Target: Ki-67 protein, a nuclear antigen expressed during active phases of the cell cycle (G1, S, G2, M) but absent in quiescent cells .
Epitope Specificity: Binds to an active conformational state of Ki-67 involved in ribosomal RNA synthesis .
Conjugate: Often labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) for photodynamic therapy (PDT) applications .
Hybridoma Source: Produced by hybridoma cells from the Leibniz Research Center Borstel, Germany .
Labeling: FITC conjugation achieved at a 20:1 molar ratio (antibody:FITC), followed by purification with Sephadex columns .
TuBB-9 has been utilized in dual-targeted cancer therapies:
Cell Line Efficacy: Demonstrated cytotoxicity in HeLa, OVCAR-5, and MCF-7 cells post-PDT, with minimal effect on non-proliferating fibroblasts .
EGFR Dependency: Erbitux-conjugated liposomes improved TuBB-9-FITC delivery in EGFR-overexpressing cells, validated via receptor-blocking experiments .
Selectivity: Unlike other Ki-67 antibodies (e.g., MIB-1), TuBB-9 does not inhibit Ki-67 activity upon binding, allowing functional studies without artifacts .
Autoantibody Role: Elevated anti-TUBB autoantibodies correlate with active melanoma progression, suggesting immune dysregulation .
Immune Correlations: TUBB autoantibodies in melanoma patients associate with exhausted T-cell subsets and IgG+ memory B cells .
TuBB-9’s ability to selectively target proliferating cells positions it as a tool for:
Cancer Prognostics: Ki-67 expression levels correlate with tumor aggressiveness .
Combination Therapies: Synergy with EGFR inhibitors enhances tumor-specific drug delivery .
Immune Monitoring: Autoantibodies against tubulin isoforms (e.g., TUBB) may serve as biomarkers for melanoma progression .
TUBB9 antibody (also referenced as TuBB-9 in some literature) is a monoclonal antibody that targets the nuclear protein Ki-67, which is a cellular marker for proliferation . This antibody is primarily used in research settings to study cell proliferation patterns and has been effectively employed in combination with fluorescence microscopy techniques to visualize Ki-67 expression in cellular nuclei. The antibody has been validated for applications including immunofluorescence microscopy, particularly after conjugation with fluorescent molecules like FITC.
TUBB9 antibody is utilized in several research applications, including:
Immunofluorescence microscopy after fluorescent labeling (particularly with FITC)
Analysis of cell proliferation through Ki-67 detection
Photochemical internalization studies investigating targeted cellular delivery
Visualization of nuclear protein expression during cell cycle progression
Combination with other antibodies in multiplexed immunostaining to evaluate cellular states
Research has demonstrated the utility of TUBB9 in photochemical internalization studies where cells are first incubated with compounds like Fimaporfin before antibody application .
While specific storage information for TUBB9 antibody isn't detailed in the provided sources, general antibody handling principles apply:
Store antibody aliquots at recommended temperatures (typically -20°C for long-term storage)
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles by preparing working aliquots
When working with fluorescently labeled TUBB9 (e.g., TUBB9-FITC conjugates), protect from light exposure
Maintain proper pH conditions (pH ~7.5 for most applications, but protocol-specific conditions may vary)
Follow manufacturer recommendations for reconstitution and dilution buffers
For experimental applications, TUBB9 antibody has been successfully used in protocols involving incubation periods of approximately 4 hours at specified concentrations .
Proper experimental design with TUBB9 antibody should include:
Negative controls:
Isotype controls (matched antibody class but irrelevant specificity)
Secondary antibody only (for indirect detection methods)
Cells known to lack Ki-67 expression
Positive controls:
Cell lines with verified Ki-67 expression (such as proliferating cancer cell lines)
Tissues with known patterns of Ki-67 expression
Validation controls:
Comparison with other validated Ki-67 antibodies
Correlation with other proliferation markers
These controls are essential for accurate interpretation of staining patterns and verification of antibody specificity.
Based on research methodologies, the following protocol has been established for FITC labeling of TUBB9 antibody :
Antibody Preparation:
Dilute TUBB9 antibody 1:5 in sodium carbonate buffer (160 nM Na₂CO₃ and 333 nM NaHCO₃, pH 9.3)
Centrifuge at 1855× g for 20 minutes
Collect residues in the filter using buffer solution (pH 9.3)
Conjugation:
Add 1 mg/mL of FITC (dissolved in DMSO) to the TUBB9 solution
Incubate at room temperature with constant agitation for 2 hours
Purification:
Use a Sephadex column (e.g., NAP-25) pre-buffered with tris-buffered saline (TBS, pH 8.2)
Centrifuge the eluate
Rinse the filter twice with 500 μL TBS (pH 7.5) and add to the sample
Verification:
Determine the final concentration of antibody and fluorescent dye using absorption spectrum analysis
This methodology has been successfully employed in studies involving photochemical internalization with Fimaporfin, where cells were incubated with TUBB9-FITC construct for 4 hours .
When encountering signal issues with TUBB9 antibody:
For Low Signal:
Verify antibody activity and concentration
Increase antibody concentration or incubation time
Optimize antigen retrieval methods if applicable
Ensure target accessibility (permeabilization for intracellular targets)
Check detection system sensitivity (for fluorescent detection, ensure appropriate filters and exposure settings)
For High Background:
Increase blocking duration or concentration (using appropriate blocking agents)
Optimize washing steps (increase number or duration)
Decrease antibody concentration
Pre-absorb antibody with potential cross-reactive proteins
For fluorescent applications, ensure proper signal thresholding to suppress false positives
Researchers have found that optimizing signal-to-noise thresholds is critical when analyzing dense MS spectra, with some studies suggesting a signal-to-noise threshold of ≥7 may be appropriate for antibody analysis rather than standard values of 3 .
For targeted cellular delivery applications using TUBB9 antibody:
Internalization Dynamics:
TUBB9 antibody has been successfully used in photochemical internalization studies, where cells are first incubated with the photosensitizer (e.g., Fimaporfin for 18h) and then with TUBB9-FITC for 4h
After washing, cells can be exposed to specific wavelength light (420 nm has been used) at defined energy levels (0.25 J/cm²) to trigger endosomal disruption and antibody release
Validation Approaches:
Optimization Parameters:
Cell type-specific incubation times
Concentration of photosensitizer and antibody
Light exposure parameters (wavelength, intensity, duration)
Buffer composition for optimal internalization
This approach allows for temporal and spatial control of TUBB9 antibody delivery for studying nuclear protein dynamics.
Analysis of Ki-67 expression using TUBB9 antibody requires:
Standardized Quantification Methods:
Percentage of positive cells (labeling index)
Intensity scoring (negative, weak, moderate, strong)
Digital image analysis with appropriate thresholding
Correlation with cell cycle markers
Experimental Design Considerations:
Consistent fixation and processing methods across samples
Matched exposure settings for image acquisition
Inclusion of proliferative and quiescent control cell populations
Technical replicates to account for staining variability
Advanced Analysis Approaches:
Single-cell analysis of Ki-67 expression in heterogeneous populations
Correlation with other proliferation markers (e.g., PCNA, MCM proteins)
Spatial analysis of Ki-67 distribution within the nucleus
Temporal dynamics during cell cycle progression
A systematic approach using these considerations enables reliable cross-comparison of Ki-67 expression between different experimental conditions and cell types.
Validating TUBB9 antibody specificity requires multiple complementary approaches:
Analytical Validation:
Western blotting to confirm target molecular weight
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry
Peptide competition assays
Immunodepletion studies
Biological Validation:
Correlation of staining with known proliferation states
Comparison with other validated Ki-67 antibodies
Testing in cells with genetic Ki-67 knockdown/knockout
Evaluation across multiple cell lines and tissue types
Advanced Specificity Testing:
Epitope mapping to determine precise binding region
Cross-reactivity assessment with related proteins
Testing in various species if cross-reactivity is expected
Analysis under different experimental conditions (fixation methods, buffer compositions)
Validation is particularly important when developing new experimental applications for TUBB9 antibody beyond established protocols.
Design of Experiments methodology provides a systematic framework for optimizing TUBB9 antibody protocols:
Key Factors to Consider:
Antibody concentration
Incubation time and temperature
Buffer composition (pH, ionic strength)
Blocking conditions
Detection system parameters
Experimental Design Structure:
Full factorial or fractional factorial designs to assess factor interactions
Response surface methodology to identify optimal conditions
Plackett-Burman designs for screening many factors
Central composite designs for optimization studies
Implementation Strategy:
| Factor | Low Level | High Level | Control Range (±) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antibody Conc. | 1 μg/mL | 10 μg/mL | 1 μg/mL |
| Temperature | 4°C | 37°C | 2°C |
| pH | 6.8 | 7.8 | 0.2 |
| Incubation Time | 1 h | 18 h | 0.5 h |
Analysis Approaches:
Researchers have successfully applied DOE approaches to antibody development processes, making it a valuable methodology for TUBB9 antibody optimization .
Multiplexed imaging with TUBB9 antibody requires careful consideration of:
Antibody Compatibility:
Species origin compatibility between antibodies
Isotype selection to avoid cross-reactivity
Epitope accessibility when multiple targets are proximal
Signal Separation:
Spectral separation between fluorophores
Sequential staining protocols when needed
Appropriate controls for spectral overlap/bleed-through
Advanced Multiplexing Strategies:
Sequential bleaching and restaining approaches
Cyclic immunofluorescence methods
Mass cytometry or imaging mass cytometry for high-dimensional analysis
Antibody stripping and reprobing protocols
Validation Requirements:
Single-stain controls for each antibody
Fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls
Signal correlation analysis between sequential imaging rounds
Comparison with single-plex staining results
These considerations enable researchers to effectively use TUBB9 antibody in complex multiplexed imaging experiments while maintaining specificity and sensitivity.
Integration of TUBB9 antibody with emerging technologies offers new research possibilities:
TUBB9 in Super-Resolution Microscopy:
Optimization of fluorophore selection for STORM, PALM, or STED microscopy
Sample preparation considerations for nanoscale resolution
Quantitative analysis of Ki-67 distribution at sub-diffraction resolution
Single-Cell Analysis Applications:
Combination with single-cell RNA sequencing for correlative analysis
Integration with mass cytometry for high-dimensional phenotyping
Microfluidic approaches for temporal analysis of Ki-67 dynamics
Live Cell Imaging Considerations:
Fragment-based antibody approaches for improved penetration
Optimization of non-perturbative labeling strategies
Photoactivatable antibody conjugates for spatiotemporal control
Computational Analysis Integration:
Machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition in TUBB9 staining
Automated image analysis workflows for high-throughput screening
Multi-parametric data integration frameworks
These approaches extend the utility of TUBB9 antibody beyond traditional applications, enabling more sophisticated analysis of Ki-67 expression and cellular proliferation dynamics.
When faced with contradictory results:
Systematic Verification:
Validate antibody lot consistency and activity
Compare fixation and sample preparation methods
Evaluate detection system sensitivity differences
Consider epitope accessibility variations between platforms
Resolution Approaches:
Use multiple antibody clones targeting different Ki-67 epitopes
Implement orthogonal methods for proliferation assessment
Perform dose-response studies to identify threshold effects
Consider cell type-specific differences in Ki-67 expression
Analytical Considerations:
Standardize quantification methods across platforms
Account for differences in detection limit and dynamic range
Apply appropriate statistical methods for cross-platform normalization
Document all experimental variables that might influence results
Research has shown that apparent contradictions in antibody studies often stem from methodological differences rather than true biological variations .
Common artifacts include:
Edge Effects:
Identified by: Increased signal at tissue or cell margins
Mitigation: Optimize fixation, improve washing techniques, adjust imaging settings
Autofluorescence:
Identified by: Signal in negative controls, broad spectral emission
Mitigation: Use appropriate quenching methods, spectral unmixing, narrow bandpass filters
Non-specific Binding:
Identified by: Diffuse cytoplasmic staining, signal in negative control samples
Mitigation: Optimize blocking, use validated diluents, include appropriate controls
Fixation Artifacts:
Identified by: Inconsistent staining patterns correlated with fixation time/method
Mitigation: Standardize fixation protocols, use positive control tissues
Cross-reactivity:
Identified by: Unexpected subcellular localization, staining in tissues without Ki-67
Mitigation: Validate with multiple antibodies, perform blocking studies
Creating a systematic artifact atlas specific to TUBB9 antibody applications can help researchers distinguish true biological signals from technical artifacts.
Best practices for reporting TUBB9 antibody methods include:
Antibody Documentation:
Complete antibody identification (clone, isotype, supplier, catalog number, lot number)
Validation methods used to confirm specificity
Concentration or dilution used
Protocol Details:
Complete buffer compositions with exact pH values
Precise timing of each step
Temperature conditions
Detailed antigen retrieval methods if applicable
Controls Description:
Full details of positive and negative controls
Images of control experiments
Criteria used to establish positive staining
Image Acquisition Parameters:
Microscope specifications
Camera/detector settings
Exposure times
Image processing methods with software versions
Quantification Methods:
Detailed analysis workflow
Software tools used for quantification
Thresholding criteria
Statistical methods for data analysis
Following these reporting standards enhances reproducibility across different research laboratories.
Emerging combinations include:
Bispecific Antibody Approaches:
Engineered Antibody Formats:
Single-domain antibodies for improved tissue penetration
pH-sensitive antibody conjugates for controlled release
Split antibody complementation systems for proximity detection
Novel Conjugation Strategies:
Site-specific conjugation methods for improved homogeneity
Cleavable linkers for controlled release of payloads
Environmentally responsive linkers for targeted delivery
These advanced approaches expand the utility of TUBB9 beyond traditional immunostaining applications toward therapeutic and diagnostic innovations.
TUBB9 antibody can contribute to understanding disease mechanisms through:
Cancer Research Applications:
Correlation of Ki-67 expression patterns with tumor progression
Identification of proliferative heterogeneity within tumors
Evaluation of treatment response based on Ki-67 dynamics
Neurodegenerative Disease Studies:
Assessment of neuronal proliferation in response to injury
Evaluation of stem cell proliferation in neurodegenerative models
Correlation of aberrant cell cycle reentry with pathology
Immunological Investigations:
Tracking lymphocyte proliferation during immune responses
Monitoring proliferative exhaustion in chronic infections
Evaluating proliferative responses to immunotherapy
Regenerative Medicine:
Assessment of stem cell proliferation during tissue repair
Evaluation of proliferative capacity in engineered tissues
Correlation of regenerative outcomes with proliferation patterns
By providing detailed information about cell proliferation states, TUBB9 antibody enables researchers to establish mechanistic links between proliferation abnormalities and disease processes.
Advanced computational integration includes:
Image Analysis Automation:
Deep learning for Ki-67 positive cell identification
Convolutional neural networks for pattern recognition
Automated quantification across large tissue sections
Multi-omics Integration:
Correlation of Ki-67 expression with transcriptomic profiles
Integration with proteomic data to identify co-expressed markers
Pathway analysis incorporating Ki-67 status
Spatial Analysis:
Neighborhood analysis of Ki-67 positive cells
Spatial statistics to identify proliferative hotspots
Tissue microenvironment characterization based on proliferation patterns
Predictive Modeling:
Development of prognostic models incorporating Ki-67 data
Simulation of proliferative responses to therapeutic interventions
Virtual tissue modeling incorporating proliferation dynamics
These computational approaches transform descriptive TUBB9 antibody data into predictive models with greater biological insight.