TRX1 inhibits NK cell cytotoxicity in vitro but shows variable in vivo effects depending on:
Dosing schedule: Continuous vs. pulse administration alters NK cell recovery timelines .
Model specificity: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) models require concurrent analysis of:
NK cell activation markers (CD69/CD107a)
Cytokine profiles (IFN-γ, granzyme B)
Conduct time-course multiparametric flow cytometry paired with single-cell RNA sequencing to map NK cell heterogeneity post-TRX1 treatment.
Tolerization phase: Co-administer TRX1 + antigen (Days 0–14).
Withdrawal phase: Monitor immune reconstitution (Days 15–60).
Challenge phase: Re-expose to antigen + adjuvant (Day 68+) .
Treg/Teff cell ratios
Antigen-specific IgE vs. IgG isotype switching
Cross-species analysis reveals:
| Species | CD4 Binding Affinity (KD) | Tolerance Induction Efficiency |
|---|---|---|
| Baboon | 2.1 nM | 92% |
| Rhesus | 5.8 nM | 67% |
| Solution: |
Engineer species-specific TRX1 variants via site-directed mutagenesis of CDR-H3.
Validate using in silico molecular docking against crystallized CD4 structures.
Conflict: TRX1 shows robust tolerance in baboons but limited efficacy in murine GVHD models.
Root cause:
Differential FcγR expression alters antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP).
Generate human CD4-transgenic murine models.
Use Fc-silent TRX1 variants (e.g., L234A/L235A mutations) to isolate Fab-mediated effects.