The alphanumeric format "SPAC139.05" does not conform to standard antibody nomenclature conventions (e.g., catalog numbers like ab3924 or 4030-05 ). Antibody identifiers typically include:
Vendor-specific codes (e.g., "ab3924" for Abcam, "4030-05" for Southern Biotech)
Target specificity (e.g., "anti-IgA secretory component" , "anti-rabbit IgG" )
No matches were found for "SPAC139.05" in these categories.
The identifier may contain a typo. For example:
SPAC139.05 → Possible intended targets include "SC-05" (ab3924, anti-IgA secretory component ) or "4030-05" (anti-rabbit IgG-HRP ).
While "SPAC139.05" remains unidentifiable, the following antibodies from the provided materials may be of interest:
Verify the identifier with the original source or supplier.
Explore analogous antibodies:
Consult recent publications: Antibodies in early-stage development (e.g., pre-2025) may not yet be indexed in commercial databases.
KEGG: spo:SPAC139.05
STRING: 4896.SPAC139.05.1
SPAC139.05 is a protein found in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast). Antibodies against this target are typically used in research settings focused on yeast cellular processes and molecular biology . The commercially available SPAC139.05 Antibody offered by manufacturers like CUSABIO-WUHAN HUAMEI BIOTECH Co., Ltd. is designed specifically for research applications involving this fission yeast protein .
A typical SPAC139.05 Antibody application protocol would involve:
| Experimental Technique | Typical Dilution | Incubation Time | Temperature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blotting | 1:1000 | Overnight | 4°C |
| Immunofluorescence | 1:200-1:500 | 1-2 hours | Room temp |
| ELISA | 1:2000-1:5000 | 1-2 hours | Room temp |
Validation of antibody specificity is crucial for generating reliable research data. For SPAC139.05 Antibody, consider these methodological approaches:
Knockout/knockdown controls: Compare antibody binding in wild-type vs. SPAC139.05 knockout or knockdown strains of S. pombe to verify specific target recognition .
Western blot analysis: Confirm a single band of appropriate molecular weight. Multiple bands might indicate non-specific binding or protein degradation .
Peptide competition assay: Pre-incubate the antibody with purified SPAC139.05 protein or peptide before application to samples. Diminished signal confirms specificity .
Cross-species reactivity testing: Test the antibody against related proteins from other yeast species to evaluate potential cross-reactivity .
Proper storage is essential for maintaining antibody activity. Based on standard protocols for research antibodies similar to SPAC139.05 Antibody:
Aliquot upon first thaw to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Working stocks can be maintained at 4°C for up to 2 weeks
Many preparations contain 50% glycerol/PBS with preservatives like sodium azide for stability
While specific ChIP protocols for SPAC139.05 are not widely reported, methodological approaches based on similar yeast protein antibodies include:
Crosslinking optimization: For S. pombe proteins, a 1% formaldehyde crosslinking for 15-20 minutes at room temperature is typically effective .
Sonication parameters: Chromatin should be shared by sonication (e.g., 30s on/30s off at medium setting for approximately 10 minutes) to achieve fragments of 200-500 bp .
Quantification methodology: ChIP signal values should be expressed as percentages of input DNA corrected for the no-antibody background to ensure accurate quantification .
Controls: Include both positive controls (a known binding region) and negative controls (a non-binding region) to validate the specificity of immunoprecipitation .
Researchers working with low-abundance SPAC139.05 protein can employ several methodological enhancements:
Signal amplification systems: Using tyramide signal amplification or polymeric detection systems can increase sensitivity by 10-50 fold .
Optimized immunoprecipitation: For co-IP experiments, using specialized buffers with reduced detergent concentrations might preserve weaker protein-protein interactions .
Super-resolution imaging techniques: For immunofluorescence applications, techniques like STORM or PALM can enhance detection of low-abundance proteins beyond standard confocal microscopy limits .
Proximity ligation assays: When studying protein-protein interactions involving SPAC139.05, this technique can visualize interactions with higher sensitivity than conventional co-immunoprecipitation .
For researchers developing multi-parameter analysis protocols:
Panel design considerations: When using SPAC139.05 Antibody in flow cytometry, it should be conjugated to fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap with other markers in your panel .
Compensation matrix: Proper compensation is crucial when SPAC139.05 Antibody is labeled with fluorophores like APC or PE that have broad emission spectra .
Optimizing fixation and permeabilization: Since SPAC139.05 is likely an intracellular target, fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde followed by permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 is recommended .
Fluorophore selection table:
| Application Requirements | Recommended Fluorophore | Excitation (nm) | Emission (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multiplexing (3+ colors) | APC | 650 | 660 |
| High sensitivity needed | PE | 565 | 573 |
| Confocal imaging | DyLight 594 | 593 | 618 |
| Standard flow cytometry | FITC | 495 | 519 |
Successful Western blotting with SPAC139.05 Antibody requires careful optimization:
Sample preparation: For S. pombe proteins, effective extraction requires mechanical disruption (e.g., glass beads) combined with appropriate lysis buffers containing protease inhibitors .
Blocking optimization: 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST is typically effective, but for phospho-specific applications, 5% BSA may yield better results .
Primary antibody incubation: For optimal signal-to-noise ratio, incubation overnight at 4°C with gentle agitation is recommended .
Secondary antibody selection: Choose species-appropriate secondary antibodies (typically anti-mouse or anti-rabbit) conjugated to HRP for standard chemiluminescent detection .
Detection system: For quantitative analysis, digital imaging systems with appropriate dynamic range should be used rather than film-based detection .
Proper controls are essential for result interpretation:
Positive control: Include a sample known to express SPAC139.05 protein to verify the staining protocol is working correctly.
Negative control: Use one of the following approaches:
Subcellular localization verification: Compare observed localization with reported localization data for SPAC139.05 to ensure staining patterns are consistent with biological expectations.
Cross-reactivity assessment: Test the antibody on tissues/cells not expected to express the target to identify potential non-specific binding .
Epitope retrieval methods significantly impact antibody binding:
Heat-induced epitope retrieval (HIER): Test multiple buffer systems:
Retrieval duration: Typically 15-20 minutes is sufficient, but optimization may be required for specific fixation conditions .
Enzymatic retrieval: For some epitopes, enzymatic treatment with proteases like proteinase K may be more effective than heat-based methods.
Fixation considerations: Antibody performance is directly related to fixation methods - shorter fixation times (4-24 hours) generally preserve epitopes better than extended fixation.
When signals are weaker than expected, consider these methodological remedies:
Antibody concentration: Titrate the antibody to determine optimal concentration; too low or too high concentrations can reduce specific signal .
Target abundance: If SPAC139.05 is expressed at low levels, consider enrichment techniques or more sensitive detection methods .
Epitope accessibility: The conformation of the target protein may obscure the epitope; try alternative fixation methods or epitope retrieval techniques .
Antibody quality: Antibody effectiveness can diminish over time or with improper storage; use fresh aliquots and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles .
Detection system sensitivity: Switch to more sensitive detection systems like tyramide signal amplification or polymeric HRP detection .
For researchers investigating new molecular interactions:
Post-translational modifications require specialized detection methods:
Phospho-specific antibodies: Consider generating antibodies specific to known or predicted phosphorylation sites on SPAC139.05 .
Lambda phosphatase treatment: Compare antibody binding before and after phosphatase treatment to determine phosphorylation-dependent binding .
Phos-tag gels: These specialized acrylamide gels can separate phosphorylated from non-phosphorylated proteins based on mobility shifts.
Mass spectrometry validation: For definitive identification of phosphorylation sites, MS/MS analysis following immunoprecipitation provides site-specific information .
Mutation studies: Replacing predicted phosphorylation sites with alanine can confirm the importance of specific sites for antibody recognition.
Forward-looking researchers should consider these evolving methodologies:
Single-cell proteomics: Adapting antibody-based detection to single-cell resolution can reveal cell-to-cell variability in SPAC139.05 expression .
Spatial proteomics: Techniques like Imaging Mass Cytometry or CODEX enable highly multiplexed antibody-based imaging for spatial context .
Synthetic antibody technologies: Recombinant antibody fragments with enhanced specificity and reduced size might improve access to sterically hindered epitopes .
Deep learning applications: AI-based image analysis can enhance detection and quantification of antibody staining, particularly in complex tissues or cellular contexts .
In situ proximity ligation: This approach can visualize protein-protein interactions with higher sensitivity than conventional co-immunoprecipitation techniques .