SDCCAG8 antibodies are immunoreagents designed to detect SDCCAG8, a cytoplasmic protein involved in ciliogenesis, epithelial lumen formation, and DNA damage response signaling . These antibodies are pivotal for:
Localizing SDCCAG8 at centrioles, basal bodies, and centrosomes .
Investigating interactions with ciliopathy-associated proteins like OFD1, RABEP2, ERC1, and CEP131 .
Diagnosing SDCCAG8 mutations linked to nephronophthisis-related ciliopathies (NPHP-RC) and Bardet-Biedl syndrome .
SDCCAG8 interacts with RABEP2 and ERC1 at centrosomes, regulating ciliary protein trafficking and cilia length . Knockdown of SDCCAG8 reduces cilia length by 32% (p < 0.0001) .
Truncation of the C-terminal region (ΔC) in mice disrupts centrosomal localization, leading to ciliopathy phenotypes like polydactyly and renal cysts .
Mutations in SDCCAG8 cause NPHP type 10, characterized by kidney cysts, retinal degeneration, and cerebellar defects .
SDCCAG8 antibodies confirmed colocalization with OFD1 at centrioles, explaining shared pathologies in oral-facial-digital syndrome .
Coiled-coil domains in SDCCAG8 mediate homodimerization and interactions with ciliary proteins .
SDCCAG8 depletion in zebrafish causes body axis defects and cell polarity impairments .
Western Blotting: Detects SDCCAG8 isoforms (83 kDa, 78 kDa, 73 kDa, 41 kDa) .
Immunofluorescence: Localizes SDCCAG8 at centriolar satellites and basal bodies in renal epithelial cells .
Co-Immunoprecipitation: Validates interactions with ICK, MAK, and CEP131 .
SDCCAG8 (serologically defined colon cancer antigen 8), also known as CCCAP (centrosomal colon cancer autoantigen protein) or NY-CO-8, is a 713 amino acid cytoplasmic protein with a molecular weight of approximately 83 kDa. This protein plays crucial roles in establishing cell polarity, epithelial lumen formation, and ciliogenesis. SDCCAG8 has gained research significance due to its association with nephronophthisis-related ciliopathies (NPHP-RC), a recessive disorder characterized by dysplasia or degeneration of the kidney, retina, and cerebellum. The protein localizes to centrioles and directly interacts with oral-facial-digital syndrome 1 (OFD1), making it an important target for studying ciliopathies and centrosomal function .
Researchers have access to both polyclonal and monoclonal SDCCAG8 antibodies for various experimental applications:
When selecting an antibody, consider your target species, application requirements, and whether polyclonal (broader epitope recognition) or monoclonal (higher specificity for a single epitope) would better suit your experimental needs .
SDCCAG8 primarily localizes to centrioles and plays a role in ciliary formation. It exists as a homodimer and contains eight predicted coiled-coil motifs divided into three regions: N-terminal (1-294 aa), middle (286-541 aa), and C-terminal (533-713 aa). The subcellular localization has important implications for antibody selection:
For centrosomal localization studies: Choose antibodies validated for immunofluorescence that have demonstrated centrosomal staining patterns
For studies of C-terminal function: Select antibodies targeting the C-terminal region (533-713 aa), which has been shown to be crucial for proper centrosomal localization and cilia formation
For protein interaction studies: Consider antibodies that don't interfere with known protein-protein interaction sites, particularly those involving OFD1 or ICK/MAK kinases
Immunofluorescence microscopy with SDCCAG8 antibodies typically shows characteristic centrosomal staining patterns, with prominent labeling at the base of primary cilia in ciliated cells .
For successful SDCCAG8 detection in tissue sections using IHC, consider the following protocol optimization parameters:
Antigen Retrieval:
Primary recommendation: TE buffer pH 9.0
Alternative: Citrate buffer pH 6.0
Antibody Dilutions:
Polyclonal antibodies: 1:50-1:500 range (Proteintech 13471-1-AP)
Monoclonal antibodies: 1:50-1:500 range (Proteintech 66284-1-Ig)
Positive Controls:
Technical Notes:
Titration in your specific testing system is strongly recommended for optimal results
Fixation conditions may significantly impact epitope availability; consider testing multiple fixation protocols if signal is suboptimal
For phosphorylated-SDCCAG8 detection, phosphatase inhibitors should be included throughout sample preparation
For optimal western blot detection of SDCCAG8 (expected molecular weight: 83 kDa), follow these methodological considerations:
Sample Preparation:
Include phosphatase and protease inhibitors in lysis buffers
Heat samples at 95°C for 5 minutes in standard reducing SDS-PAGE loading buffer
Gel Percentage and Transfer Conditions:
8-10% SDS-PAGE gels are recommended for optimal separation
Semi-dry or wet transfer systems both work effectively
Antibody Dilutions:
Positive Controls:
HEK-293 cells show reliable expression
THP-1 cells are also recommended as positive controls
COLO 320 cells have been validated for western blot applications
Detection Systems:
Both chemiluminescent and fluorescent secondary detection systems are compatible
For low expression levels, enhanced chemiluminescent substrates are recommended
For successful immunofluorescence detection of SDCCAG8 in cultured cells or tissue sections:
Cell Fixation Options:
4% paraformaldehyde (10-15 minutes at room temperature)
Methanol fixation (-20°C for 10 minutes) can enhance centrosomal epitope accessibility
Permeabilization:
0.1-0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS (5-15 minutes at room temperature)
Blocking and Antibody Conditions:
Block with 5% normal serum from secondary antibody host species
Primary antibody dilutions: 1:400-1:1600 (Proteintech 13471-1-AP)
Incubation: Overnight at 4°C or 1-2 hours at room temperature
Co-staining Recommendations:
Anti-acetylated α-tubulin for ciliary axoneme visualization
Anti-γ-tubulin for centrosome/basal body identification
Anti-OFD1 for co-localization studies at centrioles
Technical Notes:
HeLa cells have been validated for IF applications with SDCCAG8 antibodies
When studying ciliary dynamics, serum starvation (24-48 hours) is recommended to induce ciliogenesis prior to fixation
SDCCAG8 mutations are associated with nephronophthisis-related ciliopathies (NPHP-RC) and Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS16). Researchers investigating these conditions can employ SDCCAG8 antibodies in several advanced applications:
Patient Sample Analysis:
Compare SDCCAG8 expression, localization, and post-translational modifications between patient and control samples using validated antibodies
Correlate protein abnormalities with specific SDCCAG8 mutations
Animal Model Validation:
Use antibodies to confirm phenotypic effects in SDCCAG8 mutant models
The SDCCAG8ΔC/ΔC mouse model with C-terminal truncation can be studied using N-terminal targeting antibodies to assess protein expression and localization
Functional Studies:
Combine with ciliary markers to assess ciliogenesis defects
Evaluate centrosomal localization in conjunction with SDCCAG8 knockdown/mutation
Studies have demonstrated that SDCCAG8 knockdown using shRNA (particularly Sdccag8-shRNA2 and Sdccag8-shRNA3) significantly decreases ciliated cell numbers and cilia length in NIH-3T3 cells, which can be rescued by wild-type SDCCAG8 expression
Molecular Pathway Analysis:
Investigate SDCCAG8 interactions with ICK/CILK1 and MAK, which are essential for ciliary protein trafficking and cilia length regulation
Assess Hedgehog signaling pathway activity, which requires intact primary cilia for activation
SDCCAG8 participates in several critical protein interactions that can be investigated using co-immunoprecipitation and proximity ligation assays with SDCCAG8 antibodies:
Validated Interacting Partners:
OFD1 (Oral-facial-digital syndrome 1) - direct interaction at centrioles
ICK/CILK1 (Intestinal cell kinase) - interaction confirmed by endogenous co-immunoprecipitation
MAK (Male germ cell-associated kinase) - interaction detected with SDCCAG8
RABEP2 - SDCCAG8 mediates its centrosomal localization critical for ciliogenesis
Methodological Approach:
Co-immunoprecipitation can be performed using anti-SDCCAG8 antibodies in HEK293T cell extracts, which has successfully detected endogenous ICK in immunoprecipitates
Domain mapping experiments have shown that the C-terminal region of SDCCAG8 (533-713 aa) is crucial for interaction with ICK/CILK1 and MAK
Technical Considerations:
Use mild lysis conditions (e.g., 1% NP-40 or 0.5% Triton X-100) to preserve protein-protein interactions
Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads before immunoprecipitation to reduce non-specific binding
SDCCAG8 contains distinct functional domains that can be investigated using domain-specific antibodies or in combination with domain deletion/mutation constructs:
Key Functional Regions:
N-terminal region (1-294 aa)
Middle region (286-541 aa) containing coiled-coil motifs
C-terminal region (533-713 aa) - crucial for centrosomal localization and protein interactions
Experimental Approaches:
Domain deletion rescue experiments: Studies have shown that full-length human SDCCAG8 (hSDCCAG8-FL) can rescue cilia formation defects caused by Sdccag8 knockdown, while the N-terminal to middle region construct (hSDCCAG8-NM, 1-541 aa) lacking the C-terminus cannot
Immunofluorescence with antibodies targeting different domains can reveal differential localization patterns
C-terminal truncation models (such as the Sdccag8ΔC/ΔC mouse with Arg537Stop mutation) can be analyzed with N-terminal specific antibodies to study domain-specific functions
Technical Notes:
When studying domain-specific functions, consider using antibodies targeting epitopes outside the domain of interest to avoid interference
For complementation studies, ensure that epitope tags don't interfere with domain functionality
RT-PCR analysis can confirm expression levels of truncated constructs
Ensuring antibody specificity is critical for reliable SDCCAG8 detection. Consider these approaches when validating or troubleshooting specificity issues:
Validation Methods:
Knockout/Knockdown Controls:
Use SDCCAG8 knockout cell lines or SDCCAG8 shRNA-treated cells (Sdccag8-shRNA2 and Sdccag8-shRNA3 have been validated) as negative controls
Compare with wild-type or scrambled shRNA controls
Peptide Competition:
Multiple Antibody Validation:
Compare results from different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes
Both polyclonal (e.g., Proteintech 13471-1-AP) and monoclonal (e.g., Proteintech 66284-1-Ig) antibodies are available
Common Specificity Issues:
Cross-reactivity with related proteins
Non-specific binding in certain tissues
Batch-to-batch variability (especially with polyclonal antibodies)
Proper experimental controls are essential for reliable interpretation of SDCCAG8 antibody results:
Western Blot Controls:
Positive Controls: HEK-293 cells, COLO 320 cells, THP-1 cells (validated for showing 83 kDa SDCCAG8 band)
Loading Controls: Housekeeping proteins appropriate for your experimental context
Molecular Weight Marker: To confirm the expected 83 kDa band
Secondary Antibody Only: To identify non-specific binding
Immunocytochemistry/Immunofluorescence Controls:
Positive Controls: HeLa cells have been validated for IF applications
Negative Controls: Secondary antibody only
Colocalization Markers: Anti-acetylated α-tubulin (ciliary marker), anti-γ-tubulin (centrosomal marker)
Knockdown Validation: Cells treated with Sdccag8-shRNA constructs
Immunohistochemistry Controls:
Positive Controls: Mouse brain tissue and human kidney tissue have been validated
Negative Controls: Normal IgG from the same species as primary antibody
Antigen Retrieval Assessment: Compare different retrieval methods (TE buffer pH 9.0 vs. citrate buffer pH 6.0)
When faced with discrepancies between different SDCCAG8 antibodies, consider these methodological approaches:
Potential Sources of Discrepancy:
Epitope Differences:
Different antibodies target distinct regions of SDCCAG8
Some epitopes may be masked by protein interactions or post-translational modifications
The C-terminal region (533-713 aa) is particularly important for protein function
Antibody Format Differences:
Polyclonal antibodies recognize multiple epitopes but may have more background
Monoclonal antibodies offer higher specificity but might miss some isoforms
Technical Variables:
Sample preparation methods affect epitope availability
Fixation conditions can significantly impact immunostaining patterns
Antibody concentrations may require optimization for each application
Resolution Approaches:
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Include appropriate positive and negative controls
Consider the specific application requirements and optimize conditions accordingly
Consult published validation data from antibody manufacturers
SDCCAG8 antibodies offer valuable tools for advancing ciliopathy research in several emerging areas:
Multi-Organ Pathology Investigation:
SDCCAG8 mutations are associated with ciliopathies affecting multiple organs (kidney, retina, cerebellum)
Antibodies enable tissue-specific expression and localization studies in different organ systems
Correlating protein abnormalities with organ-specific phenotypes can reveal tissue-specific functions
Therapeutic Development Evaluation:
Assess restoration of proper SDCCAG8 localization and function following experimental therapies
Monitor changes in interacting protein networks after intervention
Quantify ciliary formation and function in response to treatments
Molecular Pathway Elucidation:
Further characterize the interactions between SDCCAG8, ICK/CILK1, and MAK in ciliary protein trafficking
Investigate the relationship between SDCCAG8 and Hedgehog signaling pathway components
Explore SDCCAG8's role in mediating RABEP2 centrosomal localization, which is critical for ciliogenesis
Several innovative applications for SDCCAG8 antibodies are emerging in the research landscape:
Live-Cell Imaging:
Development of anti-SDCCAG8 nanobodies or non-interfering antibody fragments for live-cell studies
Combination with fluorescent protein tagging to track SDCCAG8 dynamics during ciliary assembly and disassembly
High-Content Screening:
Automated image analysis platforms using SDCCAG8 antibodies to screen for compounds affecting ciliogenesis
Multi-parameter phenotypic profiling of genetic or chemical perturbations
Single-Cell Analysis:
Application of SDCCAG8 antibodies in mass cytometry (CyTOF) or imaging mass cytometry for single-cell protein analysis
Integration with transcriptomic data to correlate protein expression with gene expression patterns
Super-Resolution Microscopy: