Use homemade ELISA to quantify anti-CXCL4 IgG/IgA in serum ( ):
Compare against healthy donors (HD) and disease controls (e.g., SLE, ulcerative colitis)
Validate with Western blot using recombinant CXCL4
Clinical correlation: Measure IFN-α levels via ELISA and interferon-responsive genes (e.g., MX1) in blood/skin biopsies
| Cohort (n) | Anti-CXCL4+ (%) | Correlation with Lung Fibrosis (p-value) |
|---|---|---|
| SSc (58) | 50% | p = 0.002 |
| SLE (30) | 33% | NS |
Isolate circulating immune complexes (CICs) from SSc patient plasma
Use immunofluorescence to colocalize CXCL4 and DNA in skin biopsies
Stimulate pDCs with CXCL4-DNA complexes and quantify IFN-α via Luminex
Critical finding: CXCL4-DNA complexes correlate with:
Isolate PBMCs from SSc patients and perform BrdU proliferation assays:
Statistical correlation: Anti-CXCL4 antibody titers vs. T-cell proliferation index (r = 0.81, p = 0.003)
Implication: 38% of SSc patients show CXCL4-specific T-cell responses, suggesting linked recognition between B and T cells .
Train GAN models on 31,416 human antibody sequences with optimal biophysical properties
Generate 100,000 in silico variable regions filtered by:
Humanness score >90%
Hydrophobicity index <0.35
Thermal stability >68°C (DSC)
Validate top candidates via:
CE-SDS for purity
HIC-HPLC for aggregation propensity
| Metric | GAN Antibodies | Marketed Therapeutics |
|---|---|---|
| Expression yield | 2.1 g/L | 1.8–3.0 g/L |
| Monomer content | 98.5% | ≥95% |
| Non-specific binding | 12% of controls | 10–15% |
Issue: Anti-CTLA-4 antibodies may target both effector T-cells and T-regs ( )
Experimental reconciliation:
For B-cell epitope mapping: Combine hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) with alanine scanning mutagenesis of CXCL4
In cytokine storm models: Monitor CXCL4-CCR1 axis using phosphoflow cytometry (CD4+pSTAT5)
Multi-omics integration: Pair single-cell RNA-seq of CXCL4+ macrophages with spatial transcriptomics in fibrotic tissues