44805 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

1. Overview of the 44805 Antibody

The 44805 Antibody, cataloged as NBP2-44805 by Novus Biologicals (Bio-Techne), is a monoclonal mouse IgG2a antibody targeting the human CD48 protein, also known as SLAMF2. This antibody is widely used in immunological research for its specificity to cell surface leukocyte markers, enabling applications such as flow cytometry, immunocytochemistry, and immunofluorescence .

CD48/SLAMF2 is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein involved in immune cell signaling and adhesion, making it critical for studying immune responses and leukocyte interactions .

3. Research Applications and Validation

Flow Cytometry

The 44805 Antibody demonstrates high specificity for CD48 on human leukocytes, validated using peripheral blood lymphocytes. Its low background noise and strong signal make it ideal for cell surface marker profiling .

Immunofluorescence

In fixed/permeabilized cells, this antibody reliably localizes CD48 to the cell membrane, supporting studies on immune synapse formation and lymphocyte activation .

Functional Studies

CD48 is a ligand for CD244 (2B4) and CD2, playing roles in T-cell activation, NK cell cytotoxicity, and B-cell differentiation. The 44805 Antibody has been utilized to block CD48 interactions in mechanistic studies of autoimmune diseases and cancer immunology .

4. Comparative Analysis with Related Antibodies

While the 44805 Antibody is specific to CD48, other antibodies targeting immune checkpoints or leukocyte markers include:

Antibody TargetCatalog NumberHostApplicationsKey Difference
CD48/SLAMF2NBP2-44805MouseFlow Cytometry, ICC/IFTargets pan-leukocyte marker
WWTR1SAB1402558MouseELISA, IHC, WBIntracellular transcriptional coactivator
MST1SAB1406145MouseWestern BlotSerine/threonine kinase involved in apoptosis

Data synthesized from multiple sources .

6. Context in Antibody Development

The 44805 Antibody exemplifies advancements in monoclonal antibody production, leveraging hybridoma technology developed in the 1970s . Modern innovations like recombinant antibody engineering (e.g., phage display) are expanding therapeutic potential, though traditional murine monoclonals remain vital for research due to their consistency and well-characterized epitopes .

7. Future Directions

Research leveraging the 44805 Antibody could explore:

  • CD48’s role in immune evasion mechanisms in cancers.

  • Crosstalk between CD48 and checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1).

  • Engineering humanized derivatives for in vivo therapeutic applications .

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SEP1 antibody; AGL2 antibody; At5g15800 antibody; F14F8_180 antibody; Developmental protein SEPALLATA 1 antibody; Agamous-like MADS-box protein AGL2 antibody
Target Names
SEP1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This antibody targets a protein that likely functions as a transcription factor. It collaborates with SEPALLATA2/AGL4 and SEPALLATA3/AGL9 to ensure proper development of petals, stamens, and carpels, and to prevent indefinite growth of the flower meristem. This protein forms a heterodimer with AGAMOUS via the K-box domain, potentially playing a role in regulating gene expression during floral meristem development.
Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT5G15800

STRING: 3702.AT5G15800.2

UniGene: At.10163

Subcellular Location
Nucleus.
Tissue Specificity
Expressed mainly in carpels, and weakly in stamens.

Q&A

What are the 44805-designated antibodies and what proteins do they target?

The "44805" antibodies refer to research antibodies containing "44805" in their catalog numbers, primarily: the anti-Cornulin antibody (ARG44805-50) and the TCEB2 Recombinant Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody (MA5-44805). The anti-Cornulin antibody targets human cornulin (CRNN), a protein involved in epithelial immune response and differentiation, while the TCEB2 antibody targets Elongin B, a transcription elongation factor component .

What are the key specifications of the anti-Cornulin antibody (ARG44805-50)?

The anti-Cornulin antibody (ARG44805-50) is a mouse-derived monoclonal antibody of IgG2a isotype. It's unconjugated, purified using Protein A chromatography, and supplied as 50 μg in PBS buffer with 0.09% sodium azide. This antibody specifically targets human cornulin protein (Swiss-Prot ID: Q9UBG3) and is designated for laboratory research applications only, not for diagnostic or therapeutic use .

What are the primary characteristics of the TCEB2 antibody (MA5-44805)?

The TCEB2 antibody (MA5-44805) is a recombinant rabbit monoclonal antibody (clone JE65-72) targeting human TCEB2/Elongin B (UniProt ID: Q15370). This antibody recognizes a component of the elongin complex involved in transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. It's designed for research applications including protein detection and characterization in experimental systems .

What biological roles do Cornulin and TCEB2 play in cellular function?

Cornulin (CRNN) contains two EF-hand Ca²⁺ binding domains in its N-terminus and glutamine/threonine-rich repeats in its C-terminus. It functions in mucosal/epithelial immune responses and epidermal differentiation, particularly in squamous epithelia . TCEB2/Elongin B is part of the SIII complex, a general transcription elongation factor that enhances RNA polymerase II transcription past template-encoded arresting sites. The elongin complex consists of a transcriptionally active A subunit and regulatory B (TCEB2) and C subunits that form a dimeric complex that significantly enhances transcription activity .

How should researchers validate the specificity of the anti-Cornulin antibody in experimental systems?

Validating the specificity of the anti-Cornulin antibody requires multiple approaches:

  • Western blot analysis using positive controls (squamous epithelial tissues) and negative controls

  • Immunohistochemistry with appropriate tissue controls

  • RNA interference experiments to confirm signal reduction following cornulin knockdown

  • Comparative analysis with other anti-cornulin antibodies from different sources

  • Mass spectrometry validation of immunoprecipitated proteins

For comprehensive validation, use both normal and pathological tissue samples, as cornulin expression varies in different epithelial differentiation states .

What methodological considerations are critical when designing experiments with the TCEB2 antibody?

When designing experiments with the TCEB2 antibody, researchers should consider:

  • Nuclear extraction protocols must preserve protein complexes while maintaining epitope accessibility

  • Fixation methods significantly impact epitope detection in immunohistochemistry

  • TCEB2 functions within multi-protein complexes that may mask antibody binding sites

  • Cross-reactivity with other elongin family members must be controlled for

  • Post-translational modifications may affect antibody recognition

  • Appropriate positive controls (human cell lines expressing TCEB2) and negative controls (TCEB2 knockdown samples) should be included

How do sample preparation methods affect antibody performance for these targets?

Sample preparation significantly impacts antibody performance for both targets:

Preparation MethodEffects on Anti-CornulinEffects on Anti-TCEB2Optimization Approaches
FFPE ProcessingHeat-based antigen retrieval requiredMay reduce nuclear epitope accessibilityOptimize retrieval time and buffer pH
Frozen SectionsPreserves native epitopesMaintains protein complex integrityControl fixation time to prevent diffusion
Cell LysisDetergent selection criticalNuclear extraction efficiency impacts detectionBuffer optimization for target compartment
Cross-linkingMay mask EF-hand domain epitopesPreserves transient protein interactionsTitrate fixative concentration and time

Each preparation method requires validation and optimization specific to the research question and experimental system .

How can researchers employ the anti-Cornulin antibody to investigate epithelial differentiation mechanisms?

Advanced approaches for studying epithelial differentiation with the anti-Cornulin antibody include:

  • Time-course analysis of cornulin expression during in vitro differentiation of primary keratinocytes

  • Co-immunoprecipitation studies to identify calcium-dependent protein interactions

  • ChIP-seq to map cornulin associations with chromatin during differentiation

  • Immunofluorescence co-localization with differentiation markers (involucrin, loricrin)

  • Calcium imaging combined with cornulin localization to study its EF-hand domain function

  • CRISPR/Cas9 editing of cornulin domains followed by phenotypic rescue experiments

These approaches should be compared across multiple epithelial cell types as cornulin functions may be tissue-specific .

What strategies can overcome challenges in studying TCEB2 interactions within transcription complexes?

To effectively study TCEB2 in transcription complexes:

  • Use cell-permeable cross-linking agents to capture transient interactions

  • Employ sequential immunoprecipitation to isolate specific subcomplexes

  • Implement proximity labeling techniques (BioID, APEX) to identify spatial interaction networks

  • Utilize protein fragment complementation assays to visualize interactions in live cells

  • Apply chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry (ChIP-MS) to identify TCEB2-associated factors on chromatin

  • Develop FRET-based approaches to monitor dynamic complex formation

These techniques help overcome challenges related to complex stability, transient interactions, and multiple functional roles of TCEB2 .

How can these antibodies be adapted for multiplexed imaging techniques?

Adapting these antibodies for multiplexed imaging requires:

  • Direct labeling strategies:

    • Site-specific conjugation with minimal interference to binding

    • Validation of antibody performance after conjugation

    • Selection of compatible fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap

  • Multiplexing approaches:

    • Sequential immunostaining with antibody stripping between rounds

    • Spectral unmixing to distinguish overlapping emissions

    • Mass cytometry using metal-conjugated antibodies

    • Cyclic immunofluorescence for iterative imaging

  • Critical controls:

    • Single-antibody controls to assess cross-reactivity

    • Absorption controls to verify specificity

    • Computational correction for spectral bleed-through

When studying cornulin and TCEB2 together, their distinct subcellular localizations (cornulin: cytoplasmic/membrane; TCEB2: nuclear) facilitates effective multiplexing .

How should researchers interpret variations in cornulin expression patterns across different epithelial tissues?

Interpreting cornulin expression patterns requires systematic analysis:

  • Tissue-specific expression patterns:

    • Cornulin is predominantly expressed in stratified squamous epithelia

    • Expression typically increases in more differentiated epithelial layers

    • Expression patterns vary by anatomical location

  • Quantitative analysis approach:

    • Measure staining intensity across epithelial layers

    • Compare nuclear versus cytoplasmic localization

    • Correlate with differentiation markers

    • Assess calcium-dependent localization changes

  • Pathological considerations:

    • Altered expression in hyperproliferative conditions

    • Potential loss of expression in squamous cell carcinomas

    • Changes in subcellular localization in disease states

Researchers should establish standardized scoring systems based on intensity, percent positive cells, and subcellular localization for consistent comparative analyses .

What statistical methods are appropriate for analyzing TCEB2 expression data across experimental conditions?

Statistical analysis of TCEB2 expression should include:

  • Quantification approaches:

    • Western blot densitometry normalized to appropriate loading controls

    • Immunofluorescence intensity measurements using calibrated settings

    • Flow cytometry median fluorescence intensity

  • Statistical tests based on data distribution:

    • For normally distributed data: t-tests or ANOVA

    • For non-parametric data: Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests

    • For paired samples: paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test

  • Advanced analytical methods:

    • Multiple regression to control for covariates

    • Mixed-effects models for repeated measures

    • Bootstrapping for robust confidence intervals

    • Bayesian approaches for smaller sample sizes

Always report effect sizes alongside p-values and conduct power analysis to ensure adequate sample sizes .

How can researchers resolve contradictions between antibody-based protein detection and mRNA expression data?

Resolving protein-mRNA discrepancies requires systematic investigation:

  • Potential biological explanations:

    • Post-transcriptional regulation affecting translation efficiency

    • Protein stability differences from mRNA stability

    • Alternative splicing creating protein isoforms not detected by the antibody

    • Post-translational modifications affecting antibody recognition

  • Validation approaches:

    • Test multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes

    • Perform absolute quantification of both protein and mRNA

    • Assess protein half-life using translation inhibitors

    • Examine ribosome occupancy of the mRNA (polysome profiling)

  • Integrated analysis:

    • Calculate protein-to-mRNA ratios across conditions

    • Apply computational models that account for synthesis/degradation rates

    • Use time-course experiments to detect temporal discrepancies

Such discrepancies often reveal important biological mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation rather than technical errors .

What are common causes of false positive results with anti-Cornulin antibody and how can they be addressed?

Common false positive issues and solutions include:

  • Cross-reactivity with other EF-hand domain proteins:

    • Implement peptide competition assays

    • Include knockout/knockdown controls

    • Verify with orthogonal detection methods

  • Non-specific binding:

    • Optimize blocking conditions (5% BSA or normal serum)

    • Include 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 in wash buffers

    • Increase stringency of washing steps

  • Endogenous enzyme activity interference:

    • Include appropriate quenching steps (3% H₂O₂ for peroxidase)

    • Use alternative detection systems (fluorescence vs. chromogenic)

  • Tissue autofluorescence:

    • Employ Sudan Black B treatment (0.1-0.3%)

    • Use spectral unmixing techniques

    • Select fluorophores with emission spectra distinct from autofluorescence

Include isotype controls and competitive binding assays when validating new experimental systems .

How can immunoprecipitation protocols be optimized for studying TCEB2 complexes?

Optimizing immunoprecipitation for TCEB2 complexes:

  • Lysis buffer considerations:

    • Use non-denaturing buffers (e.g., 20mM HEPES pH 7.9, 150mM NaCl, 1.5mM MgCl₂, 0.2mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40)

    • Include DNase/RNase to prevent nucleic acid-mediated aggregation

    • Test salt concentration range (150-300mM) for optimal stringency

  • Cross-linking strategies:

    • Reversible cross-linkers (DSP) for protein-protein interactions

    • Formaldehyde for protein-DNA interactions

    • Optimize cross-linking time to prevent epitope masking

  • IP conditions:

    • Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads

    • Use 2-5μg antibody per reaction

    • Extend incubation time (overnight at 4°C) for complete capture

  • Detection methods:

    • Silver staining for total protein visualization

    • Mass spectrometry for unbiased interaction identification

    • Western blotting for specific known partners (TCEB1, VHL, Cullin2)

What approaches help distinguish specific from non-specific binding in complex tissue samples?

Distinguishing specific from non-specific binding requires:

  • Essential control experiments:

    • Isotype control antibodies at equivalent concentrations

    • Absorption controls (pre-incubation with purified antigen)

    • Antibody concentration gradients to identify optimal signal-to-noise ratio

    • Knockout/knockdown tissues as negative controls

  • Advanced validation techniques:

    • Dual labeling with antibodies targeting different epitopes

    • Correlative approaches combining immunostaining with in situ hybridization

    • Proximity ligation assays to confirm expected protein interactions

  • Analytical methods:

    • Quantitative image analysis comparing signal in expected vs. unexpected locations

    • Colocalization analysis with known markers

    • Spectral analysis to distinguish specific signal from autofluorescence

  • Biochemical validation:

    • Fractionation of tissues followed by Western blotting

    • Mass spectrometry of immunoprecipitated proteins

Always include both positive and negative controls and establish clear criteria for distinguishing specific from non-specific signals .

How can researchers utilize anti-Cornulin antibody to investigate calcium signaling in epithelial biology?

Innovative applications for cornulin-calcium signaling research:

  • Functional analysis approaches:

    • Monitor cornulin localization changes in response to calcium flux

    • Perform calcium chelation experiments to observe effects on cornulin function

    • Create mutations in EF-hand domains and track resulting phenotypes

  • Pathological investigations:

    • Examine cornulin expression in disorders of calcium metabolism

    • Study cornulin in epithelial disorders with disrupted calcium gradients

    • Investigate calcium-dependent cornulin interactions in inflammatory conditions

  • Technical methodologies:

    • Combine calcium imaging with immunofluorescence

    • Use proximity ligation assays to detect calcium-dependent protein interactions

    • Apply FRET-based sensors to measure calcium levels near cornulin-rich regions

    • Correlate cornulin phosphorylation status with calcium fluctuations

These approaches can reveal mechanisms by which calcium signaling regulates epithelial differentiation and barrier function through cornulin-dependent pathways .

What cutting-edge applications exist for TCEB2 antibodies in studying transcription-degradation pathway crosstalk?

Advanced applications for TCEB2 research:

  • Protein interaction network analysis:

    • Proximity labeling (BioID, APEX) to map dynamic "interactomes"

    • ChIP-SICAP to identify proteins associated with TCEB2 on chromatin

    • Ubiquitylome analysis correlated with TCEB2 localization

  • Dynamic regulation studies:

    • Live-cell imaging using antibody-based biosensors

    • Single-molecule tracking of TCEB2 movement between complexes

    • FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) to measure mobility

  • Disease-relevant applications:

    • Profile TCEB2 interactions in cancer cells with VHL mutations

    • Investigate viral hijacking of elongin complexes

    • Target specific TCEB2 complexes therapeutically

  • Multi-omics integration:

    • Correlate TCEB2 binding sites with proteomics data on substrate degradation

    • Analyze transcriptional pausing in relation to protein degradation kinetics

    • Study how TCEB2-dependent programs influence the cellular proteome

How can these antibodies contribute to single-cell analysis of protein expression heterogeneity?

Applications in single-cell protein analysis:

  • Flow cytometry and mass cytometry:

    • Quantify protein expression across thousands of individual cells

    • Correlate cornulin or TCEB2 levels with cell cycle or differentiation markers

    • Identify rare cell populations with unique expression patterns

  • Single-cell imaging techniques:

    • Highly multiplexed imaging (CODEX, MIBI) for spatial context

    • Imaging mass cytometry for tissue architecture preservation

    • Single-cell Western blotting for protein isoform detection

  • Integrated single-cell approaches:

    • CITE-seq combining antibody detection with transcriptomics

    • Spatial transcriptomics correlated with protein localization

    • Live-cell tracking of protein dynamics in individual cells

  • Data analysis considerations:

    • Dimensionality reduction techniques (tSNE, UMAP) for population identification

    • Trajectory inference to map differentiation processes

    • Spatial statistics to quantify tissue organization

How do antibody-based detection methods compare with alternative approaches for studying these proteins?

Comparative analysis of detection methodologies:

Detection MethodAdvantagesLimitationsComplementarity with Antibodies
Mass SpectrometryUnbiased detection, identifies PTMsLower sensitivity for low-abundance proteinsAntibodies can enrich targets before MS analysis
RNA-seq/qPCRSensitive for mRNA detectionDoesn't measure protein levelsAntibodies verify translation of detected transcripts
CRISPR taggingEndogenous protein levelsMay affect protein functionAntibodies validate tag accessibility
Aptamer-based detectionNo immunization needed, stableLimited epitope recognitionAntibodies provide orthogonal validation
Thermal Proteome ProfilingFunctional state informationIndirect measurementAntibodies confirm protein identity

For cornulin: Antibody detection provides superior spatial resolution within stratified epithelia
For TCEB2: Antibodies uniquely distinguish bound vs. unbound states in situ

What factors should guide selection between monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies for these targets?

Selection considerations for antibody type:

CharacteristicMonoclonal (e.g., ARG44805-50)PolyclonalTarget-Specific Considerations
SpecificityHigh for single epitopeRecognizes multiple epitopesMonoclonals preferred for distinguishing cornulin from other EF-hand proteins
Epitope accessibilityLimited to single siteMultiple sites increase detection probabilityPolyclonals better when TCEB2 is in different complexes
Batch consistencyHigh reproducibilityBatch-to-batch variationMonoclonals preferred for longitudinal studies
SensitivityLower (single epitope)Higher (multiple epitopes)Consider target abundance in experimental system
Cross-reactivity riskLower but more severe if presentDiluted by multiple specific antibodiesApplication-dependent selection

The choice between monoclonal and polyclonal depends on experimental goals, with monoclonals offering precision and reproducibility while polyclonals provide robustness and sensitivity .

How do different detection systems affect antibody performance in tissue samples?

Comparative analysis of detection systems:

Detection SystemSensitivitySpecificityBest ApplicationsConsiderations for These Antibodies
HRP-DABModerateHighArchival tissues, routine pathologyGood for cornulin in differentiated epithelia
Alkaline PhosphataseModerateVery highTissues with endogenous peroxidaseUseful for cornulin in inflammatory contexts
Tyramide AmplificationVery highModerateLow abundance targetsBenefits TCEB2 detection in nuclear complexes
Quantum DotsHighHighMultiplexed detectionExcellent for co-localization studies
ImmunofluorescenceModerate-highHighCo-localization, subcellular detectionPreferred for TCEB2 complex studies

Selection should consider target abundance (cornulin high in differentiated epithelia; TCEB2 moderate in most cells), subcellular localization (cornulin cytoplasmic/membrane; TCEB2 primarily nuclear), tissue autofluorescence, quantification needs, and multiplexing requirements .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.