SERPINB4 is a member of the ovalbumin-related serpin family (clade B) and functions as an intracellular protease inhibitor. The FITC-conjugated antibody enables fluorescence-based detection via flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry (IHC), or Western blotting (WB). Key features include:
Target: SERPINB4 (Gene ID: 6318; UniProt: P48594).
Conjugation: Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), which emits green fluorescence at 488 nm excitation.
Primary Use: Research applications, including tumor biology, immune regulation, and protease inhibition studies .
Tumor Immune Evasion:
SERPINB4 inhibits granzyme M (GrM), a cytotoxic protease released by natural killer (NK) cells, thereby protecting tumor cells from apoptosis . Overexpression of SERPINB4 in HeLa cells blocks GrM-induced cell death .
Elevated SERPINB4 levels correlate with squamous cell carcinoma progression and metastasis .
Immune Regulation:
Diagnostic Potential:
Specificity: Monoclonal antibodies (e.g., OTI4C8) show high specificity for SERPINB4, while polyclonal variants may cross-react with SERPINB3 due to ~92% sequence homology .
Optimization: Dilution ratios must be titrated per experimental system, as recommended by vendors .
Cross-Reactivity: Limited to human samples; mouse homologs (e.g., Serpinb3a) share functional similarities but require species-specific antibodies .
SERPINB4, also known as squamous cell carcinoma antigen 2 (SCCA-2), belongs to the ovalbumin-serine proteinase inhibitor (ova-serpin) family. It functions as a serine protease inhibitor that specifically targets cathepsin G and mast cell chymase, as well as the cysteine protease Derp1 found in house dust mite . SERPINB4 serves as a potent inhibitor of apoptosis and may modulate the host immune response against tumor cells . Recent research has demonstrated that SERPINB4 is expressed in human Th2 cells after in vitro polarization and in memory Th2 cells from pollen allergy patients, suggesting a role in allergic inflammation .
Methodologically, when studying SERPINB4's biological function, researchers should consider its relationship with its close homolog SERPINB3, as they share over 92% amino acid identity but differ in their reactive center loop sequences, which determines substrate specificity .
While SERPINB3 and SERPINB4 share over 92% amino acid identity, they have only 54% identity in their protease-binding reactive center loop, which provides substrate specificity . This structural difference translates to functional distinctions:
SERPINB3 (SCCA-1) inhibits both serine proteinases such as chymotrypsin and cysteine proteinases including cathepsins L, K, S, and papain
SERPINB4 (SCCA-2) specifically inhibits serine proteinases such as cathepsin G and mast cell chymase , as well as the cysteine protease Derp1 from house dust mite
Both proteins function as potent inhibitors of apoptosis and may have overlapping roles in modulating immune responses . When designing experiments to distinguish between these closely related proteins, researchers should employ highly specific antibodies or genetic approaches that can discriminate between the two serpins.
SERPINB4 has emerged as a significant factor in allergic inflammation, particularly in Th2-mediated responses. Studies have demonstrated that:
Both SERPINB3 and SERPINB4 are expressed in human Th2 cells after in vitro polarization
They are found in memory Th2 cells isolated from pollen allergy patients
SERPINB4 can inhibit the cysteine protease Derp1 found in house dust mite, a common allergen
The murine homolog Serpinb3a plays a non-redundant role in the induction of mucus production in asthma models
To investigate SERPINB4's role in allergic inflammation, researchers should consider experimental designs that include gene knockdown approaches as demonstrated in previous studies where shRNAmir targeting SERPINB3 or SERPINB4 was utilized to assess their function in CD4+CD27- T cells .
The SERPINB4 Antibody, FITC conjugated (CSB-PA021072LC01HU) has the following specifications:
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Uniprot No. | P48594 |
| Immunogen | Recombinant Human Serpin B4 protein (128-208AA) |
| Host Species | Rabbit |
| Reactivity | Human |
| Form | Liquid |
| Conjugate | FITC (Fluorescein isothiocyanate) |
| Storage Buffer | 0.03% Proclin 300, 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4 |
| Purification | >95%, Protein G purified |
| Isotype | IgG |
| Clonality | Polyclonal |
| Research Area | Immunology |
| Usage | For Research Use Only. Not for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures |
The FITC conjugation enables direct fluorescent detection in applications such as flow cytometry and immunofluorescence microscopy without the need for secondary antibodies .
Based on the antibody specifications and research on similar anti-SERPINB3/B4 antibodies, the SERPINB4 Antibody, FITC conjugated is suitable for the following applications:
Flow Cytometry: The FITC conjugation makes it ideal for direct detection of SERPINB4 in cells without requiring secondary antibodies
Immunofluorescence Microscopy: For visualization of SERPINB4 expression patterns in cells and tissues
Confocal Microscopy: For high-resolution imaging of SERPINB4 subcellular localization
While not directly specified for the FITC-conjugated version, related antibodies against SERPINB3/B4 have been validated for:
When using this antibody for new applications, researchers should perform appropriate validation studies including positive and negative controls to ensure specificity and optimal performance.
To maintain optimal activity of the SERPINB4 Antibody, FITC conjugated:
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, as these can compromise antibody integrity and fluorophore activity
For working solutions, aliquot and store at 4°C protected from light (FITC is light-sensitive)
Consider adding sodium azide (0.02%) to aliquots unless used for applications where azide would interfere
Monitor storage buffer conditions (pH 7.4) as extreme pH can affect antibody stability
For long-term storage stability assessment, researchers should periodically test antibody activity using positive control samples. FITC fluorescence can diminish over time, particularly if exposed to light or subjected to multiple freeze-thaw cycles, so proper handling is essential to maintain signal integrity.
When designing experiments to investigate SERPINB4 in Th2-mediated allergic responses, researchers should consider the following methodological approach:
Cell Isolation and Culture:
Isolate naïve CD4+CD45RA+ T cells from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using negative selection methods
Confirm purity (>95%) using flow cytometry with PE-conjugated anti-CD45RA antibodies
Culture cells in appropriate media (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin)
Th2 Polarization:
Stimulate cells with anti-CD3 (0.5μg/mL) and anti-CD28 (0.5μg/ml)
Add cytokines to induce Th2 polarization (e.g., IL-4) and block non-Th2 differentiation
SERPINB4 Expression Analysis:
Functional Studies:
In vivo Relevance:
This experimental design allows for comprehensive investigation of SERPINB4's role in allergic inflammation, from molecular expression to functional significance.
For robust flow cytometry experiments using SERPINB4 Antibody, FITC conjugated, researchers should include:
Positive Controls:
Negative Controls:
Technical Controls:
Unstained cells to establish autofluorescence
Single-color controls for compensation if performing multicolor flow cytometry
FMO (Fluorescence Minus One) controls when performing multiparameter analysis
Validation Controls:
Including these controls allows proper interpretation of results, ensures specificity, and helps troubleshoot potential technical issues.
When using SERPINB4 Antibody, FITC conjugated for immunofluorescence studies, researchers should consider:
Sample Preparation:
For fixed cells: Use 4% paraformaldehyde fixation followed by permeabilization with 0.1-0.5% Triton X-100
For tissue sections: Consider antigen retrieval methods if needed
Blocking step: Use 5-10% normal serum from a species different from the antibody host to reduce background
Antibody Dilution and Incubation:
Start with manufacturer's recommended dilution (typically 1:100 to 1:500)
Perform a dilution series to determine optimal concentration
Incubate in humidity chamber at 4°C overnight or at room temperature for 1-2 hours
Protect from light during and after incubation due to FITC photosensitivity
Counterstaining and Mounting:
Nuclear counterstain: DAPI or Hoechst (blue) works well with FITC (green)
Consider phalloidin-rhodamine for cytoskeletal visualization (red)
Use anti-fade mounting media to preserve FITC signal
Controls and Validation:
Imaging Considerations:
FITC excitation maximum: ~495 nm; emission maximum: ~519 nm
Minimize exposure time to reduce photobleaching
Consider acquiring images quickly after preparation
If stored, keep slides in the dark at 4°C
Following these methodological guidelines ensures optimal signal-to-noise ratio and specificity in immunofluorescence studies using FITC-conjugated SERPINB4 antibody.
To investigate SERPINB4's anti-apoptotic function, researchers should employ a multifaceted approach:
Molecular Interaction Studies:
Cellular Assays:
Compare apoptosis rates in cells with normal versus knocked-down SERPINB4 expression
Use flow cytometry with Annexin V/PI staining to quantify apoptotic populations
Apply specific apoptotic stimuli (UV radiation, FasL, cytotoxic drugs) to test pathway specificity
Monitor activation of caspases (especially caspase-3, -8, and -9) using fluorogenic substrates
Mechanistic Investigation:
Assess SERPINB4's impact on JNK1 activity using phospho-specific antibodies and kinase assays
Investigate how SERPINB4 inhibits its protease targets (cathepsin G, mast cell chymase)
Evaluate subcellular localization during apoptosis using the FITC-conjugated antibody
Create domain-specific mutants to map regions responsible for anti-apoptotic function
In vivo Relevance:
This comprehensive approach will help elucidate whether SERPINB4's anti-apoptotic function stems from direct protease inhibition or involves additional non-canonical mechanisms.
Distinguishing between SERPINB3 and SERPINB4 presents a significant challenge due to their 92% amino acid identity . Researchers can employ these strategies:
Genomic and Transcriptomic Approaches:
Design PCR primers targeting the divergent reactive center loop region (54% identity)
Use RNA-Seq with computational algorithms to distinguish between isoforms
Employ droplet digital PCR for absolute quantification of each transcript
Design specific siRNAs targeting unique regions for selective knockdown
Proteomic Methods:
Develop antibodies against the reactive center loop unique to each protein
Use mass spectrometry to identify peptides specific to each protein
Employ 2D gel electrophoresis to separate proteins based on slight differences in pI
Functional Discrimination:
Test inhibition against different proteases:
Assess differential inhibition kinetics with purified proteins
Create chimeric proteins swapping the reactive center loops to confirm specificity determinants
Genetic Manipulation:
This methodological toolbox enables researchers to distinguish between these closely related serpins despite their high sequence similarity.
To investigate SERPINB4's role in tumor biology using FITC-conjugated antibodies, researchers should implement a comprehensive strategy:
Expression Profiling in Tumor Tissues:
Perform immunofluorescence microscopy on tissue microarrays containing various tumor types
Compare SERPINB4 expression between tumor tissue and adjacent normal tissue
Correlate expression with clinical parameters (stage, grade, patient outcome)
Create quantitative expression maps using digital image analysis
Cellular Localization Studies:
Use confocal microscopy with FITC-conjugated SERPINB4 antibody to determine subcellular localization
Perform co-localization studies with markers for different cellular compartments
Compare localization patterns between normal and malignant cells
Track dynamic changes in localization during cell cycle or in response to stress
Flow Cytometry Applications:
Isolate cells from primary tumors and analyze SERPINB4 expression
Correlate SERPINB4 levels with other markers of proliferation or stemness
Sort SERPINB4-high versus SERPINB4-low populations for functional studies
Assess changes in expression following treatment with chemotherapeutic agents
Functional Studies in Tumor Models:
Generate SERPINB4-overexpressing and knockdown tumor cell lines
Assess impact on proliferation, migration, invasion, and resistance to apoptosis
Perform xenograft studies comparing growth and metastatic potential
Use intravital imaging with FITC-labeled antibodies to track SERPINB4-expressing cells in vivo
This approach leverages the advantages of FITC-conjugated antibodies, particularly for direct visualization applications, to comprehensively investigate SERPINB4's role in cancer biology, as suggested by its elevated expression in squamous cell carcinomas and pancreatic carcinoma .
Detecting intracellular SERPINB4 presents several challenges that researchers can address with specific methodological approaches:
Fixation and Permeabilization Issues:
Challenge: Inadequate cell permeabilization leading to poor antibody access
Solution: Optimize permeabilization conditions (test different detergents like saponin, Triton X-100, or digitonin at various concentrations)
Approach: For flow cytometry, compare commercial fixation/permeabilization kits to identify optimal conditions
Cross-Reactivity Concerns:
Low Expression Levels:
Autofluorescence Interference:
Challenge: Cellular autofluorescence in the FITC channel
Solution: Include unstained controls and consider autofluorescence quenching reagents
Approach: Adjust instrument settings based on unstained control samples
Fixation-Induced Fluorescence Loss:
Challenge: FITC signal degradation during fixation procedures
Solution: Minimize fixation time and protect from light
Approach: Consider alternative fixatives or post-fixation antibody staining
By systematically addressing these technical challenges, researchers can generate more reliable and reproducible data when studying intracellular SERPINB4 localization and expression.
When faced with discrepancies between SERPINB4 mRNA and protein expression levels, researchers should consider these methodological approaches to interpretation:
Potential Biological Explanations:
Post-transcriptional regulation: Assess miRNA targeting of SERPINB4 mRNA using prediction algorithms and validation studies
Protein stability differences: Measure protein half-life using cycloheximide chase experiments
Stimulus-specific regulation: Compare resting versus activated states (particularly relevant in immune cells)
Spatial-temporal variations: Consider differences in sampling time points and microenvironmental factors
Technical Considerations:
Primer specificity: Verify that qPCR primers discriminate between SERPINB3 and SERPINB4
Antibody cross-reactivity: Validate antibody specificity against both SERPINB3 and SERPINB4 recombinant proteins
Detection sensitivity: Compare sensitivity thresholds of PCR versus immunological methods
Sample preparation differences: Standardize protocols for both RNA and protein extraction
Experimental Validation Approaches:
Correlation analysis: Perform large-scale assessment across multiple samples to identify consistent patterns
Single-cell analysis: Use single-cell RNA-seq coupled with flow cytometry to assess correlation at individual cell level
Time-course studies: Track both mRNA and protein levels following stimulation
Translational efficiency: Assess polysome association of SERPINB4 mRNA
Integrated Analysis Framework:
Create a mathematical model accounting for transcription rates, mRNA stability, translation efficiency, and protein degradation
Perform pulse-chase experiments to determine actual rates in your experimental system
Consider that certain cellular states may prioritize post-transcriptional regulation
This systematic approach helps researchers determine whether discrepancies represent technical artifacts or biologically meaningful regulatory mechanisms affecting SERPINB4 expression.
When comparing SERPINB4 expression across different tissue types, researchers should consider these methodological factors:
Tissue-Specific Expression Patterns:
SERPINB4 shows preferential expression in squamous epithelium and certain carcinomas
Consider baseline expression levels in normal tissue counterparts (e.g., pancreatic carcinoma shows positive staining while adjacent normal pancreas does not)
Account for cellular heterogeneity within tissues using single-cell approaches or microdissection
Standardization and Quantification Approaches:
Normalization strategy: Use multiple housekeeping genes/proteins suited to each tissue type
Quantification method: Establish consistent scoring systems for immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence
Analytical controls: Include the same positive control sample across all experiments
Technical parameters: Standardize antibody concentration, incubation time, and detection systems
Confounding Variables:
Fixation differences: Compare only tissues with similar fixation protocols
Autofluorescence: Especially problematic in certain tissues (e.g., liver, brain)
Sample handling: Account for ischemic time affecting protein preservation
Pathological state: Distinguish between normal, inflammatory, and neoplastic conditions
Validation Strategies:
Confirm findings using orthogonal detection methods (e.g., Western blot, mass spectrometry)
Compare antibody-based detection with mRNA expression data from tissues
Use multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of SERPINB4
Include tissues known to be negative for SERPINB4 as controls
This comprehensive approach ensures that observed differences in SERPINB4 expression between tissue types represent true biological variation rather than methodological artifacts, particularly important when comparing results from pancreatic, lung, kidney, and bladder tissues as shown in previous studies .