The STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody is a rabbit polyclonal antibody that specifically detects endogenous levels of total STAT5A protein in human samples. It was produced by immunizing rabbits with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the sequence around amino acids 778-782 (R-L-S-P-P) of human STAT5A conjugated to KLH (Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin). The antibody was purified through affinity chromatography using the epitope-specific peptide . This careful generation process ensures high specificity for STAT5A, with minimal cross-reactivity to other STAT family members.
STAT5A is a transcription factor that plays dual roles in signal transduction and transcriptional activation. It mediates cellular responses to cytokines and growth factors, including KITLG/SCF and ERBB4, and binds to GAS (Gamma-Activated Sequence) elements to activate prolactin-induced transcription . Position 780 is particularly significant as it contains a serine residue (S780) that undergoes phosphorylation. Research has demonstrated that S780 phosphorylation regulates STAT5A activity distinctly from the well-characterized tyrosine phosphorylation at Y694. S780 phosphorylation affects STAT5A's role in oncogenesis, particularly in luminal breast cancer, where it specifically influences the clonogenicity of cancer cells . The antibody's targeting of this region makes it valuable for studying this regulatory mechanism.
For optimal preservation of antibody activity, STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody should be stored at -20°C for long-term preservation. For short-term use (up to 6 months), storage at 4°C is acceptable . The antibody is supplied at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL in phosphate buffered saline (without Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺), pH 7.4, with 150mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide, and 50% glycerol . This formulation helps maintain stability during storage. It is crucial to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they can degrade antibody performance . For laboratories conducting regular experiments with this antibody, preparing small working aliquots is recommended to minimize freeze-thaw cycles of the stock solution.
The STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody has been validated for two primary applications:
Western Blotting (WB):
Recommended dilution: 1:500 to 1:1000
Expected molecular weight: 90 kDa
Sample preparation: Total cell lysates or nuclear extracts
Blocking recommendation: 5% non-fat milk in TBST
Detection system: Standard HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies with ECL detection
Immunohistochemistry (IHC):
Recommended dilution: 1:50 to 1:100
Sample preparation: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections
Antigen retrieval: Heat-induced epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0)
Detection system: Polymer-based detection systems (e.g., HRP-polymer conjugates)
Positive control: Human breast carcinoma tissue (as shown in validation images)
Validation data demonstrates successful detection of STAT5A in K562 cells by Western blot and in human breast carcinoma tissue by immunohistochemistry , confirming the antibody's specificity and performance in these applications.
To effectively distinguish between phosphorylated and total STAT5A:
For Total STAT5A Detection:
Use STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody at recommended dilutions
Include phosphatase inhibitors in lysis buffers to maintain the natural phosphorylation state
Consider cell stimulation states based on experimental needs
For Phospho-Specific Detection:
For pY694-STAT5: Use phospho-specific antibodies like the SRBCZX monoclonal antibody, which recognizes STAT5 phosphorylated at tyrosine 694
For pS780-STAT5A: Use specific antibodies such as anti-STAT5a (phospho S780) antibody (ab30649)
Use lambda phosphatase-treated samples as negative controls
Comparative Analysis Protocol:
Prepare duplicate samples for parallel analysis
Probe one membrane with STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody for total STAT5A
Probe another membrane with phospho-specific antibodies
Normalize phospho-signal to total STAT5A signal for quantitative analysis
Include appropriate positive controls (e.g., cytokine-stimulated cells)
This approach allows researchers to quantitatively assess the proportion of phosphorylated STAT5A relative to total STAT5A under various experimental conditions.
Based on research findings, the following cell types and models are particularly appropriate for STAT5A studies using this antibody:
Cell Lines:
K562 cells: Used in validation Western blots, these BCR-ABL+ cells show strong STAT5A expression and activation
MCF7 cells: Luminal breast cancer cells appropriate for studying STAT5A's role in breast cancer pathogenesis
Jurkat cells: T-cell leukemia line showing STAT5A phosphorylation responses to stimuli
293T cells: Used in transfection studies for STAT5A overexpression and mutant analysis
Primary Cells:
Hematopoietic cells: STAT5A plays critical roles in normal and malignant hematopoiesis
Mammary epithelial cells: Important for studying STAT5A's role in lactation and breast cancer
Experimental Models:
BCR-ABL-driven leukemia models: STAT5A is critical in the signaling network downstream of BCR-ABL
Breast cancer models: Particularly useful for studying the differential roles of S726 and S780 phosphorylation
Cytokine stimulation models: Using IL-2, IL-7, IL-15 (common gamma chain cytokines) or IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF (common beta chain cytokines) to activate STAT5 signaling
When designing experiments, researchers should consider that STAT5A and STAT5B have overlapping but distinct functions, particularly in hematopoietic cells, where STAT5B appears to be the dominant isoform downstream of BCR-ABL .
The STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody offers valuable capabilities for distinguishing STAT5A from STAT5B functions in hematopoiesis and leukemia research:
Experimental Approach:
Comparative Expression Analysis:
Use STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody alongside STAT5B-specific antibodies to quantify relative expression in various hematopoietic cell types
Analyze nuclear versus cytoplasmic fractions to assess differential translocation patterns
Knockdown/Knockout Validation Studies:
In cells with STAT5A or STAT5B knockdown/knockout, use the antibody to confirm specificity and absence of compensatory changes
Combine with functional assays (proliferation, survival, differentiation) to attribute phenotypes to specific isoforms
BCR-ABL Signaling Analysis:
Use in co-immunoprecipitation studies to identify STAT5A-specific interactors in BCR-ABL+ cells
Combine with phospho-specific antibodies to compare activation patterns between isoforms
Research Applications:
Investigate the finding that STAT5B appears to be the dominant isoform downstream of BCR-ABL, facilitating transformation via suppression of IFN-α/β and IFN-γ signaling
Explore how BCR-ABL directly activates STAT5B to a higher extent than STAT5A, as STAT5A remains partially cytoplasmic
Study how imatinib-resistant cell lines upregulate STAT5A and become increasingly sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors upon STAT5A knockdown
This approach can help elucidate the mechanistic basis for STAT5B's apparent predominance in BCR-ABL+ leukemias while clarifying the distinct contributions of STAT5A to disease progression and treatment response.
Serine phosphorylation at position 780 of STAT5A represents a critical regulatory mechanism with distinct functional consequences in breast cancer:
Functional Impact of S780 Phosphorylation:
Research has demonstrated that S780 phosphorylation specifically affects STAT5A-mediated clonogenicity in breast cancer
MCF7 cells expressing S780A-STAT5A (preventing phosphorylation at this site) showed decreased colony formation in soft agar assays compared to wild-type STAT5A
This effect differs from S726 phosphorylation, which primarily influences proliferation rather than clonogenicity
Experimental Protocol for Investigating S780 Function:
Site-directed mutagenesis approach:
Generate STAT5A constructs with point mutations (S780A)
Create stable cell lines expressing these constructs in STAT5A-knockdown backgrounds
Perform RNA-sequencing to identify differentially regulated genes
Validate using functional assays (colony formation, proliferation, apoptosis)
Phosphorylation-specific detection:
Use phospho-S780-specific antibodies to monitor this modification under various conditions
Compare with total STAT5A detection using STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody
Correlate phosphorylation status with functional outcomes
Pathway Analysis Findings:
Research utilizing this approach revealed that loss of S780 phosphorylation significantly affects both prolactin-induced gene expression and functional pathways in breast cancer, including cell survival and colony formation. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of RNA-seq data from cells expressing wild-type versus S780A-STAT5A identified distinct gene expression signatures and downstream pathways affected by this phosphorylation event .
This methodology demonstrates how researchers can utilize STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody in combination with site-directed mutagenesis and phospho-specific antibodies to dissect the complex regulatory mechanisms governing STAT5A function in cancer.
STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody can be instrumental in evaluating STAT5 inhibition strategies, which represent promising therapeutic approaches for STAT5-dependent malignancies:
Research Applications in Drug Development:
Target Validation Studies:
Use the antibody to confirm STAT5A expression in patient-derived samples
Quantify nuclear versus cytoplasmic STAT5A to assess activation status
Correlate STAT5A levels with disease progression and treatment response
Inhibitor Screening Protocols:
Western blot analysis with STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody to evaluate:
Total STAT5A protein levels after inhibitor treatment
Changes in STAT5A subcellular localization
Potential degradation or post-translational modifications
Combine with phospho-specific antibodies to monitor inhibition of activation
Mechanism of Action Studies:
Use in co-immunoprecipitation experiments to identify changes in STAT5A protein interactions
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays to assess STAT5A binding to target genes
Immunofluorescence to visualize changes in STAT5A localization
Therapeutic Targeting Approaches:
Research has identified several STAT5 inhibition strategies that can be studied using this antibody:
| Inhibition Strategy | Mechanism | Representative Compounds | Assessment Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| SH2 Domain Obstruction | Prevents STAT5 dimerization and activation | AC-4-130, IST5-002 | WB for phospho-STAT5, nuclear STAT5 |
| Selective STAT5B Inhibition | Targets STAT5B-specific amino acids | Capstafin, Stafib-1, Stafib-2 | Comparative WB for STAT5A vs STAT5B |
| Upstream Kinase Inhibition | Blocks JAK/STAT activation | Ruxolitinib (JAK1/2 inhibitor) | WB for phospho-STAT5, total STAT5 |
| Nuclear Translocation Blocking | Prevents STAT5 nuclear entry | GTPase inhibitors | Nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation, IHC |
The STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody is particularly valuable for evaluating inhibitors that target the C-terminal region of STAT5A where the epitope is located, as these may affect detection if they alter antibody binding .
Researchers may encounter several technical challenges when working with STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody, particularly in Western blotting and immunohistochemistry applications:
Western Blotting Challenges:
| Challenge | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Weak signal | Insufficient protein, antibody dilution too high, short exposure | Increase protein loading (40-60 μg), optimize antibody concentration (start at 1:500), increase exposure time |
| High background | Inadequate blocking, antibody concentration too high | Extend blocking time (2 hours at RT or overnight at 4°C), optimize antibody dilution (1:1000), add 0.05% Tween-20 to wash buffers |
| Multiple bands | Post-translational modifications, protein degradation, non-specific binding | Add protease inhibitors to lysis buffer, use freshly prepared samples, include negative controls |
| No signal | Incorrect secondary antibody, protein transfer issues | Verify compatibility of secondary antibody, check transfer efficiency with Ponceau S staining |
Immunohistochemistry Challenges:
| Challenge | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Weak or no staining | Inadequate antigen retrieval, antibody dilution | Optimize antigen retrieval (pH, temperature, time), test lower antibody dilutions (1:50) |
| Non-specific staining | Insufficient blocking, cross-reactivity | Extend blocking time, use alternative blocking reagents (5% BSA), include peptide competition controls |
| Variable staining intensity | Tissue fixation differences, processing variations | Standardize fixation protocols, include positive control tissues in each run |
| Edge artifact | Drying during staining | Ensure adequate antibody coverage, use humidity chambers |
General Optimization Strategies:
For nuclear proteins like STAT5A, optimize nuclear extraction protocols
In stimulation experiments, include time course analysis to capture optimal activation
Incorporate peptide competition controls to confirm specificity
When comparing STAT5A and STAT5B, run parallel blots with isoform-specific antibodies
These troubleshooting approaches are based on validation data showing successful detection of STAT5A in K562 cells by Western blot and in human breast carcinoma tissue by IHC .
Distinguishing between the highly homologous STAT5A and STAT5B proteins requires careful experimental design:
Experimental Approaches for Isoform Discrimination:
Antibody Selection Strategy:
STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody targets a sequence around aa. 778-782 (R-L-S-P-P) in human STAT5A
This C-terminal region contains sequence differences between STAT5A and STAT5B
Use alongside STAT5B-specific antibodies targeting unique STAT5B epitopes
Validation Methods:
Recombinant Protein Controls: Include purified recombinant STAT5A and STAT5B proteins as controls
Knockout/Knockdown Controls: Use STAT5A-/- and STAT5B-/- cell lines or knockdown samples
Band Migration Analysis: STAT5A (~94 kDa) and STAT5B (~92 kDa) can sometimes be distinguished by slight differences in migration on high-resolution gels
Immunoprecipitation-Western: Immunoprecipitate with isoform-specific antibodies, then blot with pan-STAT5 antibodies
Cross-Reactivity Assessment Protocol:
Practical Implementation:
Research suggests preferential use of this approach in models where one isoform predominates, such as BCR-ABL+ leukemia models where STAT5B plays a dominant role . When both isoforms are present, combining these discrimination approaches with functional studies (e.g., knockdown of individual isoforms followed by phenotypic analysis) provides the most comprehensive understanding of isoform-specific functions.
Rigorous experimental design requires appropriate controls to ensure valid interpretation of results when using STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody:
Essential Controls for Western Blotting:
Positive Controls:
Negative Controls:
STAT5A-knockout or knockdown cell lysates
Cell lines with minimal STAT5A expression
Secondary antibody only (omit primary antibody)
Specificity Controls:
Peptide competition assay using the immunizing peptide (R-L-S-P-P)
Non-specific peptide control to confirm specificity
Loading Controls:
Housekeeping proteins (β-actin, GAPDH)
Total protein staining (Ponceau S, Coomassie)
Essential Controls for Immunohistochemistry:
Tissue Controls:
Procedural Controls:
Omit primary antibody (secondary antibody only)
Isotype control (non-specific rabbit IgG at same concentration)
Peptide competition control (pre-incubation with immunizing peptide)
Comparative Controls:
Serial sections stained with antibodies to related proteins (STAT5B)
Phospho-specific STAT5A antibodies on adjacent sections
Experimental Validation Controls:
For functional studies examining STAT5A phosphorylation and activity:
Unstimulated versus cytokine-stimulated samples (e.g., prolactin stimulation)
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor-treated samples (e.g., imatinib in BCR-ABL+ cells)
Phosphatase-treated samples to eliminate phosphorylation
Inclusion of these comprehensive controls ensures reliable interpretation of experimental results and facilitates troubleshooting if unexpected results occur .
Despite their high homology, STAT5A and STAT5B exhibit distinct functions in BCR-ABL-driven leukemias that can be studied using specific methodological approaches:
Functional Differences:
STAT5B, not STAT5A, is the dominant isoform downstream of BCR-ABL in leukemic transformation
STAT5B facilitates transformation by suppressing IFN-α/β and IFN-γ signaling
BCR-ABL directly activates STAT5B to a greater extent than STAT5A
STAT5A remains partially cytoplasmic in BCR-ABL+ cells
STAT5A knockdown in human cells shows minimal effect on survival, while STAT5B diminishment increases apoptosis and reduces self-renewal potential
Paradoxically, imatinib-resistant cell lines upregulate STAT5A, and STAT5A knockdown increases sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Experimental Approaches to Study These Differences:
Differential Localization Analysis:
Nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation followed by Western blotting with STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody
Immunofluorescence microscopy to visualize subcellular localization
Protocol: Compare nuclear/cytoplasmic ratios of STAT5A versus STAT5B in BCR-ABL+ cells before and after tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment
Isoform-Specific Knockdown Studies:
Transcriptomic Profiling:
RNA-seq after isoform-specific knockdown
ChIP-seq to identify distinct binding sites
Protocol: Compare gene expression profiles after STAT5A versus STAT5B knockdown in BCR-ABL+ cells to identify isoform-specific target genes
Phosphorylation Dynamics:
Time-course analysis of tyrosine and serine phosphorylation
Phospho-specific antibodies in combination with STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody
Protocol: Monitor kinetics of STAT5A and STAT5B phosphorylation after BCR-ABL activation or inhibition
These methodologies can reveal the mechanistic basis for STAT5B's privileged role in BCR-ABL+ leukemias while elucidating the context-specific contributions of STAT5A to disease progression and treatment response .
Phosphorylation of serine 780 in STAT5A represents a critical regulatory mechanism with specific functional consequences in breast cancer that can be studied using tailored experimental approaches:
Biological Significance of S780 Phosphorylation:
S780 phosphorylation regulates STAT5A activity distinctly from the well-characterized Y694 phosphorylation
In breast cancer, S780 and S726 phosphorylation have non-redundant roles, with S780 specifically affecting clonogenicity
MCF7 cells expressing S780A-STAT5A (preventing phosphorylation) show decreased colony formation in soft agar assays
RNA-sequencing analysis reveals that S780 phosphorylation regulates distinct gene expression patterns that influence cell survival and colony formation
Research Methodologies:
Mutation-Based Functional Analysis:
Phosphorylation Detection and Dynamics:
Use phospho-S780-specific antibodies alongside STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody
Stimulation time courses with prolactin and other activators
In vitro kinase assays to identify responsible kinases
Protocol: Monitor S780 phosphorylation in response to various stimuli and correlate with functional outcomes
Transcriptional Target Identification:
Clinical Correlation Studies:
Immunohistochemistry on breast cancer tissue microarrays using phospho-S780 antibodies
Correlation with clinical parameters and outcomes
Protocol: Compare phospho-S780 levels across breast cancer subtypes and stages
This multi-faceted approach has revealed that S780 phosphorylation contributes to STAT5A's functional dichotomy in breast cancer, regulating both pro-differentiative and pro-proliferative target genes. The research demonstrates that S780 phosphorylation specifically affects clonogenicity, which differs from S726 phosphorylation that primarily influences proliferation .
STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody provides researchers with valuable tools to evaluate promising therapeutic strategies targeting STAT5 in cancer and other diseases:
Therapeutic Targeting Approaches:
Direct STAT5 Inhibition Strategies:
SH2 domain inhibitors (AC-4-130, IST5-002)
DNA-binding domain inhibitors
N-domain inhibitors affecting oligomerization
Selective STAT5B inhibitors (Capstafin, Stafib-1, Stafib-2)
Indirect Approaches:
Experimental Applications of STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody:
Target Validation and Expression Analysis:
Protocol: Quantify STAT5A expression across cell lines and patient samples using Western blotting and IHC
Application: Identify high STAT5A-expressing samples that may benefit from STAT5-targeted therapy
Methodology: Use STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody at 1:500-1:1000 dilution for Western blot to screen cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models
Compound Screening and Mechanism Validation:
Protocol: Treat cells with candidate compounds and analyze STAT5A expression, localization, and activity
Application: Identify compounds that effectively modulate STAT5A function
Methodology:
Western blotting with STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody to assess total protein levels
Nuclear/cytoplasmic fractionation to evaluate nuclear translocation
Co-immunoprecipitation to examine protein-protein interactions
Resistance Mechanism Studies:
Protocol: Compare STAT5A expression and localization in treatment-sensitive versus resistant cells
Application: Understand how STAT5A contributes to resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Methodology: Parallel analysis of STAT5A and STAT5B expression and phosphorylation in resistant models
Combination Therapy Assessment:
Protocol: Treat cells with STAT5 inhibitors alone or in combination with other targeted agents
Application: Identify synergistic combinations for enhanced efficacy
Methodology: Western blotting with STAT5A (Ab-780) Antibody combined with viability and apoptosis assays
Research Findings on Potential Therapeutic Applications:
Studies have shown that disrupting the STAT5-BCR-ABL interaction could be therapeutically relevant in STAT5-dependent hematopoietic diseases. Inhibitors like IST5-002 block phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of STAT5A/B in BCR-ABL+ systems both in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, STAT5B-selective inhibitors (Stafib-1/2) target a STAT5B-specific amino acid in the linker domain, representing a novel design approach .