At1g06030 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% ProClin 300; Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
14-16 weeks (made-to-order)
Synonyms
At1g06030 antibody; T21E18.8 antibody; Probable fructokinase-2 antibody; EC 2.7.1.4 antibody
Target Names
At1g06030
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Plays a significant role in regulating carbon flux towards starch biosynthesis.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT1G06030

STRING: 3702.AT1G06030.1

UniGene: At.70437

Protein Families
Carbohydrate kinase PfkB family

Q&A

Basic Research Questions

How to validate antibody specificity for TET1 across experimental applications?

  • Methodology:

    • Western Blot: Use lysates from TET1-expressing cell lines (e.g., HEK293T) and compare with TET1-knockout controls. Look for a single band at ~68 kDa (observed) vs. calculated 235 kDa (due to post-translational modifications) .

    • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Validate using tissues with known TET1 expression (e.g., embryonic stem cells) and include a peptide-blocking control to confirm signal specificity .

    • Flow Cytometry: Include unstained cells, isotype controls, and secondary antibody-only controls to rule out non-specific binding .

  • Data Contradiction Analysis: If unexpected bands or staining appear, perform epitope mapping (the immunogen is a 18-aa peptide near the C-terminus) and test cross-reactivity with TET2/TET3 using recombinant proteins.

What experimental controls are critical for flow cytometry studies using TET1 antibodies?

Control TypePurposeExample
UnstainedBaseline autofluorescenceCells without antibody treatment
IsotypeFc receptor bindingRabbit IgG (non-specific)
Secondary OnlyNon-specific secondary bindingFluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody alone
Knockout CellsTarget specificityTET1-deficient cell line

How to mitigate non-specific binding in immunohistochemistry?

  • Pre-block tissues with 10% serum from the secondary antibody host (e.g., goat serum for goat anti-rabbit IgG) .

  • Optimize antigen retrieval conditions (e.g., citrate buffer pH 6.0 vs. EDTA pH 9.0) .

  • Validate with a titration series of primary antibody concentrations (e.g., 1–10 µg/mL) .

Advanced Research Questions

How to resolve discrepancies between in vitro neutralization assays and in vivo efficacy?

  • Case Study: In IL-6R studies, pH-dependent antibodies showed no in vitro neutralization but achieved in vivo efficacy via FcRn-mediated antigen sweeping . For TET1:

    • Test antibody pharmacokinetics (e.g., Fc engineering to enhance FcRn binding at neutral pH) .

    • Use transgenic models (e.g., hFcRn-Tgm) to evaluate antibody half-life and tissue penetration .

    • Pair functional assays (e.g., DNA hydroxymethylation analysis) with antibody PK/PD modeling .

What strategies improve antibody stability and binding affinity for long-term studies?

ParameterConventional AntibodyEngineered Variant
FcRn BindingWeak at neutral pHMutations (e.g., H435R) enhance affinity
Storage-20°C long-termLyophilization for room-temperature stability
Antigen BindingpH-independentpH-dependent binding reduces off-target clearance

How to interpret conflicting clinical correlations of antibody titers?

  • Example: In COVID-19, high anti-S IgG correlated with severe outcomes due to delayed neutralizing antibody kinetics . For TET1:

    • Contextualize antibody levels with functional readouts (e.g., 5hmC levels in DNA).

    • Use longitudinal sampling to distinguish early vs. late immune responses .

    • Apply multivariate analysis to decouple antibody titers from confounders (e.g., comorbidities) .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.