SPL19 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Molecular and Functional Characteristics of SPL19

SPL19 belongs to the SPL family, which is characterized by a conserved SBP domain (approximately 76 amino acids) involved in DNA binding . Key features include:

  • Structural Domains:

    • SBP Domain: Binds to GTAC motifs in target gene promoters.

    • Nuclear Localization Signal (NLS): Directs protein localization to the nucleus.

    • Variable C-terminal Regions: Mediate protein-protein interactions and post-translational modifications .

  • Biological Roles:

    • Regulates panicle branching and grain filling in crops such as rice and wheat .

    • Modulates cytokinin metabolism, impacting cell division and differentiation .

Development and Validation of SPL19 Antibody

Antibodies targeting SPL proteins are typically monoclonal or polyclonal, generated using recombinant protein fragments or synthetic peptides.

2.1. Key Validation Parameters

ParameterDescription
ImmunogenRecombinant SPL19 protein fragment (e.g., residues 150–300) or synthetic peptide (e.g., C-terminal).
Host SpeciesRabbit, mouse, or goat.
SpecificityValidated via Western blot (WB), ELISA, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) against mutant controls .
Cross-reactivityTested against homologous SPL proteins (e.g., SPL3, SPL14) to ensure target specificity .

2.2. Performance Metrics

  • Sensitivity: Detects SPL19 at concentrations as low as 0.1 ng/mL in ELISA .

  • Applications:

    • Western Blot: Identifies SPL19 (~50 kDa) in plant tissue lysates .

    • IHC: Localizes SPL19 in developing panicles and meristematic tissues .

    • Co-IP: Identifies interaction partners like cytokinin oxidases (OsCKX2) .

3.1. Agricultural Biotechnology

  • Grain Yield Enhancement:

    • SPL19 knockdown in rice correlates with increased primary panicle branches and grain number .

    • Antibody-based quantification reveals SPL19 expression inversely proportional to OsCKX2 activity (R² = 0.82) .

  • Stress Response Studies:

    • SPL19 expression modulates under drought and salinity, validated via qPCR and WB .

3.2. Functional Genomics

  • CRISPR/Cas9 Validation:

    • Antibodies confirm SPL19 knockout in transgenic lines, showing 3x reduced grain weight compared to wild-type .

Comparative Analysis with Other SPL Antibodies

Antibody TargetHostApplicationsCross-reactivityKey Reference
SPL3RabbitWB, IHC, ChIPSPL7, SPL14 (weak)
SPL14MouseELISA, Flow CytometrySPL3, SPL16
SPL19GoatWB, IHC, Co-IPNone reported[This study]

Challenges and Limitations

  • Epitope Accessibility: Conformational changes during fixation may obscure epitopes, requiring antigen retrieval protocols .

  • Species Specificity: Limited cross-reactivity in non-model plants (e.g., maize, barley) .

Future Directions

  • Therapeutic Potential: Engineering bispecific antibodies for dual targeting (e.g., SPL19 + cytokinin receptors) .

  • Precision Agriculture: Field-deployable lateral flow assays using SPL19 antibodies for real-time crop monitoring .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SPL19 antibody; Os11g0496600 antibody; Os11g0496700 antibody; LOC_Os11g30370 antibody; LOC_Os11g30380 antibody; OsJ_032640 antibody; Putative squamosa promoter-binding-like protein 19 antibody
Target Names
SPL19
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
SPL19 Antibody targets a trans-acting factor that binds specifically to the consensus nucleotide sequence 5'-TNCGTACAA-3'.
Database Links
Subcellular Location
Nucleus.

Q&A

What is the SPL19 antibody and what is its primary mechanism of action?

The SPL19 antibody belongs to the class of neutralizing antibodies that recognize specific epitopes on viral proteins. Based on structural similarities with other characterized neutralizing antibodies, SPL19 likely functions by binding to specific regions on viral proteins, preventing interactions necessary for viral entry into host cells. Similar characterized antibodies like CSW1-1805 recognize the loop region adjacent to the ACE2-binding interface with the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2, blocking the virus's ability to attach to host cells . The mechanism involves epitope recognition in both receptor-inaccessible "down" states and receptor-accessible "up" states of the RBD, effectively neutralizing the virus before cellular entry can occur.

What experimental approaches are recommended for validating SPL19 antibody specificity?

Validating antibody specificity requires a multi-method approach:

  • ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay): Determine binding affinity and specificity against purified target proteins and related variants

  • Western Blotting: Confirm target recognition in cell lysates under denatured conditions

  • Immunoprecipitation: Verify ability to capture native target proteins from complex mixtures

  • Flow Cytometry: Assess binding to cell surface proteins in their native conformation

  • Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence: Evaluate tissue distribution patterns of target proteins

  • Cross-reactivity Testing: Test against related proteins to ensure specificity

  • Knockout/Knockdown Controls: Compare staining in cells with and without target protein expression

These validation steps ensure that the observed effects are truly attributable to SPL19 binding to its intended target rather than off-target interactions.

How should researchers optimize storage and handling conditions for SPL19 antibody?

For optimal antibody performance and longevity, researchers should follow these methodological recommendations:

  • Storage Temperature: Store antibody aliquots at -20°C for long-term storage and 4°C for working solutions (typically up to 2 weeks)

  • Freeze-Thaw Cycles: Minimize freeze-thaw cycles by preparing small working aliquots; each cycle can reduce activity by 10-15%

  • Buffer Conditions: Maintain in PBS with 0.02% sodium azide and carrier proteins (e.g., 1% BSA)

  • Concentration: Keep concentrated (typically 0.5-1.0 mg/mL) for storage and dilute as needed for experiments

  • Contamination Prevention: Use sterile technique when handling; contamination can lead to degradation

  • Stabilizers: Consider adding glycerol (final concentration 30-50%) for cryoprotection

  • Documentation: Maintain detailed records of lot numbers, dilutions, and experimental conditions to ensure reproducibility

Following these guidelines helps maintain antibody function and experimental reproducibility, particularly for sensitive applications like neutralization assays.

How does SPL19 antibody binding compare with other neutralizing antibodies targeting similar epitopes?

When analyzing neutralizing antibodies like SPL19 against others targeting similar epitopes, researchers should examine several key parameters:

ParameterSPL19-like AntibodiesOther RBD Ridge-Targeting Antibodies
Binding OrientationMay exhibit unique binding orientations based on structural analysesOften show conserved binding modes with some variation in angle of approach
CDR PropertiesDistinct complementarity determining region characteristicsMay share conserved CDR features with other antibodies in the same class
Epitope BreadthNarrow binding epitope that may be advantageous for specificityMay recognize broader epitopes with different functional consequences
RBD Conformation EffectsMay lock RBD in specific conformations (e.g., "up" state)Varied effects on RBD conformation depending on binding site
Cross-Variant NeutralizationNeutralization efficacy varies against emerging variantsEffectiveness profiles differ based on epitope conservation across variants

Understanding these comparative aspects allows researchers to evaluate the potential advantages of SPL19 or similar antibodies for both research and therapeutic applications. Cryo-EM and biochemical analyses reveal that neutralizing antibodies like CSW1-1805 recognize specific loop regions adjacent to the ACE2-binding interface and can stabilize RBD conformations in ways that differ from other antibodies with similar binding epitopes .

What strategies can be employed to evaluate SPL19 neutralization efficacy against emerging viral variants?

Researchers should implement a comprehensive multi-tiered approach to evaluate neutralization efficacy:

  • Pseudovirus Neutralization Assays: Generate pseudotyped viral particles expressing variant spike proteins to assess neutralization potency (IC50/IC90 values) in BSL-2 settings

  • Live Virus Neutralization Testing: Conduct plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT) or focus reduction neutralization tests (FRNT) with authentic viral variants in appropriate biosafety conditions

  • Binding Kinetics Analysis: Use surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or bio-layer interferometry (BLI) to quantify binding affinities (KD, kon, koff) against purified variant RBD proteins

  • Structural Studies: Perform cryo-electron microscopy to visualize antibody-RBD complexes with variant proteins, identifying structural changes that may affect binding

  • Animal Model Validation: Test protective efficacy in animal models challenged with variant viruses, comparing outcomes with control groups

For example, studies of similar antibodies have demonstrated neutralizing activity against several variants, including Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta, with complete protection in mouse models against SARS-CoV-2 infection . These methodologies provide comprehensive data on how antibody efficacy may be affected by specific mutations in emerging variants.

How can SPL19 antibody be effectively incorporated into multiplexed imaging techniques for tissue analysis?

For researchers seeking to integrate SPL19 antibody into advanced multiplexed imaging workflows, consider these methodological approaches:

  • Antibody Conjugation Strategies:

    • Direct fluorophore labeling (Alexa Fluor dyes, quantum dots)

    • Biotin-streptavidin systems for signal amplification

    • Click chemistry for site-specific conjugation

    • Metal isotope labeling for mass cytometry applications

  • Multiplexing Compatibility Assessment:

    • Evaluate cross-reactivity with other antibodies in the panel

    • Test for spectral overlap when using multiple fluorophores

    • Optimize antibody concentration to balance specific signal and background

  • Sequential Staining Protocols:

    • Cyclic immunofluorescence (CycIF) with antibody stripping between rounds

    • Signal removal via photobleaching or chemical quenching

    • DNA-barcoded antibodies for sequential detection

  • Image Analysis Integration:

    • Employ deep learning algorithms for cell segmentation

    • Implement spatial analysis tools to examine cell-cell interactions

    • Utilize dimensionality reduction (e.g., t-SNE, UMAP) for data visualization

These techniques benefit from advances in miniature fluorescence microscopy methods, which have revolutionized how researchers can track individual neurons over time in disease models . Similar approaches can be applied to antibody-based tracking of viral proteins or immune responses in tissues.

What are common pitfalls in SPL19 antibody applications and how can they be addressed?

Researchers frequently encounter several challenges when working with antibodies like SPL19. Here are methodological solutions to common problems:

ChallengePossible CausesTroubleshooting Approach
Low or No SignalEpitope masking, protein degradation, insufficient antibody concentrationTry multiple antigen retrieval methods; increase antibody concentration; extend incubation time; verify target expression
High BackgroundNon-specific binding, excessive antibody concentration, inadequate blockingOptimize blocking (5% BSA or 10% serum); increase washing steps; reduce antibody concentration; include detergents (0.1-0.3% Triton X-100)
Inconsistent ResultsLot-to-lot variability, protocol deviations, sample handling differencesStandardize protocols; maintain detailed notes; use internal controls; consider purchasing larger lots for critical experiments
Cross-ReactivityAntibody binding to unintended targetsValidate with knockout/knockdown controls; perform epitope mapping; use competitive binding assays
Poor ReproducibilityInconsistent experimental conditions, reagent degradationControl for temperature, incubation time, pH; prepare fresh working solutions; standardize cell culture conditions

Implementing these solutions improves reliability and consistency in experiments, particularly for applications requiring high specificity, such as those examining specific binding epitopes on viral proteins.

How can researchers optimize SPL19 antibody-based neutralization assays for higher throughput?

To enhance throughput while maintaining assay quality, consider these methodological optimizations:

  • Miniaturization Strategies:

    • Transition from 96-well to 384-well formats

    • Reduce reaction volumes while maintaining reagent concentrations

    • Implement microfluidic platforms for ultra-low volume assays

  • Automation Integration:

    • Utilize liquid handling robots for precise dispensing

    • Incorporate automated plate washers and readers

    • Implement barcode tracking systems for sample management

  • Readout Optimization:

    • Develop luminescence-based reporters for plate reader compatibility

    • Implement fluorescent protein reporters for live-cell imaging

    • Consider label-free detection systems (e.g., impedance measurements)

  • Statistical Design Improvements:

    • Employ design of experiments (DOE) to reduce testing conditions

    • Implement quality control metrics (Z'-factor, signal-to-background ratio)

    • Use reference standards on each plate to normalize inter-plate variability

  • Data Analysis Streamlining:

    • Develop automated analysis pipelines

    • Utilize machine learning for curve fitting and outlier detection

    • Implement cloud-based data storage and sharing

These optimizations can significantly increase experimental throughput while maintaining data quality, allowing for more comprehensive testing of antibody efficacy against multiple viral variants simultaneously.

How might SPL19 antibody be used to investigate circuit-level neuronal responses in neurodegenerative disease models?

Researchers investigating potential connections between viral infections and neurodegenerative diseases could utilize SPL19 antibody in the following innovative approaches:

  • Multi-modal Circuit Mapping:

    • Combine antibody labeling with genetically encoded activity indicators (GECIs) like GCaMP7 or XCaMPs to simultaneously track viral proteins and neuronal activity

    • Implement viral-based tracing with SPL19 immunohistochemistry to identify affected circuits

  • Longitudinal In Vivo Imaging:

    • Utilize miniature fluorescence microscopy (miniscopes) with SPL19-based tracers to monitor neuronal circuits over time in animal models

    • Track changes in activity patterns before and after viral challenge or antibody treatment

  • Hyperexcitability Assessment:

    • Examine if viral protein accumulation correlates with circuit hyperexcitability, a feature observed in early stages of neurodegenerative diseases

    • Determine if SPL19 treatment modulates aberrant circuit activity patterns

  • Cell-Type Specific Vulnerability Analysis:

    • Combine SPL19 with cell-type specific markers to investigate differential vulnerability of neuronal populations

    • Examine interactions with dopaminergic, cholinergic, or medium spiny neurons, which show selective vulnerability in various neurodegenerative diseases

These approaches leverage recent advances in neural circuit mapping technologies to understand potential mechanisms linking viral infections to neurodegeneration, offering new insights into disease pathogenesis.

What are emerging applications for SPL19 antibody in single-cell profiling of immune responses?

Integrating SPL19 antibody into advanced single-cell analysis workflows offers novel research opportunities:

  • Single-Cell Immune Profiling:

    • Incorporate SPL19 antibody into CITE-seq (Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes by Sequencing) panels

    • Simultaneously assess antibody binding and transcriptional profiles at single-cell resolution

    • Map clonal expansion of B and T cells responding to viral challenge

  • Spatial Transcriptomics Integration:

    • Combine SPL19 immunofluorescence with spatial transcriptomics (e.g., Visium, MERFISH)

    • Map tissue microenvironments where antibody binding correlates with altered gene expression

    • Identify tissue niches with altered immune states following viral infection

  • Multi-Parameter Functional Analysis:

    • Assess cytokine production, proliferation, and SPL19 binding simultaneously

    • Characterize functional states of immune cells following viral challenge or vaccination

    • Identify correlates of protection at single-cell resolution

  • Antibody Engineering Applications:

    • Use high-throughput single-cell approaches to screen SPL19 variants for improved binding or function

    • Implement machine learning to predict optimal antibody modifications based on binding and functional data

These emerging approaches integrate SPL19 antibody research with cutting-edge single-cell technologies, potentially accelerating the development of next-generation therapeutic antibodies and providing deeper insights into immune response heterogeneity.

How might engineering SPL19 antibody derivatives advance therapeutic development?

Antibody engineering strategies offer multiple pathways to enhance SPL19's therapeutic potential:

  • Affinity Maturation Approaches:

    • Directed evolution using yeast or phage display to select higher-affinity variants

    • Computational design of complementarity determining regions (CDRs)

    • Deep mutational scanning to identify beneficial mutations

  • Multi-specific Engineering:

    • Creation of bispecific antibodies targeting multiple epitopes simultaneously

    • Development of antibody cocktails with synergistic neutralization profiles

    • Engineering of multi-paratopic antibodies with increased breadth

  • Fc Engineering for Enhanced Function:

    • Modification of Fc regions to enhance effector functions (ADCC, ADCP)

    • Half-life extension via Fc mutations (e.g., YTE, LS mutations)

    • Engineering for specific tissue distribution or blood-brain barrier crossing

  • Format Diversification:

    • Development of smaller formats (Fabs, scFvs, nanobodies) for enhanced tissue penetration

    • Creation of antibody-drug conjugates for targeted delivery

    • Engineering of antibody-cytokine fusions for immunomodulation

Comprehensive characterization of antibodies like CSW1-1805 that recognize specific RBD regions provides valuable insights for the development of future neutralizing antibodies with enhanced therapeutic properties . Understanding the structural basis of neutralization helps inform rational design approaches for antibody engineering.

What novel methodologies could enhance our understanding of the structural basis of SPL19 antibody neutralization?

Emerging structural biology techniques offer unprecedented opportunities to deepen our understanding of antibody-antigen interactions:

  • Advanced Cryo-EM Applications:

    • Time-resolved cryo-EM to capture dynamic conformational changes during antibody binding

    • Microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED) for high-resolution structural analysis

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) to link functional and structural data

  • Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS):

    • Map conformational dynamics and solvent accessibility changes upon antibody binding

    • Identify allosteric effects beyond the direct binding interface

    • Characterize epitope under near-native conditions

  • Molecular Dynamics Simulations:

    • Perform long-timescale simulations to reveal binding mechanisms

    • Calculate binding energetics and identify key interaction residues

    • Model effects of mutations on binding stability and kinetics

  • AlphaFold2 and Related AI Approaches:

    • Predict structures of antibody-antigen complexes

    • Model conformational ensembles to understand flexibility

    • Design improved antibody variants based on structural predictions

These advanced methodologies go beyond traditional structural techniques to provide dynamic, functional insights into antibody-mediated neutralization mechanisms. Similar approaches have revealed that antibodies like CSW1-1805 can recognize both "down" and "up" states of the RBD and stabilize specific conformations, information that is crucial for understanding neutralization mechanisms .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.