SULT1C2 is a sulfotransferase enzyme that catalyzes the sulfation of various endogenous and xenobiotic compounds. Recent research has revealed several critical biological functions of SULT1C2:
Modification of xenobiotic compounds to enhance secretion, though this process can sometimes render these compounds carcinogenic in contexts such as tobacco exposure
Conversion of cholesterol to cholesterol sulfate in mitochondrial membranes, thereby increasing mitochondrial respiratory capacity and membrane potential
Involvement in cancer progression, particularly in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) related to tobacco exposure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
SULT1C2 expression correlates significantly with lung adenocarcinoma patient survival in smokers and appears to be epigenetically regulated through DNA methylation patterns that may vary across different ethnic populations . In HCC, SULT1C2 has been shown to promote cell growth, migration, and invasiveness .
SULT1C2 antibodies are employed in multiple research techniques:
Western blotting/immunoblotting to detect and quantify SULT1C2 protein levels, using antibodies such as SC-130274
Immunohistochemistry to visualize SULT1C2 expression patterns in tissue sections
Immunofluorescence for subcellular localization studies, particularly when investigating mitochondrial localization
Immunoprecipitation for purifying SULT1C2 and studying protein-protein interactions
ChIP (Chromatin Immunoprecipitation) assays for studying transcription factors that regulate SULT1C2 expression, such as the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AHR)
For mitochondrial studies, SULT1C2 antibodies have been particularly valuable in confirming the presence of this enzyme in mitochondrial fractions, which has led to discoveries about its role in mitochondrial respiration and membrane potential .
For optimal SULT1C2 detection in Western blotting:
Sample preparation:
Protein separation:
Load 20-40 μg protein per lane on 10-12% SDS-PAGE gels
Include molecular weight markers covering the 25-45 kDa range (SULT1C2 is approximately 35-36 kDa)
Transfer and blocking:
Transfer to PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes (100V for 1 hour or 30V overnight at 4°C)
Block with 5% non-fat dry milk or BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Antibody incubation:
Incubate with primary SULT1C2 antibody (1:500 to 1:2000 dilution) overnight at 4°C
Wash thoroughly with TBST (3-5 times, 5 minutes each)
Incubate with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000 to 1:10000) for 1 hour
Detection and analysis:
Comprehensive SULT1C2 antibody validation should include:
Genetic approaches:
Biochemical validation:
Pre-absorption tests: Pre-incubate antibody with purified SULT1C2 protein
Peptide competition assays: Demonstrate that the immunizing peptide blocks antibody binding
Western blot: Confirm a single band of the expected molecular weight (35-36 kDa)
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test against related SULT family members, particularly SULT1C2A and SULT1B1 which have been detected in overlapping tissues
Proteomic analysis can help identify the specificity of antibodies in complex samples, as demonstrated in mitochondrial studies where SULT1C2 and SULT1C2A peptides were identified
Multi-technique validation:
Confirm that signals from different detection methods (Western blot, IHC, IF) show consistent patterns
Correlate protein detection with mRNA expression where possible
For studying SULT1C2's role in xenobiotic metabolism:
To investigate SULT1C2's mitochondrial functions:
Mitochondrial localization and purification:
Functional respiratory studies:
Measure oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in isolated mitochondria with and without added SULT1C2 and PAPS (3-phosphoadenosine 5-phosphosulfate, the sulfate donor)
Assess response to respiratory substrates, ADP, and inhibitors
Compare effects of recombinant SULT1C2 to direct addition of cholesterol sulfate
Membrane studies:
In vivo approaches:
Table 1 shows the relative migration (Rf) values for cholesterol and cholesterol sulfate, which is critical for identification in thin-layer chromatography analysis:
| Sample | Rf Value |
|---|---|
| Cholesterol standard | 0.97 |
| Cholesterol sulfate standard | 0.52 |
| Control mitochondrial cholesterol band | 0.95 |
| Mitochondria + SULT1C2 + PAPS cholesterol band | 0.96 |
| Mitochondria + SULT1C2 + PAPS cholesterol-SO4 band | 0.48 |
| Mitochondria from IPC kidney-cholesterol band | 0.94 |
| Mitochondria from IPC kidney-cholesterol sulfate band | 0.52 |
SULT1C2 exhibits tissue-specific expression patterns with important implications for antibody selection:
Tissue-specific expression profiles:
Lung: Expression levels correlate with tobacco exposure, with higher expression in smokers compared to non-smokers
Liver: Elevated in hepatocellular carcinoma compared to normal liver tissue
Kidney: Present in mitochondrial fractions, with increased levels after ischemic preconditioning
Normal adult lung: Generally low expression with the promoter typically methylated
Antibody selection considerations:
Sensitivity requirements: For tissues with low baseline expression (like normal lung), highly sensitive detection methods and antibodies are essential
Specificity: In tissues where multiple SULT isoforms are expressed (e.g., kidney), antibodies must be validated for minimal cross-reactivity with other SULT family members
Application optimization: For each tissue type, antibody concentration and detection methods may need specific optimization
Subcellular localization differences:
For precise quantification of SULT1C2:
Western blot quantification:
Use digital imaging systems with linear detection range
Normalize SULT1C2 band intensity to appropriate loading controls
Include standard curves using recombinant SULT1C2 for absolute quantification
Analyze multiple biological replicates for statistical validity
Comparative expression analysis:
For xenobiotic exposure studies, perform dose-response experiments with multiple concentrations of compounds like CSC
For cancer studies, compare expression between tumor and adjacent non-tumor tissues
For mitochondrial studies, quantify the ratio of cholesterol sulfate to cholesterol as shown in Table 2
Table 2: Effect of SULT1C2 on Cholesterol Sulfate Levels in Isolated Mitochondria
| Treatment Condition | Cholesterol-SO4 (μg/sample) | Cholesterol (μg/sample) | Ratio Cholesterol-SO4/Cholesterol × 100 | P value vs. control |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (average) | 1.14 | 39.03 | 2.92 | - |
| SULT1C2 + PAPS (average) | 1.17 | 34.5 | 3.32 | 0.03 |
| End incubation-SULT1C2 + PAPS (average) | 1.05 | 34.51 | 3.04 | 0.26 |
| Chol-SO4 spike (average) | 4.95 | 32.73 | 15.56 | 0.003 |
Mass spectrometry-based quantification:
Use targeted MS approaches for absolute quantification
Focus on unique peptides that distinguish SULT1C2 from other family members
Employ isotope-labeled peptide standards for precise quantification
For studying epigenetic regulation of SULT1C2:
DNA methylation analysis:
The SULT1C2 promoter has been shown to be hypomethylated in certain populations (e.g., Asian patients) compared to others (e.g., Caucasians)
Correlate methylation patterns with SULT1C2 expression levels
In vitro methylation of the SULT1C2 promoter has been shown to significantly decrease transcriptional activity of reporter plasmids
Chromatin regulation studies:
Use ChIP assays with antibodies against histone modifications associated with active (H3K4me3, H3K27ac) or repressed (H3K27me3, H3K9me3) chromatin
Target the SULT1C2 promoter region, particularly the area containing the AHR binding site that spans critical methylation sites
Compare histone modification patterns between tissues with high and low SULT1C2 expression
Transcription factor binding analysis:
Expression modulation studies:
For investigating SULT1C2 in cancer:
For mitochondrial SULT1C2 co-IP studies:
Mitochondrial isolation and preparation:
Isolate highly purified mitochondria using differential centrifugation
Verify fraction purity using markers for different compartments
Use gentle lysis conditions to preserve protein-protein interactions (e.g., 0.5% CHAPS instead of stronger detergents)
Antibody selection and validation:
Test multiple SULT1C2 antibodies for IP efficiency in mitochondrial samples
Validate antibody specificity using Western blot and proteomic analysis
Consider using antibodies against both SULT1C2 and potential interaction partners for reciprocal co-IP
Experimental controls:
Include input control (pre-IP mitochondrial lysate)
Use IgG control (same species and concentration as IP antibody)
Include negative controls such as mitochondria from tissues not expressing SULT1C2
Detection and validation:
Western blot analysis for targeted detection of specific interaction partners
Mass spectrometry for unbiased discovery of novel interactions
Validate key interactions with multiple methods and reciprocal co-IP
Investigate whether interactions are affected by the presence of substrates like cholesterol or PAPS
Functional validation:
Test whether identified interactions affect SULT1C2's ability to convert cholesterol to cholesterol sulfate
Investigate how these interactions influence mitochondrial respiration and membrane potential
Determine if interactions are affected by stress conditions such as ischemia/reperfusion
For analyzing SULT1C2 enzymatic activity across subcellular compartments:
Subcellular fractionation:
Separate cellular components into cytosolic, nuclear, mitochondrial, and microsomal fractions
Verify fraction purity using established markers
Quantify SULT1C2 distribution across fractions by Western blot
Activity assays in isolated compartments:
For mitochondrial activity: Measure conversion of cholesterol to cholesterol sulfate using thin-layer chromatography and lipidomics
The identified Rf values for cholesterol sulfate (0.48-0.52) versus cholesterol (0.94-0.97) provide reliable markers for activity assessment
Validate activity by comparing native mitochondrial fractions to those supplemented with recombinant SULT1C2 and PAPS
Functional consequences assessment:
For mitochondria: Measure oxygen consumption rate before and after SULT1C2 activity
Research has shown that addition of SULT1C2 and PAPS results in increased maximal respiratory capacity in response to succinate, ADP, and rotenone
Compare effects of enzymatic activity to direct addition of end products (e.g., cholesterol sulfate)
In vivo validation:
For cross-species SULT1C2 research:
Antibody selection considerations:
Perform sequence alignment between human SULT1C2 and target species homologs
Focus on the epitope region recognized by the antibody (request this information from vendors)
SULT1C2 antibodies have been successfully used in rat models for mitochondrial studies
Consider generating species-specific antibodies for critical experiments
Validation approaches:
Western blot validation using tissue samples from the target species
Include positive control tissues known to express SULT1C2 in the target species
Proteomic analysis can confirm antibody specificity in non-human samples
In rat kidney studies, proteomic analysis identified SULT1C2 and SULT1C2A as the predominant SULT isoforms in mitochondrial fractions
Functional conservation testing:
Data interpretation cautions:
For resolving non-specific binding:
Antibody dilution optimization:
Perform titration experiments to determine optimal antibody concentration
For Western blots, test dilutions from 1:500 to 1:2000
For immunohistochemistry, test dilutions from 1:50 to 1:200
Blocking optimization:
Washing optimization:
Increase washing time and/or number of washes
Add mild detergents to wash buffers
Use high-salt buffers for more stringent washing
Sample preparation improvements:
Control experiments:
Include knockout/knockdown samples as negative controls where possible
Use pre-immune serum or isotype-matched control antibodies
Perform peptide competition assays to confirm specificity
When selecting SULT1C2 antibodies:
Application-specific considerations:
Western blotting: Choose antibodies validated for denatured proteins
Immunohistochemistry: Select antibodies verified for specific fixation methods
Immunoprecipitation: Ensure antibodies can bind native protein conformations
ChIP: Select antibodies that function in crosslinked chromatin
Epitope considerations:
For mitochondrial studies, ensure the epitope is accessible in this compartment
For detecting specific SULT1C2 variants, choose antibodies targeting unique regions
If studying protein-protein interactions, avoid antibodies that bind interaction interfaces
Validation requirements:
Species reactivity:
Emerging areas for SULT1C2 antibody research:
Therapeutic and diagnostic applications:
Mitochondrial biology:
Personalized medicine approaches:
Technological advances:
Development of more specific and sensitive antibodies for SULT1C2 detection
Creation of isoform-specific antibodies to distinguish between closely related SULT family members
Application of new imaging technologies to study SULT1C2 localization and dynamics
For integrative research approaches:
Multi-omics integration:
Translational research strategies:
Connect basic research findings to clinical applications
Validate findings from cell culture models in patient samples
Develop standardized SULT1C2 detection methods for clinical laboratories
Computational biology approaches:
Use structural biology to predict SULT1C2 interactions and functions
Develop models of how SULT1C2-mediated cholesterol sulfation affects mitochondrial membrane properties
Integrate protein expression data with patient outcomes for predictive modeling
Collaborative research frameworks:
Establish standardized protocols for SULT1C2 detection across laboratories
Share validated antibody resources and controls
Develop common data repositories for SULT1C2 expression across tissues and disease states