srgap2 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
srgap2 antibody; srgap2a antibody; si:dkey-85p17.1SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase-activating protein 2 antibody; srGAP2 antibody
Target Names
srgap2
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
SRGAP2 is a Rac1 GTPase activating protein (GAP) that exhibits membrane binding and deformation properties. It plays a crucial role in regulating actin dynamics, which in turn influences cell migration and differentiation. SRGAP2 is implicated in various aspects of neuronal morphogenesis and migration, including neurite biogenesis (axon and dendrite outgrowth) and dendritic spine maturation. Additionally, SRGAP2 may stimulate branching of the leading process and negatively regulate neuron migration. In non-neuronal cells, SRGAP2 contributes to cell migration by regulating the formation of lamellipodia and filopodia.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. SRGAP2a, an SRGAP2 ortholog in zebrafish, exhibits protective effects against podocytes in diabetic nephropathy by suppressing podocyte migration. Knockdown of SRGAP2a leads to recapitulation of podocyte foot process effacement. PMID: 29242313
Database Links
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane. Cell projection, dendritic spine. Cell junction, synapse, postsynaptic density. Cell junction, synapse, postsynaptic cell membrane. Cell projection, lamellipodium. Cytoplasmic vesicle, phagosome. Nucleus. Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is SRGAP2 and why is it significant in neuroscience research?

SRGAP2 (also known as ARHGAP34, FNBP2, KIAA0456, and SRGAP2A) is a postsynaptic RAC1 GTPase activating protein (GAP) that plays key roles in neuronal morphogenesis and migration, particularly during cerebral cortex development. SRGAP2 regulates excitatory and inhibitory synapse maturation and density in cortical pyramidal neurons . The protein is particularly notable because it underwent human-specific gene duplication events that produced paralogs (SRGAP2B and SRGAP2C) thought to have contributed significantly to human brain evolution . These paralogs inhibit ancestral SRGAP2A function, resulting in increased synaptic density and protracted synapse maturation—traits that characterize human cortical neurons .

What are the key structural features of SRGAP2 relevant to antibody selection?

SRGAP2A is a 1071 amino acid protein with a calculated molecular weight of 121 kDa . Its structure includes:

  • An F-BAR domain that binds and deforms membranes

  • A newly identified F-BAR extension (Fx) domain

  • A RhoGAP domain that stimulates GTPase activity of Rac1

  • An SH3 domain that interacts with postsynaptic proteins

When selecting antibodies, researchers should consider:

  • SRGAP2A homo-dimerizes through a large interface including the F-BAR, Fx, and RhoGAP-SH3 domains

  • Human-specific paralogs like SRGAP2C are truncated (lacking the C-terminal portion) and can be detected only with antibodies targeting N-terminal regions

  • Post-translational modifications, especially arginine methylation at R927, affect protein function

How should researchers optimize Western blot protocols for SRGAP2 detection?

Based on validated applications, follow these protocol recommendations for Western blot detection of SRGAP2:

ParameterRecommendationJustification
Antibody Dilution1:500-1:2000Optimal range for most commercial anti-SRGAP2 antibodies
Sample PreparationInclude protease inhibitorsSRGAP2 is susceptible to degradation
Expected Molecular Weight~121 kDa for full-length SRGAP2A, ~50 kDa for SRGAP2CDifferent paralogs show distinct bands
Lysis Buffer50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 50-150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, with protease inhibitorsEffective for solubilizing membrane-associated SRGAP2
ControlsInclude HEK293 cells overexpressing SRGAP2Allows identification of specific bands

When analyzing Western blot results, be aware that some antibodies may detect both SRGAP2A (121 kDa) and its human-specific paralogs like SRGAP2C (~50 kDa) depending on the epitope location . Additionally, post-translational modifications can create higher molecular weight bands, as observed in some experiments showing bands at 170-200 kDa .

What are the critical parameters for successful immunohistochemistry with SRGAP2 antibodies?

For optimal immunohistochemistry (IHC) results when detecting SRGAP2:

ParameterRecommendationNotes
Antibody Dilution1:50-1:500Titration recommended for each tissue type
Antigen RetrievalTE buffer pH 9.0 (primary recommendation) or citrate buffer pH 6.0Essential for optimal epitope exposure
Positive Control TissuesMouse brain tissue, human kidney tissueValidated tissues with confirmed expression
Expected LocalizationNuclear and cytoplasmic staining in specific cell typesObserved in hematopoietic cells, Leydig cells, distal tubule cells
CounterstainingLight hematoxylin recommendedAllows visualization of tissue architecture without obscuring signal

Researchers should be aware that SRGAP2 shows enrichment at the leading edge of membrane protrusions in neuronal cells , and in mouse brain tissue, SRGAP2 is predominantly expressed in the retinal ganglion cell layer and inner nuclear layer .

How can researchers effectively use SRGAP2 antibodies for immunoprecipitation experiments?

For effective co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) of SRGAP2 and its interaction partners:

  • Antibody amount: Use 0.5-4.0 μg antibody for 1.0-3.0 mg of total protein lysate

  • Buffer selection is critical depending on the interaction being studied:

    • For SRGAP2-PRMT5 interactions: Use 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 50 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA with protease inhibitors

    • For SRGAP2-Rac1 interactions: Use 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 50 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100 with protease inhibitors

    • For SRGAP2 dimer formation: Use 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, 15 mM EGTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM DTT with protease inhibitors

  • Experimental controls:

    • Input controls (5-10% of lysate used for IP) are essential

    • IgG control to identify non-specific binding

    • When investigating paralog interactions, include single-transfected controls

How can researchers distinguish between SRGAP2 paralogs in experimental systems?

Distinguishing between SRGAP2 paralogs requires careful antibody selection and experimental design:

  • Epitope targeting strategy:

    • Antibodies targeting the N-terminal region (aa1-950) can detect both SRGAP2A and SRGAP2C

    • Antibodies targeting the C-terminal region (aa950-1071) detect only SRGAP2A

  • Western blot analysis:

    • SRGAP2A appears at ~120-121 kDa

    • SRGAP2C appears at ~50 kDa when using N-terminal antibodies

  • Validation approaches:

    • Use cells expressing tagged versions of specific paralogs as positive controls

    • Employ knockout or knockdown models for specificity confirmation

    • Consider heterologous expression systems comparing different paralogs

When studying human-specific features, remember that SRGAP2C contains only a few non-synonymous mutations targeting arginine residues compared to SRGAP2B, but these are sufficient to give SRGAP2C unique abilities to induce long-lasting changes in synaptic density .

How can SRGAP2 antibodies be effectively used to study neurodevelopmental processes?

SRGAP2 antibodies can provide valuable insights into neurodevelopmental processes through:

  • Temporal expression analysis:

    • SRGAP2 protein is first expressed in the mouse retina during embryonic development and persists into adulthood

    • Expression patterns change during critical developmental windows

  • Subcellular localization studies:

    • SRGAP2 is enriched at the leading edge of membrane protrusions

    • The protein localizes to the front of F-actin bundles in membrane protrusions

    • In neurons, SRGAP2A associates with both Homer1 and Gephyrin clusters

  • Functional studies integrating antibody detection:

    • Combine with GTP-bound Rac1 detection using GST-PBD pulldown assays

    • Analyze effects on cytoskeletal dynamics through co-staining with F-actin markers

    • Assess morphological changes following experimental manipulation of SRGAP2

For microglia-specific studies, researchers have successfully used tamoxifen-inducible Cre-lox systems (Tmem119-CreERT2) to delete Srgap2 and observed that Srgap2-deficient microglia show a significant, dose-dependent increase in complexity with a hyper-ramified morphology .

What are common challenges when using SRGAP2 antibodies and how can they be addressed?

ChallengePotential CauseSolution
Multiple bands in Western blotParalog detection, degradation, post-translational modificationsUse paralog-specific antibodies; include protease inhibitors; compare with overexpression controls
Weak or absent signal in IHCEpitope masking, fixation issuesOptimize antigen retrieval; test both TE buffer pH 9.0 and citrate buffer pH 6.0; adjust antibody concentration
Non-specific stainingCross-reactivityInclude blocking peptides; validate with knockout controls; optimize antibody dilution
Poor IP efficiencyBuffer incompatibilityUse specialized buffers for different interaction partners; increase antibody amount; extend incubation time
Inconsistent detection across experimentsProtein instabilityUpon hetero-dimerization with SRGAP2A, paralogs reduce SRGAP2A levels in a proteasome-dependent manner

How do post-translational modifications of SRGAP2 affect antibody recognition?

SRGAP2 undergoes several post-translational modifications that can affect antibody recognition:

  • Arginine methylation:

    • SRGAP2 arginine methylation, particularly at R927, plays important roles in cell spreading and migration

    • Methylation-specific antibodies can be used to study this modification

    • When using standard antibodies, methylated forms may appear as higher molecular weight bands

  • Phosphorylation:

    • SRGAP2A undergoes extensive phosphorylation based on mass spectrometry data

    • Phosphorylation can alter antibody binding efficiency

    • For studies focusing on phosphorylation states, consider phosphatase treatment controls

  • Ubiquitination:

    • SRGAP2 paralog interactions can lead to proteasome-dependent degradation

    • Proteasome inhibitors (MG132) should be considered when studying paralog interactions

To address these modifications, researchers should include appropriate controls (phosphatase-treated, methylation-deficient mutants) when interpreting antibody-based detection results.

How can SRGAP2 antibodies contribute to understanding human brain evolution?

SRGAP2 antibodies provide crucial tools for investigating human-specific aspects of brain evolution:

  • Comparative expression studies:

    • Using N-terminal antibodies that recognize both ancestral and human-specific paralogs

    • Comparing expression patterns between human and non-human primate tissues

    • Analyzing the developmental timing of expression in different species

  • Functional conservation and divergence:

    • SRGAP2A homo-dimerizes through a large interface including the F-BAR domain

    • SRGAP2C carries a defective Fx-domain that compromises its solubility and membrane-scaffolding ability

    • SRGAP2A:SRGAP2C hetero-dimers form but are insoluble, inhibiting SRGAP2A activity

  • Experimental model systems:

    • Using antibodies to validate expression of human SRGAP2C in mouse models

    • Confirming knockdown efficiency in comparative studies

    • Analyzing differential interaction partners between human and non-human species

When designing evolutionary studies, researchers should consider that the genetic mutagenesis phase of SRGAP2C evolution (approximately 2.4 million years ago) introduced critical substitutions that improved the formation of inactive SRGAP2A:SRGAP2C heterodimers, potentially contributing to unique human brain development characteristics .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.