The term "TMA17" appears in Search Result , which references the Saccharomyces Genome Database entry for the TMA17 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast). This entry describes TMA17 as a yeast gene involved in ribosome biogenesis, with no mention of any associated antibody. The other search results focus on:
None of these sources mention "TMA17 Antibody" as a recognized entity in immunology or biotechnology.
Terminology Error: "TMA17" may refer to a gene, protein, or experimental reagent not yet widely characterized or published.
Nomenclature Confusion: Similar-sounding terms (e.g., anti-PM/Scl antibodies in or TMEM127 in ) exist but are unrelated to TMA17.
Emerging Research: If "TMA17 Antibody" is a novel compound, it may lack peer-reviewed studies or commercial availability.
To resolve this ambiguity:
Verify the Compound Name: Ensure "TMA17 Antibody" is spelled correctly and corresponds to a validated target.
Consult Specialized Databases:
UniProt or PDBe for protein structures
ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing antibody-related research
Antibody Registry (antibodyregistry.org) for commercial reagents
Review Patent Literature: Explore the USPTO or WIPO databases for proprietary antibodies.
While "TMA17 Antibody" is unidentified, the following well-characterized antibodies may serve as points of reference:
KEGG: sce:YDL110C
STRING: 4932.YDL110C
TMA17 Antibody (such as product code CSB-PA621498XA01SVG) is a polyclonal antibody raised in rabbits against recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c, Baker's yeast) TMA17 protein . It's specifically designed for research applications and should not be used in diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. As a polyclonal antibody, it contains a heterogeneous mixture of antibodies that recognize multiple epitopes on the TMA17 protein, offering potentially broader recognition capabilities compared to monoclonal alternatives.
According to product information, TMA17 Antibody has been validated for ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) and Western Blot (WB) applications to ensure identification of the antigen . When designing experiments, researchers should consider that antibody performance can vary based on experimental conditions, sample preparation methods, and detection systems used. Preliminary validation experiments should be performed for each specific application, following principles similar to those used for other research antibodies .
TMA17 Antibody targets the TMA17 protein (Uniprot No. Q12513) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae . TMA17 (Translation Machinery-Associated protein 17) is involved in proteasome assembly and regulation in yeast. Understanding this protein's function provides insights into protein quality control mechanisms and stress responses, with potential parallels to similar systems in higher eukaryotes.
For optimal western blot results with TMA17 Antibody:
Sample preparation:
Use fresh yeast lysates prepared with protease inhibitors
Denature samples in SDS buffer at 95°C for 5 minutes
Gel electrophoresis:
Use 12-15% SDS-PAGE gels for better resolution of TMA17
Include positive control (recombinant TMA17) and negative control samples
Transfer conditions:
Semi-dry transfer: 15V for 30 minutes or wet transfer at 100V for 1 hour
Use PVDF membrane with 0.2 μm pore size for smaller proteins
Blocking:
5% non-fat milk or 3% BSA in TBST for 1 hour at room temperature
Test both blockers to determine which gives lower background
Antibody incubation:
Detection:
Use HRP-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit antibody
Consider chemiluminescent detection for sensitivity or fluorescent detection for quantification
Similar optimization principles apply to other antibodies, with careful attention to specificity validation .
When performing immunofluorescence with TMA17 Antibody, include these essential controls:
Primary controls:
Positive control: Wild-type yeast cells expressing TMA17
Negative control: TMA17 knockout yeast strain
Pre-immune serum control: To assess background signal
Peptide competition control: Pre-incubate antibody with blocking peptide
Secondary antibody controls:
No primary antibody control: Assess non-specific binding of secondary antibody
Isotype control: Use irrelevant rabbit polyclonal IgG
Sample preparation controls:
Fixation control: Test different fixatives (paraformaldehyde vs. methanol)
Permeabilization control: Optimize detergent type and concentration
Colocalization markers:
Use established markers for expected subcellular localization
For TMA17, consider proteasome markers
These comprehensive controls follow principles of rigorous antibody validation that apply broadly in research settings .
To validate TMA17 Antibody specificity in your experimental system:
Genetic validation:
Compare wild-type with TMA17 knockout strain
Use TMA17 overexpression systems
Test in strains with tagged TMA17 (e.g., TMA17-GFP)
Biochemical validation:
Western blot analysis showing single band at expected molecular weight
Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry identification
Pre-adsorption test: Pre-incubate antibody with purified antigen before use
Cross-reactivity assessment:
Test in related species to determine evolutionary conservation
Examine cross-reactivity with similar proteins (bioinformatic prediction)
Orthogonal detection methods:
Compare results with different detection technologies
Use an alternative antibody targeting a different epitope of TMA17
These validation principles align with general antibody validation methodologies described in current research literature .
TMA17 Antibody provides researchers with a valuable tool for investigating proteasome regulation in yeast, with several advanced applications:
Stress response studies:
Monitor TMA17 protein levels during various stress conditions
Correlate TMA17 expression with proteasome assembly and activity
Time-course experiments to track TMA17 dynamics during stress adaptation
Proteasome assembly analysis:
Co-immunoprecipitation to identify TMA17 interaction partners during assembly
Sucrose gradient fractionation combined with western blotting to analyze TMA17 association with proteasome intermediates
Immunofluorescence to track TMA17 localization during proteasome assembly
Regulatory pathway investigation:
Examine TMA17 phosphorylation status using phosphatase treatments
Analyze TMA17 stability and turnover through cycloheximide chase experiments
Identify transcription factors regulating TMA17 expression
This approach is conceptually similar to studies of other proteasome-related proteins and their involvement in cellular stress responses, like those described for TMEM176B in immunoregulation .
TMA17's role in stress response mechanisms can be systematically investigated using TMA17 Antibody:
Expression dynamics during stress conditions:
Quantitative western blot analysis can reveal TMA17 level changes during:
Heat shock
Oxidative stress
ER stress
Nutrient limitation
Subcellular redistribution:
Under normal conditions: primarily cytoplasmic
During stress: potential co-localization with proteasome assembly centers
Stress recovery: return to normal distribution pattern
Proteostasis network:
Functions in concert with other proteasome assembly chaperones
May coordinate with heat shock proteins
Post-translational modifications:
Phosphorylation status changes under stress conditions
Potential ubiquitination sites regulating stability
This approach parallels methodologies used to study stress-responsive proteins in other systems, similar to approaches used with transmembrane proteins like TMEM176B in immune regulation contexts .
For comparative analysis of TMA17 across yeast species:
Key experimental considerations:
Sequence homology analysis prior to experimental validation
Increased antibody concentration for distantly related species
More stringent washing for cross-species applications
Validation with genetic knockouts when available
Optimization of sample preparation for each species
Comparative approaches can provide evolutionary insights into TMA17 function, similar to cross-species antibody validation methods used in other research contexts .
Common causes of non-specific binding with TMA17 Antibody and troubleshooting strategies:
Insufficient blocking:
Problem: Inadequate blocking allows antibody to bind non-specifically
Solution: Increase blocking time (2 hours minimum), test different blockers (milk vs. BSA), increase blocker concentration (5-10%)
Cross-reactivity with similar proteins:
Problem: TMA17 antibody recognizes epitopes shared with other yeast proteins
Solution: Pre-adsorb antibody with lysate from TMA17 knockout strain, use peptide competition, increase antibody dilution
Sample preparation issues:
Problem: Incomplete protein denaturation or aggregation
Solution: Optimize lysis conditions, increase SDS concentration, ensure complete heating during sample preparation
Secondary antibody problems:
Problem: Non-specific binding of secondary antibody
Solution: Include secondary-only control, increase washing stringency, try different secondary antibody
These troubleshooting approaches follow general principles applicable to research antibodies, with careful validation of specificity being critical, as emphasized in contemporary antibody-based research methodologies .
Addressing inconsistent results with TMA17 Antibody requires systematic investigation:
Antibody storage and handling:
Sample preparation variability:
Problem: Inconsistent extraction efficiency or protein degradation
Solution: Standardize lysis protocol, use fresh protease inhibitors, compare different lysis methods, process all samples simultaneously
Experimental conditions standardization:
Problem: Variations in temperature, incubation time, buffer composition
Solution: Create detailed protocol with precise timing, temperature control, and buffer preparation instructions
Cell/culture variations:
Problem: Differences in growth phase, media composition, or strain background
Solution: Harvest cells at consistent OD600, use single media preparation, maintain consistent growth conditions
Lot-to-lot antibody variations:
Problem: Manufacturing differences between antibody batches
Solution: Validate each new lot, maintain reference sample for comparison
These approaches to ensuring experimental reproducibility are consistent with best practices in antibody-based research .
Multiple orthogonal techniques to confirm TMA17 antibody specificity:
Genetic approaches:
Knockout validation: Compare wild-type and TMA17 knockout samples
Overexpression validation: Compare empty vector with TMA17 overexpression
Tagged protein comparison: Compare TMA17 antibody staining with epitope tag antibody
Biochemical approaches:
Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry: Perform IP with TMA17 antibody, analyze by MS
Peptide competition: Pre-incubate antibody with immunizing peptide
Epitope mapping: Test antibody against overlapping peptides covering TMA17 sequence
Multiple antibody comparison:
Use antibodies raised against different epitopes of TMA17
Compare detection patterns across antibodies
Cross-species validation:
Test antibody against TMA17 homologs in related species
Correlate signal strength with sequence conservation
These validation approaches are similar to contemporary methods used to validate antibody specificity in research contexts, as described in literature about antibody validation methodologies .
Optimal storage conditions for TMA17 Antibody to maintain long-term activity:
Temperature requirements:
Long-term storage: -20°C or -80°C
Working aliquots: -20°C
Avoid storing at 4°C for more than 1-2 weeks
Never store at room temperature
Aliquoting strategy:
Create single-use aliquots upon receipt
Use sterile microcentrifuge tubes with secure seals
Label with antibody name, lot number, date, and dilution
Calculate volume needed for typical experiment to minimize waste
Buffer composition:
Physical handling:
Minimize freeze-thaw cycles
Thaw on ice rather than at room temperature
Centrifuge briefly after thawing to collect contents
Use sterile technique to prevent contamination
These storage recommendations align with standard practices for maintaining antibody activity in research settings.
TMA17 Antibody stability decreases progressively with multiple freeze-thaw cycles:
Freeze-thaw impact assessment:
Each freeze-thaw cycle potentially reduces activity by 5-15%
After 5 cycles, significant reduction in signal-to-noise ratio may occur
Background may increase as antibody undergoes partial denaturation
Mechanism of freeze-thaw damage:
Ice crystal formation disrupts antibody structure
Protein denaturation at ice-liquid interfaces
Aggregation of partially denatured antibodies
Oxidation of sensitive amino acid residues
Mitigating freeze-thaw damage:
Activity monitoring approaches:
Standard curve comparison with fresh antibody
Signal-to-noise ratio assessment
Dilution series to determine effective concentration
These stability considerations apply broadly to antibody reagents in research settings.
Optimal buffer conditions for TMA17 Antibody functionality across different applications:
Storage buffer:
Application-specific buffer conditions:
| Application | Buffer Base | pH | Salt | Detergent | Blocking Agent | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Blot | TBS or PBS | 7.4 | 150 mM NaCl | 0.05-0.1% Tween-20 | 5% milk or 3% BSA | Overnight incubation at 4°C recommended |
| ELISA | PBS | 7.2-7.4 | 150 mM NaCl | None | 1-3% BSA | Optimize antibody concentration |
| Immunoprecipitation | PBS | 7.4 | 150-300 mM NaCl | 0.1% Triton X-100 or NP-40 | 1% BSA | Add protease inhibitors fresh |
Buffer components to avoid:
Strong detergents (SDS) can denature antibodies
High salt (>500 mM) can reduce binding affinity
Extreme pH (<6.0 or >8.5) can irreversibly damage antibody
High concentrations of reducing agents (DTT, BME)
Buffer optimization experiment design:
Perform testing of critical variables (pH, salt, detergent)
Include positive and negative controls
Test signal-to-noise ratio rather than absolute signal
Validate optimal conditions across multiple experiments
These buffer optimization principles are consistent with general antibody handling best practices in research laboratories.