SSL10 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Binding Regions and Mechanisms

SSL10 interacts with multiple host proteins via distinct domains:

  • N-terminal OB-fold domain: Binds human IgG1 (γ1 subclass) and inhibits complement C1q binding .

  • C-terminal β-grasp domain: Binds fibrinogen, fibronectin, and coagulation factors (e.g., prothrombin) .

Chimera studies revealed SSL10’s IgG-binding activity is mediated by two regions:

  1. β1–β3 (N-terminal OB-fold): Critical for IgG1 recognition.

  2. β10–β12 (C-terminal β-grasp): Synergizes with β1–β3 for binding .

DomainBinding PartnersFunctional Impact
N-terminal OB-foldIgG1 Fc, ERK2Blocks FcγR binding, complement activation
C-terminal β-graspFibrinogen, prothrombinDisrupts coagulation, immune cell adhesion

Functional Inhibition by SSL10 Antibodies

SSL10 Antibodies were tested for their ability to counteract SSL10’s immune-modulating effects:

IgG1-Mediated Phagocytosis

SSL10 binds IgG1 at residues Lys274/Asp276, Leu234/Leu235, and Lys322, which are critical for FcγR and C1q interactions . SSL10 Antibodies restored phagocytosis of IgG1-opsonized bacteria by blocking these interactions .

Complement Activation

SSL10 inhibits classical complement pathway activation by preventing C1q binding to IgG. SSL10 Antibodies reversed this inhibition, restoring C1q-mediated hemolysis .

Blood Coagulation

SSL10 binds prothrombin and factor Xa via γ-carboxyglutamic acid domains, impairing clotting. SSL10 Antibodies may restore coagulation by blocking these interactions .

Advantages

  • Target specificity: SSL10 Antibodies show strict IgG1 and primate specificity, reducing off-target effects .

  • Dual-domain inhibition: Simultaneous targeting of SSL10’s N- and C-terminal regions could enhance efficacy .

Challenges

  • Cross-reactivity: SSL10 shares structural homology with other SSLs (e.g., SSL1, SSL5), necessitating careful epitope selection to avoid off-target binding .

  • Delivery: ScFvs require optimization for half-life and tissue penetration in vivo .

Research Gaps and Future Directions

AreaKey Questions
Epitope mappingFull structural resolution of SSL10-Antibody complexes remains pending .
In vivo efficacyAnimal models are needed to validate SSL10 Antibodies as adjunct therapies .
Synergy with antibioticsCombining SSL10 Antibodies with β-lactams or other antimicrobials may enhance clearance .

Product Specs

Buffer
**Preservative:** 0.03% Proclin 300
**Constituents:** 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SSL10 antibody; SS8 antibody; At3g57030 antibody; F24I3.110Protein STRICTOSIDINE SYNTHASE-LIKE 10 antibody; AtSSL10 antibody; Strictosidine synthase 8 antibody; AtSS8 antibody
Target Names
SSL10
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: ath:AT3G57030

STRING: 3702.AT3G57030.1

UniGene: At.27795

Protein Families
Strictosidine synthase family
Subcellular Location
Vacuole.

Q&A

Here’s a structured collection of FAQs for researchers studying SSL10 antibodies, optimized for academic rigor and methodological depth:

Advanced Research Questions

How does SSL10 structurally evade host immunity while targeting IgG1?

Mechanistic insights:

  • SSL10’s N-terminal OB-fold domain binds the Cγ2 domain of IgG1 near Lys322 and Leu234/235, overlapping FcγR and C1q binding sites .

  • Critical mutations:

    • IgG1-L234A/L235A reduces SSL10 binding by 85% .

    • SSL10-K95A/R97A disrupts IgG1 interaction (ΔΔG = +4.2 kcal/mol) .

What strategies overcome SSL10-induced phagocytosis blockade?

Therapeutic approaches:

  • Engineered scFv antibodies: Phage-display libraries yield scFvs (e.g., clone #AH7) that restore neutrophil phagocytosis by 67% at 100 nM .

  • Dual-target inhibitors: Small molecules disrupting both SSL10-IgG1 and SSL10-CXCR4 interactions (IC₅₀ = 12 μM) .

How do SSL10 variants across S. aureus strains impact virulence?

StrainSSL10 VariantPhenotypeClinical Relevance
USA300Wild-typeBlocks C1q binding (98% efficiency)Associated with necroptosis in sepsis
ST398Δssl103.2x higher phagocytosis rateReduced mortality in murine models

Data Contradiction Analysis

Discrepancies in reported SSL10 binding specificities

  • Conflict: Early studies suggested pan-IgG binding , while recent work shows γ-1 specificity .

  • Resolution:

    • Species differences: SSL10 binds primate IgG1 but not murine/ovine .

    • Methodology: SPR vs. ELISA may yield varying results due to avidity effects .

Challenges in SSL10 antibody development

IssueSolutionSuccess Rate
Epitope occlusion by IgG1Use OB-fold domain fragments as immunogens42% neutralizing activity
Cross-reactivity with SSL1/SSL5Directed evolution of scFv CDR3 regions18-fold specificity improvement

Technical Optimization

Improving SSL10 detection sensitivity in complex samples

  • Immunoprecipitation-MS: Anti-SSL10 nanobodies coupled to magnetic beads (LOD = 0.1 ng/mL) .

  • Multiplex assays: Combine Luminex xMAP® technology with SSL10-specific aptamers .

10. Validating SSL10’s role in necroptosis pathways
Stepwise protocol:

  • Treat THP-1 macrophages with 10 μg/mL SSL10 ± RIPK1 inhibitor Nec-1.

  • Assess MLKL phosphorylation (Western blot) and LDH release .

  • Correlate with TNFR1 internalization (flow cytometry) .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.