The SDCBP2 antibody is a specialized immunological reagent designed to detect and study Syndecan Binding Protein 2 (Syntenin 2), a protein involved in cellular adhesion, signaling, and cancer-related pathways. This antibody is widely used in research to investigate SDCBP2’s role in physiological and pathological processes. Below is a comprehensive analysis of its structure, types, applications, and clinical relevance, supported by diverse experimental data.
SDCBP2 is a 37 kDa protein containing tandem PDZ domains that interact with syndecan transmembrane proteins, facilitating cell surface adhesion and signaling . Its expression is observed in hepatocytes, skin, and cancer tissues, where it modulates β-catenin degradation and tumor progression .
PDZ Domains: Enable binding to syndecan’s FYA motif (Phe-Tyr-Ala) .
Post-Translational Modifications: Sumoylation and ubiquitination regulate its stability and function .
Multiple SDCBP2 antibodies are available, differing in host species, epitope specificity, and applications:
SDCBP2 antibodies are employed in diverse experimental settings:
Detects cytoplasmic staining in hepatocytes and cancer tissues .
Example: Goat polyclonal antibody (ABIN185169) shows specificity for human liver samples .
Quantifies SDCBP2 levels in serum/plasma with high sensitivity (0.094 ng/mL) .
Sandwich ELISA kits (e.g., HUFI02876) use paired antibodies for enhanced specificity .
SDCBP2 is implicated in:
Downregulation of SDCBP2-AS1 (a regulatory lncRNA) correlates with poor prognosis in gastric cancer, as it stabilizes β-catenin and promotes metastasis .
Antibodies targeting SDCBP2 are used to study this pathway in tumor models .
| Host | Reactivity | Species |
|---|---|---|
| Goat | Polyclonal | Human, Mouse, Rat |
| Rabbit | Polyclonal | Human |
| Mouse | Monoclonal | Human |
SDCBP2, also known as Syntenin-2, is a protein encoded by the SDCBP2 gene located on chromosome 20p13 . It contains two class II PDZ domains that facilitate protein-protein interactions by binding to the cytoplasmic C-terminus of transmembrane proteins . SDCBP2 binds to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and plays a significant role in nuclear PIP2 organization and cell division . The protein has a calculated molecular weight of approximately 32-37 kDa .
SDCBP2 is involved in multiple cellular processes including:
Cell signaling and organization of protein complexes
Intracellular transport
Nervous system development
Protein homodimerization and heterodimerization activities
Alternative spliced transcript variants encoding multiple isoforms have been observed for the SDCBP2 gene, and read-through transcription exists between this gene and the upstream FKBP1A gene .
SDCBP2 antibodies have been validated for multiple research applications, with varying protocols and optimizations for each technique:
| Application | Common Dilutions | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blot (WB) | 0.25-1 μg/ml | Expected band size ~32-37 kDa |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 2-6 μg/ml | Heat-mediated antigen retrieval in EDTA buffer (pH 8.0) recommended |
| Immunocytochemistry (ICC) | 5 μg/ml | Often combined with permeabilization |
| Immunofluorescence (IF) | 5 μg/ml | Can be used for co-localization studies |
| ELISA | 0.1-1 μg/ml | High sensitivity for protein quantification |
| Flow Cytometry | 1-3 μg/1×10^6 cells | Requires cell fixation and permeabilization |
For optimal results, validation of antibody specificity and optimization of protocols for each specific experimental system is strongly recommended .
For successful Western blot detection of SDCBP2, follow these methodological considerations:
Sample preparation: Use 30 μg of protein lysate per lane under reducing conditions .
Gel electrophoresis: Run samples on a 5-20% SDS-PAGE gel at 70V (stacking gel) followed by 90V (resolving gel) for 2-3 hours .
Transfer conditions: Transfer proteins to nitrocellulose membrane at 150 mA for 50-90 minutes .
Blocking: Block the membrane with 5% non-fat milk in TBS for 1.5 hours at room temperature .
Primary antibody incubation: Incubate with anti-SDCBP2 antibody at 0.5-1 μg/ml overnight at 4°C .
Secondary antibody incubation: Use appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (e.g., anti-rabbit IgG) at 1:5000 dilution for 1.5 hours at room temperature .
Detection: Develop using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection system .
Validation data shows SDCBP2 detection at approximately 37 kDa in human A431 and HaCaT whole cell lysates, though the expected band size is 32 kDa .
Immunohistochemical analyses have revealed SDCBP2 expression in multiple human tissues and cancer types:
| Tissue Type | Expression Pattern | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Breast cancer | Positive | Varying intensity based on cancer subtype |
| Colon adenocarcinoma | Positive | Distinct membrane/cytoplasmic staining |
| Liver cancer | Positive | Heterogeneous expression pattern |
| Lung adenocarcinoma | Positive | Often showing strong expression |
| Prostate adenocarcinoma | Positive | Variable expression levels |
| Renal cancer | Positive | Typically moderate to strong expression |
| Spleen | Positive | Normal tissue with detectable expression |
Expression levels may vary based on tissue type, disease state, and individual patient characteristics. Clinical data from 132 gastric cancer patients showed that SDCBP2-AS1 expression correlates with clinical parameters including gender and tumor diameter .
SDCBP2 and its antisense RNA (SDCBP2-AS1) have emerging roles in cancer biology, particularly in gastric cancer:
Gastric cancer mechanisms: SDCBP2-AS1 is involved in gastric cancer tumorigenesis and progression through post-translational modifications . Research shows that SDCBP2-AS1 destabilizes β-catenin by regulating ubiquitination processes .
Clinical correlations: In a study of 132 pairs of gastric cancer and adjacent normal tissues, SDCBP2-AS1 expression showed significant correlation with gender (p=0.019) and tumor diameter (p=0.016) . The following data demonstrates these clinical correlations:
| Characteristic | Total [cases (%)] | Low Expression [cases (%)] | High Expression [cases (%)] | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 132 | 73 (55.3) | 59 (44.7) | - |
| Gender | - | - | - | 0.019 |
| Male | 88 (66.7) | 55 (62.5) | 33 (37.5) | - |
| Female | 44 (33.3) | 18 (40.9) | 26 (59.1) | - |
| Tumor diameter | - | - | - | 0.016 |
| ≤4 cm | 63 (47.7) | 28 (44.4) | 35 (55.6) | - |
Experimental approaches: Investigating SDCBP2's role in cancer requires multiple methodologies:
Understanding these mechanisms provides potential for therapeutic targeting and biomarker development in gastric and other cancers.
To effectively study SDCBP2 protein-protein interactions, consider the following methodological approach:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Utilize two primary antibodies from different species targeting SDCBP2 and potential binding partners
Apply species-specific PLA probes and perform rolling circle amplification
Visualize interaction signals using fluorescence microscopy
PDZ domain interaction mapping:
Design experiments focusing on the two class II PDZ domains of SDCBP2
Create domain-specific mutations to identify critical interaction regions
Use peptide arrays with C-terminal sequences of potential transmembrane protein partners
Analyzing PIP2 interactions:
Employ lipid binding assays to study SDCBP2-PIP2 interactions
Use fluorescently labeled PIP2 and purified SDCBP2 protein
Perform subcellular fractionation to assess nuclear versus cytoplasmic interactions
When conducting these experiments, it's critical to incorporate appropriate controls and validate results through multiple complementary techniques to ensure specificity of detected interactions.
Based on research showing SDCBP2-AS1's involvement in regulating ubiquitination , the following experimental approaches are recommended:
Ubiquitination assays:
Perform in vitro ubiquitination reactions using purified components
Use co-transfection of SDCBP2, substrate proteins, and tagged ubiquitin
Analyze by immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting with anti-ubiquitin antibodies
Proteasome inhibition studies:
Treat cells with proteasome inhibitors (MG132, bortezomib) to accumulate ubiquitinated proteins
Compare SDCBP2 knockdown/overexpression effects on substrate stability
Monitor half-life changes of target proteins using cycloheximide chase assays
E3 ligase interaction analysis:
Investigate SDCBP2 interactions with E3 ubiquitin ligases
Map binding domains using truncation mutants
Perform functional assays to determine if SDCBP2 modulates E3 ligase activity
Mass spectrometry approaches:
Use SILAC or TMT labeling to quantify changes in the ubiquitinome upon SDCBP2 manipulation
Enrich for ubiquitinated peptides using K-ε-GG antibodies
Identify specific lysine residues modified in a SDCBP2-dependent manner
When interpreting results, consider that SDCBP2 may function as a scaffold that brings together substrate proteins and ubiquitination machinery rather than possessing intrinsic enzymatic activity.
Distinguishing specific from non-specific binding is crucial for generating reliable data with SDCBP2 antibodies. Implement these methodological controls and validation steps:
Knockout/knockdown validation:
Compare antibody signals in SDCBP2 knockout/knockdown cells versus wild-type cells
Use CRISPR-Cas9, siRNA, or shRNA approaches to deplete SDCBP2
Expect significant reduction or elimination of specific signals
Peptide competition assays:
Pre-incubate antibody with excess immunizing peptide before application
Compare signals with and without peptide competition
Specific signals should be blocked by the peptide
Multiple antibody validation:
Use antibodies raised against different epitopes of SDCBP2
Compare staining patterns and detection profiles
Consistent results across antibodies suggest specific detection
Positive and negative control samples:
Isotype controls:
For flow cytometry and IHC applications, use matched isotype controls
Process in parallel with the same concentration as the SDCBP2 antibody
This controls for non-specific binding of antibody isotype
By implementing these validation approaches, researchers can confidently distinguish between specific SDCBP2 signals and non-specific background.
For optimal immunohistochemical detection of SDCBP2 in paraffin-embedded tissue sections, follow this detailed protocol:
Sample preparation:
Use formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections (4-6 μm thickness)
Mount on positively charged slides
Deparaffinize and rehydrate through xylene and graded ethanol series
Antigen retrieval:
Blocking:
Primary antibody incubation:
Secondary antibody and detection:
This protocol has been validated with SDCBP2 antibodies in multiple cancer tissues including breast, colon, liver, lung, prostate, and renal cancers, as well as normal tissues like spleen .
To effectively investigate SDCBP2 subcellular localization, implement these methodological approaches:
Immunofluorescence microscopy:
Subcellular fractionation:
Separate cellular components (nuclear, cytoplasmic, membrane fractions)
Analyze SDCBP2 distribution by Western blotting
Include fraction-specific markers as controls (e.g., lamin for nuclear fraction, GAPDH for cytoplasmic fraction)
Live-cell imaging:
Generate cells expressing SDCBP2-GFP/RFP fusion proteins
Monitor dynamic localization changes in response to stimuli
Combine with photobleaching techniques (FRAP/FLIP) to assess protein mobility
Super-resolution microscopy:
Apply techniques like STORM, PALM, or STED for nanoscale resolution
Particularly useful for studying SDCBP2's association with membrane microdomains or nuclear structures
Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM):
Combine fluorescence and electron microscopy
Provide ultrastructural context for SDCBP2 localization
Given SDCBP2's reported roles in both PIP2 binding and nuclear organization, special attention should be paid to its distribution between nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments. Validation data shows both nuclear and cytoplasmic localization patterns depending on cell type and experimental conditions .