SOBIR1 Kinase Activity: The antibody confirmed that SOBIR1 phosphorylation is essential for its constitutive immune activity. Studies showed that kinase-active SOBIR1 and BAK1/SERK3 co-receptor are required for immune signaling in A. thaliana and Cf-4/Avr4-mediated resistance in tomato .
Phosphorylation Dynamics: SOBIR1 phosphorylation is linked to its interaction with BAK1. Co-expression of kinase-dead BAK1 mutants (e.g., D416N) suppresses SOBIR1-mediated immune responses, highlighting their interdependent activation .
Plasma Membrane Microdomains: Immunoblotting revealed two distinct molecular weight forms of SOBIR1 in N. benthamiana, suggesting post-translational modifications. The higher molecular weight form associates with ER-localized proteins like NbRLP1, modulating immune responses .
CRISPR/Cas9 Validation: The antibody was used to validate SOBIR1 knockout lines in N. benthamiana, demonstrating its necessity for Cf-4/Avr4-triggered hypersensitive response (HR) .
Western Blot Analysis: The antibody reliably detects SOBIR1 in protein extracts, aiding studies on its expression under pathogen challenge or genetic manipulation .
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies: Co-immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed SOBIR1’s interaction with RLPs (e.g., Cf-4) and BAK1, elucidating its role in receptor complex activation .
Functional Characterization: Research using this antibody revealed SOBIR1’s dual role in immunity and development, such as regulating floral organ shedding via endosomal trafficking .
Cross-Reactivity: While effective in A. thaliana and N. benthamiana, reactivity in other species (e.g., soybean) remains predicted and requires validation .
Phosphorylation-Specific Tools: Current antibodies detect total SOBIR1 but lack specificity for phosphorylated forms, limiting studies on activation dynamics .
Methodology:
Perform co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) with RLPs (e.g., Cf-4, Ve1) in the presence/absence of pathogens. SOBIR1 constitutively associates with RLPs like ELR and requires BAK1/SERK3 for signal amplification .
Use Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) or bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) to visualize SOBIR1-RLP interactions in planta .
Critical consideration: SOBIR1 stability depends on RLP interaction; monitor protein turnover via cycloheximide chase assays .
Context-dependent analysis:
Experimental design: Use tissue-specific promoters or inducible systems (e.g., dexamethasone) to titrate SOBIR1 expression levels and separate immunity from cell death .
Tools:
Challenge: Phosphorylation status may vary by subcellular localization (e.g., plasma membrane microdomains vs. endocytosed vesicles) .
| Species | Confirmed Reactivity | Predicted Reactivity | Observed MW (kDa) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. thaliana | Yes | N/A | 71 |
| N. benthamiana | Yes | N/A | 71 |
| S. lycopersicum | No | Yes | – |
| G. max | No | Yes | – |
For subcellular localization studies, use Airyscan confocal microscopy to track SOBIR1 microdomains on the plasma membrane and their coordination with ER remodeling .
In kinase activity assays, combine in vitro kinase assays (SOBIR1-KD + ATP) with in vivo phosphoproteomics to map phosphorylation sites .
For contradictory phenotypes, employ tissue-specific CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts to bypass pleiotropic effects of constitutive sobir1 mutations .