TARBP2 (TAR RNA-binding protein 2), also known as TRBP, is a multifunctional protein that plays crucial roles in several cellular pathways. It functions as a subunit of the RISC loading complex and contains three double-stranded RNA-binding domains (DSRBDs). The human version of TRBP has a canonical length of 366 amino acid residues and a molecular weight of approximately 39 kDa .
TARBP2 is important in research because it:
Functions in microRNA processing and RISC assembly
Binds to HIV-1 TAR RNA and activates HIV-1 gene expression
Regulates RNA stability and splicing in the nucleus
Plays a role in muscle cell differentiation
Has been implicated in cancer progression, particularly lung cancer
Participates in immune responses against certain viruses
TARBP2 is localized in both the nucleus and cytoplasm, with distinct functions in each compartment . This dual localization makes it an interesting target for studying various cellular processes.
When selecting a TARBP2 antibody, researchers should consider:
Antibody Format and Application Compatibility:
| Antibody Type | Common Applications | Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Monoclonal | WB, IHC, Flow Cytometry | Higher specificity, consistent results between lots |
| Polyclonal | WB, ELISA, IHC | Recognizes multiple epitopes, higher sensitivity |
Species Reactivity: Ensure the antibody recognizes TARBP2 from your experimental species. Many available antibodies react with human, mouse, and rat TARBP2 .
Epitope Location: Consider whether the target epitope is in a functional domain of TARBP2. For instance, antibodies targeting the dsRNA-binding domains might interfere with RNA-binding capacity in certain applications.
Validation Data: Review the validation data provided by manufacturers, including Western blot images, IHC staining patterns, and specificity tests .
Cellular Localization Studies: If studying the nuclear versus cytoplasmic functions of TARBP2, verify that the antibody can detect the protein in both compartments, as TARBP2 has been shown to localize to both areas .
For optimal Western blot detection of TARBP2, follow these research-validated recommendations:
Sample Preparation:
Include both nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions since TARBP2 is found in both compartments
Use protease inhibitors to prevent degradation
Consider phosphatase inhibitors if studying post-translational modifications
SDS-PAGE Conditions:
Use 10-12% acrylamide gels to properly resolve the ~39 kDa TARBP2 protein
Include positive control samples (e.g., recombinant TARBP2)
Antibody Dilution and Incubation:
For monoclonal antibodies, optimal dilutions are typically between 1:1000-1:2000
For polyclonal antibodies, start with dilutions of 1:500-1:1000
Most TARBP2 antibodies work well with standard blocking buffers (5% non-fat milk or BSA)
Signal Detection:
Expect to see a band at approximately 39 kDa
Some splice variants may produce additional bands
TARBP2 may also show post-translational modifications affecting migration
Validation Controls:
Use TARBP2 knockdown or knockout samples as negative controls
Consider using recombinant TARBP2 protein as a positive control
Immunoprecipitation (IP) of TARBP2 requires careful optimization, especially when studying its interactions with RNA or protein partners:
Lysis Buffer Selection:
For protein-protein interactions: Use buffers containing 0.5% NP-40 or 1% Triton X-100
For RNA-protein interactions: Consider crosslinking with formaldehyde before lysis
Include protease and phosphatase inhibitors
Antibody Selection:
Monoclonal antibodies often provide cleaner results with fewer non-specific interactions
Protocol Optimization:
Pre-clear lysates with protein A/G beads to reduce background
Use 2-5 μg of antibody per mg of total protein
Incubate antibody-lysate mixture overnight at 4°C
Thoroughly wash beads to remove non-specific binders
Co-IP Detection:
When studying TARBP2 interactions with Dicer or Ago2, use stringent washing conditions
For LGP2 interactions, gentler washing conditions may be required
When investigating WTAP or METTL3 interactions, consider nuclear fractionation first
Research has shown that TARBP2 interacts specifically with LGP2 but not with related RIG-I-like receptors . Similarly, interactions between TARBP2 and the nucleoprotein TPR promote degradation of TARBP2-bound transcripts by the nuclear exosome .
Recent research has revealed that TARBP2 plays important roles in nuclear RNA processing, particularly in regulating splicing and RNA stability. To investigate these functions:
Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Fractionation:
Use established protocols to separate nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions
Verify fractionation quality using markers like GAPDH (cytoplasmic) and Lamin B (nuclear)
Confirm TARBP2 presence in nuclear fractions via Western blot
RNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP):
Use anti-TARBP2 antibodies to immunoprecipitate TARBP2-RNA complexes
Extract and analyze bound RNAs via RT-PCR or RNA-seq
Focus on intronic sequences, as TARBP2 shows pervasive binding to introns
Splicing Analysis:
Use high-throughput transcriptomic profiling after TARBP2 knockdown
Quantify intron retention using computational tools like MISO
Calculate percent intron retention (PIR) changes in TARBP2-bound introns
Research has demonstrated that silencing TARBP2:
Results in decreased retention of TARBP2-bound introns
Increases expression of TARBP2 target transcripts in the nucleus
m6A Methylation Analysis:
Perform MeRIP-seq in control and TARBP2 knockdown cells
Analyze changes in m6A methylation patterns of TARBP2 target RNAs
Focus on TARBP2-bound introns and their flanking exons
Studies have shown that TARBP2-bound introns significantly overlap with introns that contain m6A marks, and TARBP2 knockdown leads to decreased m6A signal in these introns .
TARBP2 has been identified as an important factor in innate immune responses, particularly in virus-triggered interferon signaling. To study this function:
Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis:
Use co-immunoprecipitation with anti-TARBP2 antibodies to pull down immune-related binding partners
Perform Western blot analysis to detect interactions with specific proteins like LGP2
Map interaction domains using truncated protein constructs
Research has shown that TARBP2 interacts specifically with LGP2 but not with related RIG-I-like receptors, RIG-I or MDA5 . The interaction involves both dsRNA binding domains (dsRBD 1 and dsRBD 2) of TARBP2 .
Functional Analysis in Viral Infection:
Perform TARBP2 knockdown experiments using siRNA
Infect cells with different viruses (e.g., TMEV, EMCV, Sendai virus)
Measure interferon responses via qRT-PCR and ELISA
Use TARBP2 antibodies to monitor knockdown efficiency
Studies have demonstrated that silencing TARBP2 significantly reduces IFNβ mRNA induction upon Cardiovirus (TMEV, EMCV) infection but does not affect Sendai virus-triggered interferon response .
Quantitative Analysis of Cytokine Production:
| Virus Type | Effect of TARBP2 Knockdown on IFNβ Response |
|---|---|
| TMEV (Cardiovirus) | Significant reduction |
| EMCV (Cardiovirus) | Severe impairment |
| Sendai virus | No significant effect |
This pattern suggests that TARBP2 is specifically involved in the LGP2/MDA5-mediated interferon response pathway rather than the RIG-I pathway .
Multiple bands in TARBP2 Western blots can result from several phenomena:
Alternative Splicing:
TARBP2 has multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms
The two main isoforms (TRBP1 and TRBP2) differ slightly in size
Verify which isoforms your antibody should detect based on the epitope location
Post-translational Modifications:
TARBP2 can undergo phosphorylation which may cause mobility shifts
Consider using phosphatase treatment of lysates to determine if bands are phosphorylated forms
Degradation Products:
TARBP2 may undergo proteolytic processing during sample preparation
Ensure fresh preparation of samples with adequate protease inhibitors
Keep samples cold throughout processing
Antibody Cross-reactivity:
Some antibodies may cross-react with related proteins like PACT/PRKRA
Validate specificity using TARBP2 knockout or knockdown samples
Compare results with multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Resolution Strategies:
Optimize gel percentage to better separate closely migrating bands
Run longer SDS-PAGE separations to distinguish closely-spaced bands
Use gradient gels for improved resolution of multiple isoforms
Compare band patterns with recombinant TARBP2 protein standards
To rigorously evaluate TARBP2 antibody specificity:
Genetic Validation:
Generate TARBP2 knockdown or knockout samples
Compare antibody signals between wild-type and TARBP2-depleted samples
The specific signal should be significantly reduced or absent in knockdown/knockout samples
Peptide Competition:
Pre-incubate the antibody with the immunizing peptide (if available)
Perform Western blot or immunostaining in parallel with untreated antibody
Specific signals should be blocked by peptide competition
Orthogonal Detection Methods:
Compare results using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes of TARBP2
Use tagged TARBP2 constructs and detect with both anti-tag and anti-TARBP2 antibodies
Concordant results increase confidence in antibody specificity
Positive Controls:
Use cell lines known to express high levels of TARBP2
Compare molecular weight with the expected size (39 kDa for full-length TARBP2)
Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry:
Perform IP with the TARBP2 antibody
Analyze immunoprecipitated proteins by mass spectrometry
TARBP2 should be among the top-identified proteins
Known TARBP2 interactors (Dicer, Ago2, PACT) may also be detected
TARBP2 has been implicated in cancer development, particularly in lung cancer. To investigate its oncogenic roles:
Expression Analysis in Clinical Samples:
Perform immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays using validated TARBP2 antibodies
Compare TARBP2 expression levels between normal and tumor tissues
Correlate expression with clinical parameters and patient outcomes
Mechanistic Studies:
Use TARBP2 antibodies for chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify upstream regulators
Perform RNA immunoprecipitation to identify cancer-relevant TARBP2 RNA targets
Conduct co-immunoprecipitation to map protein interaction networks in cancer cells
Research has identified ZNF143 as an upstream regulator of TARBP2 expression and shown that TARBP2-mediated destabilization of ABCA3 and FOXN3 impacts tumor growth in lung cancer models .
Functional Assays:
Perform TARBP2 knockdown in cancer cell lines
Use antibodies to verify knockdown efficiency
Assess effects on cancer phenotypes (proliferation, migration, invasion)
Analyze changes in RNA processing and stability of cancer-relevant transcripts
Studies demonstrate that increased activity of TARBP2 promotes lung cancer growth, and a network analytical approach has identified key factors that participate in its oncogenic role .
Recent research has uncovered important connections between TARBP2 and RNA methylation. To investigate these interactions:
Protein Complex Analysis:
Use TARBP2 antibodies for immunoprecipitation followed by Western blot
Probe for m6A methyltransferase components (METTL3, METTL14, WTAP)
Perform reciprocal IPs with antibodies against methyltransferase components
Research has shown that TARBP2 co-immunoprecipitates with METTL3, the enzymatic component of the methyltransferase complex .
Methylation Analysis:
Perform MeRIP-seq in control and TARBP2 knockdown cells
Quantify changes in m6A levels on TARBP2 target transcripts
Focus on the overlap between TARBP2 binding sites and m6A modification sites
Studies have revealed that:
More than 50% of TARBP2-bound introns contain methylation marks, compared to less than 10% of all expressed introns
TARBP2 knockdown causes a significant decrease in m6A signal in TARBP2-bound introns
Functional Reporter Assays:
Design minigene constructs containing TARBP2 binding sites
Create variants with mutated binding sites
Compare m6A levels and splicing patterns between wild-type and mutant constructs
Assess the effects of TARBP2 or METTL3 knockdown on reporter expression
Experimental data has demonstrated that decreased intron retention upon reduced levels of TARBP2 and METTL3 is contingent on the presence of TARBP2 binding sites .
Mechanistic Model:
Current research suggests a model where TARBP2: