SEC14L4 antibodies are polyclonal or monoclonal immunoglobulins raised against specific epitopes of the SEC14L4 protein. Their primary role is to detect and quantify SEC14L4 expression in biological samples, aiding studies on lipid metabolism, cancer biology, and drug resistance .
SEC14L4 overexpression is strongly linked to poor prognosis in ESCC patients:
Upregulated in Tumors: Significantly higher expression in ESCC vs. normal tissues (P < 0.001) .
Prognostic Marker: High expression correlates with advanced TNM stages (III–IV) and reduced survival (P = 0.045) .
Drug Sensitivity: Associated with resistance to AICAR, BMS.708163, and Nutlin.3a, suggesting therapeutic targeting potential .
Blocking Peptides: Use catalog-specific peptides (e.g., Aviva’s AAP55734) to validate antibody specificity .
Sample Preparation: Optimize for IHC by using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues .
Controls: Validate with negative controls (e.g., non-cancerous tissues) and positive controls (e.g., KYSE cell lines) .
SEC14L4 (SEC14-like lipid binding 4) is a probable hydrophobic ligand-binding protein involved in the transport of hydrophobic ligands like tocopherol, squalene, and phospholipids. In humans, the canonical protein has 406 amino acid residues and a molecular mass of 46.6 kDa, with up to two different isoforms reported .
This protein belongs to the SEC14-like family, representing mammalian Golgi dynamics proteins uniquely found in all eukaryotic genomes . Its importance in research stems from its role in lipid homeostasis and cellular lipid transport, with dysregulation linked to various conditions including metabolic disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer . Recent studies have specifically implicated high SEC14L4 expression as a prognostic indicator of poor outcomes in esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) .
Multiple types of SEC14L4 antibodies are available for research applications:
| Antibody Type | Common Forms | Applications | Species Reactivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyclonal | Unconjugated, Biotin-conjugated | WB, ELISA, IHC, ICC, IF | Human, Mouse, Rat |
| Monoclonal | Unconjugated, Agarose-conjugated | WB, FCM, IHC-p, IP | Human |
| Recombinant | Unconjugated | WB, FCM, IHC-p | Human |
Most available antibodies target human SEC14L4, though some cross-react with other species. Region-specific antibodies, such as those targeting the N-terminal region, are also available for specialized applications .
Based on commercially available options, SEC14L4 antibodies are most commonly used in the following applications:
Western Blot (WB): The most frequent application, used to detect and quantify SEC14L4 protein expression in cell or tissue lysates.
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): For quantitative detection of SEC14L4.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Both paraffin-embedded (IHC-p) and frozen sections (IHC-fr) for localizing SEC14L4 in tissue specimens.
Immunocytochemistry (ICC)/Immunofluorescence (IF): For visualizing SEC14L4 distribution within cells.
Flow Cytometry (FCM): Less common but used for detecting SEC14L4 in cell populations.
Immunoprecipitation (IP): For isolating SEC14L4 protein complexes .
Most SEC14L4 antibodies are supplied in liquid form with a storage buffer typically consisting of 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4, and a preservative such as 0.03% Proclin 300 . For optimal stability and activity, these antibodies should be:
Stored at -20°C for long-term storage
Avoided repeated freeze-thaw cycles (aliquoting upon receipt is recommended)
Kept at 4°C for short-term use (1-2 weeks)
Protected from light, especially if conjugated to fluorophores
Recent research has revealed significant associations between SEC14L4 expression and cancer progression:
High expression of SEC14L4 has been identified as a prognostic indicator of poor outcomes in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) . The biological mechanism appears related to SEC14L4's role in lipid metabolism and transport, as alterations in lipid metabolism and glycerophospholipids in cancer cells can affect the immune system response .
This correlation makes SEC14L4 a potential therapeutic target and biomarker in ESCC and possibly other cancers. Researchers investigating SEC14L4 in cancer contexts should consider:
Comparing expression levels between tumor and adjacent normal tissues
Correlating expression with clinical parameters like tumor stage, grade, and patient survival
Investigating the functional consequences of SEC14L4 knockdown or overexpression in cancer cell lines
Exploring the relationship between SEC14L4 and specific lipid profiles in the tumor microenvironment
Ensuring antibody specificity is critical for reliable research outcomes. For SEC14L4 antibodies, consider these validation approaches:
Positive and negative controls:
Isoform specificity testing:
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Technical validation across methods:
Compare antibody performance across multiple techniques (e.g., if positive in WB, confirm with IHC)
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of SEC14L4 to confirm findings
The SEC14-like family contains several members with structural and functional similarities. To distinguish SEC14L4 specifically:
Epitope selection:
Molecular weight confirmation:
SEC14L4: 46.6 kDa
Validate molecular weight precisely using SDS-PAGE with appropriate markers
Expression pattern analysis:
Functional assays:
Develop assays specific to SEC14L4's role in lipid transport
Use specific lipid binding assays to differentiate function from other family members
As a protein involved in lipid transport and metabolism, SEC14L4 research benefits from specialized techniques:
Lipidomics approaches:
Mass spectrometry-based lipidomics to identify specific lipids transported by SEC14L4
Lipid binding assays to characterize affinity for tocopherol, squalene, and phospholipids
Live-cell imaging:
Fluorescently tagged SEC14L4 to track intracellular movement
FRET-based assays to monitor lipid transfer activities
Structural biology:
Crystallography or cryo-EM to determine SEC14L4 structure, especially the lipid-binding pocket
Computational modeling of ligand interactions
Genome editing:
CRISPR-Cas9 to generate SEC14L4 knockout or knock-in models
Site-directed mutagenesis to identify key residues for lipid binding
For successful Western blot detection of SEC14L4 (46.6 kDa), consider these protocol elements:
Sample preparation:
Extract proteins using lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors
For membrane-associated proteins like SEC14L4, include detergents like NP-40 or Triton X-100
Gel electrophoresis:
Use 10-12% polyacrylamide gels for optimal separation around 46.6 kDa
Load appropriate positive controls (e.g., liver or kidney tissue lysates)
Transfer and blocking:
PVDF membranes typically work well for hydrophobic proteins
Block with 5% non-fat milk or BSA in TBST
Antibody incubation:
Primary antibody dilution: typically 1:500-1:2000 (optimize for specific antibody)
Incubate overnight at 4°C for best results
Secondary antibody: 1:5000-1:10000, species-matched to primary antibody host
Detection:
Both chemiluminescence and fluorescence detection systems are suitable
For quantitative analysis, consider fluorescence-based detection
Based on successful IHC applications reported for SEC14L4 antibodies:
Tissue preparation:
Both paraffin-embedded and frozen sections have been used successfully
Paraffin sections typically require antigen retrieval
Antigen retrieval:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) is commonly effective
Test both citrate and EDTA-based retrieval solutions
Antibody dilution and incubation:
Detection system:
HRP/DAB systems work well for brightfield microscopy
For fluorescence, select secondary antibodies with appropriate fluorophores
Controls:
For rigorous quantitative analysis of SEC14L4 expression:
Protein quantification methods:
Western blot with densitometry analysis (normalize to loading controls)
ELISA (for absolute quantification, use standard curves with recombinant SEC14L4)
Quantitative immunofluorescence with appropriate controls
mRNA quantification:
RT-qPCR (design primers specific to SEC14L4, avoiding other family members)
RNAseq for broader expression context
In situ hybridization for spatial expression analysis
Digital pathology approaches:
For IHC analysis, use digital image analysis software to quantify DAB staining intensity
H-score or Allred scoring systems for semi-quantitative assessment
Multiplex immunofluorescence for co-expression with other proteins
Statistical considerations:
Use appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution
Include sufficient biological replicates (minimum n=3)
Consider power analysis to determine appropriate sample sizes
Multiple bands when probing for SEC14L4 can occur for several reasons:
Isoform detection: Up to 2 different isoforms have been reported for SEC14L4 .
Post-translational modifications: Phosphorylation, glycosylation, or other modifications can alter apparent molecular weight.
Proteolytic degradation: Incomplete protease inhibition during sample preparation.
Cross-reactivity: Some antibodies may detect other SEC14 family members (SEC14L2/L3) .
Non-specific binding: Particularly with polyclonal antibodies.
Optimize protein extraction with fresh, complete protease inhibitors
Test different blocking reagents (milk vs. BSA)
Increase washing stringency and duration
Try antibodies targeting different epitopes
Use gradient gels for better separation
If experiencing weak or no signal when detecting SEC14L4 in tissues:
Antigen retrieval optimization:
Test multiple retrieval methods (heat vs. enzymatic)
Adjust retrieval time and temperature
Try different buffer systems (citrate, EDTA, Tris)
Antibody concentration:
Detection system enhancement:
Use polymer-based detection systems for signal amplification
Consider tyramide signal amplification for very low abundance targets
Try biotin-streptavidin systems if not already used
Sample quality assessment:
Distinguishing true SEC14L4 signal from background:
Control experiments:
Peptide competition/neutralization assays
SEC14L4 knockdown/knockout tissues as negative controls
Comparison with mRNA expression patterns (ISH or public databases)
Pattern analysis:
SEC14L4 is suspected to be involved in lipid transport, suggesting intracellular/membrane localization
Compare staining pattern with published data and expected cellular locations
Antibody validation:
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Compare staining patterns across different antibodies
Validate findings with orthogonal methods (WB, IF)
Technical controls:
No primary antibody control
Isotype control antibody
Gradient of antibody concentrations to identify optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Based on SEC14L4's association with poor outcomes in ESCC , researchers might consider:
Expression correlation studies:
Compare SEC14L4 expression between tumor and adjacent normal tissues
Correlate expression with clinical parameters (stage, grade, metastasis)
Analyze public databases (TCGA, GEO) for broader context across cancer types
Functional studies:
Knockdown/overexpression models to assess effects on:
Proliferation
Migration/invasion
Resistance to therapy
Lipid metabolism alterations
Mechanistic investigations:
Identify SEC14L4 interaction partners via co-IP/mass spectrometry
Map affected signaling pathways
Characterize lipid profile changes using lipidomics
In vivo models:
Generate SEC14L4 knockout or overexpression mouse models
Assess tumor development, progression, and metastasis
Evaluate response to standard therapies
The search results indicate that alterations in lipid metabolism and glycerophospholipids in cancer cells can affect the immune system response . For SEC14L4 specifically:
Immune contexture analysis:
Correlate SEC14L4 expression with immune cell infiltration
Assess relationship with specific immune cell populations (T cells, macrophages)
Evaluate association with immune checkpoint markers
Lipid mediator investigation:
Analyze how SEC14L4-mediated lipid transport affects immunomodulatory lipids
Examine eicosanoid production and signaling
Assess impact on membrane composition of immune cells
Therapeutic implications:
Evaluate whether SEC14L4 inhibition sensitizes to immunotherapy
Assess combination approaches targeting both SEC14L4 and immune checkpoints
Consider SEC14L4 as a biomarker for immunotherapy response prediction
As SEC14L4 is involved in lipid transport, researchers investigating metabolic disorders should consider:
Expression profiling:
Analyze SEC14L4 expression in tissues relevant to lipid metabolism (liver, adipose)
Compare expression levels in normal vs. metabolic disease states
Assess correlation with specific lipid profile abnormalities
Metabolic phenotyping:
Generate SEC14L4 transgenic models
Characterize effects on:
Serum lipid profiles
Glucose homeostasis
Liver fat accumulation
Response to high-fat diet challenges
Cellular metabolism studies:
Assess impact on lipid droplet formation and dynamics
Characterize effects on fatty acid uptake, synthesis and oxidation
Measure membrane lipid composition changes
Therapeutic targeting potential:
Screen for small molecule modulators of SEC14L4
Evaluate effects of targeting SEC14L4 in metabolic disease models
Assess pharmacological vs. genetic inhibition outcomes
Emerging technologies could provide new insights into SEC14L4 biology:
Single-cell techniques:
scRNA-seq to identify cell populations with high SEC14L4 expression
Spatial transcriptomics to map SEC14L4 expression in tissue context
CyTOF or single-cell proteomics for protein-level analysis
Advanced imaging:
Super-resolution microscopy to visualize SEC14L4 subcellular localization
Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) for ultrastructural context
Live-cell imaging with lipid probes to track SEC14L4-mediated transport
Structural biology innovations:
AlphaFold or other AI prediction tools to model SEC14L4 structure
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to map dynamic protein regions
Small-angle X-ray scattering for solution structure analysis
Systems biology approaches:
Multi-omics integration (transcriptomics, proteomics, lipidomics)
Network analysis to place SEC14L4 in broader cellular pathways
Computational modeling of lipid trafficking processes
Despite current knowledge, several fundamental questions remain:
Substrate specificity:
Which specific lipid species does SEC14L4 preferentially transport?
How does substrate binding affect protein conformation?
What determines specificity among SEC14 family members?
Regulatory mechanisms:
How is SEC14L4 expression and activity regulated?
What post-translational modifications affect function?
What are the key transcription factors controlling expression?
Physiological roles:
What is the normal physiological function in different tissues?
How do the two reported isoforms differ functionally?
What phenotypes result from SEC14L4 deficiency?
Disease relevance beyond cancer:
Are SEC14L4 alterations involved in neurodegenerative diseases?
What is its role in metabolic syndrome and liver diseases?
Could SEC14L4 be implicated in inflammatory disorders?
By addressing these questions, researchers can significantly advance our understanding of SEC14L4 biology and its potential as a therapeutic target.