UniGene: Dr.152033
Applications : Immunohistochemical staining
Sample type: Cells
Review: Analysis for SMIM1 and ANXA7 expression in a cohort of LC, HCC and HC, respectively. The protein expression was calculated from mass spectrometry data and the signifi cant difference analysis were conducted between groups; E- F, The expression trend of SMIM1 and ANXA7 during the tumorigenesis were verifi ed with PRM strategy with another batch of clinical samples from LC (N=9), HCC (N=11) and HC (N=10); G. Immunostaining for SMIM1 in normal liver and HCC tissue.
SMIM1 encodes a 78-amino acid erythroid transmembrane protein that carries the Vel blood group antigen. It is highly expressed in bone marrow and at lower levels in non-hematopoietic tissues . The protein has a molecular mass of 8.7 kDa and is localized in the cell membrane . SMIM1 functions as a regulator of red blood cell formation and belongs to the small integral membrane protein family . The gene is conserved across multiple species including mouse, rat, bovine, frog, zebrafish, and chimpanzee .
SMIM1 is a type II transmembrane protein with its short C-terminus located extracellularly and the bulk of the polypeptide in the cytoplasm . This orientation places the Vel blood group antigen on the C-terminal domain, which is estimated to contain only 3-12 amino acid residues exposed on the cell surface . SMIM1 most likely belongs to the tail-anchored class of membrane proteins . The transmembrane orientation was initially debated, with experimental data supporting both N- and C-termini being extracellular, but studies using cell-free systems and HEK293T/17 cells have confirmed its type II orientation .
The Vel-negative (Vel−) phenotype is predominantly caused by a homozygous 17-nucleotide deletion in the coding sequence of SMIM1 . This deletion can be detected through PCR-RFLP analysis as it encompasses a StyI restriction site . Among 70 Vel-negative subjects tested, 68 were homozygous for this deletion while two were heterozygous . Additionally, novel mutations such as the c.161T>C (p.Leu54Pro) missense mutation in the transmembrane region have been identified, resulting in very weak Vel expression on red blood cells .
Various types of anti-SMIM1 antibodies are commercially available including:
Non-conjugated/unconjugated antibodies
HRP-conjugated antibodies
Biotin-conjugated antibodies
Polyclonal antibodies (such as those raised against amino acids 1-15 in SMIM1)
Monoclonal antibodies (including human IgG monoclonal anti-Vel)
These antibodies are suitable for multiple applications including ELISA, immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunofluorescence (IF), and flow cytometry .
A comprehensive validation approach should include:
Positive and negative controls: Use Vel-positive and Vel-negative red blood cells or cell lines transfected with SMIM1 cDNA versus empty vector controls .
Western blot validation: Verify that the antibody detects a protein of the expected molecular weight (~8.7 kDa), noting that SMIM1 runs at distinctly different molecular weights under reducing and non-reducing conditions due to its ability to form disulfide-bonded complexes .
Flow cytometry: Compare cell surface expression patterns between Vel-positive and Vel-negative samples or transfected cell lines .
Cross-reactivity testing: Test against cell lines expressing related membrane proteins to ensure specificity.
Peptide blocking: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide to confirm specificity of binding.
For flow cytometry analysis of SMIM1/Vel antigen expression:
Sample preparation: Prepare single-cell suspensions from red blood cells or relevant cell lines (e.g., K-562 erythroleukemia cells).
Antibody dilution: Use primary anti-SMIM1/anti-Vel antibodies at appropriate dilutions (e.g., 1:100 for anti-opsin tag antibodies when using tagged constructs) .
Secondary antibody: Apply appropriate fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies (e.g., APC-conjugated goat-anti-mouse IgG at 1:200) .
Controls: Include isotype controls, Vel-negative cells, and cells transfected with empty vectors as negative controls .
Analysis considerations: Be aware that Vel expression shows significant loss during enucleation and reticulocyte maturation, resulting in variable antigen density on mature RBCs .
For optimal IHC detection of SMIM1:
Dilution range: Use anti-SMIM1 antibodies at dilutions of 1:50 to 1:200 depending on the antibody and sample type .
Antigen retrieval: Apply appropriate antigen retrieval methods based on fixation protocol.
Detection system: Use a sensitive detection system appropriate for the primary antibody species.
Tissues of interest: Focus particularly on bone marrow and erythroid lineage cells where SMIM1 is highly expressed, but also test in non-hematopoietic tissues for comparative analysis .
Validation: Cross-validate with complementary techniques such as flow cytometry or western blotting.
SMIM1 undergoes several post-translational modifications that can impact antibody binding:
Phosphorylation: SMIM1 has multiple phosphorylation sites in its N-terminal region that regulate SMIM1 protein levels during erythropoiesis .
Acetylation: The initiating methionine of SMIM1 is acetylated .
Potential glycosylation: SMIM1 may have glycosylation sites that affect its apparent molecular weight in SDS-PAGE and may influence antibody recognition .
Disulfide bond formation: SMIM1 can form molecular complexes (likely homodimers) via disulfide bonds, which dramatically affects its migration pattern in non-reducing versus reducing conditions .
Researchers should consider using antibodies that target epitopes unlikely to be affected by these modifications or use multiple antibodies targeting different regions of the protein.
A comprehensive approach to studying SMIM1 mutations includes:
Genotyping methods:
Expression systems:
Protein analysis:
Western blotting to compare expression levels and molecular weights
Flow cytometry to quantify cell surface expression of Vel antigen
Functional studies:
SMIM1 can form molecular complexes, likely homodimers, via disulfide bonds . This has important implications for research:
Sample preparation: Compare reducing vs. non-reducing conditions in protein analysis to determine the native state of SMIM1 in cell membranes.
Epitope accessibility: Consider that SMIM1 conformation/multimerization within the membrane may affect Vel antigen recognition during terminal differentiation .
Antibody selection: Choose antibodies that can recognize monomeric forms, multimeric complexes, or both depending on research questions.
Biochemical analysis: Use techniques such as blue native PAGE, chemical crosslinking, or co-immunoprecipitation to study SMIM1 complexes.
SMIM1 antibodies offer significant advantages for Vel blood group typing:
Recombinant antibodies: Production of recombinant anti-Vel antibodies (such as the anti-Vel IgM antibody) provides unlimited availability and improves diagnostics in correctly typing for the Vel blood group .
Flow cytometry applications: Anti-SMIM1 antibodies can discriminate between Vel-weak and Vel-negative donors, which is crucial for safe blood transfusions .
Complementary approach: Combine serological typing using anti-SMIM1 antibodies with DNA-based genotyping of the 17-bp deletion for comprehensive screening .
Reference standards: Use of K-562 cells stably transfected with SMIM1 cDNA as positive control cells for anti-Vel identification and standardization .
Researchers face several challenges when studying SMIM1:
Protein size and conformation: SMIM1 is small (78 amino acids) and resistant to trypsin digestion despite containing several arginine and lysine residues, making standard proteomics approaches difficult .
Antibody specificity: The small size of SMIM1 and its single transmembrane domain limits the number of potential epitopes, making antibody specificity crucial .
Variable expression: Vel antigen expression is variable among individuals and during erythropoiesis, requiring sensitive detection methods .
Migration patterns: SMIM1 does not migrate at its theoretical molecular weight (8.749 kDa) in SDS-PAGE even under reducing conditions, potentially due to post-translational modifications or the behavior of hydrophobic transmembrane domains in SDS .
Protein purification: The unusual biochemical properties of SMIM1 make its purification challenging, requiring specialized approaches .
| Characteristic | Details | Implications for Antibody Research |
|---|---|---|
| Protein size | 78 amino acids, 8.7 kDa | Limited epitope availability |
| Membrane topology | Type II, C-terminus extracellular | C-terminal antibodies detect cell surface Vel antigen |
| Post-translational modifications | Phosphorylation, acetylation | May affect antibody recognition |
| Complex formation | Disulfide-bonded complexes | Different migration in reducing vs. non-reducing conditions |
| Vel antigen location | C-terminal 3-12 amino acids | Specific area for anti-Vel antibody targeting |
| Expression pattern | High in bone marrow, variable in mature RBCs | Consider cell type when optimizing detection |