The SASH1 Antibody, HRP conjugated, is a primary antibody directly conjugated with Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP), enabling direct detection of the SASH1 protein in immunological assays such as Western blotting (WB), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). SASH1 (SAM and SH3 domain-containing protein 1) is a tumor suppressor implicated in inhibiting cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis . The HRP conjugation eliminates the need for secondary antibodies, streamlining detection workflows .
Key Features:
Target Protein: SASH1 (136.7 kDa, cytoplasmic localization).
Conjugate: HRP, enabling chromogenic detection via substrates like TMB or DAB .
Reactivity: Primarily tested in human and rodent models, with cross-reactivity noted for rat (e.g., Biocompare product) .
The SASH1 Antibody, HRP conjugated, is utilized in diverse experimental contexts:
Purpose: Quantitative detection of SASH1 protein levels.
Example: In hepatocarcinoma studies, WB confirmed SASH1 overexpression post-transfection, correlating with reduced cell proliferation and invasion .
Protocol: Lysate samples are separated via SDS-PAGE, transferred to membranes, and probed with the HRP-conjugated antibody. Detection is achieved via ECL substrate, eliminating secondary antibody steps .
Purpose: High-throughput quantification of SASH1 in biological samples.
Advantages: Direct detection reduces assay time and cross-reactivity risks .
Purpose: Localization of SASH1 in tissue sections.
Applications: Analyzed SASH1 expression in breast cancer cohorts, linking its downregulation to poor prognosis .
Tumor Suppression: SASH1 overexpression inhibits hepatocarcinoma cell proliferation and invasion by suppressing the Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathway .
Prognostic Biomarker: Low SASH1 expression correlates with aggressive breast cancer phenotypes and reduced survival in ER+ subgroups .
| Assay | Sensitivity | Key Advantage | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| WB | High | Quantitative | Time-consuming |
| ELISA | Moderate | High throughput | Limited to soluble proteins |
| IHC | Moderate | Spatial resolution | Subjective interpretation |
| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Immunogen | Recombinant SASH1 (aa 1-300) | |
| Observed MW | 170 kDa | |
| Calculated MW | 137 kDa | |
| Applications | WB, ELISA, IHC-p/IHC-fr | |
| Reactivity | Human, Mouse, Rat |
Western Blot: Detects SASH1 in lysates of breast cancer cell lines (e.g., MDA-MB-231, MCF7) .
IHC: Used to assess SASH1 localization in tumor tissues, with nuclear staining linked to favorable outcomes in ER+ breast cancer .
SASH1 is a tumor suppressor protein that belongs to the SLY (SH3 domain containing expressed in lymphocytes) family of signal adapter proteins. It contains sterile α motif (SAM) and Src-homology 3 (SH3) domains that mediate protein-protein interactions. SASH1 has emerged as a critical regulator of tumor progression across multiple cancer types. It has been shown to inhibit proliferation, migration, invasion, and metastasis formation in colorectal carcinoma, hepatocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer .
Research has demonstrated that SASH1 expression is frequently downregulated in human cancer cell lines compared to non-malignant cells. For example, SASH1 mRNA and protein levels are significantly decreased in pancreatic cancer cell lines compared to the non-malignant hTERT-HPNE cell line . Similar patterns of reduced expression have been observed in hepatocarcinoma, thyroid cancer, and breast cancer cell lines .
The clinical significance of SASH1 varies by cancer subtype. In breast cancer, low SASH1 expression is associated with poor outcomes in HER2+ disease, particularly in HER2+/ER+ cases where low SASH1 is linked to nearly 100% survival (HR 0.06, p = 0.0002) . These findings highlight why SASH1 detection is crucial for understanding cancer biology and potentially developing therapeutic strategies.
HRP-conjugated antibodies offer several significant advantages for detecting SASH1 in research applications:
Enhanced sensitivity: HRP (40,000 Da) catalyzes reactions with hydrogen peroxide and electron-donating substrates to produce color, fluorescent, or chemiluminescent products, enabling highly sensitive detection of SASH1 even at low expression levels .
Signal amplification: The enzymatic activity of HRP provides signal amplification through substrate conversion, making it ideal for detecting SASH1 in samples where the protein may be downregulated.
Versatility across applications: HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibodies are suitable for multiple techniques including Western blotting, ELISA, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and immunocytochemistry (ICC) .
Stability: HRP remains stable and functional under various conditions including chemical cross-linking, freeze-drying, and prolonged storage at 4°C, making HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibodies reliable research tools .
Accessibility to antigenic sites: The relatively small size of HRP facilitates better access to antigenic sites or structures in SASH1, particularly important when the protein is part of complex molecular interactions .
When using SASH1 antibody, HRP conjugated for Western blotting, the following methodological considerations are recommended:
Sample preparation:
Extract proteins using RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors
For detecting SASH1 in cancer cells, ensure adequate lysis as SASH1 can have varied subcellular distributions
Include positive controls (cells with known SASH1 expression) and negative controls (SASH1-knockdown cells)
Gel electrophoresis and transfer:
Use 8-10% SDS-PAGE gels as SASH1 is a relatively large protein (~170 kDa)
Transfer to PVDF membranes (rather than nitrocellulose) for optimal protein binding
Use semi-dry transfer at 15V for 60 minutes or wet transfer at 100V for 90 minutes
Antibody incubation and detection:
Block membranes with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Dilute SASH1 antibody, HRP conjugated at 1:1000-1:5000 in blocking buffer
Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rocking
Wash extensively with TBST (4-5 times, 5 minutes each)
Proceed directly to enhanced chemiluminescent (ECL) detection without secondary antibody since the antibody is already HRP-conjugated
For optimal sensitivity, use a digital imaging system with various exposure times
The HRP enzyme conjugated to the SASH1 antibody catalyzes the oxidation of luminol in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, producing light that can be detected with appropriate imaging equipment. This direct detection eliminates the need for secondary antibody incubation, reducing background and improving specificity.
For immunohistochemical analysis of SASH1 expression in tissue samples, consider the following protocol:
Tissue preparation:
Use either formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) or frozen tissue sections
For FFPE sections (4-6 μm thickness), perform heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) or EDTA buffer (pH 9.0)
For frozen sections, fix with cold acetone or 4% paraformaldehyde
Staining procedure:
Quench endogenous peroxidase activity with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes
Block non-specific binding with 5-10% normal serum in PBS for 30-60 minutes
Apply HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibody (1:100-1:500 dilution) and incubate overnight at 4°C
Wash thoroughly with PBS (3-4 times, 5 minutes each)
Develop with DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) substrate
Counterstain with hematoxylin, dehydrate, and mount
Important considerations:
SASH1 expression can be heterogeneous within tumor tissue, so examine multiple fields
Include positive controls (normal tissues with known SASH1 expression) in each batch
For hypoxic tissues, additional considerations may be necessary as hypoxia has been shown to inhibit SASH1 expression
When studying EMT processes, co-staining with epithelial markers (E-cadherin) and mesenchymal markers (vimentin) alongside SASH1 may provide valuable insights
Proper validation of SASH1 antibody specificity is crucial for generating reliable research data. Include the following controls:
Positive controls:
Cell lines with confirmed high SASH1 expression (e.g., normal epithelial cells)
Recombinant SASH1 protein for Western blot analysis
Tissues known to express SASH1 (e.g., normal colon tissue)
Negative controls:
SASH1 knockdown or knockout cells using siRNA or CRISPR-Cas9
Cell lines with confirmed low SASH1 expression (e.g., many cancer cell lines including HepG2, HCCLM3, PANC-1)
Primary antibody omission control
Isotype control antibody
Validation experiments:
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the SASH1 antibody with excess purified SASH1 protein or immunizing peptide before use in your application. Signal reduction confirms specificity.
Molecular weight verification: Confirm that the detected band corresponds to the expected molecular weight of SASH1 (~170 kDa).
Orthogonal method comparison: Compare results with alternative detection methods such as RT-qPCR using validated SASH1 primers (5′-TCCCGTCACAGGAAGAAACG-3′ and 5′-GATACCCATCACGTCGGTCC-3′) .
Signal pattern analysis: Verify that the subcellular localization pattern matches known SASH1 distribution (typically cytoplasmic with occasional nuclear localization).
SASH1 has been implicated in regulating several signaling pathways relevant to cancer progression. Here are experimental approaches using HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibodies to investigate these mechanisms:
For studying SASH1 in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway:
Co-immunoprecipitation studies:
Immunoprecipitate SASH1 from cell lysates and probe for PI3K, Akt, or other pathway components
Western blot with HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibody to confirm successful immunoprecipitation
Investigate changes in these interactions under various treatments or in different cell lines
Pathway activation analysis:
Compare phosphorylation levels of PI3K and Akt in cells with normal versus overexpressed or knocked-down SASH1
Use HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibody alongside phospho-specific antibodies for PI3K/Akt
Research has shown that SASH1 overexpression prevents hypoxia-induced activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway
For investigating SASH1's role in the Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathway:
Design experiments to demonstrate the relationship between SASH1 and Shh pathway components as observed in hepatocarcinoma :
| Experimental Condition | SASH1 Expression | Shh Pathway Components (Shh, Smo, Ptc, Gli-1) | Cell Phenotype |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control vector | Low (endogenous) | High expression | High proliferation, invasion |
| SASH1 overexpression | High | Decreased expression | Reduced proliferation, invasion |
| SASH1 knockdown | Very low | Further increased expression | Enhanced proliferation, invasion |
| SASH1 overexpression + Shh pathway activator | High | Partially restored | Partially rescued proliferation |
Use HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibody for Western blotting to confirm expression levels while simultaneously probing for Shh pathway components (Shh, Smo, Ptc, Gli-1) to establish correlation or causation .
Hypoxia has been shown to inhibit SASH1 expression and promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancer cells. When designing experiments to study this relationship using HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibodies, consider:
Experimental design considerations:
Hypoxic conditions:
EMT marker panel:
HIF-1α assessment:
Protocol modifications for hypoxic samples:
Sample collection and processing should be rapid to preserve hypoxic conditions
Consider using hypoxia-mimetic agents (e.g., CoCl2) as additional controls
When analyzing protein extracts from hypoxic cells, include reducing agents in sample buffers to prevent oxidation artifacts
Expected results based on published data:
| Condition | SASH1 Expression | E-cadherin | Vimentin | HIF-1α | Cell Migration/Invasion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normoxia | Normal/Baseline | High | Low | Low | Low/Baseline |
| Hypoxia | Decreased | Decreased | Increased | Increased | Increased |
| Hypoxia + SASH1 overexpression | High | Partially restored | Decreased | Decreased | Decreased |
These patterns have been observed in pancreatic cancer cell lines (PANC-1) and may vary in other cancer types .
When experiencing technical issues with SASH1 antibody, HRP conjugated, consider the following troubleshooting approaches:
For weak signal:
Antibody concentration:
Try a more concentrated antibody dilution (e.g., 1:500 instead of 1:1000)
Extend primary antibody incubation time (overnight at 4°C)
Antigen retrieval enhancement:
For FFPE tissue sections, optimize antigen retrieval (test both citrate pH 6.0 and EDTA pH 9.0 buffers)
Increase retrieval time or temperature
Detection system enhancement:
Use a more sensitive ECL substrate for Western blotting
For IHC, consider using amplification systems like tyramide signal amplification (TSA)
Sample preparation:
Ensure complete lysis of cells/tissues
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles of lysates
Consider concentration of dilute samples by immunoprecipitation
For non-specific binding/high background:
Blocking optimization:
Test different blocking agents (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers)
Increase blocking time (2 hours or more)
Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to reduce hydrophobic interactions
Wash protocol intensification:
Increase number and duration of washes
Use higher salt concentration in wash buffers (up to 500 mM NaCl)
Antibody specificity verification:
Perform peptide competition assay
Test antibody on known negative controls
Consider antibody purification using antigen affinity chromatography
Endogenous enzyme inactivation:
For tissues with high endogenous peroxidase activity, increase H2O2 quenching time
Use additional blocking steps for endogenous biotin if applicable
SASH1 expression patterns and their clinical implications vary across cancer types and even within subtypes of the same cancer. When interpreting seemingly contradictory findings:
Consider tissue-specific baseline expression:
Different tissues have varied normal SASH1 expression levels
Compare cancer samples to appropriate normal tissue controls
Evaluate cancer subtype heterogeneity:
Examine contextual signaling pathway activation:
Consider genetic and epigenetic alterations:
Some cancers may have mutations in SASH1 that alter protein function without affecting detection by antibodies
Epigenetic silencing mechanisms may vary across cancer types
When designing experiments, include controls representing multiple cancer subtypes when possible, and correlate SASH1 expression with other molecular markers to contextualize findings.
Emerging evidence suggests SASH1 may influence drug sensitivity in cancer. To investigate this using HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibodies:
Drug response correlation studies:
Treat cancer cell panels with various chemotherapeutic agents
Use HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibody to quantify expression by Western blotting
Correlate SASH1 levels with IC50 values for each drug
Research has shown that chloropyramine increases SASH1 protein levels in breast cancer cells and reduces cell confluency
SASH1 modulation experiments:
Generate stable cell lines with SASH1 overexpression or knockdown
Confirm expression changes using HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibody
Assess drug sensitivity changes using dose-response curves
Analyze changes in apoptotic markers in response to treatment
Signaling pathway analysis:
Experimental design recommendation:
| Cell Condition | SASH1 Status | Drug Treatment | Analysis Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent line | Endogenous | Vehicle control | Western blot (SASH1), Cell viability |
| Parent line | Endogenous | Drug treatment | Western blot (SASH1), Cell viability |
| SASH1 overexpression | High | Vehicle control | Western blot (SASH1), Cell viability |
| SASH1 overexpression | High | Drug treatment | Western blot (SASH1), Cell viability |
| SASH1 knockdown | Low | Vehicle control | Western blot (SASH1), Cell viability |
| SASH1 knockdown | Low | Drug treatment | Western blot (SASH1), Cell viability |
For each condition, collect samples at multiple time points (24h, 48h, 72h) to track dynamic changes in SASH1 expression and drug response.
The conjugation process can significantly impact antibody performance. Understanding these methods helps researchers select the appropriate HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibody:
Common conjugation methods:
Glutaraldehyde method:
Uses glutaraldehyde to crosslink amino groups between HRP and antibody
Advantages: Simple, cost-effective
Limitations: Can cause antibody aggregation, potential loss of antibody activity
Periodate method:
Oxidizes carbohydrate residues on HRP to create aldehydes that react with antibody amino groups
Advantages: Milder conditions, less impact on antibody binding
Limitations: Less stable linkage, potential for heterogeneous conjugation
Heterobifunctional linker method:
Uses reagents like sulfo-SMCC and SATA to create defined linkages
Sulfo-SMCC activates HRP to create reactive maleimide groups for coupling to sulfhydryl groups in antibodies
SATA introduces protected sulfhydryl groups into the antibody
Advantages: Greater control over conjugation, more homogeneous products, preservation of antibody activity
This is a preferred method for creating stable antibody-HRP conjugates with retention of antigen-binding activity
How conjugation affects performance:
The conjugation method can impact:
Antigen binding affinity
Sensitivity and specificity
Stability during storage
Background signal in assays
When selecting a commercial SASH1 antibody, HRP conjugated, consider requesting information about the conjugation method used and validation data showing retained specificity after conjugation.
Before using HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibody in critical experiments, verify both antibody quality and HRP enzyme activity:
Antibody quality verification:
Western blot analysis:
Run known positive and negative controls for SASH1
Verify correct molecular weight band (~170 kDa)
Check for absence of non-specific bands
Dot blot titration:
Apply serial dilutions of recombinant SASH1 protein to membrane
Probe with HRP-conjugated SASH1 antibody
Determine limit of detection and linear range
Immunocytochemistry:
Test on cell lines with known SASH1 expression patterns
Verify expected subcellular localization
HRP enzyme activity verification:
Direct enzyme activity assay:
Spot dilutions of antibody-HRP conjugate onto nitrocellulose
Develop with TMB (3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine) or other HRP substrate
Compare color development intensity with a standard HRP curve
Absorbance measurement:
Measure absorbance ratio (A403/A280) to determine HRP:antibody ratio
Optimal conjugation typically yields 2-4 HRP molecules per antibody
Storage stability testing:
Test activity after various storage conditions (4°C, -20°C, -80°C)
Compare fresh vs. stored conjugate performance
Quality control checklist:
Specific binding to SASH1 antigen
Low background in negative controls
Consistent lot-to-lot performance
Strong and proportional signal with increasing antigen concentration
Stable signal over the recommended storage period
By performing these quality checks, researchers can ensure reliable results when using SASH1 antibody, HRP conjugated for critical experiments investigating SASH1's role in cancer biology.