STX18 antibody is a polyclonal antibody raised against the human Syntaxin 18 protein, which localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus. It is widely used to investigate STX18’s roles in vesicular transport, cancer biology, and lipid droplet dynamics .
The antibody has been rigorously validated across multiple applications:
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Effective at 1:500–1:1000 dilution for detecting STX18 in human tissues .
Immunofluorescence (IF): Works at 0.25–2 µg/mL, confirming STX18’s subcellular localization .
Western Blot: Detects endogenous STX18 in lung cancer cell lines (e.g., A549, H460) and liver tissue .
Specificity is confirmed by knockdown experiments, where reduced STX18 expression correlates with diminished signal .
STX18 knockdown in NSCLC cells (A549, H460) impaired DNA damage checkpoints (ATM/ATR pathways) and increased apoptosis via mitotic catastrophe. The antibody confirmed reduced STX18 protein levels post-shRNA knockdown, correlating with:
In HepG2 cells, STX18 antibody revealed its localization on lipid droplets (LDs). Knockdown studies showed:
SPP protease cleaves STX18, triggering proteasomal degradation. The antibody detected:
KEGG: dre:554130
UniGene: Dr.87736
STX18 (Syntaxin 18) is an ER-resident SNARE protein that plays a critical role in retrograde vesicular transport between the Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum. Beyond its role in membrane trafficking, STX18 has been identified as a substrate for the intramembrane protease SPP and has emerging functions in DNA damage response pathways. It is relatively long-lived compared to many cellular proteins and has been implicated in cancer cell radioresistance, making it an important target for both basic cell biology and translational cancer research .
STX18 antibodies are available in multiple formats including monoclonal mouse antibodies (such as clone 2E5) and polyclonal rabbit antibodies. The monoclonal antibodies are available in specialized formats such as azide-free and BSA-free preparations for sensitive applications. These antibodies have been validated across multiple species including human, mouse, and rat samples. Researchers should select the appropriate format based on their experimental needs, with monoclonals offering higher specificity and polyclonals potentially providing greater sensitivity .
STX18 antibodies have been validated for multiple applications including:
Western blotting (WB)
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded tissues (IHC-P)
Immunocytochemistry/Immunofluorescence (ICC/IF)
Sandwich ELISA
The recommended dilutions vary by application, with IHC typically using 1:500-1:1000 dilutions and ICC/IF requiring 1-4 μg/ml. For optimal results, researchers should experimentally determine the ideal concentration for their specific experimental conditions and sample types .
For optimal Western blot results with STX18 antibodies:
Sample preparation: Prepare cell lysates in RIPA or NP-40 buffer containing protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Protein loading: Load 20-40 μg of total protein per lane
Gel percentage: Use 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels for optimal separation
Transfer conditions: Transfer to PVDF membrane at 100V for 1 hour or 30V overnight
Blocking: Block with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Primary antibody: Incubate with STX18 antibody at experimentally determined dilution (typically starting at 1:1000) overnight at 4°C
Detection controls: Include positive controls such as PC-12 or Raw 264.7 cell lysates which have been validated for STX18 detection
Expected results: Anticipate a band at approximately 42 kDa for full-length STX18, with potential cleavage fragments at lower molecular weights when studying proteolytic processing
The antibody has been validated to detect STX18 expression in cell lines such as PC-12 and Raw 264.7, making these useful positive controls .
To maintain optimal antibody performance:
Upon receipt, immediately aliquot the antibody to minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Store at -20°C or -80°C in small working volumes (typically 10-20 μl)
Avoid more than 2-3 freeze-thaw cycles as this can lead to antibody denaturation and loss of activity
When thawing, place on ice and use immediately or return to storage
For diluted working solutions, store at 4°C and use within 1-2 weeks
If using BSA-free and azide-free formulations, consider adding a protein carrier (0.1-1% BSA) for longer-term storage of diluted antibody
Always centrifuge briefly before opening the antibody vial to collect all liquid at the bottom
Following these guidelines will help maintain antibody specificity and sensitivity throughout your research project timeline .
When performing immunohistochemistry with STX18 antibodies, the following controls are essential:
Positive tissue control: Human salivary gland has been validated for STX18 expression and serves as an excellent positive control
Negative controls:
Omission of primary antibody (secondary antibody only)
Isotype control (matching IgG at the same concentration)
Tissue known to lack STX18 expression
Antigen competition: Pre-incubation of antibody with immunizing peptide to confirm specificity
Concentration gradient: Testing multiple antibody concentrations (typically 1-5 μg/ml)
Signal validation: Using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of STX18
Knockdown validation: When possible, compare staining between wild-type and STX18-knockdown samples
Recommended antibody concentration is 3 μg/ml for paraffin-embedded tissues, but optimal concentration should be determined experimentally for each tissue type and fixation method .
To investigate STX18's role in DNA damage response:
Radiation-induced damage model:
Treat cells with X-radiation (2-10 Gy)
Use STX18 antibodies in Western blot and immunofluorescence to monitor changes in expression levels and subcellular localization
Compare STX18 levels in radioresistant versus radiosensitive cell lines
STX18 knockdown experiments:
Generate STX18 knockdown cell lines using siRNA or CRISPR-Cas9
Assess DNA damage response by measuring γH2AX foci formation
Evaluate cell cycle checkpoints via flow cytometry
Analyze clonogenic survival following radiation treatment
Use STX18 antibodies to confirm knockdown efficiency
Co-immunoprecipitation:
Use STX18 antibodies to pull down protein complexes
Analyze interactions with DNA repair proteins
Compare protein interactions before and after DNA damage induction
These approaches can reveal how STX18 integrates membrane trafficking with DNA damage response pathways, particularly in the context of cancer radioresistance .
When experiencing non-specific binding with STX18 antibodies:
Increase blocking stringency:
Use 5% BSA instead of milk for blocking
Add 0.1-0.3% Triton X-100 to reduce hydrophobic interactions
Consider adding 5% normal serum from the secondary antibody host species
Antibody optimization:
Titrate primary antibody concentration
Reduce incubation time or increase washing steps
Test different antibody clones targeting different epitopes
Sample preparation adjustments:
Optimize fixation protocols (reduce fixation time)
Try antigen retrieval methods (citrate buffer pH 6.0 or EDTA buffer pH 9.0)
For Western blot, increase washing time and detergent concentration
Secondary antibody considerations:
Use highly cross-adsorbed secondary antibodies
Reduce secondary antibody concentration
Consider using F(ab')2 fragments to reduce Fc receptor binding
Validation strategies:
Verify specificity with peptide competition assays
Include STX18 knockdown samples as negative controls
These approaches can help distinguish specific STX18 signal from background, particularly in complex tissue samples .
To investigate STX18 processing by the intramembrane protease SPP:
Experimental design:
Treat cells with proteasome inhibitors (e.g., epoxomicin) to stabilize cleaved fragments
Use cycloheximide chase experiments to assess protein turnover rates
Apply SPP inhibitors such as (Z-LL)2-ketone to block cleavage
Antibody-based detection strategies:
Use antibodies recognizing different domains of STX18 to track specific fragments
Perform Western blotting with gradient gels (8-16%) to resolve both full-length and cleaved products
Combine with subcellular fractionation to detect cytosolic accumulation of cleaved fragments
Quantification approach:
Measure the ratio of full-length to cleaved STX18
Track degradation kinetics by time-course experiments
Compare processing efficiency under different cellular conditions
Controls:
Co-express wild-type SPP versus catalytically inactive SPP-DA mutant
Include other SNARE proteins (e.g., STX5) as specificity controls
Use cells with varying levels of endogenous SPP expression
This methodology has revealed that STX18 is a bona fide SPP substrate, with cleaved fragments being released into the cytosol and subsequently degraded by the proteasome .
STX18's role in cancer radioresistance can be investigated using antibodies through:
Expression analysis in cancer models:
Compare STX18 protein levels across radioresistant and radiosensitive cell lines
Assess STX18 expression in patient-derived xenografts before and after radiation treatment
Correlate STX18 expression with clinical radiotherapy outcomes in patient samples
Mechanistic investigations:
Use immunofluorescence to track STX18 relocalization following radiation
Employ co-immunoprecipitation with STX18 antibodies to identify radiation-induced protein interactions
Study post-translational modifications of STX18 after radiation exposure
Functional analyses:
Monitor STX18-dependent gene expression programs using antibodies for ChIP-seq
Assess impact on DNA damage repair by measuring γH2AX foci clearance
Analyze effects on cell cycle checkpoints and mitotic catastrophe
Research has shown that STX18 downregulation impairs DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoints and leads to cell death by mitotic catastrophe. Additionally, STX18 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers and affects migration and invasion capacity, suggesting it controls both primary tumor growth and metastatic potential following radiotherapy .
STX18-AS1 is a long non-coding RNA implicated in atrial septal defects. To study its role:
Expression analysis:
Use RT-qPCR to measure STX18-AS1 expression during cardiac development
Perform in situ hybridization to localize STX18-AS1 in developing heart tissue
Compare expression between normal and diseased cardiac samples
Functional studies:
Generate STX18-AS1 knockdown models using CRISPR techniques
Assess impact on cardiomyocyte differentiation from human embryonic stem cells
Monitor cardiac-specific gene expression, particularly NKX2-5
Molecular mechanism investigation:
Perform Chromatin Isolation by RNA Purification (ChIRP) to study STX18-AS1 interaction with chromatin
Use ChIP-qPCR to measure histone modifications (H3K4me3, H3K27me3) at cardiac gene promoters
Analyze interaction with chromatin remodeling complexes like SET1/MLL complex
Research has demonstrated that STX18-AS1 knockdown reduces H3K4me3 around the NKX2-5 gene by approximately 70%, corresponding with reduced NKX2-5 expression. STX18-AS1 interacts with WDR5, a scaffold protein of the SET1/MLL complex necessary for H3K4 trimethylation, suggesting it regulates cardiac development through epigenetic mechanisms .
Although the provided search results don't directly address STX18 in neurodegeneration, its role as an ER-resident SNARE protein suggests potential applications:
ER stress investigations:
Use STX18 antibodies to monitor protein levels during ER stress conditions
Assess STX18 distribution in neurons exposed to neurotoxic proteins
Compare STX18 processing in control versus disease models
Vesicular trafficking studies:
Employ co-localization analysis with STX18 antibodies and markers of ER-Golgi intermediate compartment
Track anterograde/retrograde transport defects in neuronal models
Measure interaction with other SNARE components under disease conditions
Proteostasis analysis:
Monitor STX18 degradation kinetics in presence of misfolded proteins
Assess SPP-mediated processing of STX18 in neurodegenerative models
Investigate potential sequestration of STX18 in protein aggregates
Therapeutic target validation:
Use STX18 antibodies to confirm target engagement of compounds affecting ER-Golgi trafficking
Monitor STX18 levels following treatment with proteostasis modulators
Validate STX18 pathway interventions in disease models
These approaches could reveal novel roles for STX18 in neuronal health and disease, potentially identifying new therapeutic targets for neurodegenerative conditions.
For multiplexed imaging with STX18 antibodies:
Antibody selection and validation:
Choose STX18 antibodies raised in different host species than other target antibodies
Validate antibody specificity with appropriate controls
Test for cross-reactivity with other primary and secondary antibodies in the panel
Sample preparation:
Optimize fixation protocols (4% paraformaldehyde for 10-15 minutes)
Use sequential antigen retrieval if necessary
Apply appropriate blocking (5% normal serum from secondary antibody host species)
Staining strategies:
Sequential staining: Complete one staining cycle before starting the next
Simultaneous staining: Apply compatible primary antibodies together
Consider using directly conjugated STX18 antibodies to eliminate secondary antibody issues
Signal separation:
Select fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap
Apply spectral unmixing algorithms for closely overlapping signals
Include single-stained controls for each fluorophore
Image acquisition:
Use sequential scanning for confocal microscopy
Apply appropriate exposure settings to avoid bleed-through
Acquire z-stacks to capture the full subcellular distribution
When co-staining with markers of vesicular compartments, STX18 antibodies work effectively at concentrations of 1-4 μg/ml for immunofluorescence applications .
For quantitative analysis of STX18 expression:
Sample standardization:
Use consistent tissue processing protocols
Prepare tissue microarrays for high-throughput analysis
Process all samples simultaneously when possible
Staining optimization:
Determine linear range of STX18 antibody staining
Include calibration controls with known STX18 expression levels
Apply automated staining platforms for consistency
Image acquisition standardization:
Use identical microscope settings across all samples
Acquire images at the same exposure and gain settings
Include fluorescence calibration beads or slides
Quantification methods:
Define consistent regions of interest (ROIs)
Apply automated analysis algorithms for unbiased quantification
Measure both intensity and distribution parameters
Data normalization:
Normalize to housekeeping proteins
Apply tissue-specific normalization factors
Use z-score transformations for cross-tissue comparisons
Statistical analysis:
Apply appropriate statistical tests for comparison across groups
Consider hierarchical clustering for pattern recognition
Use machine learning approaches for complex dataset analysis
This approach has been used successfully to compare STX18 expression in normal versus cancerous tissues, revealing its potential role in cancer progression .
To investigate STX18 protein interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Use STX18 antibodies conjugated to agarose or magnetic beads
Apply mild lysis conditions to preserve protein-protein interactions
Include appropriate controls: IgG control, input samples, and reciprocal IP
Consider crosslinking to stabilize transient interactions
Proximity ligation assay (PLA):
Combine STX18 antibody with antibodies against potential interacting partners
Optimize antibody concentrations and incubation conditions
Include appropriate controls: single antibody controls and known interacting pairs
FRET/BRET analysis:
Generate fluorescent protein-tagged STX18 constructs
Combine with tagged potential interacting partners
Measure energy transfer in live cells
Validate findings with co-IP of endogenous proteins
Mass spectrometry approaches:
Perform immunoprecipitation with STX18 antibodies
Analyze precipitated complexes by LC-MS/MS
Filter against appropriate control IPs
Validate top hits by orthogonal methods
Research has demonstrated that STX18 physically interacts with the intramembrane protease SPP, with the catalytically inactive SPP-DA mutant showing stronger interaction due to its substrate-trapping properties. This approach revealed that approximately 10% of total STX18 interacts with SPP-DA, providing insight into the kinetics of this enzyme-substrate relationship .
STX18 antibodies can be applied to investigate various cellular stress responses:
ER stress and unfolded protein response:
Monitor STX18 expression and localization during ER stress
Assess correlation with UPR markers (BiP, CHOP, XBP1s)
Track changes in STX18 processing under ER stress conditions
Oxidative stress:
Evaluate STX18 distribution following oxidative damage
Measure post-translational modifications (oxidation, nitrosylation)
Assess impact on membrane trafficking during redox imbalance
Nutrient deprivation and autophagy:
Track STX18 during starvation-induced autophagy
Investigate potential roles in autophagosome formation
Study interaction with autophagy machinery components
Hypoxic stress:
Monitor STX18 expression under hypoxic conditions
Assess correlation with HIF-1α stabilization
Evaluate changes in vesicular trafficking during hypoxia
These applications could reveal how membrane trafficking systems integrate with cellular stress response pathways, potentially identifying novel therapeutic targets for stress-related pathologies .
Several advanced techniques can enhance STX18 detection in difficult samples:
Signal amplification methods:
Tyramide signal amplification (TSA) to enhance fluorescence detection
Rolling circle amplification for ultrasensitive detection
Quantum dot-conjugated secondary antibodies for improved signal-to-noise ratio
Sample preparation enhancements:
Optimized antigen retrieval methods for formalin-fixed tissues
Tissue clearing techniques for thick section imaging
Hydrogel embedding for structure preservation
Advanced microscopy approaches:
Super-resolution microscopy (STORM, PALM, STED) for nanoscale localization
Expansion microscopy for physical magnification of structures
Light sheet microscopy for rapid 3D imaging with reduced photobleaching
Combinatorial detection strategies:
Antibody-guided CRISPR-Cas9 systems for highly specific detection
Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) for interaction mapping
Antibody-DNA conjugates for digital quantification (Immuno-SABER)
These methodological advances could enable more sensitive and specific detection of STX18 in complex samples such as patient tissues, organoids, or single cells .
STX18's role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) suggests several therapeutic implications:
Radiosensitization strategies:
Develop STX18-targeted approaches to enhance radiotherapy efficacy
Combine STX18 inhibition with DNA damage response inhibitors
Monitor EMT markers as biomarkers of treatment response
Metastasis prevention:
Target STX18-dependent pathways to reduce migration and invasion
Develop combination approaches targeting both primary and metastatic disease
Identify patient subgroups likely to benefit from STX18-targeted therapies
Resistance mechanisms:
Investigate STX18's role in treatment-induced EMT
Study adaptive responses to STX18 inhibition
Develop strategies to overcome potential resistance mechanisms
Biomarker development:
Use STX18 antibodies to stratify patients for treatment selection
Monitor STX18 levels during treatment as response indicators
Develop multiplexed assays including STX18 and EMT markers