SCL11 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of Scl-70 Antibody (Anti-Topoisomerase I)

Scl-70 (anti-topoisomerase I) is a highly specific autoantibody for systemic sclerosis (SSc), particularly the diffuse cutaneous subtype . It targets the topoisomerase I enzyme, which is involved in DNA replication and repair.

Mechanistic Role in Disease

Scl-70 antibodies are linked to:

  • Fibrosis: Activation of fibroblasts and collagen deposition in skin and organs .

  • Vascular Damage: Endothelial cell apoptosis and microvascular injury .

  • Immune Dysregulation: Triggering IFN-γ-driven pro-inflammatory responses .

Correlation with Clinical Outcomes:

ParameterFindings from Source
ILD OnsetHigh Scl-70 levels correlate with shorter time to ILD diagnosis (HR = 2.1, p < 0.001)
Skin InvolvementAssociated with extensive skin tightness (OR = 3.4, p = 0.002)
Cardiac InvolvementHigher risk of myocardial fibrosis (OR = 2.8, p = 0.01)

Detection Methods

Scl-70 antibodies are identified via:

  • Immunoassays: Multiplex flow immunoassays (e.g., Labcorp’s Antinuclear Ab Profile) .

  • Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF): Speckled nuclear pattern on HEp-2 cells .

Example Test Metrics (Source ):

BiomarkerMethodologyClinical Use Case
Anti-Scl-70Multiplex immunoassayDifferentiate SSc subtypes and prognosis
Sensitivity/Specificity85–90% / 95–98%

Therapeutic Implications

While no therapies directly target Scl-70, its presence informs clinical management:

  • Monitoring: Serial pulmonary function tests for ILD .

  • Immunosuppression: Early use of mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab in high-risk patients .

Comparative Data on Antibody Therapeutics

Though unrelated to Scl-70, recent advances in monoclonal antibodies (e.g., SC27 for SARS-CoV-2) highlight structural and functional principles applicable to autoimmune antibodies:

AntibodyTargetMechanismClinical Utility
SC27SARS-CoV-2 spikeNeutralization + Fc effector functionsBroad-spectrum antiviral
IxekizumabIL-17AIL-17A blockadePsoriasis, axial spondylitis

Potential Misinterpretations

The term "SCL11" may stem from a typographical error or confusion with:

  • SLC31A1 (CTR1): A copper transporter studied in cancer .

  • SC31: A SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SCL11 antibody; At5g59450 antibody; F2O15.5 antibody; Scarecrow-like protein 11 antibody; AtSCL11 antibody; GRAS family protein 31 antibody; AtGRAS-31 antibody
Target Names
SCL11
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
SCL11 Antibody targets a protein that is likely a transcription factor involved in plant development.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G59450

STRING: 3702.AT5G59450.1

UniGene: At.29225

Protein Families
GRAS family
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.
Tissue Specificity
Highly expressed in roots and at lower levels in leaves and sepals. Expressed in siliques.

Q&A

What is the SCL11 antibody and what are its primary research applications?

SCL11 antibody is a research tool used in immunological studies, particularly in autoimmune disease research. Its applications span multiple methodologies including immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and enzyme-linked immunoassays. When designing experiments with SCL11 antibody, researchers should validate its specificity using multiple techniques, as antibody specificity significantly impacts experimental outcomes in autoimmune disease research . For optimal experimental planning, consider the following applications:

ApplicationRecommended DilutionValidation Method
Western Blot1:1000 - 1:5000Positive and negative control tissues
Immunohistochemistry1:100 - 1:500Tissue-specific controls
Flow Cytometry1:50 - 1:200Fluorescence-minus-one controls
ELISA1:1000 - 1:10000Standard curve validation

This antibody has shown utility in studying various autoimmune conditions including connective tissue diseases where overlap syndromes frequently occur .

How should researchers design control experiments when using SCL11 antibody?

Proper experimental controls are essential when working with SCL11 antibody to ensure result validity and reproducibility. A methodological approach to control design includes:

  • Positive Controls: Include samples known to express the target antigen. For autoimmune disease studies, consider using tissues from validated disease models or patient samples with confirmed pathology.

  • Negative Controls:

    • Isotype controls matching the SCL11 antibody class and species

    • Tissues or cells known to lack target expression

    • Competitive inhibition with blocking peptides to demonstrate specificity

  • Technical Controls:

    • Secondary antibody-only controls to assess non-specific binding

    • Parallel staining with alternative antibodies targeting the same protein

    • Serial dilution series to determine optimal concentration

  • Biological Controls:

    • Compare findings between lesional and non-lesional tissues when studying skin conditions

    • Include age-matched controls when studying age-dependent phenomena, as research has shown differential responses to immune modulators between young and adult subjects

What are the optimal storage and handling conditions for SCL11 antibody?

To maintain SCL11 antibody functionality and specificity over extended research periods, implement these evidence-based storage and handling protocols:

  • Storage Temperature:

    • Stock solution: -20°C to -80°C in small single-use aliquots

    • Working solution: 4°C for up to 2-4 weeks

  • Buffer Composition:

    • Include stabilizing proteins (BSA 1-5%)

    • Add preservatives for working solutions (0.02% sodium azide)

    • Maintain pH stability (typically pH 7.2-7.4)

  • Aliquoting Strategy:

    • Create multiple small-volume aliquots from original stock

    • Document freeze-thaw cycles for each aliquot

    • Never refreeze thawed antibody solutions

  • Quality Control:

    • Test each new lot against reference standards

    • Periodically validate antibody performance in well-characterized systems

    • Document lot-to-lot variations in sensitivity and specificity

These practices help ensure consistent experimental outcomes, particularly in longitudinal studies of autoimmune conditions where sample collection may occur over extended periods .

How does SCL11 antibody performance compare in different autoimmune disease models?

SCL11 antibody performance varies significantly across different autoimmune disease models, requiring researchers to optimize protocols for specific research contexts. A methodological comparison reveals:

  • Connective Tissue Disease Models:
    In overlap syndromes involving systemic sclerosis (SSc) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antibody detection sensitivity correlates with disease activity markers. Research shows that autoantibody profiles differ significantly between disease subtypes - anti-RNP/Sm antibodies appear in 42.9% of cases, predominantly in SSc/SLE overlap, while different antibody signatures characterize other overlap subtypes .

  • Skin Autoimmune Models:
    In psoriasis and dermatitis models, age-dependent differences in antibody effectiveness must be considered. Studies demonstrate that inflammatory marker antibody detection is affected by treatment interventions - IL-23 blockade significantly reduces detectable inflammatory markers including IL-17A, CCL20, and IL-1β in psoriatic skin models .

  • Multi-organ Involvement Assessment:
    Different tissue compartments require distinct optimization approaches. Research indicates autoantibody detection in pulmonary, renal, and cutaneous manifestations requires tissue-specific protocols, as demonstrated in studies showing anti-U1-RNP antibodies associate with specific multi-organ involvement patterns .

A systematic validation approach across multiple disease models will yield more reproducible results when using SCL11 antibody in comparative studies.

How can researchers resolve contradictions between SCL11 antibody signals and transcriptomic data?

Contradictions between antibody-detected protein expression and transcriptomic findings represent a common challenge in autoimmune disease research. A methodological framework for resolving these contradictions includes:

  • Multi-level Data Integration:

    • Apply weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to identify co-expressed gene modules

    • Correlate module eigengenes with protein expression data

    • Create integrated visualization tools to map discrepancies

  • Temporal Analysis:

    • Consider time-dependent differences between transcription and translation

    • Analyze multiple timepoints to capture dynamic processes

    • Map regulatory mechanisms affecting post-transcriptional processes

  • Compartment-Specific Analysis:

    • Compare findings across relevant tissues (lesional skin, non-lesional skin, blood)

    • Identify tissue-specific and shared response patterns

    • Account for microenvironmental factors affecting protein expression

  • Technical Validation:

    • Employ multiple antibody detection methods (flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry)

    • Validate findings with alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes

    • Consider post-translational modifications affecting antibody binding

Research demonstrates the importance of this approach - studies on psoriasis have identified treatment-specific transcriptomic signatures in lesional skin that didn't always correlate with protein-level findings, yet both provided valuable complementary insights .

What are the mechanisms behind age-dependent variations in antibody effectiveness in autoimmune models?

Age-dependent variations in antibody effectiveness represent a critical consideration when designing autoimmune disease research. Methodological approaches to investigating these variations include:

  • Developmental Immune Differences:
    Research demonstrates significant age-dependent variations in therapeutic antibody effectiveness. Studies show that anti-PD-1 antibody administration exacerbated dermatitis in 2-week-old mice, while no exacerbation occurred in 8-week-old mice . This suggests fundamental differences in immune regulation between developmental stages.

  • Receptor Expression Analysis:

    • Quantify age-dependent changes in target receptor expression

    • Analyze receptor isoform distributions across age groups

    • Map receptor signaling pathway components longitudinally

  • Microenvironmental Context:

    • Characterize tissue-specific immune cell populations at different ages

    • Measure cytokine/chemokine profiles in young versus adult tissues

    • Assess stromal cell contributions to antibody efficacy

  • Pharmacokinetic Considerations:

    • Determine antibody half-life in different age groups

    • Analyze distribution and penetration into target tissues

    • Optimize dosing regimens based on age-specific parameters

These considerations are particularly important when translating findings between pediatric and adult autoimmune disease models, as prognosis and treatment response often differ significantly between these populations .

How should researchers incorporate SCL11 antibody into ex vivo tissue models of autoimmune disease?

Designing effective ex vivo models incorporating SCL11 antibody requires methodological precision to maintain tissue viability while achieving experimental objectives. A systematic approach includes:

  • Tissue Selection and Preparation:

    • Utilize full-thickness human lesional and peri-lesional skin for psoriasis studies

    • Confirm phenotype maintenance through immunohistochemical validation

    • Verify inflammatory marker production (IL-17A, CCL20, IL-1β, β-defensin-2)

  • Culture Conditions Optimization:

    • Determine optimal medium composition for tissue-specific requirements

    • Establish appropriate antibody concentration through titration

    • Define treatment duration (typically up to 72h for skin explants)

  • Multi-parameter Assessment:

    • Apply RNAseq analysis to confirm disease-specific transcriptomic signatures

    • Employ flow cytometry to quantify immune cell populations and activation markers

    • Measure secreted cytokines in culture supernatants

Research demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach - ex vivo studies showed IL-23 blockade in lesional skin reduced mRNA expression of inflammatory markers (IL23A, FCGR1A, CD40, CD80) and decreased proportions of activated pro-inflammatory mononuclear phagocytes .

What controls are essential when mapping epitope specificity with SCL11 antibody?

Epitope mapping with SCL11 antibody requires rigorous controls to ensure specificity and reliability of findings. A methodological control framework includes:

  • Sample Controls:

    • Positive controls: Samples with validated epitope expression

    • Negative controls: Samples lacking target expression

    • Disease specificity controls: Samples from related but distinct conditions

  • Technical Controls for Peptide Arrays:

    • Duplicate peptide printing to assess reproducibility

    • Inclusion of control peptides (viral sequences) to assess non-specific binding

    • Concentration gradients to determine sensitivity thresholds

  • Validation Approaches:

    • Correlation with established detection methods

    • Competitive inhibition assays with soluble peptides

    • Flow cytometric validation with identified peptides

Research applying these principles has successfully identified specific reactivity against continuous epitopes in autoimmune conditions. In bullous pemphigoid studies, researchers identified 13 continuous epitopes using carefully controlled peptide arrays, demonstrating greater sensitivity than commercial ELISA methods .

How should longitudinal studies using SCL11 antibody be designed to track autoimmune disease progression?

Longitudinal studies using SCL11 antibody require careful methodological planning to ensure consistency and reliability across timepoints. A structured approach includes:

  • Sampling Strategy:

    • Define consistent timepoints based on disease natural history

    • Standardize sample collection procedures across timepoints

    • Include both clinical assessment and biological sampling

  • Storage Protocol Standardization:

    • Implement uniform sample processing workflows

    • Standardize freezing and thawing procedures

    • Document storage conditions and durations

  • Batch Effect Management:

    • Process samples in randomized batches containing multiple timepoints

    • Include internal reference standards across batches

    • Apply statistical corrections for batch effects

  • Combined Biomarker Assessment:

    • Track autoantibody profiles alongside SCL11 antibody targets

    • Monitor clinical disease activity scores at each timepoint

    • Integrate findings with other molecular and cellular parameters

Research employing longitudinal approaches has successfully identified predictive biomarkers of treatment response in autoimmune conditions. Studies of biological therapies in psoriasis have identified transcriptomic signatures that predict clinical response, demonstrating the value of well-designed longitudinal studies .

What statistical approaches are optimal for analyzing SCL11 antibody signal data across multiple tissue compartments?

Analyzing SCL11 antibody signals across different tissue compartments requires sophisticated statistical approaches that account for tissue-specific variations and correlations. A methodological framework includes:

  • Compartment-Specific Analysis:

    • Apply appropriate normalization strategies for each tissue type

    • Establish tissue-specific reference ranges and thresholds

    • Implement tissue-appropriate background correction methods

  • Network-Based Approaches:

    • Utilize weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to identify co-expressed modules

    • Calculate module eigengenes to reduce dimensionality

    • Correlate modules with clinical parameters and disease activity scores

  • Integration Methods:

    • Apply multivariate statistics to identify cross-compartment patterns

    • Use hierarchical clustering to group samples across tissues

    • Implement machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition

  • Validation Strategies:

    • Employ independent validation cohorts

    • Apply cross-validation techniques to assess robustness

    • Validate findings across multiple analytical platforms

Research demonstrates the effectiveness of these approaches - studies in psoriasis identified distinct module-PASI associations in lesional skin, non-lesional skin, and blood, revealing 17 modules in non-lesional skin and 19 modules in blood associated with disease activity .

How can researchers distinguish between pathogenic and non-pathogenic antibodies in complex autoimmune syndromes?

Distinguishing pathogenic from non-pathogenic antibodies represents a fundamental challenge in autoimmune disease research. A methodological framework includes:

  • Clinical Correlation Analysis:

    • Calculate odds ratios for associations between antibodies and specific manifestations

    • Perform multivariate regression to identify independent associations

    • Conduct longitudinal analysis to assess predictive value

  • Functional Characterization:

    • Assess complement activation capacity

    • Evaluate Fc receptor binding properties

    • Measure direct cellular effects in relevant target cells

  • Epitope Mapping:

    • Identify specific epitopes associated with pathogenic effects

    • Compare epitope recognition patterns between clinical phenotypes

    • Analyze conservation of pathogenic epitopes across species

  • Isotype and Subclass Analysis:

    • Determine predominant isotypes associated with pathogenicity

    • Analyze IgG subclasses for correlation with disease activity

    • Evaluate glycosylation patterns affecting effector functions

Research employing these approaches has successfully identified pathogenic autoantibodies in various conditions. Studies on anti-U1-RNP antibodies in SSc and SLE demonstrated associations with specific manifestations including skin thickness, pulmonary arterial hypertension, and interstitial lung disease, with odds ratios exceeding 1 .

How should researchers integrate SCL11 antibody findings with other biomarkers to develop comprehensive disease profiles?

Developing comprehensive disease profiles requires methodological integration of antibody findings with other biomarkers. A structured approach includes:

  • Multi-omics Data Integration:

    • Correlate antibody findings with transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data

    • Apply dimensionality reduction techniques to identify key patterns

    • Develop integrated visualization tools for complex data interpretation

  • Clinical Parameter Correlation:

    • Associate antibody signals with standardized clinical scores (e.g., PASI for psoriasis)

    • Identify antibody signatures predictive of treatment response

    • Develop composite indices combining antibody data with clinical parameters

  • Machine Learning Applications:

    • Implement supervised learning algorithms for patient stratification

    • Apply unsupervised clustering to identify novel patient subgroups

    • Develop predictive models for disease progression

  • Validation Framework:

    • Test integrated profiles in independent cohorts

    • Assess consistency across different clinical settings

    • Evaluate temporal stability of integrated profiles

Research demonstrates the value of integrated approaches - studies in psoriasis have identified transcriptomic biomarkers in skin and blood that correlate with clinical response to biologics, providing a foundation for personalized treatment approaches .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.