SMARCAL1 Antibody, Biotin conjugated

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Primary Use Cases

  • ELISA: Detects SMARCAL1 in serum or cell lysates for quantitative analysis .

  • Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Localizes SMARCAL1 in tissue sections using Biotin-streptavidin systems .

  • Western Blot: Requires unconjugated antibodies (e.g., Proteintech’s 12513-1-AP), but Biotin variants may be used with streptavidin-HRP systems .

Optimal Dilutions (varies by product):

ApplicationRecommended Dilution (Rabbit Polyclonal)
ELISANot specified (user-determined)
IHC (Paraffin)1:50–1:200
Western Blot1:500–1:3000 (unconjugated forms)

Role of SMARCAL1 in Cancer and DNA Repair

  1. Immune Evasion and PD-L1 Regulation
    SMARCAL1 suppresses cGAS-STING signaling by limiting endogenous DNA damage, thereby reducing innate immune activation . Concurrently, it cooperates with JUN to promote PD-L1 expression, enabling tumors to evade T-cell responses . Biotin-conjugated antibodies can quantify SMARCAL1 levels to predict PD-L1 expression and immunotherapy efficacy .

  2. DNA Damage Response
    SMARCAL1 is ubiquitylated by RFWD3 in response to genotoxic stress (e.g., camptothecin, UV), stabilizing its chromatin association and facilitating fork repair . Antibodies enable monitoring of SMARCAL1 ubiquitylation status post-DNA damage .

  3. Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT)
    SMARCAL1 loss correlates with ALT activation in cancers like glioblastoma. Rescuing SMARCAL1 expression inhibits telomere synthesis and ALT markers, suggesting therapeutic potential .

Product Comparison Table

ParameterRabbit Polyclonal (ABIN7171063) Rabbit Polyclonal (CSB-PA885774LD01HU) Mouse Monoclonal (NBP3-20733B)
HostRabbitRabbitMouse
EpitopeAA 6-277Not specifiedFull-length SMARCAL1
ApplicationsELISAELISAIHC (Paraffin)
Cross-ReactivityHumanHumanHuman
DilutionUser-determinedUser-determinedNot specified
ConjugateBiotinBiotinBiotin

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Typically, we are able to dispatch products within 1-3 business days of receiving your order. Delivery times may vary depending on the mode of purchase and destination. For specific delivery timeframes, please consult your local distributors.
Synonyms
HARP antibody; HepA Related Protein antibody; HepA-related protein antibody; hHARP antibody; SIOD antibody; SMAL1_HUMAN antibody; SMARCA like Protein 1 antibody; smarcal1 antibody; Sucrose nonfermenting protein 2 like 1 antibody; Sucrose nonfermenting protein 2-like 1 antibody; SWI/SNF Related antibody; SWI/SNF related matrix associated actin dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily A like protein 1 antibody; SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily A-like protein 1 antibody
Target Names
SMARCAL1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
SMARCAL1 is an ATP-dependent annealing helicase that exhibits selective binding to fork DNA compared to single-stranded (ssDNA) or double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). It catalyzes the rewinding of stably unwound DNA. SMARCAL1 rewinds single-stranded DNA bubbles that are stably bound by replication protein A (RPA). It functions throughout the genome to reanneal stably unwound DNA, performing the opposite reaction of many enzymes, such as helicases and polymerases, which unwind DNA. SMARCAL1 may play a crucial role in the DNA damage response by acting at stalled replication forks.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. A significant number of SNF2 family, DNA and ATP-dependent motor proteins are essential during transcription, DNA replication, and DNA repair to manipulate protein-DNA interactions and alter DNA structure. SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, and HLTF are three closely related members of this family with specialized functions that maintain genome stability during DNA replication. [review] PMID: 28954549
  2. This review focuses on the primary roles of SMARCAL1 in DNA repair, telomere maintenance, and replication fork stability in response to DNA replication stress. PMID: 28623093
  3. Depletion of SMARCAL1, an SNF2-family DNA translocase that remodels stalled forks, restores replication fork stability and reduces the formation of replication stress-induced DNA breaks and chromosomal aberrations in BRCA1/2-deficient cells. In addition to SMARCAL1, other SNF2-family fork remodelers, including ZRANB3 and HLTF, cause nascent DNA degradation and genomic instability. PMID: 29053959
  4. Our findings reveal the critical function of the DNA replication stress response, and specifically, Smarcal1, in hematopoietic cell survival and tumor development. Our results also provide significant insight into the immunodeficiency observed in individuals with mutations in SMARCAL1 by suggesting that it is an HSPC defect. PMID: 27797382
  5. This study elucidates the mechanism of SMARCAL1 function in maintaining genome stability. PMID: 27355316
  6. This research demonstrates that deficiency of a SMARCAL1 ortholog alters the chromatin structure of a gene. PMID: 27813696
  7. These results provide evidence that BRG1 and SMARCAL1 regulate each other. BRG1 binds to the SMARCAL1 promoter, while SMARCAL1 binds to the brg1 promoter. During DNA damage, the occupancy of SMARCAL1 on the brg1 promoter increases concurrently with an increase in BRG1 occupancy on the SMARCAL1 promoter, leading to increased brg1 and SMARCAL1 transcripts respectively. PMID: 26843359
  8. This study demonstrates that the replication stress response protein SMARCAL1 is a critical regulator of alternative lengthening of telomeres activity. PMID: 26832416
  9. SMARCAL1 negatively regulates c-myc transcription by altering the conformation of its promoter region during differentiation. PMID: 26648259
  10. Mutations in human SMARCAL1 that result in loss of ATPase activity lead to increased replication stress and therefore potentially manifest as Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia. PMID: 26195148
  11. These results provide the first identification, to our knowledge, of an endogenous source of replication stress that requires SMARCAL1 for resolution and define differences between members of this class of replication fork-repair enzymes. PMID: 26578802
  12. The findings suggest that Smarcal1 enhances nonhomologous end-joining repair, presumably by interacting with RPA at unwound single-strand sequences and subsequently facilitating annealing at double-strand-break ends. PMID: 26089390
  13. This research investigates the role of SMARCAL1 in the pathogenesis of Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia. PMID: 25319549
  14. In addition to its annealing helicase activity, which eliminates the natural binding substrate for RPA, HARP inhibits the phosphorylation of RPA by DNA-PK. PMID: 24565939
  15. We present here the first evidence of intrinsic chromosomal instability in a severe SMARCAL1-deficient patient with a clinical picture of SIOD. PMID: 24197801
  16. Conserved motifs are required for RPA32 binding to the N-terminus of SMARCAL1. PMID: 24910198
  17. This report provides the clinical and genetic description of a mild phenotype of Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia associated with nephrotic proteinuria, which decreases after combined therapy with ACE inhibitors and sartans. PMID: 24589093
  18. This study reports the characterization of the RPA32C-SMARCAL1 interface at the molecular level; implications of these results are discussed with respect to the recruitment of SMARCAL1 and other DNA damage response and repair proteins to stalled replication forks. PMID: 24730652
  19. Data suggest that replication protein A (RPA) brings a complex of SMARCAL1 and WRN to stalled forks, but they may act in different pathways to promote fork repair and restart. PMID: 23671665
  20. This report describes Schimke Immunoosseous Dysplasia associated with undifferentiated carcinoma and a novel SMARCAL1 mutation in a child. PMID: 23630135
  21. ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 on S652, thereby limiting its fork regression activities and preventing aberrant fork processing. PMID: 23873943
  22. This review summarizes recent advances in understanding the biochemical and cellular functions of SMARCAL1 and discusses the rationale for developing SMARCAL1 inhibitors as novel anticancer therapies. [Review] PMID: 22995303
  23. SMARCAL1 annealing helicase buffers fluctuations in gene expression and alterations in gene expression contribute to the penetrance of SIOD. PMID: 22378147
  24. SMARCAL1 continuously surveys replication forks for damage. PMID: 22279047
  25. Loss of SMARCAL1 function in patients may cause DNA replication-associated genome instability that contributes to the pleiotropic phenotypes of Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia. PMID: 21327070
  26. The HARP domain endows HARP with this ATP-driven annealing helicase activity. PMID: 21525954
  27. This report describes novel compound mutations of SMARCAL1 associated with severe Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia in a Chinese patient. PMID: 20179009
  28. This report describes a Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia patient who has survived to 20 years despite having a homozygous SMARCAL1 nonsense mutation and severe early onset disease. PMID: 12471207
  29. A missense mutation in the SMARCAL1 gene is associated with mild Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia. PMID: 16237566
  30. SMARCAL1 is mutated in Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia, a fatal autosomal recessive disorder. PMID: 16840568
  31. The severity of Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia (SIOD) within the same family might be modified by the splicing machinery. The renal expression pattern of SMARCAL1 explains a broader spectrum of renal disease in SIOD than previously described. PMID: 18356746
  32. SMARCAL1 deficiency may influence brain development and function in addition to its previously recognized effect on cerebral circulation. PMID: 18520775
  33. SMARCAL1 binds chromatin in vivo, and Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia arises from impairment of diverse SMARCAL1 functions. PMID: 18805831
  34. This study found that HARP is an ATP-dependent annealing helicase that rewinds single-stranded DNA bubbles that are stably bound by replication protein A. PMID: 18974355
  35. This report describes SMARCAL1 mutations as a cause of prepubertal idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (Case Report). PMID: 19127206
  36. Donor serum SMARCAL1 may serve as a specific, sensitive, and noninvasive predictive marker in the assessment of cardiac graft quality. PMID: 19752368
  37. SMARCAL1 directly interacts with Replication protein A (RPA) and is recruited to sites of DNA damage in an RPA-dependent manner. PMID: 19793862
  38. The interaction of HARP with RPA increases the concentration of annealing helicase activity in the vicinity of ssDNA regions to facilitate processes such as DNA repair. PMID: 19793863
  39. ARP is recruited to stalled replication forks via its direct interaction with Replication protein A (RPA). PMID: 19793864
  40. SMARCAL1 is a novel DNA damage-binding protein involved in replication fork stabilization. PMID: 19841479

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

HGNC: 11102

OMIM: 242900

KEGG: hsa:50485

STRING: 9606.ENSP00000349823

UniGene: Hs.516674

Involvement In Disease
Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia (SIOD)
Protein Families
SNF2/RAD54 helicase family, SMARCAL1 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Nucleus. Note=Recruited to damaged DNA regions.
Tissue Specificity
Ubiquitously expressed, with high levels in testis.

Q&A

What is SMARCAL1 and what cellular functions does it perform?

SMARCAL1 is an ATP-dependent annealing helicase that binds selectively to fork DNA relative to ssDNA or dsDNA and catalyzes the rewinding of stably unwound DNA. It specifically rewinds single-stranded DNA bubbles that are stably bound by replication protein A (RPA) and acts throughout the genome to reanneal stably unwound DNA, essentially performing the opposite reaction of helicases and polymerases that unwind DNA . SMARCAL1 plays a critical role in the DNA damage response pathway, particularly at stalled replication forks, helping to maintain genomic stability during DNA replication . Recent research also suggests SMARCAL1 functions as a dual regulator of innate immune signaling and potentially interacts with PD-L1 pathways, indicating broader functions in cellular immunity .

What specific applications are biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies validated for?

Biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies have been specifically validated for ELISA applications when working with human samples . The biotin conjugation provides significant advantages for detection sensitivity through the strong biotin-streptavidin interaction, which allows for amplified signal generation and lower background. While the primary validated application is ELISA, researchers should note that the base antibody without biotin conjugation has been validated for additional applications including Western Blot (WB) and immunocytochemistry/immunofluorescence (ICC/IF) . When considering alternative applications for biotin-conjugated versions, researchers should conduct preliminary validation experiments to confirm functionality in their specific experimental systems.

How should researchers optimize sample preparation for SMARCAL1 detection using biotin-conjugated antibodies?

For optimal sample preparation when using biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies, researchers should follow these methodological guidelines:

For protein extracts (ELISA/WB applications):

  • Use appropriate lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

  • Ensure complete solubilization of nuclear proteins, as SMARCAL1 is a chromatin-associated protein

  • Consider specialized nuclear extraction protocols for enriched SMARCAL1 preparations

  • Avoid excessive sample heating which may affect epitope recognition

  • Block endogenous biotin in samples using avidin/streptavidin blocking kits to prevent false positives

When preparing samples, it's crucial to maintain the antibody's storage conditions (-20°C or -80°C) and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that may degrade the antibody's activity . The biotin-conjugated antibody is preserved in a buffer containing 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS (pH 7.4), and 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative . Researchers should exercise caution when handling the antibody as Proclin is classified as a hazardous substance and should be handled by trained personnel only .

What epitope specificity considerations apply to biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies?

The biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibody described in the search results targets amino acids 6-277 of the human SMARCAL1 protein . This epitope specificity has important implications for experimental design:

  • The antibody was generated using a recombinant fragment of human SMARCAL1 (amino acids 6-277) as the immunogen, which encompasses part of the N-terminal region of the protein

  • Different commercial antibodies target varying epitopes of SMARCAL1, including:

    • Amino acids 100-500 (ab154226)

    • C-terminal regions (available in unconjugated formats)

    • Amino acids 719-768 (available in unconjugated formats)

For research requiring detection of specific SMARCAL1 domains or isoforms, researchers should carefully select antibodies targeting appropriate epitopes. The N-terminal region targeted by the biotin-conjugated antibody (AA 6-277) is important for SMARCAL1's function but may not detect certain splice variants or post-translationally modified forms of the protein. Researchers should consider domain-specific detection requirements when selecting antibodies for specific experimental questions.

What cross-reactivity profiles can researchers expect with SMARCAL1 antibodies?

The biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibody has been specifically validated for human sample reactivity . Cross-reactivity potential with other species varies depending on the specific antibody and targeted epitope:

Antibody Target RegionValidated SpeciesPotential Cross-Reactive Species
AA 6-277 (Biotin conjugated)HumanNot validated for other species
AA 100-500 (ab154226)HumanNot specified for other species
AA 1-954 (unconjugated)HumanNot specified
C-Term (unconjugated)Human, Rat, Horse, Rabbit, Guinea Pig, MonkeyPotential for broad mammalian cross-reactivity
AA 719-768 (unconjugated)Human, Dog, Rabbit, MonkeyMultiple mammalian species
N-Term (unconjugated)Human, Mouse, Rat, Horse, Dog, Rabbit, BatBroad mammalian cross-reactivity

When working with non-human samples, researchers should perform sequence homology analysis (BLAST) between the immunogen sequence and the target species' SMARCAL1 sequence to predict potential cross-reactivity . Validation experiments are essential when using antibodies in species other than those explicitly validated by manufacturers. Some suppliers offer innovator award programs for researchers who validate antibodies in new applications or species .

How can biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies be optimized for studying DNA damage response pathways?

For studying SMARCAL1's role in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, researchers can optimize biotin-conjugated antibodies through the following methodological approaches:

  • Temporally-resolved immunoprecipitation: Use the biotin-conjugated antibody with streptavidin beads to pull down SMARCAL1 at different timepoints after DNA damage induction (e.g., UV, hydroxyurea, camptothecin treatment)

  • Proximity ligation assays (PLA): Combine the biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibody with antibodies against other DDR proteins (e.g., RPA, ATR, ATRIP) to detect protein-protein interactions at stalled replication forks

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) optimization:

    • Pre-clear samples with unconjugated streptavidin to reduce background

    • Use formaldehyde crosslinking followed by sonication for optimal chromatin fragmentation

    • Implement stringent washing conditions to reduce non-specific binding

    • Consider dual crosslinking approaches for improved chromatin association detection

  • Sequential ChIP protocol: For detecting SMARCAL1 co-localization with other proteins at stalled replication forks:

    • First ChIP: Standard protocol with biotin-SMARCAL1 antibody

    • Elution: Use biotin to competitively elute protein complexes

    • Second ChIP: With antibodies against potential binding partners (RPA, γH2AX, etc.)

SMARCAL1's function in rewinding DNA bubbles bound by RPA suggests it plays a critical role in stabilizing stalled replication forks , making these approaches valuable for understanding its dynamic function in genomic maintenance during replication stress.

What methodological considerations apply when using biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies in multiplexed detection systems?

When implementing biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies in multiplexed detection systems, researchers should consider these methodological approaches:

  • Addressing biotin interference issues:

    • Block endogenous biotin in biological samples using avidin/streptavidin blocking kits

    • Avoid biotin-containing buffers or culture media components that may create background

    • Consider using streptavidin conjugated to spectrally distinct fluorophores when multiplexing

  • Multiplexed immunofluorescence optimization:

    • Sequential detection approach: Apply the biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibody first, followed by streptavidin-fluorophore, then block remaining biotin binding sites before applying additional antibodies

    • Use carefully selected fluorophore combinations to minimize spectral overlap

    • Implement appropriate controls to measure and subtract autofluorescence

  • Multi-epitope detection strategies:

    • Combine the biotin-conjugated antibody (AA 6-277) with unconjugated antibodies targeting other SMARCAL1 epitopes (e.g., C-terminal) for confirmation of specificity

    • Use antibodies raised in different host species to enable simultaneous detection with species-specific secondary antibodies

  • Signal amplification considerations:

    • Tyramide signal amplification (TSA) can be employed with biotin-conjugated antibodies for enhanced sensitivity

    • Quantum dots conjugated to streptavidin provide photostable, narrow emission spectra ideal for multiplexing

    • Consider sequential rounds of streptavidin-based detection with intermittent biotin blocking

These approaches allow researchers to simultaneously detect SMARCAL1 alongside other proteins involved in DNA damage response, replication fork stability, or chromatin remodeling pathways, enabling comprehensive analysis of protein interactions and co-localization patterns.

What validation strategies should researchers employ to confirm SMARCAL1 antibody specificity?

Rigorous validation of SMARCAL1 antibody specificity is essential for reliable research outcomes. Researchers should implement a multi-faceted validation strategy:

  • Genetic validation approaches:

    • SMARCAL1 knockout/knockdown controls: Generate CRISPR/Cas9 knockout or siRNA knockdown cells to confirm signal absence

    • Overexpression controls: Express tagged SMARCAL1 constructs and confirm co-localization with antibody signal

    • Rescue experiments: Reintroduce SMARCAL1 in knockout backgrounds to restore antibody signal

  • Biochemical validation methods:

    • Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide (AA 6-277) to block specific binding

    • Multiple antibody approach: Compare signals from antibodies targeting different SMARCAL1 epitopes (N-terminal vs. C-terminal)

    • Mass spectrometry validation: Confirm identity of immunoprecipitated proteins using LC-MS/MS

  • Application-specific controls:

    • For ELISA: Include gradient dilution series and calculate detection limits

    • For immunofluorescence: Perform secondary-only controls and isotype controls

    • For immunoprecipitation: Compare with IgG control pull-downs

  • Cross-reactivity assessment:

    • Test antibody against recombinant proteins with structural similarity to SMARCAL1

    • Evaluate antibody performance in species with varying degrees of SMARCAL1 homology

    • Assess performance in tissues/cells with known SMARCAL1 expression profiles

The antibody should be validated at the >95% purity level, which matches the protein G purification standard mentioned in the biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibody specifications . Comprehensive validation ensures experimental results accurately reflect SMARCAL1 biology rather than non-specific interactions.

How can researchers effectively troubleshoot inconsistent results when using biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies?

When encountering inconsistent results with biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies, researchers should systematically troubleshoot following this methodological framework:

  • Antibody storage and handling assessment:

    • Verify proper storage conditions (-20°C or -80°C as recommended)

    • Check for evidence of antibody degradation (precipitation, cloudiness)

    • Minimize freeze-thaw cycles by maintaining small working aliquots

    • Ensure proper buffer conditions and pH stability

  • Sample preparation optimization:

    • Evaluate different lysis conditions to ensure complete extraction of chromatin-associated proteins

    • Test fresh vs. frozen samples to assess impact on epitope integrity

    • Optimize antigen retrieval methods for fixed samples

    • Consider native vs. denaturing conditions based on application requirements

  • Biotin-specific troubleshooting:

    • Implement avidin/biotin blocking to eliminate endogenous biotin interference

    • Test different streptavidin conjugates if detection issues persist

    • Consider biotin amplification systems for low abundance targets

    • Evaluate potential steric hindrance from the biotin conjugation affecting epitope binding

  • Experimental condition optimization:

    ParameterTroubleshooting ApproachPotential Solutions
    Antibody concentrationTitration seriesDetermine optimal concentration between 1:100-1:5000 dilution
    Incubation timeTime-course experimentTest 1h, 2h, overnight incubations
    Incubation temperatureTemperature comparisonCompare 4°C, RT, 37°C performance
    Blocking reagentBlock optimizationTest BSA, milk, serum, commercial blockers
    Wash stringencyBuffer comparisonEvaluate different wash buffer formulations
  • Application-specific variables:

    • For ELISA: Optimize coating buffer, blocking conditions, and detection system

    • For immunofluorescence: Evaluate fixation methods, permeabilization conditions

    • For Western blot: Test different blocking agents and membrane types

The biotin-conjugated antibody's optimal working dilution should be determined empirically for each experimental system, as noted in the product information , with special attention to the preservative composition (0.03% Proclin 300) which may affect certain biochemical assays.

What are the latest advances in using SMARCAL1 antibodies to study its role in innate immune signaling?

Recent research has identified SMARCAL1 as a dual regulator of innate immune signaling and potential interactions with immune checkpoint mechanisms including PD-L1 . For researchers investigating this emerging area, optimized methodological approaches include:

  • Integrative immunophenotyping approaches:

    • Combine biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies with markers of innate immune activation (STING, cGAS, IRF3)

    • Implement multi-parameter flow cytometry panels incorporating SMARCAL1 and immune checkpoint molecules

    • Develop co-immunoprecipitation protocols to identify SMARCAL1 interaction partners in immune signaling cascades

  • Genomic instability and immune activation correlation:

    • Design experiments linking SMARCAL1 function at stalled replication forks with cytosolic DNA sensing pathways

    • Develop chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) protocols using biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies to map genomic binding sites related to immune gene regulation

    • Implement CUT&RUN or CUT&Tag approaches for higher resolution chromatin association mapping

  • Cancer immunology applications:

    • Optimize multiplex immunohistochemistry protocols combining SMARCAL1 with PD-L1 and immune cell markers

    • Develop SMARCAL1 detection in circulating tumor cells as potential biomarkers

    • Establish correlative analyses between SMARCAL1 expression/localization and immune infiltration patterns

  • Methodology for studying SMARCAL1-dependent immune evasion:

    • Implement CRISPR-based SMARCAL1 functional genomics screens in cancer cells with readouts for immune recognition

    • Develop organoid or co-culture systems to examine SMARCAL1's role in tumor-immune cell interactions

    • Optimize biotin-conjugated antibody-based proximity labeling approaches to identify SMARCAL1-associated proteins in immune signaling complexes

This emerging research direction suggests SMARCAL1's functions extend beyond DNA repair to immune regulation, potentially through its role in preventing cytosolic DNA accumulation that would otherwise trigger innate immune sensing . These approaches leverage the specificity and sensitivity of biotin-conjugated antibodies for detecting SMARCAL1 in complex immunological contexts.

What are the recommended storage and handling procedures for maintaining biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibody activity?

For optimal maintenance of biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibody activity, researchers should follow these evidence-based technical guidelines:

  • Storage conditions:

    • Store unopened vials at -20°C or -80°C as recommended by manufacturers

    • After opening, aliquot the antibody into single-use volumes to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

    • For extended storage, maintain at -20°C or -80°C rather than 4°C

    • Avoid repeated freezing and thawing which can lead to antibody degradation and loss of activity

  • Working solution preparation:

    • Prepare working dilutions immediately before use rather than storing diluted antibody

    • Use appropriate diluent buffers compatible with the preservative system (0.03% Proclin 300)

    • For dilutions, use high-quality buffers free of contaminants and microbial growth

    • Consider adding carrier proteins (e.g., BSA) to very dilute antibody solutions to prevent adsorption to tubes

  • Quality control procedures:

    • Centrifuge the product if not completely clear after standing at room temperature

    • Visually inspect for precipitates or cloudiness before each use

    • Implement periodic validation testing for antibodies stored long-term

    • Document lot numbers and maintain consistency within experimental series

  • Safety considerations:

    • Handle with appropriate precautions as the preservative (Proclin 300) is classified as a poisonous and hazardous substance

    • Follow institutional guidelines for handling biohazardous materials

    • Wear appropriate personal protective equipment during handling

The manufacturer indicates the biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibody has an expiration date of one year from opening , but proper storage and handling can help maintain activity throughout this period. The antibody's formulation in 50% glycerol helps prevent freezing damage during storage at -20°C .

What optimized protocols exist for using biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies in chromatin immunoprecipitation studies?

For researchers using biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies in chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) studies, these optimized methodological guidelines can enhance experimental outcomes:

  • Sample preparation optimization:

    • Crosslinking: Use dual crosslinking with DSG (disuccinimidyl glutarate) followed by formaldehyde to capture transient chromatin interactions

    • Cell quantity: Start with 5-10 million cells for abundant targets, increase to 20 million for low abundance factors

    • Sonication parameters: Optimize sonication to generate DNA fragments of 200-500bp, verifying by gel electrophoresis

    • Pre-clearing: Implement stringent pre-clearing with protein G beads to reduce background

  • Immunoprecipitation protocol:

    • Antibody binding: For biotin-conjugated antibodies, pre-form antibody-streptavidin bead complexes before adding to chromatin

    • Streptavidin selection: Use high-capacity streptavidin magnetic beads rather than agarose for improved recovery

    • Incubation conditions: Extend incubation to overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation

    • Washing stringency: Implement increasingly stringent wash buffers to reduce non-specific binding

  • Elution and recovery optimization:

    • Biotin elution option: Consider competitive elution with free biotin for native ChIP applications

    • Reverse crosslinking: Optimize time and temperature for efficient crosslink reversal without DNA damage

    • DNA purification: Use silica column-based methods for consistent DNA recovery

    • Quality control: Implement qPCR validation of known SMARCAL1 binding sites before proceeding to sequencing

  • ChIP-seq specific considerations:

    • Input normalization: Prepare matched input controls from the same chromatin preparation

    • Library preparation: Select methods optimized for low DNA input when necessary

    • Sequencing depth: Aim for minimum 20 million uniquely mapped reads for transcription factors

    • Peak calling parameters: Optimize for expected binding patterns (broad domains vs. sharp peaks)

SMARCAL1's function at stalled replication forks suggests it may have transient chromatin associations requiring optimized crosslinking and immunoprecipitation conditions . Researchers should consider SMARCAL1's DNA fork-binding properties when designing ChIP experiments, as its chromatin association may be dependent on replication stress or specific cell cycle phases.

How can researchers quantitatively determine optimal working concentrations for biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies?

Determining the optimal working concentration for biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies requires a systematic quantitative approach:

  • Titration matrix optimization:

    • Prepare a dilution series spanning at least 3 orders of magnitude (e.g., 1:100 to 1:100,000)

    • Test each dilution against various sample concentrations to generate a response matrix

    • Plot signal-to-noise ratios rather than absolute signal intensity

    • Determine the minimal antibody concentration that provides maximal specific signal

  • Application-specific optimization protocols:

    • For ELISA:

      • Coat plates with recombinant SMARCAL1 at defined concentrations (10-1000 ng/mL)

      • Apply antibody dilution series and measure absorbance

      • Generate standard curves to determine linear detection range

      • Calculate detection limits (LOD and LOQ)

    • For Western blot:

      • Prepare serial dilutions of both antibody and protein lysates

      • Quantify band intensity using densitometry software

      • Plot signal intensity vs. antibody concentration

      • Identify concentration at which signal saturation occurs

  • Statistical determination of optimal concentration:

    • Calculate Z-factor for each concentration tested: Z = 1 - [(3σp + 3σn)/(|μp - μn|)]
      Where: σp = standard deviation of positive signal
      σn = standard deviation of negative signal
      μp = mean of positive signal
      μn = mean of negative signal

    • Select concentration with highest Z-factor (closest to 1.0)

    • Confirm reproducibility across at least three independent experiments

  • Validation in biological context:

    • Test optimized concentration in relevant biological samples (not just recombinant proteins)

    • Verify specificity using appropriate controls (SMARCAL1 knockout/knockdown)

    • Confirm linearity of detection across expected physiological concentration range

As noted in the product information, the optimal working dilution should be determined by the investigator , but this systematic approach provides a quantitative framework for optimization. For the biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibody, starting dilutions of 1:1000 for ELISA applications are typically recommended, with further optimization based on signal intensity and background levels.

How can biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies be used to investigate its role in genomic stability maintenance?

SMARCAL1's function as an ATP-dependent annealing helicase that rewinds DNA at stalled replication forks positions it as a key guardian of genomic stability . Researchers can leverage biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies to investigate this role through these methodological approaches:

  • Replication stress response analysis:

    • Use biotin-conjugated antibodies for immunofluorescence co-localization studies with γH2AX and 53BP1 following replication stress

    • Develop ELISA-based quantification of SMARCAL1 recruitment to chromatin after hydroxyurea or aphidicolin treatment

    • Implement proximity ligation assays to detect SMARCAL1 interactions with RPA, PCNA, and other fork protection components

  • Cell cycle-dependent regulation assessment:

    • Combine flow cytometry with intracellular SMARCAL1 staining using biotin-streptavidin detection systems

    • Synchronize cells and analyze SMARCAL1 chromatin association through biochemical fractionation followed by Western blot

    • Perform FUCCI-based live cell imaging with biotin-based pulse-chase labeling of SMARCAL1

  • Fork protection complex assembly studies:

    • Use biotin-conjugated antibodies for sequential ChIP experiments at known fragile sites

    • Implement in situ proximity labeling (BioID or TurboID) with SMARCAL1 as the bait protein

    • Develop single-molecule approaches combining biotin-SMARCAL1 antibodies with DNA combing techniques

  • Genomic instability phenotyping protocol:

    • Correlate SMARCAL1 expression/localization with micronuclei formation

    • Analyze sister chromatid exchange rates in cells with varying SMARCAL1 levels

    • Implement metaphase spread analysis to quantify chromosomal abnormalities in relation to SMARCAL1 function

The biotin-conjugated antibody targeting amino acids 6-277 is particularly suitable for these applications as this region contains important functional domains of SMARCAL1 involved in its annealing helicase activity. These methodologies can be adapted to study how SMARCAL1 dysfunction contributes to genomic instability in cancer and other diseases characterized by defective DNA damage response pathways.

What are the experimental considerations for studying SMARCAL1's role in cancer immunotherapy resistance?

Recent research has implicated SMARCAL1 as a dual regulator of innate immune signaling and a potential factor in PD-L1 regulation , suggesting its involvement in cancer immunotherapy resistance mechanisms. Researchers investigating this emerging area should consider these methodological approaches:

  • Immune checkpoint regulation analysis:

    • Develop co-immunoprecipitation protocols using biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies to identify interactions with immune checkpoint pathway components

    • Implement ChIP-seq to map SMARCAL1 binding at promoters/enhancers of immune checkpoint genes

    • Use siRNA/CRISPR screening with SMARCAL1 as a target to assess effects on PD-L1 expression and other immune checkpoint molecules

  • Tumor-immune microenvironment assessment:

    • Optimize multiplex immunohistochemistry protocols combining SMARCAL1 with immune cell markers and PD-L1

    • Develop flow cytometry panels for single-cell analysis of SMARCAL1 expression in relation to immune phenotypes

    • Implement spatial transcriptomics approaches to correlate SMARCAL1 activity with immune infiltration patterns

  • Therapeutic resistance mechanism investigation:

    • Design protocols to assess SMARCAL1 expression/activity before and after immunotherapy treatment

    • Develop in vitro co-culture systems to study how SMARCAL1 modulation affects T-cell killing capacity

    • Implement CRISPR-based screens to identify synthetic lethal interactions between SMARCAL1 and immune pathway components

  • Genomic instability and neoantigen generation correlation:

    • Analyze the relationship between SMARCAL1 expression, mutation burden, and neoantigen load

    • Develop organoid models with modulated SMARCAL1 expression to assess immunogenicity

    • Implement longitudinal sampling and SMARCAL1 profiling during immunotherapy treatment

These approaches leverage the specificity of biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies for detecting its expression and interactions in complex tumor microenvironments. The emerging connection between SMARCAL1 and immune regulation represents a novel area where well-characterized antibodies can help elucidate mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance and identify potential combination therapeutic strategies.

How can researchers implement biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies in cutting-edge microscopy applications?

Advanced microscopy techniques can significantly enhance our understanding of SMARCAL1's spatial and temporal dynamics. Researchers can implement biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies in state-of-the-art microscopy using these methodological approaches:

  • Super-resolution microscopy optimization:

    • STORM/PALM imaging: Use biotin-conjugated primary antibodies with streptavidin-conjugated photoswitchable fluorophores

    • SIM (Structured Illumination Microscopy): Implement multi-color imaging combining SMARCAL1 with replication fork markers

    • Expansion microscopy: Develop protocols for physical expansion of samples with biotin-streptavidin linkages preserved

    • Sample preparation optimization for maximum resolution:

      TechniqueFixation MethodBlocking StrategyDetection System
      STORM4% PFA + 0.1% glutaraldehydeBSA + glycineStreptavidin-Alexa647
      SIM4% PFA onlyCasein-based blockersStreptavidin-ATTO488
      STEDMethanol fixationBSA + fish gelatinStreptavidin-STAR635P
  • Live-cell imaging approaches:

    • Develop cell-permeable biotin-conjugated nanobodies against SMARCAL1

    • Implement SNAP/CLIP-tag fusions to SMARCAL1 for orthogonal labeling

    • Design correlative light-electron microscopy workflows using biotin-gold nanoparticle conjugates

    • Optimize live-cell compatible buffer systems that maintain streptavidin-biotin interactions

  • DNA damage response dynamics visualization:

    • Implement laser micro-irradiation with real-time SMARCAL1 recruitment tracking

    • Develop FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) protocols using biotin-streptavidin detection

    • Design FRET sensors incorporating SMARCAL1 and interaction partners

    • Optimize multi-color 4D imaging (x,y,z,t) of SMARCAL1 recruitment to damaged DNA

  • Quantitative image analysis workflows:

    • Develop machine learning algorithms for automatic detection of SMARCAL1 foci

    • Implement tracking algorithms for single-molecule imaging of SMARCAL1 dynamics

    • Design colocalization analysis pipelines with statistical validation

    • Create open-source analysis toolboxes specific for DNA repair protein dynamics

These approaches leverage the high affinity and specificity of the biotin-streptavidin interaction (Kd ≈ 10^-15 M) to achieve optimal signal-to-noise ratios in challenging microscopy applications. The biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibody provides flexibility for implementing various detection strategies with different streptavidin-conjugated probes, enabling multimodal imaging approaches to study SMARCAL1's dynamic functions in maintaining genome integrity.

How can SMARCAL1 antibodies contribute to understanding the connection between DNA repair defects and autoimmunity?

SMARCAL1 mutations cause Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia (SIOD), a disorder characterized by renal failure, immune system defects, and skeletal abnormalities. Researchers investigating the connection between DNA repair defects and autoimmunity can utilize SMARCAL1 antibodies through these methodological approaches:

  • Cell type-specific expression profiling:

    • Implement immune cell sorting followed by SMARCAL1 quantification using biotin-conjugated antibodies

    • Develop tissue microarray analysis of SMARCAL1 expression across immune organs in health and disease

    • Design flow cytometry panels to correlate SMARCAL1 levels with immune cell activation states

    • Create reference datasets of normal SMARCAL1 expression across immune cell lineages

  • DNA damage-immune signaling axis investigation:

    • Design protocols to simultaneously detect DNA damage markers and cytosolic DNA sensors

    • Implement ChIP-seq to identify SMARCAL1 binding sites near immune response genes

    • Develop assays to measure cGAS-STING pathway activation in relation to SMARCAL1 dysfunction

    • Create reporter systems to monitor interferon responses upon SMARCAL1 modulation

  • Autoantibody development and characterization:

    • Screen autoimmune patient cohorts for anti-SMARCAL1 autoantibodies

    • Develop protocols to distinguish between pathogenic and non-pathogenic anti-SMARCAL1 antibodies

    • Create immunoassays to monitor anti-SMARCAL1 antibody titers as disease biomarkers

    • Implement epitope mapping to identify immunodominant regions of SMARCAL1

  • Therapeutic targeting strategies:

    • Design screens for small molecules that modulate SMARCAL1 activity

    • Develop cell-based assays to identify compounds that rescue SMARCAL1 deficiency phenotypes

    • Implement protein replacement strategies for SMARCAL1-deficient cells

    • Create genetic models for testing targeted therapeutics in SMARCAL1-related disorders

The biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibody targeting amino acids 6-277 is particularly valuable for these applications, as this region contains domains important for SMARCAL1's function in preventing cytosolic DNA accumulation that would otherwise trigger autoimmune responses. These methodologies can elucidate the mechanisms by which DNA repair deficiencies lead to autoimmune phenotypes and identify potential therapeutic interventions.

What are the considerations for using SMARCAL1 antibodies in high-throughput screening applications?

High-throughput screening approaches can accelerate discovery of SMARCAL1 modulators and interaction partners. Researchers implementing such screens should consider these methodological optimizations:

  • Automated immunoassay development:

    • Optimize biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies for 384/1536-well plate formats

    • Develop homogeneous assay formats (no-wash) using time-resolved FRET

    • Implement bead-based multiplexed detection systems compatible with biotin-streptavidin

    • Design quality control metrics for assay performance:

      ParameterAcceptance CriterionOptimization Strategy
      Z' factor>0.5Buffer optimization, signal amplification
      CV%<15%Automated liquid handling, edge effect mitigation
      S/B ratio>3Blocking optimization, detection system selection
      DMSO toleranceUp to 1%Carrier protein addition, DMSO pre-dilution
  • Compound screening workflow optimization:

    • Develop cell-based reporter systems for SMARCAL1 activity

    • Implement high-content imaging approaches to monitor SMARCAL1 localization

    • Design counter-screens to eliminate false positives targeting the biotin-streptavidin system

    • Create data analysis pipelines for multiparametric phenotypic screening

  • Protein interaction screening protocols:

    • Optimize biotin-conjugated antibodies for protein microarray applications

    • Develop luminescent proximity assays (AlphaScreen) for detecting SMARCAL1 interactions

    • Implement biotin-based pull-down systems compatible with mass spectrometry

    • Design split-reporter systems for validating SMARCAL1 protein-protein interactions

  • Library design and screening strategy:

    • Develop focused libraries targeting DNA repair pathways

    • Implement fragment-based screening approaches for SMARCAL1 modulators

    • Design phenotypic screens based on SMARCAL1 cellular functions

    • Create natural product libraries enriched for chromatin-targeting compounds

These approaches leverage the high specificity of biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies and the amplification potential of the biotin-streptavidin system to achieve robust signal detection in high-throughput formats. When implementing such screens, researchers should carefully optimize detection parameters to ensure consistency across large sample sets and minimize edge effects common in plate-based assays.

How can computational approaches enhance the utility of SMARCAL1 antibody-based research?

Integrating computational methods with experimental data from SMARCAL1 antibody studies can significantly enhance research outcomes. Researchers should consider implementing these computational approaches:

  • Epitope prediction and antibody design optimization:

    • Implement in silico epitope prediction to identify optimal SMARCAL1 regions for antibody development

    • Use structural modeling to assess epitope accessibility in different SMARCAL1 conformational states

    • Develop algorithms to predict potential cross-reactivity with structurally similar proteins

  • Image analysis automation:

    • Develop deep learning models for automated detection of SMARCAL1 foci in microscopy images

    • Implement computer vision algorithms for colocalization analysis

    • Create unsupervised clustering approaches for identifying SMARCAL1 spatial distribution patterns

    • Design temporal analysis workflows for time-lapse microscopy data

  • Multi-omics data integration frameworks:

    • Develop computational pipelines to integrate SMARCAL1 ChIP-seq with transcriptomics data

    • Implement network analysis approaches to position SMARCAL1 in protein interaction networks

    • Create systems biology models of SMARCAL1's role in DNA damage response pathways

    • Design machine learning approaches to predict cellular outcomes based on SMARCAL1 status

  • Benchmarking and standardization tools:

    • Develop computational tools for antibody validation metric standardization

    • Implement database systems for sharing SMARCAL1 antibody validation data

    • Create automated workflows for comparing antibody performance across platforms

    • Design visualization tools for complex SMARCAL1 functional data

These computational approaches complement experimental methods using biotin-conjugated SMARCAL1 antibodies by enhancing data interpretation, reducing experimental bias, and accelerating discovery. The integration of computational and experimental approaches is particularly valuable for understanding complex biological systems like DNA damage response networks where SMARCAL1 plays a critical role in maintaining genomic stability .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.