SYCE3 ensures accurate chromosome pairing and recombination during meiosis by facilitating SC assembly. Key roles include:
Central Element Formation: SYCE3 anchors other central element proteins (e.g., SYCE1, SYCE2, TEX12) to the SC, enabling synapsis initiation and stabilization .
DNA Repair and Recombination: SYCE3-deficient mice exhibit meiotic arrest due to defective crossover formation, highlighting its role in recombination progression .
Chromatin Organization: SYCE3 compacts meiotic chromosomes into loop-axis structures conducive to recombination .
SYCE3 expression is modulated by environmental and pharmaceutical compounds:
SYCE3 integrates into a network of SC proteins:
Infertility: SYCE3 mutations disrupt SC assembly, causing meiotic arrest and sterility in mice and humans .
Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Nonsense mutations in SYCE3 correlate with recurrent miscarriage in women .
Cancer: Ectopic SYCE3 expression in somatic cells promotes aneuploidy by impairing DNA repair .
Knockout Models: Syce3 −/− mice show complete synapsis failure and absence of crossover markers (e.g., MLH1) .
Structural Remodeling: SYCE3 replaces SYCP1’s tetramer interface with self-assembled lattices, enabling CE protein recruitment .
Evolutionary Conservation: SYCE3’s role in loop-axis chromatin organization is conserved across vertebrates .
SYCE3 is a strongly conserved mammalian protein that localizes to the central element (CE) of the synaptonemal complex. It plays a critical role in enabling chromosome loading of other CE-specific proteins, which promotes synapsis between homologous chromosomes .
Methodological answer: The role of SYCE3 has been established through knockout mouse models, which demonstrated that SYCE3 is essential for fertility in both sexes. Loss of SYCE3 blocks synapsis initiation and results in meiotic arrest. In SYCE3-deficient mice, initiation of meiotic recombination appears normal, but progression is severely impaired with complete absence of MLH1 foci (markers of crossovers) .
Methodological answer: Multi-angle light scattering and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments have revealed that SYCE3 adopts a dimeric four-helical bundle structure that acts as the building block for concentration-dependent self-assembly into discrete higher-order oligomers . This self-assembly occurs through:
Staggered lateral interactions between self-assembly surfaces of SYCE3 dimers
End-on interactions through intermolecular domain swapping between dimer folds
Remodeling of SYCE3 chains from helix-loop-helix to extended α-helical conformations
This complex assembly mechanism uniquely positions SYCE3 to contribute to structural stabilization of the SC central element.
Methodological answer: Several complementary techniques provide robust analysis of SYCE3:
Immunofluorescence microscopy on chromosome spreads for localization studies
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to generate knockout and separation-of-function mutant models
Biochemical pull-downs and protein binding assays to identify interaction partners
Structural techniques (SAXS, multi-angle light scattering) for molecular characterization
Automated image analysis tools like CO analyzer (an ImageJ macro) for quantitative analysis of synaptonemal complex formation
Most successful research approaches combine multiple techniques to comprehensively characterize SYCE3's properties and functions.
Methodological answer: Combined biochemical and separation-of-function mutagenesis studies have revealed that SYCE3 actively remodels the SC structure rather than simply stabilizing existing assemblies. The current model indicates:
SYCE3-binding competes with SYCP1's tetramer interface, disrupting the SYCP1 tetramer lattice into SYCP1-SYCE3 2:1 complexes
SYCE3 self-assembly compensates for the disrupted interface by supporting formation of a new integrated SYCP1-SYCE3 lattice
This remodeled lattice provides binding sites for SYCE1-SIX6OS1 and SYCE2-TEX12, enabling their recruitment
SYCE3 promotes both SYCP1-SYCE3 lattice extension and SYCE2-TEX12 fiber formation
This model explains why SYCE3 deletion prevents SC extension and why certain mutations (like the WY mutation) severely disrupt SYCP1 assemblies.
Methodological answer: Structural and genetic studies have identified several key mutations that affect SYCE3 function:
The Syce3WY/WY mouse model demonstrates that the WY mutation is more deleterious than a simple SYCE3 deletion, as it actively disrupts SYCP1 assemblies rather than simply failing to support them .
Methodological answer: Studies of Sycp1 and Syce3 mutants have challenged the traditional hierarchical model by demonstrating that:
CE proteins can be recruited to meiotic chromosomes independently of SYCP1
These proteins localize to recombination sites prior to synapsis
CE proteins assemble into bridge-like structures that link paired pre-synaptic chromosomes at recombination sites
These findings suggest mammalian SC assembly involves multiple recruitment pathways operating in parallel, with direct interactions between CE proteins and recombination intermediates directing a subset of SC assembly events to recombination sites .
Methodological answer: Biochemical and structural studies reveal SYCE3 acts as a molecular adapter within a network of interactions:
SYCP1-SYCE3 interaction: Forms a 2:1 heterotrimeric complex where SYCE3-binding causes conformational change in SYCP1 from tetramers to the 2:1 complex, competing with SYCP1's tetramer interface
SYCE1-SIX6OS1 interaction: Direct binding provides a mechanism for recruitment of this complex to the central element
SYCE2-TEX12 interaction: SYCE3 both recruits and promotes fibrous assembly of SYCE2-TEX12, stimulating its structural organization
Self-interaction: SYCE3 self-assembly creates higher-order structures that can link multiple SYCP1-SYCE3 complexes, mimicking the role of the disrupted tetramer interface
These interactions collectively enable SYCE3 to integrate the SC's distinct architectural units into a structurally and functionally mature SC.
Methodological answer: Human SYCE3 research faces several challenges requiring specialized approaches:
Limited sample access: Utilizing patient-derived samples from fertility clinics when available, coordinated through multi-center collaborations
Translation from model organisms: Leveraging high conservation of SYCE3 among mammals to apply findings from mouse models to human contexts
Super-resolution microscopy: Employing techniques like STORM and PALM to visualize SYCE3 organization at nanometer resolution
In vitro reconstitution: Developing systems to reconstitute human SYCE3 interactions with binding partners using recombinant proteins
Computational modeling: Applying structural predictions and molecular dynamics simulations to model human SYCE3 behavior when experimental data is limited
These approaches can be combined to build comprehensive models of human SYCE3 function despite experimental limitations.
Methodological answer: Effective SYCE3 research requires careful experimental design:
Choice of model system: While mouse models provide in vivo insights, in vitro biochemical systems allow precise manipulation of molecular interactions
Mutation strategy: Separation-of-function mutations (like WY and PPP-loop) provide more nuanced understanding than complete knockouts
Temporal analysis: Studies must account for the dynamic nature of meiosis by examining multiple time points
Combinatorial approaches: Combining genetic, cytological, biochemical, and structural analyses provides comprehensive insights
Controls and quantification: Include appropriate genetic controls (e.g., Syce3PAM/PAM as control for Syce3WY/WY) and quantitative analysis of SC assembly and recombination
The SC analyzer ImageJ macro facilitates standardized analysis across experiments, improving reproducibility .
Methodological answer: Distinguishing direct and indirect effects requires:
Temporal studies: Examining the earliest detectable changes after SYCE3 manipulation
Domain-specific mutations: Creating targeted mutations that affect specific SYCE3 interactions rather than all functions
Biochemical reconstitution: Testing direct protein interactions in vitro to confirm mechanisms observed in vivo
Rescue experiments: Reintroducing wild-type or mutant SYCE3 to knockout systems to determine which functions are restored
Proximity labeling approaches: Using techniques like BioID to identify proteins in direct proximity to SYCE3 in vivo
These approaches help establish causality in the complex network of interactions during meiosis.
Methodological answer: The relationship between SYCE3 and meiotic recombination appears bidirectional:
In SYCE3-deficient mice, initiation of meiotic recombination appears normal, but progression is severely impaired with complete absence of MLH1 foci (crossover markers)
Recent evidence suggests CE proteins, including SYCE3, localize to recombination sites prior to synapsis, suggesting recombination intermediates may help recruit SYCE3
SYCE3's role in remodeling the SYCP1 lattice appears essential for creating a structural environment that supports crossover formation
This suggests SYCE3 plays both structural and potentially regulatory roles in meiotic recombination, with the precise mechanisms still being investigated.
SYCE3 is a protein-coding gene that plays a significant role in the formation and stabilization of the synaptonemal complex. It is a major component of the transverse central element of synaptonemal complexes (SCS), which are formed between homologous chromosomes during meiotic prophase . The protein is required for chromosome loading of the central element-specific SCS proteins and for initiating synapsis between homologous chromosomes .
The synaptonemal complex is essential for the proper recombination and segregation of meiotic chromosomes. Defects in the assembly of the synaptonemal complex or in the function of associated meiotic recombination machinery can lead to meiotic arrest and human infertility . SYCE3 is required for fertility, and its proper function is crucial for the successful completion of meiosis .
The SYCE3 gene is located on chromosome 22 and is highly expressed in the testis . It is involved in pathways related to meiosis and the cell cycle, particularly during the mitotic phase . Mutations in this gene have been associated with various disorders, including Cutis Laxa, Autosomal Recessive, Type IId, and Loeys-Dietz Syndrome 4 .
Research on SYCE3 and the synaptonemal complex has significant implications for understanding human fertility and the genetic basis of infertility. Aberrant expression and malfunctioning of these genes have also been associated with cancer development . Understanding the role of SYCE3 in meiosis can provide insights into potential therapeutic targets for treating infertility and related disorders.