sox3-a Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
sox3-a antibody; sox3 antibody; Transcription factor Sox-3-A antibody; xSox3 antibody; xSox-B1 antibody
Target Names
sox3-a
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Sox3 is a transcription factor that exhibits sequence-specific DNA binding activity. It binds to the consensus sequence 5'-[AT][AT]CAA[AT]G-3', demonstrating a preference for 5'-AACAAT-3' and 5'-AACAAAG-3'. Sox3 functions as an inhibitor of beta-catenin-mediated dorsal axis specification by binding to sites within the promoter of the beta-catenin-regulated gene nodal5. It plays a maternal role as a transcriptional repressor of nodal5 and nodal6, restricting their expression to the vegetal hemisphere of early embryos, thus establishing germ layer formation. Sox3 exerts its inhibitory effects on nodal signaling at multiple points. It represses the expression of other mesoderm-inducing nodal genes, including nodal, nodal2, and nodal4. Furthermore, it acts downstream to induce the expression of genes such as trim33/ectodermin, ema, and coco, whose products further repress nodal signaling.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. XSeb4R protein binds specifically to the 3'UTR of Sox3 mRNA. Gain-of-function studies involving XSeb4R in ectodermal explants have revealed increased stability of the maternal Sox3 transcripts, leading to robust Sox3 protein production. PMID: 22261149
  2. Knockdown of Oct91 inhibits neural induction triggered by either Sox2 or Sox3. PMID: 21147085
  3. Sox3, localized to the animal pole, functions to inhibit Nodal (Xnr5 and Xnr6) expression and induces the expression of genes (Ectodermin, Xema, and Coco) whose products suppress Nodal signaling. PMID: 17608734
  4. Research findings demonstrate that both sox3 and sox2 are induced in response to BMP antagonism, albeit through distinct mechanisms. The activation of both genes is independent of FGF signaling; however, both require FGF for the maintenance of their expression. PMID: 18031719
Database Links

KEGG: xla:399335

UniGene: Xl.22

Subcellular Location
Nucleus. Cytoplasm. Note=Primarily cytoplasmic in early embryos. Nuclear localization becomes more pronounced as development proceeds.
Tissue Specificity
Expression is restricted to the animal hemisphere of the uncleaved egg and early cleavage embryos. In late blastula and gastrula stages, expressed in the dorsal animal and marginal zone. In neurula stages, expressed in the developing central nervous syste

Q&A

What is SOX3 and what cellular functions make it an important research target?

SOX3 is a transcription factor belonging to the SOX (SRY-related HMG-box) family that plays critical roles in neural development from the earliest stages. The protein functions as a switch in neuronal development by maintaining neural cells in an undifferentiated state through counteraction of proneural proteins . SOX3 is also required for normal development of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis and is involved in craniofacial morphogenesis through its expression within pharyngeal epithelia . In male development, SOX3 controls a genetic switch necessary for initiating sex determination by directing the development of supporting cell precursors (pre-Sertoli cells) .

Research methodology considerations:

  • When studying SOX3, focus on early developmental timepoints as it is one of the earliest neural markers in vertebrates

  • Consider both gain-of-function and loss-of-function approaches as both over- and underdosage of SOX3 can affect development

  • Remember that SOX3 expression is predominantly nuclear, which affects sample preparation protocols

What are the optimal applications for SOX3 antibodies in developmental biology research?

Based on validated research applications, SOX3 antibodies are most effectively used in:

ApplicationValidated DilutionsSample TypesSpecial Considerations
Western Blot (WB)0.1 μg/mL to 1:500 Cell lysates, tissue extractsExpected band at ~45 kDa
Immunocytochemistry (ICC/IF)5-15 μg/mL or 1:200-1:500 Fixed cells (especially neuronal lineages)Nuclear localization expected
Immunohistochemistry (IHC-P)1:500 Paraffin-embedded tissues (brain, pituitary)Citrate buffer (pH 6.0) recommended for antigen retrieval
ELISAVaries by antibodyRecombinant proteinsNo cross-reactivity with SOX2, 7, 10, or 17

Methodology tip: For developmental studies, SOX3 expression has been successfully detected in the telencephalic ventricular zone at 13.5 dpc in mice, making this an excellent positive control tissue .

How can I validate SOX3 antibody specificity for my experimental system?

Thorough validation of SOX3 antibodies is critical due to potential cross-reactivity with other SOX family members. Implement these methodological approaches:

  • Positive/negative cell line controls: Use U-251 MG human glioblastoma cells as a positive control and HDLM-2 human Hodgkin's lymphoma cells as a negative control for SOX3 expression .

  • Genetic validation: Compare staining between wild-type and Sox3-null cells to confirm antibody specificity .

  • Expression pattern analysis: Verify nuclear localization pattern in neural progenitors, as SOX3 should show specific nuclear staining in these cells .

  • Western blot validation: Confirm a single band at approximately 45 kDa (calculated molecular weight) when testing cell lysates .

  • Cross-reactivity testing: If studying multiple SOX proteins, verify that your antibody does not cross-react with other family members, particularly SOX2 which has high sequence homology .

What methodological approaches are recommended for studying SOX3 protein-level changes in mutant models?

Research with SOX3 mutant models reveals important technical considerations for antibody-based studies:

  • Transcript vs. protein discrepancies: SOX3-26ala mutant models demonstrate that transcript levels can remain unchanged while protein levels are dramatically reduced, necessitating both RNA (qPCR/ISH) and protein (WB/IHC) analyses for complete characterization .

  • Detection sensitivity: For mutants with reduced SOX3 expression, extend Western blot exposure times (both short 3-minute and long 30-minute exposures are recommended) to detect low protein levels .

  • Chimeric analysis approach: When working with chimeric embryos (e.g., Sox3-26ala ↔ WT), process tissues on the same slide to enable direct comparison between mutant and wild-type cells under identical staining conditions .

  • Nuclear extraction protocols: Since SOX3 is predominantly nuclear, prepare nuclear extracts rather than whole cell lysates for more sensitive detection of protein level changes in mutant models .

  • Quantification methods: Normalize protein levels appropriately; for Sox3-26ala studies, data was successfully normalized to Sox3 levels in Sox3-Neo control cells with SEM reported across three experimental replicates .

How do different fixation and sample preparation methods affect SOX3 antibody performance?

Sample preparation significantly impacts SOX3 antibody performance:

MethodRecommended ProtocolAdvantagesLimitations
ImmunocytochemistryImmersion fixation for cell lines; 4% paraformaldehyde fixation at room temperature for 15 minutes Preserves nuclear localization signalExtended fixation may reduce antibody accessibility
Tissue immunohistochemistryParaffin embedding with citrate buffer (pH 6.0) antigen retrieval for 15 minutes Enables co-localization with other markersMay require optimization for different tissue types
Western blottingNuclear extraction recommended for enrichment Improved sensitivity for detecting low expression levelsAdditional preparation time compared to whole cell lysates

Advanced methodology: For dual immunofluorescence studies with SOX3, successful protocols have used NorthernLights™ 493-conjugated or 557-conjugated secondary antibodies with DAPI counterstaining to visualize nuclear localization . This approach enables co-localization studies with other developmental markers.

What are the critical considerations when using SOX3 antibodies to study embryonic neural development?

Studying SOX3 during embryonic neural development presents specific technical challenges:

  • Developmental timing: SOX3 expression is dynamic during development. For neural studies, expression is robust in the 13.5 dpc telencephalic ventricular zone in mice . Time course experiments are recommended to capture temporal expression patterns.

  • Cell type heterogeneity: SOX3 expression varies significantly between neural progenitors (high expression) and differentiated neurons (downregulated). Single-cell approaches or co-staining with progenitor/differentiation markers is recommended .

  • Chimeric analysis: For developmental studies comparing mutant and wild-type cells, chimeric embryos provide valuable internal controls. Process adjacent 10 μm sections for immunostaining and in situ hybridization to compare protein and transcript levels .

  • Differentiation protocols: When studying SOX3 during neural differentiation in vitro, established protocols include differentiating ES cells in CDM as multi-cellular bodies for 5 days or in N2B27 for 4 days to form neural progenitors .

  • Antibody penetration: For thick tissue sections or whole-mount embryonic samples, extended incubation times (up to 3 hours at room temperature) with primary antibody have been successfully employed .

How can functional studies of SOX3 complement antibody-based detection methods?

To fully characterize SOX3 function beyond expression analysis:

  • Transcriptional activity assays: Luciferase reporter assays using SOX3 expression vectors can assess transactivation function of wild-type and mutant SOX3 proteins. COS-7 cells have been successfully used with this approach .

  • Subcellular localization studies: Mutations in SOX3 can affect nuclear localization. Combined immunofluorescence with nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation followed by Western blotting provides comprehensive analysis of localization defects .

  • Protein stability assessment: For mutants with reduced protein levels despite normal transcript levels (e.g., SOX3-26ala), protein stability can be assessed by treating cells with proteasome inhibitors to determine if protein degradation is accelerated .

  • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP): While not explicitly mentioned in the search results, ChIP using SOX3 antibodies would be an appropriate method to identify genomic binding sites and target genes.

  • Co-immunoprecipitation: To identify protein interaction partners of SOX3, co-IP protocols using SOX3 antibodies have been applied in developmental studies to understand the mechanism of SOX3 action .

What methodological approaches are recommended for studying SOX3 in human pituitary disorders?

Research linking SOX3 to human pituitary disorders requires specialized approaches:

  • Dosage assessment: Both over- and underdosage of SOX3 is associated with infundibular hypoplasia and hypopituitarism, necessitating quantitative approaches to assess gene copy number and expression levels .

  • Mutation screening: Techniques such as polyalanine tract expansion analysis should be considered, as a seven-alanine expansion within SOX3's polyalanine tract has been identified in patients with panhypopituitarism .

  • Interphase FISH: For detecting SOX3 duplications, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization using human genomic BAC clones containing the SOX3 gene has been successfully applied to patient samples .

  • Functional consequences: For identified mutations, transactivation assays and subcellular localization studies should be performed to assess functional consequences, as the seven-alanine expansion resulted in reduced transcriptional activity and impaired nuclear localization .

  • Family studies: When analyzing SOX3 mutations in patients with hypopituitarism, screening mothers of affected males is recommended to identify possible carriers of duplications involving SOX3 .

What are common issues when using SOX3 antibodies and how can they be resolved?

IssuePossible CausesRecommended Solutions
Weak or absent signalLow SOX3 expressionUse enrichment methods like nuclear extraction; increase antibody concentration or incubation time
Multiple bands in Western blotCross-reactivity or degradationValidate with SOX3-null controls; use fresh samples and protease inhibitors
High backgroundNon-specific bindingOptimize blocking conditions; validate dilution ratios; use antigen pre-absorption
Inconsistent results between experimentsVariable expression levelsInclude established positive control cells (U-251 MG) and negative control cells (HDLM-2)
Cytoplasmic rather than nuclear stainingFixation issuesOptimize fixation time; ensure proper nuclear permeabilization

Advanced troubleshooting: For challenging samples with low SOX3 expression, comparison of different SOX3 antibodies targeting distinct epitopes may improve detection. Antibodies targeting the N-terminal region (AA 4-118) , middle region (AA 84-206) , and C-terminal region of SOX3 are available and may have different sensitivities depending on protein conformation and epitope accessibility.

How can SOX3 antibody protocols be optimized for different experimental systems?

Optimization strategies for different experimental systems:

  • Cell lines: For immunocytochemistry in cell lines, 5-15 μg/mL antibody concentration with 3-hour room temperature incubation has been validated for both positive (U-251 MG) and negative (HDLM-2) control cell lines .

  • Tissue sections: For paraffin-embedded tissues, antigen retrieval using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 15 minutes followed by primary antibody incubation at 1:200-1:500 dilution has been effective .

  • Western blot: For detecting recombinant SOX3, 0.1 μg/mL antibody concentration is recommended, while for endogenous SOX3, higher concentrations may be necessary depending on expression levels .

  • Developmental studies: For embryonic tissues with dynamic SOX3 expression, optimization of fixation time is critical, as overfixation can mask epitopes while underfixation can compromise tissue morphology .

  • Neural differentiation models: For in vitro differentiation systems, comparing SOX3 expression between undifferentiated and differentiated states requires consistent sample preparation and loading controls appropriate for changes in cellular composition .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.