The SFRP2 Antibody, HRP conjugated, is a polyclonal antibody produced in rabbits against a recombinant human SFRP2 protein fragment (amino acids 68–186). It is covalently linked to horseradish peroxidase (HRP), enabling colorimetric or chemiluminescent detection in assays like ELISA and Western blot .
Validated for direct ELISA with high specificity for human SFRP2 .
Cross-reactivity with mouse SFRP2 has not been reported for this conjugate .
While the HRP-conjugated antibody itself is primarily used for detection, studies using other SFRP2 antibodies highlight its biological relevance:
Angiogenesis: SFRP2 promotes endothelial tube formation via calcineurin/NFAT signaling, a process inhibitable by SFRP2-neutralizing antibodies .
Cancer: SFRP2 monoclonal antibodies reduce tumor growth in angiosarcoma and triple-negative breast cancer models by blocking Wnt/β-catenin and NFAT pathways .
Immune Modulation: Anti-SFRP2 antibodies restore T-cell proliferation and reduce PD-1 expression in osteosarcoma models .
Specificity: Recognizes the internal region (68–186AA) of human SFRP2 with no reported cross-reactivity to unrelated proteins .
Sensitivity: Detects SFRP2 at low concentrations in ELISA, though exact limits depend on assay conditions .
Reproducibility: Consistent performance across multiple lots when stored as recommended .
The HRP conjugate offers advantages over non-conjugated variants:
SFRP2 (Secreted frizzled-related protein 2) functions as a critical modulator of Wnt signaling through direct interaction with Wnt proteins, regulating cell growth and differentiation in specific cell types. It is widely expressed in various tissues including the heart, lungs, and kidneys, and plays important roles in eye retinal development and myogenesis . SFRP2 has gained significant research interest because it is overexpressed in the vasculature of approximately 85% of human breast tumors and other cancer types . Its involvement in promoting angiogenesis, tumor cell migration, and immunomodulation makes it an important target for both basic research and therapeutic development .
SFRP2 antibodies are valuable tools for multiple research applications:
Western Blotting (WB): For detecting endogenous levels of SFRP2 protein in tissue or cell lysates
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): For visualizing SFRP2 expression patterns in tissue sections
ELISA: For quantifying SFRP2 levels in biological fluids or cell culture media
Dot Blot Analysis: For rapid screening of SFRP2 in samples
Immunofluorescence (IF): For subcellular localization studies of SFRP2
HRP-conjugated SFRP2 antibodies specifically enhance sensitivity in WB, ELISA, and IHC applications by eliminating the need for secondary antibody incubation, reducing background, and enabling direct detection through enzymatic color development or chemiluminescence.
For optimal Western blotting results with HRP-conjugated SFRP2 antibodies:
Sample Preparation:
Use RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors for tissue/cell lysis
Load 20-50 μg of total protein per lane
Optimization Steps:
Controls:
Note that antibody specificity testing has shown that some SFRP2 antibodies do not cross-react with human SFRP1, making them ideal for discriminating between these related proteins .
SFRP2 antibodies are critical tools for elucidating SFRP2's role in cancer progression through multiple experimental approaches:
Tumor Microenvironment Analysis:
Use SFRP2 antibodies (HRP-conjugated) for immunohistochemical analysis of tumor sections to identify SFRP2 distribution in cancer tissues and correlate with vasculature markers (CD31, CD34)
Double staining procedures can reveal colocalization with endothelial markers
Mechanistic Studies:
In Vivo Models:
These applications highlight the dual utility of SFRP2 antibodies as both research tools and potential therapeutic agents.
When investigating SFRP2's role in angiogenesis, researchers should consider these methodological approaches:
In Vitro Assays:
Endothelial cell tube formation assays: Plate endothelial cells on Matrigel, treat with SFRP2 protein or anti-SFRP2 antibodies, and quantify tube formation after 4-16 hours
Endothelial cell migration assays: Use scratch wound or transwell migration assays to assess SFRP2's effects on endothelial motility
Apoptosis assays: Evaluate SFRP2's protective effects against hypoxia-induced endothelial apoptosis
In Vivo Models:
Molecular Pathway Analysis:
These methodologies provide complementary approaches to comprehensively evaluate SFRP2's angiogenic functions and the efficacy of anti-SFRP2 strategies.
Recent research has revealed SFRP2's unexpected roles in immune regulation, making SFRP2 antibodies valuable tools for studying tumor immunology:
T-cell Function Analysis:
Immune Checkpoint Regulation:
Combined Immunotherapy Approaches:
These applications highlight SFRP2 antibodies' value in understanding the intersection between angiogenesis and immunomodulation in the tumor microenvironment.
When evaluating anti-SFRP2 treatment efficacy, researchers should consider these methodological approaches:
Serum Biomarker Analysis:
Tumor Response Assessment:
Measure tumor volume longitudinally using calipers or advanced imaging
Perform immunohistochemistry on tumor sections to assess:
Microvessel density (CD31 staining)
Tumor cell apoptosis (TUNEL or cleaved caspase-3)
Immune cell infiltration (CD3, CD8, etc.)
Pharmacokinetic/Biodistribution Analysis:
These methodologies provide multiple complementary endpoints to thoroughly evaluate SFRP2-targeted therapies.
Proper antibody validation ensures reliable experimental results. For HRP-conjugated SFRP2 antibodies, researchers should verify:
Specificity Testing:
Sensitivity Assessment:
Serial dilution testing to determine the limit of detection
Signal-to-noise ratio evaluation across different applications
HRP Conjugation Quality:
Verify enzymatic activity through chemiluminescent substrate testing
Check protein-to-HRP molar ratio (typically 1:1 to 1:4)
Test storage stability at various temperatures (4°C, -20°C, -80°C)
Application-Specific Controls:
For Western blotting: Positive control (recombinant human SFRP2) and negative control tissues
For IHC: Known positive tissue sections and appropriate blocking controls
These validation steps ensure reproducible results and minimize artifacts in subsequent experiments.
Common challenges with HRP-conjugated SFRP2 antibodies in IHC and their solutions include:
High Background Signal:
Increase blocking duration (use 5-10% normal serum from the same species as the secondary antibody)
Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to blocking solution to reduce non-specific binding
Optimize antibody concentration through titration experiments
Ensure complete quenching of endogenous peroxidase activity (use 0.3% H₂O₂ in methanol for 30 minutes)
Weak or Absent Staining:
Optimize antigen retrieval (test multiple methods: heat-induced with citrate buffer pH 6.0 or EDTA buffer pH 8.0)
Increase antibody concentration or incubation time
Ensure tissue fixation protocols are optimized (overfixation can mask epitopes)
Try signal amplification systems (e.g., avidin-biotin complex)
Non-uniform Staining:
Ensure adequate tissue section thickness (4-6 μm ideal)
Check for complete deparaffinization and rehydration
Apply antibody solution to completely cover the tissue
Use humidity chambers during incubation
Degradation of HRP Activity:
Store antibody according to manufacturer recommendations (typically 4°C for short-term, -20°C with glycerol for long-term)
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Use freshly prepared DAB substrate solution
These troubleshooting approaches help maximize the utility of HRP-conjugated SFRP2 antibodies in tissue-based applications.
SFRP2 antibodies are valuable tools for dissecting complex signaling relationships:
Canonical vs. Non-canonical Wnt Pathway Analysis:
NFATc3 Pathway Investigation:
Multi-pathway Analysis:
Combination of SFRP2 antibodies with other pathway-specific antibodies in multiplexed assays
Proteomic approaches using SFRP2 antibodies for immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
These approaches help unravel the complex signaling network around SFRP2 and identify potential therapeutic vulnerabilities.
Research indicates SFRP2's involvement in therapeutic resistance, particularly to immunotherapy. Key methodological approaches include:
Resistance Model Development:
Create PD-1 inhibitor-resistant cell lines or animal models
Use HRP-conjugated SFRP2 antibodies to monitor SFRP2 expression changes during resistance development
Combination Therapy Assessment:
Immune Profiling:
Flow cytometry to assess changes in:
CD38 levels in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
PD-1 levels in T-cells
T-cell function and exhaustion markers
Combined with SFRP2 antibody-based detection methods
These methodologies help elucidate SFRP2's role in therapy resistance and identify strategies to overcome it.
Various SFRP2 antibody formats offer distinct advantages for different research applications:
| Antibody Type | Target Region | Host | Applications | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monoclonal (HRP-conjugated) | Specific epitope | Rabbit/Mouse | WB, IHC, ELISA | High specificity, one-step detection, batch consistency | Limited epitope recognition |
| Polyclonal (HRP-conjugated) | Multiple epitopes | Rabbit | WB, ELISA, IHC, IF, ICC | Enhanced sensitivity, robust signal | Potential cross-reactivity |
| Recombinant Monoclonal | Specific epitope | Rabbit | Dot, WB | Renewable source, high reproducibility | Higher cost |
| Humanized Monoclonal | Specific epitope | Human | Therapeutic applications | Lower immunogenicity in human studies | Limited research applications |
When selecting the optimal SFRP2 antibody format, researchers should consider:
Target region specificity (internal region, C-terminal, etc.)
Host species compatibility with experimental design
Detection method requirements
When comparing studies using different SFRP2 antibodies, researchers should carefully evaluate:
Epitope Targeting:
Methodology Differences:
Antigen retrieval protocols vary between antibodies
Different detection systems (direct HRP vs. indirect methods)
Varying sensitivities affect minimum detectable concentrations
Cross-reactivity Profiles:
Validation Standards:
Evaluate whether antibodies were validated using:
Knockout controls
Recombinant protein standards
Multiple application testing
These considerations ensure proper interpretation when comparing results across studies using different SFRP2 antibody reagents.