KEGG: spo:SPAC607.10
STRING: 4896.SPAC607.10.1
The spo3 Antibody is a polyclonal antibody raised in rabbits that targets the Sporulation-specific protein 3 (spo3) from Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast). The spo3 protein is crucial for spore morphogenesis, specifically in the assembly of the forespore membrane during spore development. According to available data, spo3 functions as a peripheral membrane protein associated with both the plasma membrane and prospore membrane.
The antibody is developed against recombinant Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972/ATCC 24843) spo3 protein . It has the UniProt accession number Q9US08 and Entrez Gene ID 2543520 .
Based on validation data, spo3 Antibody is primarily suitable for:
| Application | Validated | Recommended Dilution |
|---|---|---|
| ELISA | Yes | Not specified |
| Western Blotting (WB) | Yes | 1:500-2000 |
These applications make the antibody valuable for researchers studying sporulation processes, membrane assembly, and related cellular functions in fission yeast models . Like other antibodies, proper experimental validation is crucial before use, as antibody performance can vary significantly by application and experimental conditions .
The spo3 Antibody specifically reacts with Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972/ATCC 24843), commonly known as fission yeast . Unlike some antibodies with cross-reactivity across multiple species, this antibody appears to be specifically designed for research involving S. pombe models.
Researchers working with other species should not expect cross-reactivity with this antibody. This specificity is important to note when designing experiments, as approximately 50% of commercial antibodies fail to meet basic standards for characterization , often due to cross-reactivity issues or inadequate validation.
For optimal performance and longevity of the spo3 Antibody, follow these storage and handling recommendations:
| Storage Duration | Temperature | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Long-term storage | −20°C or −80°C | Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles |
| Short-term/frequent use | 4°C | Up to one month |
The antibody is typically supplied in liquid form in a buffer containing 50% glycerol, 0.01M PBS at pH 7.4, and 0.03% Proclin 300 as a preservative . Aliquoting the antibody into smaller volumes upon first use can help prevent degradation from multiple freeze-thaw cycles, which is a common cause of antibody performance decline .
Antibody validation is critical for ensuring reliable research outcomes. Recent studies indicate that poor antibody validation contributes to financial losses of $0.4-1.8 billion per year in the United States alone . For spo3 Antibody, implement these validation strategies:
Knockout/knockdown validation: The gold standard approach is using spo3 knockout or RNAi knockdown S. pombe strains as negative controls. The YCharOS group has demonstrated that knockout cell lines provide superior controls compared to other validation methods .
Overexpression validation: Compare wild-type cells with cells overexpressing spo3 protein. An increased signal intensity in overexpressing cells supports antibody specificity .
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide before application to samples. This should block specific binding and reduce the target signal.
Multiple antibody validation: If available, compare results with different antibodies targeting distinct epitopes of the same protein.
Mass spectrometry validation: Perform immunoprecipitation using the antibody, followed by mass spectrometry analysis to confirm the pulled-down protein is indeed spo3 .
A comprehensive validation approach using multiple methods provides the strongest evidence for antibody specificity.
While spo3 Antibody is not specifically validated for immunofluorescence in the provided information, researchers sometimes adapt antibodies for additional applications. If attempting this, include these essential controls:
Negative controls:
Primary antibody omission: Incubate samples with only secondary antibody
Isotype control: Use an irrelevant primary antibody of the same isotype (IgG) and host species (rabbit)
Knockout/knockdown samples: If available, use spo3-deficient samples
Positive controls:
Known positive samples: Include samples with confirmed spo3 expression
Overexpression samples: If available, use samples overexpressing spo3 protein
Technical controls:
Autofluorescence control: Image unstained samples
Counter-staining: Use nuclear or membrane markers to provide context for spo3 localization
Z-stack imaging: Capture multiple focal planes to confirm membrane localization
When facing weak or absent signals with spo3 Antibody in Western blotting, consider the following methodological approaches:
Antibody-related factors:
Increase antibody concentration (try 1:500 if using 1:2000)
Check antibody storage conditions and expiration date
Use a fresh aliquot to avoid potential degradation from freeze-thaw cycles
Sample preparation factors:
Ensure proper protein extraction from membranes (spo3 is membrane-associated)
Increase protein loading amount (try 50-75 μg if using 25 μg)
Verify protein transfer efficiency with Ponceau S staining
Use optimized lysis buffers containing appropriate detergents for membrane proteins
Technical factors:
Optimize blocking conditions (5% BSA may be better than milk for membrane proteins)
Try different membrane types (PVDF often works better than nitrocellulose for some antibodies)
Adjust incubation temperature (4°C overnight may improve signal)
Enhance detection sensitivity using more sensitive chemiluminescence substrates
Biological factors:
Confirm spo3 expression in your samples (may be cell-cycle or condition dependent)
Consider using positive controls with known spo3 expression
Systematic optimization of these factors should help resolve signal problems in Western blotting applications.
When planning co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) experiments with spo3 Antibody to investigate protein-protein interactions, several factors should be considered:
Lysis buffer optimization:
Use mild, non-denaturing buffers to preserve protein-protein interactions
For membrane proteins like spo3, include appropriate detergents (e.g., 0.5-1% NP-40, 0.5% Triton X-100)
Add protease inhibitors to prevent degradation during extraction
Antibody binding conditions:
Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding
Optimize antibody concentration (typically 2-5 μg per mg of total protein)
Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation
Essential controls:
IgG control from same species as the antibody
Lysate from cells not expressing spo3 (if available)
Reciprocal IP with antibodies against suspected interaction partners
Detection and confirmation:
Western blotting for known or suspected interaction partners
Mass spectrometry for unbiased identification of the complete interactome
Proximity ligation assay to confirm interactions in intact cells
These methodological considerations help ensure that co-IP experiments with spo3 Antibody yield reliable and biologically meaningful results.
Understanding and addressing potential cross-reactivity is essential for generating reliable data with any antibody. Research has shown that antibody specificity is a major concern, with approximately 50% of commercial antibodies demonstrating specificity issues .
Potential sources of cross-reactivity:
Sequence homology with related proteins in S. pombe
Shared epitopes with functionally similar membrane proteins
Non-specific binding to highly abundant proteins
Binding to denatured proteins exposing normally hidden epitopes
Experimental strategies to identify cross-reactivity:
Western blotting: Look for bands at unexpected molecular weights
Mass spectrometry analysis of immunoprecipitated proteins
Comparative analysis using knockout/knockdown samples
Testing reactivity in systems with known expression patterns
Methodological approaches to mitigate cross-reactivity:
Optimization of blocking conditions (5% BSA may be more effective than milk for membrane proteins)
Addition of 0.1-0.5% non-ionic detergents to reduce non-specific hydrophobic interactions
Pre-adsorption with lysates from organisms lacking spo3
Affinity purification against the specific antigen
A comprehensive validation strategy can help ensure that observed signals are specific to the target protein rather than the result of cross-reactivity.
When working with proteins like spo3, understanding the comparative advantages of polyclonal versus monoclonal antibodies is important:
| Parameter | Polyclonal Antibodies (like spo3 Antibody) | Monoclonal Antibodies |
|---|---|---|
| Epitope recognition | Multiple epitopes | Single epitope |
| Sensitivity | Generally higher | Generally lower |
| Specificity | May have more cross-reactivity | Usually higher specificity |
| Batch-to-batch consistency | Variable | High consistency |
| Cost | Generally lower | Generally higher |
| Production time | Shorter (weeks to months) | Longer (months) |
Recent studies by YCharOS demonstrated that recombinant antibodies outperformed both traditional monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies in various assays . For spo3 detection, the polyclonal nature of the available antibody likely offers sensitivity advantages, especially when working with low-abundance membrane proteins.
Recent research has highlighted significant advantages of recombinant antibodies compared to conventional polyclonal antibodies like the spo3 Antibody:
The YCharOS group found that recombinant antibodies outperformed both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies across multiple assays . This aligns with recommendations from over 100 researchers who called for transition to recombinant antibody technologies to address reproducibility issues in biomedical research .
While spo3 Antibody is not explicitly validated for immunofluorescence, researchers may want to adapt it for this application, particularly to study membrane localization of spo3 protein:
Fixation optimization:
Paraformaldehyde (4%): Preserves membrane structures while maintaining protein antigenicity
Methanol/acetone (1:1): Can improve access to membrane proteins but may affect some epitopes
For yeast cells: Consider enzymatic cell wall digestion (e.g., zymolyase treatment) before fixation
Permeabilization strategies:
Gentle detergent treatment (0.1% Triton X-100) for accessing membrane proteins
Saponin (0.1-0.2%) for selective membrane permeabilization
Digitonin (0.01-0.05%) for cholesterol-rich membrane domains
Protocol optimization:
Test different fixation times (10-30 minutes)
Vary permeabilization duration (5-15 minutes)
Optimize antibody concentration (starting at 1:100-1:500)
Extended incubation times (overnight at 4°C may improve sensitivity)
These methodological considerations should be empirically tested to determine optimal conditions for specific experimental systems.
For accurate quantitative assessment of spo3 protein expression, consider these methodological approaches:
Western blotting quantification:
Use housekeeping proteins (e.g., actin, GAPDH) as loading controls
Include a standard curve with known amounts of recombinant spo3 protein
Employ digital imaging systems with linear dynamic range rather than film
Use software designed for Western blot densitometry (e.g., ImageJ)
ELISA-based quantification:
Develop a sandwich ELISA using spo3 Antibody as capture or detection antibody
Create standard curves using recombinant spo3 protein
Optimize sample dilutions to ensure readings fall within the linear range
Include technical replicates (minimum triplicates) for statistical validity
Statistical considerations:
Perform appropriate statistical tests for comparative analyses
Use multiple biological replicates to account for biological variability
Report confidence intervals along with means/medians
When designing multiplexed immunoassays incorporating spo3 Antibody with other antibodies, follow these methodological guidelines:
Antibody selection criteria:
Ensure host species compatibility (avoid multiple rabbit antibodies unless using specialized detection systems)
Verify that secondary antibodies do not cross-react
Choose antibodies with similar optimal working conditions
Staining optimization:
Sequential rather than simultaneous staining may reduce cross-reactivity
Include appropriate controls for each antibody used:
Single-stained samples for each antibody
Fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls
Isotype controls for each species and isotype
Signal separation strategies:
Select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap
Perform proper compensation controls when using flow cytometry
For imaging applications, use sequential scanning to minimize bleed-through
Data analysis considerations:
Account for potential signal spillover in quantitative analyses
Use statistical methods appropriate for multiparameter data
Include suitable visualization approaches for multidimensional data
These methodological considerations help ensure reliable results when multiplexing spo3 Antibody with other immunoreagents.
Understanding the specific epitope recognized by an antibody can provide valuable insights for experimental design and interpretation. For spo3 Antibody, the immunogen was derived from recombinant Schizosaccharomyces pombe spo3 protein , but the specific epitope is not explicitly stated. To determine this:
Experimental approaches:
Epitope mapping using peptide arrays
Alanine scanning mutagenesis of recombinant spo3
Competition assays with synthetic peptides
Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry
X-ray crystallography of antibody-antigen complex
Computational predictions:
Sequence-based epitope prediction algorithms
Structural modeling of antibody-antigen interactions
Comparative analysis with known antibody epitopes
Determining the specific epitope can help predict potential cross-reactivity with related proteins and assess whether post-translational modifications might affect antibody binding.
When adapting spo3 Antibody for advanced imaging techniques like super-resolution microscopy, consider these methodological approaches:
Sample preparation optimization:
Use thinner sections for better resolution and signal-to-noise ratio
Optimize fixation for structural preservation without compromising antigenicity
For yeast cells, enzymatic cell wall digestion parameters may need refinement
Antibody considerations:
Direct labeling of primary antibody may improve localization precision
Smaller probes (Fab fragments, nanobodies) provide better spatial resolution
Use minimal antibody concentrations to reduce background
Technical considerations:
For STORM/PALM: Optimize photoswitchable fluorophore selection
For STED: Select fluorophores with appropriate depletion characteristics
For expansion microscopy: Test antibody retention during expansion process
Validation approaches:
Correlative light and electron microscopy to confirm localizations
Multi-technique imaging to cross-validate findings
Appropriate resolution standards to measure actual system performance
These considerations can help maximize the information gained from high-resolution imaging studies using spo3 Antibody.