SWI6 Antibody

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Target

SWI6 is a homolog of Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) in fission yeast, functioning as a scaffold for heterochromatin assembly. The SWI6 antibody is a polyclonal rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) generated against recombinant SWI6 protein or synthetic peptides (e.g., residues 314–328 of SWI6 in S. pombe [UniProt: P40381]) . It recognizes a ~37–43 kDa protein in Western blot (WB) and is validated for immunoprecipitation (IP), chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) .

Mechanism of Action

SWI6 binds H3K9me via its chromodomain, compacting chromatin to silence genes at mating-type loci, centromeres, and telomeres . Key functional insights include:

  • RNAi Pathway Coordination: SWI6 recruits RNA-directed RNA polymerase complex (RDRC) via Ers1 to promote siRNA amplification, essential for heterochromatin maintenance .

  • Phosphorylation Regulation: Casein kinase II (CK2)-dependent phosphorylation at serine residues (e.g., S18, S24) modulates SWI6’s interaction with silencing complexes (e.g., SHREC) and antisilencing factors (e.g., Epe1) .

  • Metabolic Reprogramming: In pathogenic fungi like Ceratocystis fimbriata, SWI6 deletion disrupts amino acid/lipid metabolism and GPI-anchored protein synthesis, impairing virulence .

Table 1: Key Applications of SWI6 Antibody

ApplicationProtocol DetailsSource
Western Blot1:500–1:3,000 dilution; detects ~43 kDa band in S. pombe lysate
ChIPValidated for heterochromatin localization studies (e.g., centromeric repeats)
ImmunoprecipitationUsed to isolate SWI6-associated complexes (e.g., SHREC, cohesin)
Functional StudiesIdentified SWI6’s role in fungal pathogenicity and RNAi-mediated silencing

Table 2: SWI6 Antibody Characteristics

ParameterDetails
Host SpeciesRabbit
ClonalityPolyclonal
ReactivitySchizosaccharomyces pombe
ImmunogenSynthetic peptide (aa 314–328) or recombinant full-length SWI6
Storage Conditions-20°C; avoid freeze-thaw cycles
Validated SpeciesS. pombe; predicted cross-reactivity in homologs (e.g., C. fimbriata)

Research Findings

  • Heterochromatin Dynamics: SWI6 collaborates with Clr4 (H3K9 methyltransferase) to recruit silencing machinery. Phosphorylation at S18/S24 enhances H3K9me3 binding affinity, while non-phosphorylated SWI6 preferentially associates with H3K9me0 nucleosomes .

  • Pathogenicity Mechanisms: In C. fimbriata, SWI6 deletion reduced virulence by disrupting metabolic pathways critical for cell wall integrity and energy storage .

  • RNA-DNA Hybrid Binding: SWI6 binds siRNA-DNA hybrids with high affinity (Kd = 0.08–0.73 μM), facilitating heterochromatin nucleation independent of H3K9me .

Validation and Quality Control

  • Specificity: Recognizes endogenous SWI6 in S. pombe lysates without cross-reactivity to unrelated proteins .

  • Functional Assays: Used to demonstrate SWI6’s role in RDRC recruitment and siRNA amplification .

  • Phosphorylation Studies: Anti-SWI6 antibodies enabled detection of phosphorylation-dependent interactions with SHREC and Epe1 .

Future Directions

Current research explores SWI6’s role in epigenetic inheritance and its potential as a antifungal target. Advances in phospho-specific SWI6 antibodies may clarify how post-translational modifications fine-tune heterochromatin dynamics .

Product Specs

Buffer
Preservative: 0.03% Proclin 300
Constituents: 50% Glycerol, 0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
Form
Liquid
Lead Time
Made-to-order (14-16 weeks)
Synonyms
SWI6 antibody; YLR182W antibody; L9470.8 antibody; Regulatory protein SWI6 antibody; Cell-cycle box factor subunit SWI6 antibody; MBF subunit P90 antibody; Trans-acting activator of HO endonuclease gene antibody
Target Names
SWI6
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
SWI6 is a key component of a complex involved in regulating transcription during the cell cycle. It partners with SWI4 to form the SBF (Swi4/Swi6) factor, which binds to the cell-cycle box (CCB), a repeated element in the upstream region of HO genes. This interaction is crucial for the formation of the cell-cycle box factor-DNA complex, essential for cell cycle-dependent transcription.
Gene References Into Functions
  1. SBF binding at the HO gene exhibits a temporal cascade. Initially, SBF binds to URS2-L, an upstream regulatory sequence. This binding serves as a signal relay to the SBF sites in URS2-R, ultimately activating gene expression. PMID: 25512608
  2. A study has identified a region in the carboxy terminus of Swi6 that is critical for the binding of Nrm1 and Whi5 to their target transcription factors. Mutations in this region disrupt the repression of MBF- and SBF-regulated genes by Nrm1 and Whi5. PMID: 23382076
  3. Research indicates that the transcriptional cofactor Swi6p and activator Swi4p, along with the G(2)/M-specific cyclin Clb2p, are essential in environments where microtubules are destabilized. PMID: 22037179
  4. Oxidative stress signaling, which regulates the cell cycle, involves the oxidation of the G(1)/S-specific transcription factor Swi6p. This oxidation leads to suppression of G(1) cyclin expression and a delay in cells entering the cell cycle. PMID: 21147769
  5. Studies have revealed that the structural and physical features of the nucleic acid binding interface have been completely eradicated in Swi6. PMID: 20635421
  6. Data indicates that Mpk1 negatively regulates Swi6 by phosphorylating Ser238, which inhibits nuclear entry. PMID: 20219973
  7. The Swi4/Swi6 (SBF) transcription factors bind to a conserved site within the recombination enhancer. PMID: 16809780
  8. Swi6p plays a role in sensing oxidants, leading to a delay in cell division. PMID: 18205808
  9. A model has been proposed where phosphorylated Mpk1 or Mlp1 forms a dimeric complex with Swi4, capable of associating with the FKS2 promoter. PMID: 18268013
  10. The cell cycle-regulated SBF protein complex (Swi4/Swi6) has been identified as essential for H3K79 dimethylation. PMID: 19682934

Show More

Hide All

Database Links

KEGG: sce:YLR182W

STRING: 4932.YLR182W

Subcellular Location
Nucleus. Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Swi6 and why is it important in epigenetic research?

Swi6 is a homolog of Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) that plays fundamental roles in chromatin organization and gene silencing. It recognizes and binds to histone H3 tails methylated at 'Lys-9', leading to epigenetic repression . In fission yeast, Swi6 is involved in repressing silent mating-type loci MAT2 and MAT3, and is essential for centromeric heterochromatin assembly . Its ability to selectively bind specific DNA sequences makes it critical for controlling gene expression patterns, while its interactions with RNA interference machinery connect various epigenetic silencing pathways . Researchers study Swi6 to understand fundamental mechanisms of heterochromatin formation, maintenance, and inheritance across cell divisions.

What types of Swi6 antibodies are available for research applications?

Researchers typically work with polyclonal antibodies raised against full-length Swi6 protein. For instance, rabbit polyclonal antibodies that recognize Schizosaccharomyces pombe Swi6 are commercially available . These antibodies can be used across multiple applications including Western blotting, immunoprecipitation (IP), and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) . There are also phospho-specific antibodies that detect particular phosphorylated residues of Swi6, such as those that recognize phosphorylation at serine residues S18 and S24 . When selecting an antibody, researchers should consider the specific application, the species of Swi6 being studied, and whether post-translational modifications need to be detected.

What are the recommended dilutions and conditions for using Swi6 antibodies in Western blot analyses?

For Western blot applications with polyclonal Swi6 antibodies, a typical working dilution is 1:2000 . The protocol should include standard SDS-PAGE separation of proteins followed by transfer to a membrane. When probing for phosphorylated forms of Swi6, include phosphatase inhibitors in lysis buffers to maintain phosphorylation status. For loading controls, anti-α-tubulin antibody (diluted 1:2000) can be used . After primary antibody incubation, wash the membrane twice with PBS-T for 10 minutes each time . Be aware that not all phospho-site mutants of Swi6 will show observable band shifts by SDS-PAGE, as the sequence context of phosphorylated residues influences whether a bandshift occurs . The predicted molecular weight for Swi6 is approximately 37 kDa, which should be used as a reference when analyzing Western blot results .

How should I design a ChIP experiment to study Swi6 localization at heterochromatic regions?

To design an effective ChIP experiment for studying Swi6 localization:

  • Crosslinking and Sonication: Use 1% formaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature for crosslinking. Optimize sonication to achieve chromatin fragments of 200-500 bp.

  • Antibody Selection: Choose a ChIP-validated anti-Swi6 antibody . Pre-clear chromatin with protein A/G beads before adding the antibody.

  • Controls:

    • Include a no-antibody (beads-only) control to assess non-specific binding

    • Use a non-specific IgG control

    • Include positive control primers targeting known Swi6-enriched regions (e.g., centromeric repeats like dg and dh)

    • Include negative control primers targeting euchromatic regions

  • Genomic Regions: Design primers to amplify centromeric repeats, mating type loci, or other heterochromatic regions where Swi6 is known to bind .

  • Genetic Controls: Consider using clr4Δ or swi6Δ mutant strains as negative controls, as these should show reduced or absent Swi6 binding .

  • Analysis: Calculate percent input or fold enrichment over IgG control for each target region.

Remember that the chromatin association of Swi6 can be affected by mutations or deletions of interacting proteins like Ers1, which mediates the recruitment of RNA-directed RNA polymerase complex (RDRC) to heterochromatin .

How can flow cytometry be used to assess Swi6 function in heterochromatin silencing?

Flow cytometry provides a powerful approach to quantitatively assess Swi6's role in gene silencing:

  • Reporter System Design: Use reporter genes integrated at nucleation and spreading regions of heterochromatin. For example:

    • A green fluorescent reporter to monitor nucleation

    • An orange fluorescent reporter to monitor spreading of silencing

  • Sample Preparation:

    • Grow cells under appropriate conditions

    • Create necessary control strains including wildtype, Δswi6, and phosphorylation site mutants (e.g., swi6S18/24A)

    • Prepare single-cell suspensions using standard protocols for flow cytometry

  • Data Acquisition and Analysis:

    • Gate cells appropriately based on size and complexity

    • Measure fluorescence in green and orange channels

    • Determine percentage of cells with reporters in "ON" vs. "OFF" state

    • Compare different genetic backgrounds to assess silencing effects

  • Result Interpretation:

    • In wild-type cells with functional Swi6, both reporters should be silenced (low percentage of "ON" cells)

    • In Δswi6 cells, both nucleation and spreading reporters may be expressed (high percentage of "ON" cells)

    • In specific phospho-site mutants like swi6S18/24A, you may observe defects in spreading (high orange "ON") while maintaining nucleation (green remains "OFF")

This approach allows for quantitative assessment of the distinct roles of different Swi6 domains or post-translational modifications in heterochromatin formation and maintenance .

What are the best practices for immunoprecipitation (IP) experiments with Swi6 antibodies?

For successful immunoprecipitation of Swi6:

  • Cell Lysis Conditions:

    • Use a gentle lysis buffer (e.g., 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100)

    • Include protease inhibitors to prevent degradation

    • For phosphorylation studies, add phosphatase inhibitors

    • For studying protein interactions, consider crosslinking or native conditions depending on interaction strength

  • Antibody Binding:

    • Pre-clear lysate with protein A/G beads to reduce non-specific binding

    • Use 2-5 μg of Swi6 antibody per mg of protein lysate

    • Incubate overnight at 4°C with gentle rotation

  • Wash Conditions:

    • Perform 4-5 washes with decreasing salt concentrations

    • Include a final wash with low-salt buffer to remove detergents

  • Elution and Analysis:

    • Elute using SDS sample buffer for Western blot analysis

    • For mass spectrometry analysis, consider elution with peptides or acidic conditions

    • When detecting interacting partners, probe blots with antibodies against known or suspected interactors like Ers1 or components of RDRC

  • Controls:

    • Include a non-specific IgG control

    • For validation, use swi6Δ strain lysates to confirm antibody specificity

    • For phosphorylation-specific studies, include phosphatase-treated samples and phospho-site mutants (e.g., swi6S18/24A)

These practices will help ensure specific and efficient immunoprecipitation of Swi6 and its interacting partners.

How can I determine the phosphorylation status of Swi6 in different experimental conditions?

To analyze Swi6 phosphorylation:

  • Western Blot Analysis:

    • Use phospho-specific antibodies that recognize specific phosphorylated residues (e.g., pS18 and pS24)

    • Run SDS-PAGE with appropriate controls:

      • Wild-type Swi6

      • Phosphorylation site mutants (e.g., Swi6S18/24A)

      • Lambda phosphatase-treated samples

    • Phosphorylated Swi6 may exhibit band shifts on SDS-PAGE, although not all phosphorylations cause observable shifts

  • Quantification:

    • Create a standard curve using recombinant phosphorylated Swi6 to quantify the proportion of phosphorylated protein in your samples

    • Compare the ratio of phosphorylated to total Swi6 across different conditions

  • Mass Spectrometry:

    • Immunoprecipitate Swi6 using a general anti-Swi6 antibody

    • Perform tryptic digestion and phosphopeptide enrichment

    • Analyze by LC-MS/MS to identify and quantify phosphorylation sites

  • Experimental Considerations:

    • Always include phosphatase inhibitors in lysis buffers

    • Consider time-course experiments to track dynamic changes in phosphorylation

    • Examine phosphorylation status under different cellular conditions (e.g., cell cycle phases, stress conditions)

Research has shown that the majority of cellular Swi6 is phosphorylated at S18 and S24, with approximately 70-100% of the total Swi6 pool carrying these modifications across biological replicates .

What is the functional significance of different Swi6 phosphorylation sites?

Different phosphorylation sites on Swi6 have distinct roles in regulating its function:

These findings suggest a complex regulatory system where different phosphorylation patterns fine-tune Swi6 function in heterochromatin formation and maintenance.

How can I design experiments to investigate the functional interaction between Swi6 and the RNAi machinery?

To investigate Swi6's role in RNAi-mediated heterochromatin formation:

  • Genetic Approach:

    • Create strains with mutations in both Swi6 and RNAi components (e.g., swi6Δ ago1Δ, swi6Δ dcr1Δ)

    • Generate phosphorylation site mutants of Swi6 and combine with RNAi machinery mutations

    • Use reporter genes (e.g., ura4+) integrated at heterochromatic regions to assess silencing

  • Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:

    • Perform co-immunoprecipitation experiments with Swi6 antibodies and probe for RNAi components

    • Test interactions with intermediaries like Ers1, which connects Swi6 to the RNA-directed RNA polymerase complex (RDRC)

    • Use proximity ligation assays to detect interactions in situ

  • ChIP and RNA Analysis:

    • Perform ChIP for Swi6 and RNAi components (e.g., Ago1, Rdp1, Hrr1) at heterochromatic regions

    • Assess how Swi6 mutations affect localization of these factors

    • Quantify siRNAs derived from heterochromatic regions in wild-type vs. swi6 mutant backgrounds

    • Use RNA immunoprecipitation to detect association of Swi6 with nascent transcripts

  • Tethering Experiments:

    • Create fusion proteins between RDRC components (e.g., Hrr1) or intermediaries (e.g., Ers1) and chromodomain (CD) to bypass Swi6 requirement

    • Assess if tethering restores heterochromatin formation in swi6Δ backgrounds

    • Measure siRNA production and heterochromatic silencing in these tethered systems

This experimental strategy will help elucidate how Swi6 contributes to RNAi-directed heterochromatin assembly, potentially through its role in recruiting RDRC through the intermediate factor Ers1 .

How should I design experiments to investigate the role of Swi6 phosphorylation in regulating its interaction with Clr4 methyltransferase?

To investigate how Swi6 phosphorylation impacts its interaction with Clr4:

  • In Vitro Enzymatic Assays:

    • Purify phosphorylated (pSwi6) and unphosphorylated (unpSwi6) Swi6 protein

    • Assess Clr4 methyltransferase activity in the presence of each form using:

      • Single turnover conditions monitoring conversion of H3K9me2 to H3K9me3

      • Measurement of methyltransferase kinetics (Km and kcat)

    • Test binding affinities of pSwi6 vs. unpSwi6 for different methylation states (H3K9me0, me1, me2, me3)

  • Interaction Studies:

    • Perform co-immunoprecipitation experiments comparing wild-type Swi6 vs. phospho-mutants

    • Use biolayer interferometry or surface plasmon resonance to measure binding kinetics

    • Employ proximity ligation assays to visualize interactions in vivo

  • Genomic Approaches:

    • Perform ChIP-seq for H3K9me3, Clr4, and Swi6 in wild-type and phospho-mutant backgrounds

    • Identify regions where phosphorylation affects co-localization of these factors

    • Combine with RNA-seq to correlate changes in methylation with transcriptional effects

  • Structural Analysis:

    • If feasible, perform structural studies (X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM) of Swi6-Clr4 complexes

    • Compare structures with phosphorylated vs. non-phosphorylated Swi6

    • Use molecular dynamics simulations to predict how phosphorylation affects interaction interfaces

  • Competition Assays:

    • Design experiments to test if phosphorylation relieves competition between Swi6 and Clr4

    • Use defined amounts of pSwi6 and unpSwi6 competing for binding to H3K9me3-modified nucleosomes

    • Measure displacement of one factor by the other under different conditions

These experiments will help elucidate how phosphorylation acts as a regulatory switch to control the interplay between Swi6 and Clr4 in heterochromatin establishment and maintenance.

What approaches can be used to study Swi6's role in non-yeast systems or its homologs in other organisms?

To investigate Swi6 homologs (such as HP1 proteins) across different species:

  • Comparative Genomics and Proteomics:

    • Identify HP1/Swi6 homologs across species using sequence alignment tools

    • Compare domain structures, focusing on chromodomain and chromoshadow domain conservation

    • Analyze post-translational modification sites for evolutionary conservation

    • Generate phylogenetic trees to understand evolutionary relationships

  • Functional Complementation:

    • Express homologs from different species in swi6Δ fission yeast

    • Assess rescue of silencing defects at heterochromatic regions

    • Create chimeric proteins with domains from different species to map functional conservation

  • Cross-Species Antibody Validation:

    • Test whether Swi6 antibodies cross-react with homologs in other species

    • Validate specificity using knockout/knockdown controls in each system

    • Develop new antibodies if necessary, potentially targeting conserved epitopes

  • Metabolomic Analysis (particularly for fungal systems):

    • Apply OPLS-DA (Orthogonal Projections to Latent Structures Discriminant Analysis) to compare metabolite profiles between wild-type and Swi6/HP1-deficient strains

    • Validate models using permutation tests and assess R² and Q² values for reliability

    • Identify specific metabolic pathways affected by Swi6/HP1 disruption

  • Plant Pathogenic Fungi Studies:

    • Investigate SWI6's role in regulating growth and metabolism in plant filamentous pathogenic fungi

    • Create deletion mutants and assess phenotypic changes

    • Combine with metabolomic approaches to identify regulatory mechanisms

These approaches enable researchers to understand the conserved and divergent functions of Swi6/HP1 proteins across evolutionary lineages, potentially revealing new insights about their fundamental roles in chromatin biology.

What are common problems in Swi6 antibody-based experiments and how can they be resolved?

When working with Swi6 antibodies, researchers may encounter these common issues:

ProblemPossible CausesSolutions
Weak or no signal in Western blots- Insufficient protein loading
- Antibody degradation
- Inefficient transfer
- Increase protein amount (30-50 μg)
- Use fresh antibody aliquots
- Optimize transfer conditions
- Try 1:2000 dilution for Swi6 antibody
High background- Insufficient blocking
- Too much antibody
- Inadequate washing
- Increase blocking time (1-2 hours)
- Dilute antibody further
- Wash membranes thoroughly with PBS-T (2x10 min)
Multiple bands- Protein degradation
- Phosphorylation states
- Cross-reactivity
- Use fresh lysates with protease inhibitors
- Include phosphatase controls
- Use phospho-specific antibodies
Poor IP efficiency- Inadequate lysis
- Epitope masking
- Insufficient antibody
- Optimize lysis conditions
- Try different antibody amounts (2-5 μg)
- Consider native vs. denaturing conditions
Inconsistent ChIP results- Variable crosslinking
- Sonication inconsistency
- Cell cycle effects
- Standardize crosslinking time (10 min)
- Monitor sonication by gel
- Synchronize cells if necessary
Non-specific binding in flow cytometry- Inadequate controls
- Cell aggregation
- Autofluorescence
- Include proper controls (Δswi6)
- Filter cell suspensions
- Use compensation controls

For phosphorylation-specific studies, remember that not all phospho-site mutants yield observable band shifts in SDS-PAGE, even though the protein may retain phosphorylation at other sites .

How can I quantitatively assess the proportion of phosphorylated Swi6 in my samples?

To accurately quantify Swi6 phosphorylation:

  • Standard Curve Method:

    • Generate recombinant phosphorylated Swi6 for use as standards

    • Prepare a dilution series of known concentrations

    • Run standards alongside experimental samples

    • Probe Western blots with both phospho-specific and total Swi6 antibodies

    • Plot band intensities against known concentrations to create standard curves

    • Interpolate experimental sample values from these curves

  • Phosphatase Controls:

    • Divide your sample into two portions

    • Treat one portion with lambda phosphatase to remove phosphorylations

    • Compare treated vs. untreated samples using:

      • Mobility shift in SDS-PAGE

      • Reactivity with phospho-specific antibodies

  • Multiple Technical Approaches:

    • Combine Western blotting with other techniques:

      • Phos-tag gels for enhanced separation of phosphorylated species

      • Mass spectrometry for site-specific quantification

      • 2D gel electrophoresis to separate by both pI and molecular weight

  • Data Analysis:

    • Calculate the ratio of phosphorylated to total Swi6

    • Perform replicate experiments (at least 2-3 biological replicates)

    • Report results as percentages with appropriate error ranges

This approach has revealed that the majority of cellular Swi6 (70-100% across biological replicates) is phosphorylated at S18 and S24 residues under normal conditions .

How might Swi6 antibodies be used in investigating the role of heterochromatin in genome organization?

Swi6 antibodies can provide valuable insights into higher-order chromatin organization:

  • Chromosome Conformation Capture with ChIP (HiChIP):

    • Use Swi6 antibodies for immunoprecipitation in HiChIP protocols

    • Map long-range interactions between Swi6-enriched domains

    • Compare interaction networks in wild-type vs. phospho-mutant backgrounds

    • Assess how heterochromatin domains interact with other genomic regions

  • Super-resolution Microscopy:

    • Employ fluorescently-labeled Swi6 antibodies for STORM/PALM imaging

    • Visualize nanoscale organization of heterochromatin domains

    • Combine with DNA FISH to map specific sequences within these domains

    • Track dynamics of heterochromatin formation in living cells

  • Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation (LLPS) Studies:

    • Investigate whether Swi6/HP1 forms phase-separated condensates

    • Examine how phosphorylation affects condensate formation

    • Use antibodies to track partition coefficients of different Swi6 variants

    • Assess how LLPS contributes to heterochromatin compartmentalization

  • Proteomic Approaches:

    • Perform BioID or APEX proximity labeling with Swi6 as bait

    • Identify proteins in close proximity to Swi6 in different genomic contexts

    • Use antibodies to validate interactions by co-immunoprecipitation

    • Map the protein interaction network of Swi6 heterochromatin

  • Single-Cell Technologies:

    • Apply Swi6 antibodies in single-cell CUT&Tag protocols

    • Map heterochromatin distribution at single-cell resolution

    • Correlate with transcriptional states using scRNA-seq

    • Identify cell-to-cell variability in heterochromatin organization

These approaches leverage Swi6 antibodies to provide multi-scale insights into how heterochromatin contributes to nuclear architecture and genome function.

What are the most promising approaches for developing antibodies with customized specificity for Swi6 and its modified forms?

Advanced approaches for developing highly specific Swi6 antibodies include:

  • Biophysics-Informed Modeling:

    • Leverage high-throughput selection data to identify different binding modes for antibodies

    • Train computational models to predict antibody-epitope interactions

    • Generate antibody variants with customized specificity profiles:

      • Specific high affinity for particular target epitopes

      • Cross-specificity for multiple related epitopes

    • Validate computationally designed antibodies experimentally

  • Phage Display Selection Strategy:

    • Design selection experiments against multiple ligand combinations

    • Select antibodies against specific phosphorylated forms of Swi6

    • Create training and test sets to build computational models

    • Use models to predict outcomes for new ligand combinations

  • Structure-Based Design:

    • Use structural information about Swi6 domains and modifications

    • Design antibodies targeting specific conformational epitopes

    • Engineer complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) for optimal binding

    • Screen libraries focused on structure-informed sequence variations

  • Post-Selection Engineering:

    • Optimize antibodies after initial selection through:

      • Site-directed mutagenesis of key residues

      • Affinity maturation by directed evolution

      • Computational optimization of binding interfaces

    • Create panels of antibodies with graduated specificity profiles

  • Validation Pipeline:

    • Establish rigorous validation procedures including:

      • Testing against phospho-site mutants (e.g., Swi6S18/24A)

      • Competition assays with recombinant phosphorylated peptides

      • Cross-reactivity testing against related proteins

      • Performance assessment across multiple applications (WB, IP, ChIP)

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.