SRT1 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SRT1 antibody; YMR101C antibody; YM6543.08C antibody; Dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase complex subunit SRT1 antibody; EC 2.5.1.87 antibody; Ditrans,polycis-polyprenyl diphosphate synthase antibody; (2E,6E)-farnesyl diphosphate specific) antibody
Target Names
SRT1
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
SRT1, in conjunction with NUS1, forms the dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase (DDS) complex. This complex is an essential component of the dolichol monophosphate (Dol-P) biosynthetic pathway. The DDS complex catalyzes the addition of multiple isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) units to farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP), generating dehydrodolichyl diphosphate (Dedol-PP). Dedol-PP is a precursor of dolichol, which serves as a sugar carrier in protein glycosylation within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER).
Gene References Into Functions
  1. Studies conducted on S. cerevisiae mutants revealed a significant elevation in SRT1 activity levels. PMID: 17343985
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YMR101C

STRING: 4932.YMR101C

Protein Families
UPP synthase family
Subcellular Location
Lipid droplet.

Q&A

What is SRT1 and why are antibodies against it important for research?

SRT1 (Silent Information Regulator Type 1) is a histone deacetylase that plays a critical role in epigenetic regulation. In Arabidopsis thaliana, SRT1 interacts with ENAP1 and associates with EIN2 in the nucleus to regulate ethylene-responsive genes . SRT1 specifically regulates the acetylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3K9Ac) over ethylene-repressed genes, functioning as a negative regulator .

Antibodies against SRT1 are essential tools that enable researchers to:

  • Detect and quantify SRT1 protein levels in various experimental contexts

  • Study protein-protein interactions involving SRT1, such as its interaction with ENAP1

  • Investigate the binding of SRT1 to specific genomic regions through chromatin immunoprecipitation

  • Understand the role of SRT1 in transcriptional repression mechanisms

What validation approaches should researchers employ for SRT1 antibodies?

Validation is critical as approximately 50% of commercial antibodies fail to meet basic characterization standards . For SRT1 antibodies, validation should include:

  • Specificity testing:

    • Western blotting with positive controls expressing SRT1 and negative controls (knockout/knockdown)

    • Antibody absorption studies similar to those described for other antibodies

    • Testing cross-reactivity with related histone deacetylases

  • Application-specific validation:

    • Validate separately for each intended application (Western blot, immunoprecipitation, ChIP)

    • Determine optimal working concentrations for each application

    • Document optimal experimental conditions

  • Independent verification:

    • Do not rely solely on vendor-provided data

    • Perform in-house validation in your specific experimental system

    • Consider validation techniques recommended in resources like the Human Protein Atlas or Antibodypedia

How should SRT1 antibodies be stored and handled to maintain their integrity?

Proper storage and handling are essential as even antibodies from reputable vendors can lose integrity during shipping or laboratory handling :

  • Storage recommendations:

    • Follow manufacturer's guidelines (typically -20°C or -80°C for long-term storage)

    • Aliquot antibodies upon receipt to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

    • Document lot numbers and purchase dates

  • Handling precautions:

    • Maintain cold chain during all handling steps

    • Use appropriate buffers as recommended by manufacturers

    • Avoid contamination with microorganisms or other proteins

  • Quality control:

    • Periodically re-validate antibodies, especially those stored for extended periods

    • Maintain records of antibody performance over time

    • Consider replacing antibodies that show diminished performance

What controls are essential when using SRT1 antibodies in Western blotting?

Proper experimental controls ensure reliable and interpretable results:

  • Sample controls:

    • Positive control: Sample known to express SRT1

    • Negative control: Sample with SRT1 knocked down or knocked out

    • Loading control: Use internal standards like GAPDH for normalization

  • Antibody controls:

    • Secondary antibody-only control to assess non-specific binding

    • Isotype control (same species and isotype as SRT1 antibody)

    • Pre-absorption control if possible (pre-incubating antibody with immunizing antigen)

  • Technical considerations:

    • Include molecular weight markers to confirm expected SRT1 band size

    • Consider analyzing blots with quantitative systems like Odyssey

    • Document all experimental parameters for reproducibility

How can SRT1 antibodies be effectively used in immunoprecipitation studies?

Based on research showing SRT1 interacts with ENAP1 , immunoprecipitation studies should consider:

  • Experimental design:

    • Buffer optimization to preserve protein-protein interactions

    • Careful cell lysis to maintain native protein conformations

    • Pre-clearing lysates to reduce non-specific binding

  • Essential controls:

    • Input sample (pre-immunoprecipitation lysate)

    • IgG control (same species as SRT1 antibody)

    • Reciprocal Co-IP (e.g., pull down with ENAP1 antibody and probe for SRT1)

  • Special considerations:

    • SRT1-ENAP1 interaction is enhanced by ethylene treatment , suggesting experimental conditions may affect complex formation

    • Consider both in vivo and in vitro validation approaches as demonstrated in the literature

What are optimal approaches for using SRT1 antibodies in ChIP assays?

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) is crucial for studying SRT1's role in gene regulation:

  • Experimental optimization:

    • Fixation conditions: Typically 1% formaldehyde for 10-15 minutes

    • Sonication parameters: Aim for 200-500bp fragments

    • Antibody amount: Titrate to determine optimal concentration

  • Controls and validation:

    • Input chromatin (pre-immunoprecipitation)

    • IgG control ChIP

    • Positive control regions (known SRT1 binding sites)

    • Negative control regions (non-binding regions)

  • Analysis approaches:

    • ChIP-qPCR targeting specific promoter regions, similar to the approach used in studying SRT1 binding to ethylene-repressed genes

    • ChIP-seq for genome-wide binding profiles

    • Integration with transcriptomic data to correlate binding with gene expression changes

How can researchers address cross-reactivity issues with SRT1 antibodies?

Cross-reactivity is a significant concern that can compromise experimental results:

  • Validation strategies:

    • Test against related histone deacetylases with sequence homology to SRT1

    • Use SRT1 knockout/knockdown samples as negative controls

    • Perform peptide competition assays to confirm specificity

  • Mitigation approaches:

    • Use multiple antibodies targeting different SRT1 epitopes

    • Pre-absorb antibodies with recombinant related proteins

    • Consider using epitope-tagged SRT1 with well-validated tag antibodies

  • Documentation requirements:

    • Record observed cross-reactivity patterns

    • Note limitations in experimental interpretations

    • Report validation data alongside experimental results

How can SRT1 antibodies be used to study temporal dynamics of SRT1 function?

Understanding time-dependent SRT1 activities requires specialized approaches:

  • Time-course experiments:

    • Synchronize cells/treatments before sampling at defined intervals

    • Use consistent processing methods across timepoints

    • Include appropriate time-matched controls

  • Stimulus-response studies:

    • Similar to how ethylene treatment enhances SRT1-ENAP1 interaction

    • Monitor both SRT1 levels and its interactions with partners

    • Track associated histone modifications (H3K9Ac) over time

  • Analysis considerations:

    • Normalize data appropriately across timepoints

    • Consider statistical methods for time-series data

    • Correlate SRT1 activity with downstream effects

What approaches can integrate SRT1 antibody-based data with transcriptomics?

Connecting SRT1 binding with gene expression changes provides mechanistic insights:

  • Experimental integration:

    • Perform ChIP-seq with SRT1 antibodies in parallel with RNA-seq

    • Compare SRT1 binding sites with differentially expressed genes

    • Focus on genes showing both SRT1 binding and expression changes

  • Analysis strategies:

    • Identify enriched motifs in SRT1 binding regions

    • Perform gene ontology analysis of SRT1-regulated genes

    • Compare with known ethylene-repressed genes that depend on SRT1/SRT2

  • Validation approaches:

    • Confirm selected targets with ChIP-qPCR and RT-qPCR

    • Use genetic approaches (SRT1 mutants) to verify regulation

    • Consider reporter assays for key regulatory elements

What are common causes of inconsistent results when using SRT1 antibodies?

Understanding potential sources of variability helps troubleshoot experimental issues:

  • Antibody-related factors:

    • Lot-to-lot variation in commercial antibodies

    • Degradation due to improper storage or handling

    • Epitope accessibility changes in different experimental conditions

  • Sample-related factors:

    • Post-translational modifications affecting epitope recognition

    • Protein-protein interactions masking antibody binding sites

    • Sample preparation methods destroying or altering epitopes

  • Technical considerations:

    • Inconsistent blocking or washing conditions

    • Variable incubation times or temperatures

    • Detection system issues (substrate depletion, over-development)

How should researchers interpret contradictory results from different SRT1 antibodies?

When different antibodies yield conflicting results:

  • Evaluation approach:

    • Compare epitopes targeted by each antibody

    • Review validation data for each antibody

    • Consider experimental conditions that might affect one epitope differently than another

  • Resolution strategies:

    • Use orthogonal methods to confirm results (e.g., mass spectrometry)

    • Employ genetic approaches (SRT1 knockout/knockdown)

    • Consider that both results may be correct but reflect different SRT1 pools or states

  • Reporting recommendations:

    • Clearly document discrepancies in your findings

    • Report all antibodies used with catalog numbers and lot information

    • Discuss potential biological explanations for differences

What strategies can overcome poor performance of commercial SRT1 antibodies?

When facing limitations with available antibodies:

  • Optimization approaches:

    • Modify fixation conditions (for immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence)

    • Adjust extraction buffers to improve epitope accessibility

    • Try different blocking agents to reduce background

  • Alternative strategies:

    • Generate custom antibodies against specific SRT1 epitopes

    • Use epitope tagging approaches (FLAG, HA, etc.)

    • Consider proximity labeling methods (BioID, APEX)

  • Community resources:

    • Consult validation databases like Antibodypedia

    • Contact researchers who have published using SRT1 antibodies

    • Consider antibody testing services offered by core facilities

How can SRT1 antibodies be used to study tissue-specific or cell-type-specific roles of SRT1?

Understanding contextual functions of SRT1 requires specialized approaches:

  • Tissue analysis techniques:

    • Immunohistochemistry with validated SRT1 antibodies

    • Laser capture microdissection followed by immunoblotting

    • Single-cell approaches combined with SRT1 detection

  • Comparison strategies:

    • Create tissue-specific expression profiles of SRT1

    • Compare SRT1 binding patterns across tissues using ChIP-seq

    • Correlate with tissue-specific transcriptomes

  • Validation approaches:

    • Use tissue-specific knockdown/knockout models

    • Include appropriate tissue-specific markers

    • Compare with in vitro cell culture models

How can researchers study SRT1 interactions with chromatin remodeling complexes?

Investigating SRT1's role in chromatin modification:

  • Complex isolation techniques:

    • Tandem affinity purification with SRT1 antibodies

    • Size exclusion chromatography followed by immunoblotting

    • Density gradient centrifugation to separate complexes

  • Interaction mapping:

    • Co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies against known complex components

    • Mass spectrometry analysis of SRT1-associated proteins

    • Proximity ligation assays to visualize interactions in situ

  • Functional analysis:

    • ChIP-reChIP to identify co-occupancy of SRT1 with other factors

    • Assess changes in histone modifications (especially H3K9Ac) at SRT1 binding sites

    • Correlate complex formation with transcriptional outcomes

What strategies can detect post-translational modifications of SRT1 using antibodies?

Studying SRT1 regulation through modifications:

  • Detection approaches:

    • Use modification-specific antibodies if available

    • Immunoprecipitate SRT1 and probe with modification-specific antibodies

    • Separate modified forms by 2D gel electrophoresis before immunoblotting

  • Validation methods:

    • Treatment with specific enzymes (phosphatases, deacetylases)

    • Mass spectrometry confirmation of modifications

    • Mutation of modification sites followed by antibody detection

  • Functional correlation:

    • Connect modifications to SRT1 activity changes

    • Investigate stimulus-dependent modification patterns

    • Study how modifications affect SRT1 interactions with partners like ENAP1

Table 1: SRT1 Antibody Validation Checklist

Validation StepBasic ResearchAdvanced ApplicationsExpected Outcome
Specificity testingWestern blot with controlsTesting against related HDACsSingle band at expected MW
Peptide competitionPre-incubation with immunizing peptideTitration of competing peptideSignal reduction/elimination
Knockout/knockdownTesting in SRT1-deficient samplesGenetic rescue experimentsAbsence/reduction of signal
Application testingStandard protocolsOptimization for specialized applicationsReproducible results across applications
Lot-to-lot testingTesting new lots against referenceStatistical comparison of performanceConsistent performance metrics

Table 2: SRT1-Mediated Gene Regulation

ContextSRT1 BindingH3K9 AcetylationTranscriptional OutcomeReference
Ethylene signalingEnhanced at repressed gene promotersDecreased at SRT1 binding sitesRepression of target genes
Without ethylenePresent but reducedHigher levelsLess repression
SRT1/SRT2 double mutantAbsentMaintained even with ethyleneDerepression of ethylene-repressed genes

Table 3: Troubleshooting Guide for SRT1 Antibody Applications

IssuePotential CausesSolutionsControls to Include
No signal in Western blotProtein degradation; Epitope destruction; Wrong antibody dilutionFresh sample preparation; Optimize extraction buffer; Antibody titrationPositive control sample; Loading control
High backgroundInsufficient blocking; Excessive antibody; Non-specific bindingOptimize blocking; Reduce antibody concentration; More stringent washingSecondary-only control; Pre-immune serum control
Multiple bandsCross-reactivity; Protein degradation; Post-translational modificationsValidate with knockout sample; Add protease inhibitors; Use fresh samplesSize marker; Known positive control
Failed ChIPInsufficient crosslinking; Poor sonication; Low antibody specificityOptimize crosslinking time; Adjust sonication parameters; Try different antibodyInput control; IgG control; Positive control region

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.