TMEM186 is a transmembrane protein associated with mitochondria. Research has demonstrated its localization through detergent permeabilization experiments that distinguish between different membrane compartments. Studies have examined TMEM186's relationship with nuclear membrane components, suggesting potential roles beyond simple mitochondrial functions . The protein shows different accessibility depending on whether only the plasma membrane (digitonin permeabilization) or all cellular membranes (TX100 permeabilization) are made permeable, indicating its specific membrane topology .
Commercial TMEM186 antibodies have been validated for several experimental applications:
| Application | Recommended Dilution | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Western Blotting (WB) | 1:500-1:5000 | Detects TMEM186 protein bands |
| Immunohistochemistry (IHC) | 1:20-1:200 | May require optimization of antigen retrieval |
| Immunofluorescence (IF) | 1:50-1:200 | Useful for cellular localization studies |
| ELISA | Varies by product | Check specific product documentation |
These applications enable researchers to study TMEM186 expression, localization, and interactions in various experimental contexts .
Most commercially available TMEM186 antibodies show reactivity to human TMEM186, with some exhibiting cross-reactivity with mouse TMEM186. For instance, the polyclonal antibody targeting amino acids 124-213 exhibits reactivity to both human and mouse TMEM186, making it valuable for comparative studies across these species . When planning experiments involving different species, researchers should carefully verify the cross-reactivity information provided by manufacturers.
TMEM186 antibodies are available in multiple formats to suit different experimental needs:
| Format | Applications | Host | Clonality | Target Epitope |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unconjugated | ELISA, IHC, WB, IF | Rabbit | Polyclonal | AA 124-213 |
| HRP-conjugated | ELISA | Rabbit | Polyclonal | AA 124-213 |
| FITC-conjugated | Fluorescence-based assays | Rabbit | Polyclonal | AA 124-213 |
| Biotin-conjugated | ELISA | Rabbit | Polyclonal | AA 124-213 |
Each format offers distinct advantages depending on the experimental design and detection methods employed .
For optimal Western blotting results with TMEM186 antibodies:
Use recommended dilutions (1:500-1:5000) based on antibody sensitivity
Consider specialized extraction protocols for membrane proteins
Include positive controls (tissues/cells known to express TMEM186)
Include negative controls (ideally TMEM186 knockout samples)
Use protein G-purified antibodies (>95% purity) for highest specificity
Be aware that different detergents may influence protein extraction efficiency
Researchers should note that TMEM186 is a transmembrane protein, which may require optimization of extraction and separation conditions different from those used for soluble proteins .
When performing immunofluorescence with TMEM186 antibodies:
Begin with recommended dilutions (1:50-1:200) and optimize as needed
Carefully select fixation methods that preserve mitochondrial structures
Consider dual staining with established mitochondrial markers to confirm localization
Both unconjugated antibodies with secondary detection or directly FITC-conjugated antibodies can be used
When studying subcellular localization, differential permeabilization techniques can provide insights into protein topology
For colocalization studies with nuclear structures, appropriate nuclear markers should be included
Research has utilized both FLAG-tagged TMEM186 constructs and TMEM186-specific antibodies to investigate its cellular localization and interactions .
To maintain optimal antibody performance:
Store concentrated antibody stock at -20°C or -80°C
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles by preparing working aliquots
Most commercial preparations contain 50% glycerol and 0.03% ProClin 300 as preservatives
Note that ProClin 300 is classified as a hazardous substance requiring appropriate handling
Working dilutions should be prepared fresh or stored at 4°C for short periods
Follow manufacturer's recommendations regarding buffer compatibility
Proper storage is crucial as antibody degradation can lead to reduced sensitivity and increased background in experiments.
Robust experimental design requires appropriate controls:
Positive controls: Tissues or cells known to express TMEM186 (based on transcript data)
Negative controls:
Primary antibody omission
TMEM186 knockout samples (ideal negative control)
Tissues/cells with confirmed low TMEM186 expression
Peptide competition controls: Pre-incubation with immunizing peptide should abolish specific signal
For tagged constructs: Compare signals between tag-specific and TMEM186-specific antibodies
Research has utilized TMEM186 knockout cell lines as important negative controls to validate antibody specificity and to study the effects of TMEM186 deletion .
TMEM186 antibodies can facilitate several approaches to study protein interactions:
Immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by mass spectrometry
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) to confirm specific interactions
Proximity ligation assays for in situ detection of protein interactions
Biomolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays
Research has successfully employed FLAG-tagged TMEM186 with immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry to identify interactions with nuclear pore complex proteins including NDC1, AAAS, and NUP35/53. These interactions were subsequently confirmed using BiFC assays .
| Interacting Protein | Function | Detection Method | Confirmation Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| NDC1 | Nuclear pore complex component | FLAG-IP + MS | BiFC |
| AAAS | Nuclear pore complex component | FLAG-IP + MS | BiFC |
| NUP35/53 | Nuclear pore complex component | FLAG-IP + MS | BiFC |
| MCIA complex components | Mitochondrial complex I assembly | BirA* proximity labeling | Complexome profiling |
When validating knockout models:
Compare antibody signal between wild-type and knockout samples across multiple techniques
Use quantitative approaches (Western blot densitometry) to detect any residual expression
Be aware that some knockout models may retain minimal expression (e.g., mouse models showed 2.1% residual TMEM186 transcript)
Complement protein detection with transcript analysis (qRT-PCR)
Consider using multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Research has successfully employed TMEM186 antibodies to validate knockout cell lines, analyzing the resulting effects on mitochondrial complex I using blue native PAGE (BN-PAGE) .
To ensure signal specificity:
Titrate antibody concentrations to determine optimal signal-to-noise ratio
Compare staining patterns across multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes
Use siRNA knockdown to verify signal reduction correlates with reduced expression
Perform peptide competition assays
Analyze signal in tissues with known expression patterns based on transcriptomic data
When possible, include genetic models (knockout, knockdown) as gold-standard controls
Researchers have used multiple validation approaches, including genetic models, to ensure specificity when studying TMEM186 localization and function .
For detailed subcellular localization studies:
Use differential detergent permeabilization:
Digitonin (40 μg/mL) selectively permeabilizes the plasma membrane
TX100 permeabilizes all cellular membranes including nuclear membrane
Compare with known compartment markers:
Lamin B (nuclear membrane, internal face)
Calnexin (spans nuclear membrane with C-terminus in cytoplasm)
Use super-resolution microscopy for precise localization
Research has employed these approaches to determine TMEM186's membrane topology and relationships with nuclear structures .
TMEM186 has been implicated in mitochondrial function:
It co-migrates with components of the Mitochondrial Complex I Assembly (MCIA) complex based on dynamic complexome profiling
TMEM186 was significantly enriched in NDUFAF1-BirA* proximity labeling experiments
Analysis of TMEM186 knockout cell lines by BN-PAGE showed impacts on complex I assembly
The protein is classified with "mitochondrion" as its background in protein databases
These findings suggest TMEM186 may play an important role in mitochondrial complex I assembly or function, though the precise mechanisms require further investigation .
Research has revealed connections between TMEM186 and metabolism regulation:
Studies showed that TMEM186 expression in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus is altered by nutritional state. Overexpression of TMEM186 using adeno-associated viral vectors in the PVN resulted in significantly reduced weight gain compared to controls (0.9g vs 2.7g after 6 weeks), suggesting a role in appetite control and body weight regulation .
Several experimental models have been developed:
Knockout mice: Generated through targeting disruption of exon 2 of TMEM186, resulting in only 2.1% residual expression
Heterozygous mouse models: Show approximately 50% reduction in TMEM186 expression
Cell line knockout models: Generated for studying effects on mitochondrial function
Overexpression models: Using adeno-associated viral vectors (AAV-TMEM186) for targeted expression
Tagged expression systems: FLAG-tagged TMEM186 constructs for protein interaction studies
These models provide complementary approaches to investigate TMEM186 function in different contexts and at different levels of biological organization .
The identification of interactions between TMEM186 and nuclear pore complex proteins raises interesting functional possibilities:
Mass spectrometry identified interactions with three nuclear pore components (NDC1, AAAS, NUP35/53)
These proteins showed high abundance in pulldown experiments, suggesting robust interactions
BiFC assays confirmed these protein-protein interactions
These findings suggest potential roles beyond classical mitochondrial functions
TMEM186 may participate in communication between mitochondria and the nucleus
It may have roles in nuclear-mitochondrial protein trafficking
The dual association with both mitochondrial complexes and nuclear pore components suggests TMEM186 may function at the interface of these critical cellular structures .
When working with TMEM186 antibodies, buffer selection can significantly impact results:
Commercial antibodies are typically supplied in:
50% Glycerol
0.01M PBS, pH 7.4
0.03% ProClin 300 as preservative
For Western blotting, standard transfer buffers are generally suitable
For immunoprecipitation, consider mild non-ionic detergents that preserve protein interactions
For immunohistochemistry, optimize antigen retrieval buffers (citrate, EDTA, or Tris-based)
For ELISA applications, standard blocking buffers (BSA or casein-based) are appropriate
Proper buffer selection helps maintain antibody stability and specificity while maximizing target antigen accessibility.
When facing inconsistent results:
Verify antibody lot consistency (request Certificate of Analysis from manufacturer)
Check protein extraction efficiency for membrane proteins
Optimize detergent concentration for solubilization without disrupting epitopes
Consider native versus denaturing conditions (especially important for transmembrane proteins)
Evaluate fixation methods that may affect epitope accessibility
Test multiple antibodies against different epitopes of TMEM186
Consider post-translational modifications that might affect antibody recognition
Systematic troubleshooting approaches can help distinguish between technical issues and biologically relevant variations in TMEM186 detection.
For complex tissue analysis:
Immunohistochemistry with optimized antigen retrieval protocols
Laser capture microdissection combined with Western blotting for region-specific analysis
In situ hybridization to correlate protein with mRNA localization
Multi-label immunofluorescence to examine co-localization with cell-type specific markers
Tissue clearing techniques combined with immunofluorescence for 3D visualization
Single-cell approaches to examine cell-type specific expression patterns
Research has successfully employed various approaches to study TMEM186 expression and function in brain regions like the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus .
For quantitative TMEM186 expression analysis:
Western blotting with densitometry (normalize to appropriate loading controls)
Quantitative immunofluorescence (measure fluorescence intensity)
ELISA-based quantification (using validated TMEM186 antibodies)
Correlate protein levels with transcript quantification (qRT-PCR)
Consider challenges of membrane protein quantification:
When examining expression changes, it's important to use multiple complementary approaches, as seen in studies of TMEM186 knockout models where both protein and transcript levels were assessed .