What is the relationship between RXFP3 and dopaminergic neurons?

The relationship between RXFP3 and dopaminergic neurons is complex and region-specific:

  • Differential expression patterns: Studies using RXFP3-Cre/tdTomato transgenic mice have examined the co-localization of RXFP3 with tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, a marker for dopaminergic neurons) in three key brain regions :

    • Arcuate nucleus (ARC): Important for feeding regulation

    • Dorsomedial hypothalamus (DMH): Involved in energy homeostasis

    • Ventral tegmental area (VTA): Critical for reward processing

  • Co-localization analysis: Researchers have employed confocal microscopy and manual cell quantification using ImageJ software to determine the extent of RXFP3 expression in dopaminergic neurons across these regions .

  • Functional implications: The presence or absence of RXFP3 in dopaminergic neurons has important implications for understanding how relaxin-3/RXFP3 signaling might modulate dopamine-dependent functions, including reward processing and motivated behaviors .

The differential expression of RXFP3 in dopaminergic neurons across different brain regions suggests region-specific roles for relaxin-3/RXFP3 signaling in modulating dopamine-related functions. This has significant implications for understanding how RXFP3-targeted interventions might affect dopamine-dependent behaviors and for developing more selective therapeutic approaches.

How do RXFP3 agonists and antagonists affect neurophysiological processes?

RXFP3 agonists and antagonists have demonstrated significant effects on various neurophysiological processes:

  • Feeding behavior:

    • RXFP3 agonists: Acute intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of human relaxin-3 and selective RXFP3 agonists increases food consumption in rats

    • RXFP3 antagonists: Co-injection of RXFP3 antagonists inhibits the orexigenic effects of RXFP3 agonists

  • Stress response:

    • RXFP3 is expressed in brain regions involved in stress responses, including the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei

    • RXFP3 signaling may modulate hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity

  • Mood regulation:

    • Evidence suggests connections between RXFP3 and depression, with RXFP3 potentially influencing mood regulation through interactions with serotonin systems

    • RXFP3 levels in the parietal cortex correlate with severity of depression symptoms in AD patients

  • Signaling mechanisms:

    • Unlike relaxin-2 binding to LGR7 (RXFP1), which increases intracellular cAMP, relaxin-3 binding to RXFP3 inhibits cAMP accumulation

    • This indicates differential coupling to G-protein signaling pathways

The development of selective RXFP3 agonists and antagonists has been crucial for distinguishing RXFP3-specific effects from those mediated by RXFP1, as exogenous relaxin-3 can pharmacologically cross-react with RXFP1 . These pharmacological tools are essential for investigating the therapeutic potential of RXFP3 in conditions such as obesity, eating disorders, and depression.

Why might RXFP3 antibodies show inconsistent results across different applications?

Several factors contribute to the variability observed with RXFP3 antibodies:

  • Epitope accessibility: The conformation of RXFP3, a G-protein-coupled receptor with seven transmembrane domains, varies depending on tissue preparation methods. Fixation and embedding procedures may alter epitope accessibility differently across applications.

  • Expression levels: RXFP3 is expressed at relatively low levels in some brain regions, making detection challenging without signal amplification strategies.

  • Cross-reactivity issues: Some RXFP3 antibodies may cross-react with related GPCRs, including other relaxin family receptors, leading to false positive signals .

  • Species differences: Sequence variations between human and rodent RXFP3 can affect antibody binding. Antibodies validated for human RXFP3 may not recognize rodent RXFP3 with equal affinity.

  • Alternative approaches: Due to challenges with antibody validation, researchers have turned to genetic approaches, such as transgenic RXFP3-Cre/tdTomato mice, to visualize RXFP3-expressing neurons .

When encountering inconsistent results, consider validating antibody specificity using transfected cells expressing RXFP3 , employing peptide competition assays, and corroborating antibody-based detection with complementary approaches such as in situ hybridization for RXFP3 mRNA.

What are the best approaches for studying RXFP3 function in the absence of fully validated antibodies?

Given the challenges with RXFP3 antibody validation, researchers have developed alternative strategies:

  • Genetic reporter systems:

    • RXFP3-Cre/tdTomato transgenic mice: These mice express Cre-recombinase under the control of the RXFP3 promoter, allowing visualization of RXFP3-expressing cells through tdTomato fluorescence

    • Breeding protocol: Pair homozygous RXFP3-Cre and Rosa26-tdTomato reporter strains to generate double transgenic mice heterozygous for each mutation

  • Pharmacological approaches:

    • Selective RXFP3 agonists and antagonists enable functional studies of RXFP3 signaling without requiring antibody-based detection

    • These compounds provide the additional advantage of temporal control over RXFP3 activation or inhibition

  • RNA-based detection methods:

    • RT-PCR, RNAscope in situ hybridization, or RNA-seq to identify RXFP3 mRNA expression

    • Single-cell RNA sequencing to characterize cell populations expressing RXFP3

  • Functional readouts:

    • Monitor downstream signaling events such as inhibition of cAMP accumulation

    • Examine behavioral responses to RXFP3 agonists/antagonists (e.g., feeding behavior)

When using these approaches, it's important to consider their limitations. For example, while genetic reporter systems provide excellent spatial resolution of RXFP3 expression, they may not accurately reflect dynamic changes in receptor protein levels. Similarly, pharmacological approaches depend on the selectivity of available compounds.

How might RXFP3 serve as a therapeutic target for neuropsychiatric disorders?

RXFP3 shows significant promise as a therapeutic target for several neuropsychiatric conditions:

  • Depression and anxiety:

    • RXFP3 levels correlate with depression severity in Alzheimer's disease patients

    • RXFP3 is expressed in brain regions involved in stress responses and emotional processing

    • Targeted RXFP3 modulation could potentially address treatment-resistant depression

  • Eating disorders and obesity:

    • RXFP3 agonists increase food intake in rodent models

    • RXFP3 antagonists may have potential as anti-obesity therapeutics

    • Region-specific modulation could potentially separate feeding effects from other consequences of RXFP3 signaling

  • Neurodegenerative disorders:

    • Alterations in RXFP3 may serve as neurochemical markers of depression in Alzheimer's disease

    • RXFP3-targeted therapies might address neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia, which are often resistant to conventional treatments

  • Drug development considerations:

    • Blood-brain barrier penetration will be crucial for RXFP3-targeted therapeutics

    • Region-specific drug delivery may help minimize off-target effects

    • Development of biased ligands that selectively activate beneficial signaling pathways downstream of RXFP3

Future research should focus on clarifying the signaling mechanisms downstream of RXFP3 activation, developing more selective RXFP3 ligands with favorable pharmacokinetic properties, and conducting preclinical studies to assess the efficacy and safety of RXFP3-targeted interventions in relevant disease models.

What novel methodologies are emerging for studying RXFP3 localization and function?

Several cutting-edge approaches are advancing our understanding of RXFP3:

  • CRISPR-based approaches:

    • CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to generate improved RXFP3 reporter lines

    • Knock-in of epitope tags for reliable antibody detection without relying on RXFP3 antibodies

    • Creation of conditional and cell-type-specific RXFP3 knockout models

  • Advanced imaging techniques:

    • Super-resolution microscopy to precisely localize RXFP3 within neuronal compartments

    • Expansion microscopy to physically enlarge samples for improved visualization of RXFP3 distribution

    • Light sheet microscopy for whole-brain mapping of RXFP3 expression patterns

  • Functional mapping approaches:

    • Chemogenetic or optogenetic manipulation of RXFP3-expressing neurons identified using transgenic reporter lines

    • Calcium imaging to monitor activity of RXFP3-expressing neurons in response to physiological stimuli or pharmacological agents

    • In vivo fiber photometry to record activity of RXFP3-expressing neurons during behavioral tasks

  • Single-cell multiomics:

    • Integration of single-cell transcriptomics, proteomics, and epigenomics to characterize RXFP3-expressing cell populations

    • Spatial transcriptomics to map RXFP3 expression while preserving tissue architecture

These emerging methodologies promise to overcome current limitations in RXFP3 research, providing unprecedented insights into the localization, regulation, and function of this receptor. By combining these approaches with traditional techniques, researchers can develop a more comprehensive understanding of RXFP3 biology and its potential as a therapeutic target.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.