Structure: 300 amino acids, composed of α-helices and β-sheets, with a predicted nuclear localization signal (amino acids 174–191) .
Post-translational modifications: Includes phosphorylation (e.g., at Ser113), N-glycosylation, and a GPI-anchor site .
Isoforms: Two potential isoforms, though only the 30 kDa isoform is experimentally confirmed .
SPATS1 antibodies are utilized across diverse experimental techniques:
SPATS1 is highly expressed in spermatocytes, Sertoli cells, and spermatogonia during early testis development but declines in adulthood .
Knockout mouse models (Spats1−/−) showed no overt fertility defects, suggesting compensatory mechanisms or species-specific functions .
Male Infertility: Reduced SPATS1 levels correlate with impaired spermatogenesis in humans .
Testicular Cancer: SPATS1 mutations are linked to seminomas, though causality remains unproven .
Proposed as a negative regulator of the canonical Wnt pathway, though mouse studies found no significant impact on Wnt target genes .
Sample Handling: Aliquot antibodies to avoid freeze-thaw cycles; store at -20°C .
Cross-Reactivity: Most antibodies are human-specific; murine reactivity is limited .
Controls: Include protein lysates from SPATS1-expressing tissues (e.g., testes) for WB validation .
SPATS1 is conserved across vertebrates, with studies in Pelodiscus sinensis (soft-shelled turtle) highlighting its male-specific expression and role in spermatogenesis . Phylogenetic analysis groups SPATS1 with reptiles and mammals, underscoring its functional conservation .
SPATS1 (spermatogenesis-associated, serine-rich 1) is an evolutionarily conserved, testis-specific protein that is differentially expressed during male meiotic prophase. The protein was first detected in embryo testes at 17.5-18 days post-coitum (dpc) and reaches maximum expression levels at 21 days postpartum (dpp), coinciding with the pachytene stage of meiosis . SPATS1 is of particular research interest because some studies have suggested potential links between SPATS1 underexpression/mutation and human pathologies such as male infertility and testicular cancer . SPATS1 is highly conserved across metazoans, suggesting an important evolutionary role, though recent knockout studies have revealed it is not individually essential for mouse fertility .
Researchers have access to several types of SPATS1 antibodies, including polyclonal antibodies such as the Rabbit Polyclonal Anti-SPATS1 Antibody, which targets human SPATS1 at a concentration of 0.4 mg/ml . These antibodies are typically validated for multiple applications including immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunocytochemistry-immunofluorescence (ICC-IF), and Western blotting (WB) . Additionally, antibodies used in ELISA kits are available for the quantitative detection of SPATS1 in various sample types .
SPATS1 antibodies can be used to analyze various biological samples including cell culture supernatants, serum, plasma, and other biological fluids . In research contexts, these antibodies have been used to detect SPATS1 in tissue sections (particularly testicular tissue), cell lysates, and protein extracts. The selection of appropriate sample preparation methods depends on the specific application (IHC, Western blot, or ELISA) and should be optimized based on the antibody manufacturer's recommendations .
When designing Western blot experiments for SPATS1 detection, follow these methodological steps for optimal results:
Determine linear range: First establish the linear range for your specific SPATS1 antibody by performing serial 1:2 dilutions of your sample in Laemmli buffer .
Sample loading design: Counterbalance sample positions across the gel by treatment condition to minimize position-based artifacts. Load approximately 15 μg of total protein per sample in separate lanes on a precast 10-20% Tris-HCl polyacrylamide gel .
Electrophoresis conditions: Run the gel at 200V for approximately 30 minutes in SDS buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS, pH 8.3) .
Membrane transfer: Transfer proteins to a nitrocellulose membrane in cold transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 20% ethanol, pH 8.3). Confirm transfer using Ponceau S stain followed by blocking in appropriate blocking buffer .
Antibody incubation: Block the membrane for 1 hour in blocking buffer containing 0.1% Tween-20, then incubate overnight with primary SPATS1 antibody at 4°C (typically at 1:1000-1:2000 dilution) .
Detection: After washing, incubate with appropriate secondary antibody (such as IRdye-labeled goat anti-rabbit at 1:30,000) for 1 hour, then wash thoroughly before imaging .
Technical replicates: For rigorous results, run at least three independent replications and use appropriate loading controls like beta-actin for covariance correction .
When utilizing SPATS1 ELISA kits for quantitative analysis, consider the following methodological aspects:
Assay principle: SPATS1 ELISA kits typically employ a two-site sandwich ELISA methodology. The microplate is pre-coated with an antibody specific for SPATS1, and samples are added so that any SPATS1 present binds to the immobilized antibody .
Procedure overview: After sample binding, a biotin-conjugated SPATS1-specific antibody is added, followed by Streptavidin-HRP. A substrate solution creates color development proportional to SPATS1 concentration, which is measured colorimetrically .
Sample preparation: Ensure proper sample preparation—SPATS1 can be measured in cell culture supernatants, plasma, serum, and other biological fluids. Each sample type may require specific preparation protocols .
Duration consideration: The assay involves multiple steps with a working time of approximately 3-5 hours, depending on operator experience .
Specificity: Select kits with validated specificity showing no significant cross-reactivity or interference between human SPATS1 and analogues .
Controls: Always include appropriate standards and controls to establish a reliable standard curve for accurate quantification .
Validating SPATS1 antibody specificity is crucial for experimental reliability. Implement these methodological approaches:
Positive and negative controls: Use tissue samples known to express SPATS1 (such as testicular tissue) as positive controls, and non-expressing tissues as negative controls. Based on current research, SPATS1 is primarily expressed in testicular tissues, with highest levels in primary spermatocytes .
Knockout validation: The gold standard for antibody validation is testing in SPATS1 knockout models. Researchers have generated Spats1 loss-of-function mouse models using CRISPR/Cas9 technology which can serve as excellent negative controls .
Multiple detection methods: Validate antibody specificity across multiple platforms (Western blot, IHC, ICC-IF) to ensure consistent detection patterns .
Peptide competition: Perform peptide competition assays where pre-incubation of the antibody with its immunizing peptide should abolish specific signal.
Alternative antibodies: When possible, compare results using alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes of SPATS1 to confirm detection pattern consistency .
To investigate correlations between SPATS1 expression and fertility parameters, consider this research methodology:
Sample collection: Obtain appropriate samples from subjects with varying fertility statuses. Previous research has examined SPATS1 expression in men with severely impaired spermatogenesis compared to controls .
Expression analysis methods:
Quantitative RT-PCR for SPATS1 mRNA expression
Western blot for protein expression using validated SPATS1 antibodies
Immunohistochemistry on testicular biopsies to analyze cellular localization patterns
Correlation with fertility parameters: Analyze SPATS1 expression in relation to:
Sperm concentration and motility parameters
Spermatogenesis stages using histological analysis
Hormonal profiles (testosterone, FSH, LH)
Statistical approach: Implement appropriate statistical methods to establish correlations:
Comparative analysis: Although Spats1 knockout mice showed no overt fertility phenotype , human studies suggest decreased expression in men with impaired spermatogenesis, indicating possible species-specific differences that warrant careful comparative analysis.
Current research presents an interesting contradiction: while some human studies suggest associations between SPATS1 underexpression and fertility issues, knockout mouse models show no fertility phenotype . To address this contradiction:
Species-specific investigations:
Compare SPATS1 expression patterns across species (human, mouse, rat, bovine)
Analyze protein interaction partners that might differ between species
Investigate compensatory mechanisms that might exist in mice but not humans
Multifactorial analysis:
Investigate SPATS1 in combination with other fertility-related genes
Examine environmental factors that might interact with SPATS1 function
Study SPATS1 in various genetic backgrounds to identify potential modifier genes
Functional genomics approaches:
Environmental and physiological stress models:
Clinical correlations:
Design larger cohort studies in humans with fertility issues
Perform exome sequencing to identify SPATS1 mutations in infertile populations
Correlate with specific clinical parameters of infertility
To investigate potential connections between SPATS1 and testicular cancer:
Expression analysis in cancer samples:
Genetic analysis approaches:
Screen for SPATS1 mutations in testicular cancer samples, particularly seminomas, as exome-wide sequencing studies have suggested possible associations
Perform targeted sequencing of SPATS1 in large cohorts of testicular cancer patients
Analyze copy number variations that might affect SPATS1 expression
Functional studies:
Develop cell culture models with SPATS1 knockdown/overexpression in testicular cell lines
Assess changes in proliferation, migration, and invasion capacity
Investigate potential involvement in the Wnt signaling pathway, which has been suggested in previous research and is often dysregulated in cancer
Animal models:
Integration of multi-omics data:
Correlate SPATS1 expression/mutation data with broader genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic profiles of testicular cancers
Identify potential biomarker signatures that include SPATS1
When working with SPATS1 antibodies in Western blot experiments, researchers may encounter these common issues:
Weak or no signal:
Solution: Optimize antibody concentration through titration experiments
Solution: Increase protein loading (up to 30μg) while ensuring you remain in the linear range
Solution: Extend primary antibody incubation time to overnight at 4°C
Solution: Verify sample preparation method preserves SPATS1 integrity (avoid excessive freeze-thaw cycles)
High background:
Multiple bands or unexpected band size:
Solution: Verify antibody specificity using knockout controls if available
Solution: Consider post-translational modifications, as SPATS1 is highly phosphorylatable
Solution: Adjust gel percentage to better resolve proteins in the expected molecular weight range
Solution: Consider alternative antibodies targeting different epitopes of SPATS1
Inconsistent results between replicates:
Solution: Implement technical triplicates as recommended for Western blot reproducibility
Solution: Counterbalance sample positions across the gel by treatment condition
Solution: Use appropriate loading controls and statistical analysis as covariates
Solution: Standardize all steps of the protocol including sample preparation, protein quantification, and loading
To optimize SPATS1 immunohistochemistry across various tissue types:
Fixation optimization:
For testicular tissue (primary SPATS1 expression site), optimize fixation time (typically 24-48 hours in 10% neutral buffered formalin)
Consider alternative fixatives such as Bouin's solution for better morphological preservation of testicular tissues
For frozen sections, fixation in cold acetone or 4% paraformaldehyde can preserve antigenicity
Antigen retrieval methods:
Compare heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER) using citrate buffer (pH 6.0) versus EDTA buffer (pH 9.0)
Optimize retrieval time (typically 10-30 minutes) and method (microwave, pressure cooker, or water bath)
For testicular tissue, gentler retrieval methods may be preferred to preserve morphology
Blocking and antibody conditions:
Test various blocking solutions (BSA, normal serum, commercial blockers)
Determine optimal primary antibody dilution (typically starting at 1:100-1:500 for IHC)
Optimize incubation conditions (1 hour at room temperature versus overnight at 4°C)
Detection system selection:
Compare different detection systems (ABC, polymer-based) for sensitivity and specificity
For dual staining to co-localize with other proteins, select compatible detection systems with distinct chromogens
Consider fluorescent detection for co-localization studies with other testicular markers
Controls and validation:
For rigorous statistical analysis of SPATS1 expression data:
Experimental design considerations:
Appropriate statistical models:
For simple comparisons between two groups, use t-tests with Welch's correction for unequal variances if necessary
For multiple groups, employ ANOVA followed by appropriate post-hoc tests (Tukey, Bonferroni)
For complex designs, consider linear mixed models that can account for both fixed and random effects
Covariate incorporation:
Effect size and power analysis:
Reporting standards:
Based on current knowledge gaps and contradictory findings, several promising research directions emerge:
Molecular function characterization:
Investigate the molecular function of SPATS1 through protein interaction studies
Explore its reported connections to the Wnt signaling pathway and determine if this relationship is tissue-specific
Characterize the significance of its high phosphorylation potential and identify key phosphorylation sites
Species-specific roles:
Clinical associations:
Regulatory mechanisms:
Study the transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of SPATS1
Investigate epigenetic mechanisms controlling its testis-specific expression
Examine how environmental factors might influence SPATS1 expression and function
Therapeutic implications:
Explore whether modulation of SPATS1 could have therapeutic applications in certain forms of male infertility
Investigate potential as a target in testicular cancer cases with SPATS1 mutations